Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T20:37:35.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical Taxonomy, R-Mode Factor Analysis, and Archaeological Classification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Andrew L. Christenson  and
Dwight W. Read
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The concepts underlying numerical taxonomy and factor analysis are examined in relation to the goals and requirements of archaeological classification. Numerical taxonomy, represented in the archaeological literature most commonly by cluster analysis on raw data, is found to be inappropriate for those goals. In contrast, the technique of r-mode factor analysis fits very well with the nature of archaeological data and the general aims of archaeological classification. The results of three experiments are presented which illustrate the drastically different interpretations that can be engendered by the two procedures from the same data.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , April 1977 , pp. 163 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahler, S. A. 1971 Projectile point form and function at Rodgers Shelter. Missouri Archaeological Society Research Series 8. Google Scholar
Ahler, S. A. 1973 Post-Pleistocene depositional change at Rodgers Shelter, Missouri. Plains Anthropologist 18:1–26.Google Scholar
Baker, F. G. 1974 Stability of two hierarchical grouping techniques. Case 1: sensitivity to data errors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 69:440–45.Google Scholar
Benfer, R. A. 1967 A design for the study of archaeological characteristics. American Anthropologist 69:719–30.Google Scholar
Benfer, R. A. 1972 Factor analysis as numerical induction: how to judge a book by its cover. American Anthropologist 74:530–54.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R. 1972 An archaeological perspective. Seminar Press, New York.Google Scholar
Borillo, M. 1974 A few remarks on Whallon's “A new approach to pottery typology.” American Antiquity 39:371–73.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. 1965 Factor analysis: an introduction to essentials. Biometrics 21:190–215,405-35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christenson, A. L. 1972 The requirements of factor analysis. Mankind 8:307–09.Google Scholar
Ciolek-Torrello, R. S. 1971 Projectile point analysis from Ven-39. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. L. 1968 Analytical archaeology. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Cooley, W., and Lohnes, P. 1971 Multivariate data analysis. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Cormack, R. M. 1971 A review of classification. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 134:321–65.Google Scholar
Dixon, W. J. 1953 Processing data for outliers. Biometrics 9:74–89.Google Scholar
Dixon, W. J., ed. 1970 BMD: biomedical computer programs, X-series supplement. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Dixon, W. J., ed. 1975 BMDP: biomedical computer programs. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Doran, J. E., and Hodson, F. R. 1975 Mathematics and computers in archaeology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Dumond, D. E. 1974 Some uses of r-mode analysis in archaeology. American Antiquity 39:253–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. 1953 The logical basis of factor analysis. American Psychologist 8:105–14.Google Scholar
Guertin, W. H., and Bailey, J. P. 1970 Introduction to modern factor analysis. Edwards Brothers, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Hill, J. N. 1970 Broken K Pueblo: prehistoric social organization in the Southwest. University of Arizona, Anthropological Papers 18.Google Scholar
Hill, J. N., and Evans, R. K. 1972 A model for classification and typology. In Models in archaeology, edited by Clarke, D. L., pp. 231–73. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Hodson, F. R. 1969 Searching for structure within multivariate archaeological data. World Archaeology 1:90–105.Google Scholar
Hull, D. L. 1970 Contemporary systematic philosophies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1:19–54.Google Scholar
Jardine, N., and Sibson, R. 1971 Mathematical Taxonomy. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Johnson, L. A. S. 1970 Rainbow's end: the quest for an optimal taxonomy. Systematic Zoology 19:203–39.Google Scholar
Matson, R. G., and True, D. L. 1974 Site relationships at Quebrada Tarapaca, Chile: a comparison of clustering and scaling techniques. American Antiquity 39:51–74.Google Scholar
Morrison, D. F. 1967 Multivariate statistical methods. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Oxnard, C. 1973 Form and pattern in human evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Oxnard, C, and Neely, P. M. 1969 The descriptive use of neighborhood limited classification in functional morphology: an analysis of the shoulder in primates. Journal of Morphology 129:127–48.Google Scholar
Ahler, S. A. 1974a Some comments on the use of mathematical models in anthorpology. American Antiquity 39:3–15.Google Scholar
Ahler, S. A. 1974b Some comments on typologies in archaeology and an outline of a methodology. American Antiquity 39:216–42.Google Scholar
Redman, C. L. 1973 Multistage fieldwork and analytical techniques. American Antiquity 28:61–79.Google Scholar
Rowlett, R. A., and Pollnac, R. B. 1971 Multivariate analysis of Marnian La Tene cultural groups. In Mathematics in the archaeological and historical sciences, edited by Kendall, D. G., Hodson, F. R., and Tautu, P., pp. 46–58. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Rummel, R. J. 1970 Applied factor analysis. Northwestern University Press, Evanston.Google Scholar
Service, E. R. 1964 Archaeological theory and ethnological fact. In Process and pattern in culture, edited by Manners, R. A., pp. 364–75. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Sneath, P. H. A., and Sokal, R. R. 1973 Numerical taxonomy. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R., and Sneath, P. H. A. 1963 Principles of numerical taxonomy. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Stephenson, W. 1953 The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. H. 1972 The use and abuse of numerical taxonomy in archaeology. Archaeology and Physical Anthropology in Oceania 7:31–49.Google Scholar
True, D. L., and Matson, R. G. 1970 Cluster analysis and multidimensional scaling of archaeological sites in northern Chile. Science 169:1201–03.Google Scholar
Tugby, D. J. 1969 Archaeology and statistics. In Science in archaeology, edited by D. Brothwell and E. Higgs, pp. 635–48. Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
Veldman, D. J. 1967 Fortran programming for the behavioral sciences. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
Whallon, R. 1971 A computer program for monothetic subdivisive classification in archaeology. University of Michigan, Museum of Anthropology, Technical Reports 1.Google Scholar
Ahler, S. A. 1972a The computer in archaeology: a critical survey. Computers and the Humanities 7:29–45.Google Scholar
Ahler, S. A. 1972b A new approach to pottery typology. American Antiquity 37:13–33.Google Scholar