No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Reply to Blair
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 July 2021
Abstract
Blair provides a thorough review of data he claims stands in opposition to our narrative concerning the origins of IIa40/Early Blue glass trade beads and their presence in arctic Alaska prior to Columbus’ initial voyage. He employs three lines of evidence: historical and archaeological data, Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis, and radiocarbon dating. Our reply addresses his application of these data sets, clarifying his use of our data to arrive at his conclusions. While we continue to disagree with Blair, we do wish to acknowledge his time spent on debating the issue thereby furthering all of our understanding on this topic.
Blair proporciona una revisión exhaustiva de los datos que, según él, se oponen a nuestra narrativa sobre los orígenes de las perlas comerciales de vidrio IIa40 / Early Blue, y su presencia en el Ártico de Alaska antes del viaje inicial de Colón. Emplea tres líneas de evidencia: datos históricos y arqueológicos, análisis de activación de neutrones instrumentales y datación por radiocarbono. Nuestra respuesta aborda su aplicación de estos conjuntos de datos aclarando su uso de nuestros datos para llegar a sus conclusiones. Si bien seguimos en desacuerdo con Blair, deseamos reconocer el tiempo que dedicó a debatir el tema y, por lo tanto, ampliar nuestra comprensión sobre este tema.
Keywords
IIa40 / Early Blue glass trade beadsPaternostri guildLate Prehistoric Eskimoradiocarbon datinginstrumental neutron activation analysisfifteenth centurysixteenth centuryseventeenth centuryIIa40 / Cuentas comerciales de vidrio azul tempranogremio Paternostriesquimal prehistórico recientedatación por radiocarbonoanálisis de activación de neutrones instrumentalessiglo 15°siglo 16°siglo 17°
- Type
- Comment
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for American Archaeology
References
References Cited
Blair, Elliot H. 2021 Reconsidering the Precolumbian Presence of Venetian Glass Trade Beads in Arctic Alaska. American Antiquity 86:638–642. DOI:10.1017/aaq.2021.38.Google Scholar
Deagan, Kathleen 1987 Artifacts of the Spanish Colonies of Florida and the Caribbean, 1500–1800: 1: Ceramics, Glassware, and Beads. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Francis, Peter J. Jr. 1988 The Glass Trade Beads of Europe: Their Manufacture, Their History, and Their Identification. World of Beads Monograph Series 8. Lapis Route Books, Lake Placid, New York.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ron V. G., Chafe, Anne, and Kenyon, Ian 1994 Neutron Activation Analysis of Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century European Glass Trade Beads from the Eastern Great Lakes Area of North America. Archaeometry 36:253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunz, Michael 2005 The Denbigh Flint Complex at Punyik Point, Etivlik Lake, Alaska. Alaska Journal of Anthropology 3:101–115.Google Scholar
Kunz, Michael 2009 The Mesa, Lisburne, and Punyik Point Sites: Colville River Drainage, Northern Alaska: The Sequence of Ancient Cultures in the Brooks Range Foothills. In Archaeology in America: An Encyclopedia, edited by McManamon, Francis, pp. 321–326. Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Kunz, Michael L., and Mills, Robin O. 2021 A Precolumbian Presence of Venetian Glass Trade Beads in Arctic Alaska. American Antiquity 86:395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar