Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-nxk7g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-14T19:20:48.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

United States Supports UN Sanctions, Vigorous Enforcement Following North Korean Missile and Nuclear Tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Glenn, Kessler, U.S. Rejects Suggestion to Strike N. Korea Before It Fires Missile, Wash. Post, June 23, 2006, at A21 Google Scholar.

2 SC Res. 1695 (July 15, 2006).

3 North Korea Is Defiant over U.N. Council Nuclear Resolution, N.Y. Times, July 17, 2006, at A4 Google Scholar.

4 See Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns, R., Testimony Before the House International Relations Committee on U.S. Policy Toward North Korea (Nov. 16, 2006), at <http://www.state.gov/p/us/rm/2006/76178.htm>Google Scholar.

5 U.S. Dep’t of State Press Statement 2006/839, Actions by Japan and Australia to Implement Resolution 1695 (Sept. 19, 2006), at <http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2006/72633.htm>.

6 David E., Sanger, North Koreans Say They Tested Nuclear Device, N.Y. Times, Oct. 9, 2006, at A1 Google Scholar; Anthony, Faiola, Glenn, Kessler, & Dafna, Linzer, N. Korea Claims Nuclear Test, Wash. Post, Oct. 9, 2006, at A1 Google Scholar.

7 William J., Broad & Mark, Mazzetti, Small Blast May Be Only a Partial Success, Experts Say, N.Y. Times, Oct. 10, 2006, at A8 Google Scholar; Dafna, Linzer, Low Yield of Blast Surprises Analysts, Wash. Post, Oct. 10, 2006, at A12 Google Scholar; David E., Sanger & William J., Broad, Small Blast or ‘Big Deal’? U.S. Experts Look for Clues, N.Y. Times, Oct. 11, 2006, at A10 Google Scholar; Dafna, Linzer & Thomas E., Ricks, U.S. Waits for Firm Information on Nature and Success of Device, Wash. Post, Oct. 11, 2006, at A14 Google Scholar; Mark, Mazzetti, Preliminary Samples Hint at North Koran Nuclear Test, N.Y. Times, Oct. 14, 2006, at A7 Google Scholar; Dafna, Linzer & Walter, Pincus, U.S. Detects Signs of Radiation Consistent with Test, Wash. Post, Oct. 14, 2006, at A14 Google Scholar; Thorn, Shanker & David E., Sanger, North Korean Fuel Identified as Plutonium, N.Y. Times, Oct. 17, 2006, at A9 Google Scholar.

8 David E., Sanger & Jim, Yardley, U.S. Warns North Koreans About Nuclear–Weapon Test, N.Y. Times, Oct. 5, 2006, at A8 Google Scholar; Dafna, Linzer, Pyongyang Warned on Weapons Testing, Wash. Post, Oct. 5, 2006, at A16 Google Scholar; David E., Sanger, U.S. Reviews Response Options for North Korean Nuclear Test, N.Y. Times, Oct. 6, 2006, at A8 Google Scholar.

9 UN Doc. S/PRST/2006/41 (Oct. 6, 2006).

10 Thorn, Shanker, Pentagon Assesses Responses, Including a Possible Blockade, N.Y. Times, Oct. 10, 2006, at A8 Google Scholar; David E., Sanger, Bush Rebukes North Korea; U.S. Seeks New U.N. Sanctions, Oct. 10, 2006, at A1 Google Scholar; Warren, Hoge & Sheryl, Gay Stolberg, ‘A Grave Threat,’ N.Y. Times, Oct. 10, 2006, at A1 Google Scholar; Michael, Abramowitz & Colum, Lynch, U.S. Urges Sanctions on North Korea, Wash. Post, Oct. 10, 2006, at A1 Google Scholar.

11 Warren, Hoge, China and Russia Stall Sanctions on North Korea, N.Y. Times, Oct. 13, 2006, at A1 Google Scholar; Warren, Hoge, U.S. Hits Obstacle to Actions by UN on North Korea, N.Y. Times, Oct. 14, 2006, at A1 Google Scholar; Colum, Lynch & Glenn, Kessler, Russia, China Resist UN Vote on N. Korea, Wash. Post, Oct. 14, 2006, at A14 Google Scholar.

12 Thorn, Shanker & Warren, Hoge, Rice Asserts U.S. Plans No Attack on North Korea, N.Y. Times, Oct. 11, 2006, at A1 Google Scholar; Colum, Lynch & Maureen, Fan, China Says It Will Back Sanctions on N Korea, Oct. 11, 2006, at A1 Google Scholar.

13 See Warren, Hoge, Security Council Supports Sanctions on North Korea, N.Y. Times, Oct. 15, 2006, at A1 Google Scholar; Colum, Lynch & Glenn, Kessler, U.N. Votes to Impose Sanctions on N. Korea, Wash. Post, Oct. 15, 2006, at A1 Google Scholar.

14 Norimitsu, Onishi, Questions Grow over U.N. Curbs on North Korea, N.Y. Times, Oct. 16, 2006, at A1 Google Scholar; Glenn, Kessler, U.S. Officials Call on China to Help Enforce U.N. Resolution on N. Korea, Wash. Post, Oct. 16, 2006, at A15 Google Scholar; Thorn, Shanker, Rice to Urge Radiation Inspections to Thwart North Korea, N.Y. Times, Oct. 17, 2006, at A11 Google Scholar; Glenn, Kessler & Dafna, Linzer, Rice Trip to Push Full Sanctions for N. Korea, Wash. Post, Oct. 17, 2006, at A12 Google Scholar; Glenn, Kessler, Escalation Not the Aim on North Korea, Rice Says, Wash. Post, Oct. 18, 2006, at A17 Google Scholar.

15 Jim, Yardley, Sanctions Don’t Dent North Korea–China Trade, N.Y. Times, Oct. 27, 2006, at A1 Google Scholar; Joseph, Kahn, China May Be Using Oil to Press North Korea, N.Y. Times, Oct. 31, 2006, at A10 Google Scholar.

16 Norimitsu, Onishi, South Korea Won’t Intercept Cargo Ships from the North, N.Y. Times, Nov. 14, 2006, at A8 Google Scholar.

17 John R., Crook, Contemporary Practice of the United States, 99 AJIL 914 (2005)Google Scholar.

18 Joseph, Kahn & Helene, Cooper, North Korea Will Resume Nuclear Talks, N.Y. Times, Nov. 1, 2006, at A1 Google Scholar; Glenn, Kessler, N. Korea Agrees to Return to Talks, Wash. Post, Nov. 1, 2006, at A1 Google Scholar; Helene, Cooper, North Korea Talks: Back to the Table, Some Reluctantly, N.Y. Times, Nov. 2, 2006, at A8 Google Scholar.