Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T21:18:14.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fertility management in dryland conservation cropping systems of the Pacific Northwest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Paul E. Rasmussen
Paul E. Rasmussen
Affiliation:
Soil Scientist, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Columbia Plateau Conservation Research Center, PO Box 370, Pendleton, OR 97801-0370.
Get access

Abstract

The Pacific Northwest dryland region is moving toward conservation tillage to control excessive erosion on steep slopes, but progress has been slow because of adverse effects on plant growth and yield. Fertility relations in cereal grains with conventional tillage are well known, with deficiencies occurring for nitrogen, sulfur, and phosphorus, in declining order of frequency. N and S deficiencies are more severe in conservation tillage, although the pattern of crop response to nutrient application is the same as in conventional tillage. Placing nutrients in a subs urface band near the seed is more effective than broadcasting on the surface. Higher fertility is required near developing root systems to offset greater competition from grassy weeds and more intense pressure from root-pruning soil pathogens. Conservation tillage alters soil fertility and plant growth in different ways on different landscapes. These differences must be considered to ensure tha t conservation tillage will be effective over the entire field.

Keywords

dryland croppingconservation tillagesoil fertility
Type
Selected Papers from the U.S.-Middle East Conference on Sustainable Dryland Agriculture
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 11 , Issue 2-3 , September 1996 , pp. 108 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Anderson, R.L. 1991. Timing of nitrogen application affects downy brome (Bromus tectorum) growth in winter wheat. Weed Technology 5:582–585.Google Scholar
2.Campbell, C.A., Zentner, R.P., Janzen, H.H., and Bowren, K.E.. 1990. Crop rotation studies on the Canadian prairies. Agric. Canada Research Br. Publ. 1841/E. Canadian Govt. Publication Centre, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
3.Carter, M.R., Parton, W.J., Rowland, I.C., Schultz, J.E., and Steed, G.R.. 1993. Simulation of soil organic carbon and nitrogen changes in cereal and pasture systems of southern Australia. Australian J. Soil Research 31:481–491.Google Scholar
4.Ciha, A.J. 1984. Slope position and grain yield of soft white winter wheat. Agronomy J. 76:193–196.Google Scholar
5.Collins, H.P., Rasmussen, P.E., and Douglas, C.L. Jr., 1992. Crop rotation and residue management effects on soil carbon and microbial dynamics. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 56:783–788.Google Scholar
6.Cook, R.J. 1990. Diseases caused by root-infecting pathogens in dryland agriculture. Advances in Soil Sci. 13:215–239.Google Scholar
7.Cook, R.J., and Veseth, R.J.. 1991. Wheat health management. APS Press, St Paul, Minnesota.Google Scholar
8.Doran, J.W. 1980. Soil microbial and biochemical changes associated with reduced tillage. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 44:765–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Douglas, C.L. Jr., Allmaras, R.R., and Rasmussen, P.E.. 1984. Soil productivity on different landscape positions in the Columbia Plateau of Oregon and Washington. Agronomy Abstracts p. 247. Amer. Soc. Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
10.Fiez, T.E., Miller, B.C., and Pan, W.L.. 1994a. Winter wheat yield and grain protein across landscape positions. Agronomy J. 86:1026–1032.Google Scholar
11.Fiez, T.E., Miller, B.C., and Pan, W.L.. 1994b. Assessment of spatially variable nitrogen fertilizer management in winter wheat. J. Production Agric. 7:86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Hyde, G., Wilkins, D., Saxton, K.E., Hammel, J.E., Swanson, G., Hermanson, R., Dowding, E., Simpson, J., and Peterson, C.. 1987. Reduced tillage seeding equipment development. In Elliott, L.F., Cook, R.J., Molnau, M., Witters, R.E., and Young, D.L. (eds). STEEP—Conservation Concepts and Accomplishments. Pub. 662. Washington State Univ., Pullman, pp. 41–56.Google Scholar
13.Klepper, B., Rasmussen, P.E., and Rickman, R.W.. 1983. Fertilizer placement for cereal root access. J. Soil and Water Conservation 38:250–252.Google Scholar
14.Koehler, F.E., Cochran, V.L., and Rasmussen, P.E.. 1987. Fertilizer placement, nutrient flow, and crop response in conservation tillage. In Elliott, L.F., Cook, R.J., Molnau, M., Witters, R.E., and Young, D.L. (eds). STEEP—Conservation Concepts and Accomplishments. Pub. 662. Washington State Univ., Pullman, pp. 57–74.Google Scholar
15.Leggett, G.E. 1959. Relationships between wheat yield, available moisture, and available nitrogen in eastern Washington dryland areas. Bull. 609. Washington Agric. Exp. Sta., Pullman.Google Scholar
16.Mahler, R.L., and Harder, R.W.. 1984. The influence of tillage methods, cropping sequence, and N rates on the acidification of a northern Idaho soil. Soil Sci. 137:52–60.Google Scholar
17.Mahler, R.L., Bezdicek, D.F., and Witters, R.E.. 1979. Influence of slope position on nitrogen fixation and yield of dry peas. Agronomy J. 71:348–351.Google Scholar
18.Mahler, R.L., Murray, G.A., and Swensen, J.B.. 1993. Relationships between soil sulfate-sulfur and seed yields of winter rapeseed. Agronomy J. 85:128–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Miller, R.E., Singer, M.J., and Nielsen, D.R.. 1988. Spatial variability of wheat yield and soil properties on complex hills. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 52:1133–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Mulla, D.J. 1986. Distribution of slope steepness in the Palouse region of Washington. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 50:1401–1405.Google Scholar
21.Pan, W.L., and Hopkins, A.G. Jr., 1991. Plant development and N and P use in winter barley: I. Evidence of water stress induced P deficiency in an eroded toposequence. Plant and Soil 135:9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Pan, W.L., Tillman, B.A., and Ullrich, S.E.. 1991. Ammonium and nitrate uptake by barley genotypes in diurnally fluctuating root temperatures simulating till and no-till conditions. Plant & Soil 135:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Papendick, R.I. and Miller, D.E.. 1977. Conservation tillage in the Pacific Northwest. J. Soil and Water Conservation 32:49–56.Google Scholar
24.Parsons, B.C. 1984. Nitrogen uptake and fertilizer use efficiency by spring wheat grown in tilled and no-tilled soil. M.S. thesis, Dept. of Agronomy, Washington State Univ., Pullman.Google Scholar
25.Paustian, K., Parton, W.J., and Persson, J.. 1992. Organic amendments and N-fertilization in long-term plots: model analyses of soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 56:476–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Power, J.F. 1990. Fertility management and nutrient cycling. Advances in Soil Sci. 13:131–149.Google Scholar
27.Powlson, D.S., Pruden, G., Johnston, A.E., and Jenkinson, D.S.. 1986. The nitrogen cycle in the Broadbalk wheat experiment: recovery and losses of 15N-labeled fertilizer applied in spring and inputs of nitrogen from the atmosphere. J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge 107:591–609.Google Scholar
28.Ramig, R.E., and Ekin, L.G.. 1991. When do we store water with fallow? Spec. Rep. 879. USDA-ARS & Oregon State Univ., Agric. Exp. Sta., Corvallis. pp. 56–60.Google Scholar
29.Rasmussen, P.E. 1993. Surface residue and nitrogen fertilization effects on notill wheat. In Barrow, N.J. (ed). Plant Nutrition—From Genetic Engineering to Field Practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 555–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Rasmussen, P.E., and Collins, H.P.. 1991. Long-term impacts of tillage, fertilization, and crop residues on soil organic matter in temperate semi-arid regions. Advances in Agronomy 45:93–134.Google Scholar
31.Rasmussen, P.E., and Douglas, C.L. Jr., 1992. The influence of tillage and cropping-intensity on cereal response to nitrogen, sulfur, and phosphorus. Fertilizer Research 31:15–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Rasmussen, P.E., and Kresge, P.O.. 1986. Plant response to sulfur in the western United States. In Tabatabai, M.A. (ed). Sulfur in Agriculture. Agronomy Monograph No. 27. Amer. Soc. Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 357–374.Google Scholar
33.Rasmussen, P.E., and Rohde, C.R.. 1988. Long-term tillage and nitrogen fertilization effects on organic nitrogen and carbon in a semiarid soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 52:1114–1117.Google Scholar
34.Rasmussen, P.E., and Rohde, C.R.. 1989. Soil acidification from ammoniumnitrogen fertilization in moldboard plow and stubble-mulch wheat-fallow tillage. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 53:119–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Rasmussen, P.E., and Rohde, C.R.. 1991. Tillage, soil depth, and precipitation effects on wheat response to nitrogen. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 55:121–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Reinertsen, M.R., Cochran, V.L., and Morrow, L.A.. 1984. Response of spring wheat to N fertilizer, row spacing, and wild oat herbicides in a no-till system. Agron. J. 76:753–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Smith, J.L., and Elliott, L.F.. 1990. Tillage and residue management effects on soil organic matter dynamics in semiarid regions. In Singh, R.E. et al. (ed). Dryland Agriculture: Strategies for Sustainability. Advances in Soil Sci. Vol. 13. Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y. pp. 69–88.Google Scholar
38.Smith, V.T., Wheeling, L.C., and VanDecaveye, S.C.. 1946. Effects of organic residues and nitrogen fertilizers on a semiarid soil. Soil Sci. 61:393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39.Sowers, K.E., Miller, B.C., and Pan, W.L.. 1994. Optimizing yield and grain protein in soft white winter wheat with split N applications. Agronomy J. 86:1020–1025.Google Scholar
40.Verity, G.E., and Anderson, D.W.. 1990. Soil erosion effects on soil quality and yield. Canadian J. Soil Sci. 70:471–484.Google Scholar
41.Voroney, R.P., van Veen, J.A., and Paul, E.A.. 1981. Organic C dynamics in grassland soils. 2. Model validation and simulation of the long-term effects of cultivation and rainfall erosion. Canadian J. Soil Sci. 61:211–224.Google Scholar