Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T12:56:34.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mass Public Decisions on Go to War: A Cognitive-Interactionist Framework

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Richard K. Herrmann ,
Philip E. Tetlock  and
Penny S. Visser
Richard K. Herrmann
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Philip E. Tetlock
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Penny S. Visser
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How do Americans decide whether their country should use military force abroad? We argue they combine dispositional preferences and ideas about the geopolitical situation. This article reports the results of a representative national survey that incorporated five experiments. Findings include the following: (1) Respondent dispositions, especially isolationism versus internationalism and assertiveness versus accommodativeness, consistently constrained policy preferences, whereas liberalism-conservatism did not; (2) features of the geopolitical context—the presence of U.S. interests, relative power, the images of the adversary's motivations, and judgments about cultural status—also influenced support for military intervention; and (3) systematic interactions emerged between dispositions and geopolitical context that shed light on when and why ideological disagreements about the use of force are likely to be amplified and attenuated by situational factors. Our results are consistent with a cognitive-interactionist perspective, in which people adapt broad predispositions in relatively thoughtful ways to specific foreign policy problems.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 93 , Issue 3 , September 1999 , pp. 553 - 573
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldrich, John, Sullivan, John, and Borgida, Eugene. 1989. “Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting: Do Presidential Candidates ‘Waltz Before a Blind Audience?’“ American Political Science Review 83 (March): 123–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Michele, Brewer, Marilynn, and Herrmann, Richard. 1999. “Images and Affect: A Functional Analysis of Out-group Stereotypes.” The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (July): 78–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, Michael W., and Cudeck, Robert. 1992. “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit.” Sociological Methods and Research 21 (November): 230–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, David. New York: Wiley. Pp. 206–61.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1975. “Public Opinion and Voting Behavior.” In Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 4, ed. Greenstein, Fred and Polsby, Nelson. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Pp. 75–169.Google Scholar
Cottam, Richard. 1977. Foreign Policy Motivation: A General Theory and A Case Study. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. 1957. “The Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology.” American Psychologist 12 (November): 671–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. 1975. “Beyond the Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology.” American Psychologist 30 (February): 116–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1993. “Measuring Political Knowledge: Putting First Things First.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (November): 1179–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deili Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Etheredge, Lloyd. 1978. A World of Men: The Private Sources of American Foreign Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gamson, William, and Modigliani, Andre. 1966. “Knowledge and Foreign Policy Opinions: Some Models for Consideration.” Public Opinion Quarterly 30 (Summer): 187–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, Richard. 1985. Perceptions and Behavior in Soviet Foreign Policy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Richard. 1986. “The Power of Perceptions in Foreign Policy Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science 30 (November): 841–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, Richard, James Voss, , Schooler, Tonya, and Ciarrochi, Joseph. 1997. “Images in International Relations: An Experimental Test of Cognitive Schemata.” International Studies Quarterly 41 (September): 403–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, Ole. 1996. Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole, and Rosenau, James. 1984. American Leadership in World Affairs: Vietnam and the Breakdown of Consensus. Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole, and Rosenau, James. 1993. “The Structure of Foreign Policy Beliefs among American Opinion Leaders—After the Cold War.” Millennium 22 (2): 235–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Hurwitz, Jon, and Peffley, Mark. 1987. “How Are Foreign Policy Attitudes Structured? A Hierarchical Model.” American Political Science Review 81 (December): 1099–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwitz, Jon, and Peffley, Mark. 1990. “Public Images of the Soviet Union: The Impact on Foreign Policy Attitudes.” Journal of Politics 52 (February): 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jentleson, Bruce. 1992. “The Pretty Prudent Public: Post Post-Vietnam American Opinion on the Use of Force.” International Studies Quarterly 36 (March): 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jentleson, Bruce, and Britton, Rebecca. 1998. “Still Pretty Prudent: Post-Cold War American Public Opinion on the Use of Military Force.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (August): 395–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judd, Charles, and Krosnick, Jon. 1989. “The Structural Bases of Consistency among Political Attitudes: Effects of Political Expertise and Attitude Importance.” In Attitude Structure and Function, ed. Pratkanis, Anthony, Breckler, Stephen, and Greenwald, Anthony. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Pp. 99–128.Google Scholar
Langer, Ellen J., Blank, Arthur and Chanowitz, Benzion. 1978. “The Mindlessness of Ostensibly Thoughtful Action: The Role of ‘Placebic’ Information in Interpersonal Interaction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36 (June): 635–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasswell, Harold. 1930. Psychopathology and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lian, Bradley, and Oneal, John R. 1993. “Presidents, the Use of Military Force, and Public Opinion.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 37 (June): 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, James, Sayrs, Lois, and Steger, Wayne. 1992. “The Determinants of Presidential Foreign Policy Choice.” American Politics Quarterly 20 (January): 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, William J. 1968. “The Nature of Attitudes and Attitude Change.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, 2d ed., Vol. 3, ed. Lindzey, Gardner and Aronson, Elliot. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Pp. 136–314.Google Scholar
Mischel, Walter, and Shoda, Yuichi. 1998. “Reconciling Processing Dynamics and Personality Dispositions.” The Annual Review of Psychology 49: 229–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mischel, Walter. 1971. Introduction to Personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans. 1973. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 5th ed. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Morin, Richard. 1994. “Support for Sending GIs to Haiti May Be Increasing Polls Show.” Washington Post, June 29, All.Google Scholar
Mueller, John. 1973. War, Presidents and Public Opinion. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Mueller, John. 1994. Policy and Opinion in the Gulf War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Shoon. 1996. Anchors against Change: American Opinion Leaders' Beliefs after the Cold War. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nincic, Miroslav, and Hinckley, Barbara. 1991. “Foreign Policy and the Evaluation of Presidential Candidates.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 35 (June): 333–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce, and Hartley, Thomas and Murray, Shoon. 1994. “The End of the Cold War, Attitude Change, and the Politics of Defense Spending.” PS: Political Science & Politics 27 (March): 17–21.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul, Tetlock, Philip, and Elms, Laurel. 1999. “Public Opinion and Democratic Politics: The Problem of Non-Attitudes and the Social Construction of Political Judgment.” In Citizens and Politics: Perspectives from Political Psychology, ed. Kuklinski, James. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E. 1998. “Social Psychology and World Politics.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2, 4th ed., ed. Fiske, Susan, Gilbert, Daniel, and Lindzey, Gardner. New York: McGraw Hill. Pp. 868–912.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Wittkopf, Eugene. 1990. Faces of Internationalism: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar