Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T16:28:48.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legitimation and the Classification of Archaeological Sites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mark P. Leone  and
Parker B. Potter Jr.
Mark P. Leone
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
Parker B. Potter Jr.
Affiliation:
New Hampshire Division of Historical Resources, P.O. Box 2043, Concord, NH 03302-2043
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A good deal of archaeology is conducted within the context of historic preservation, which means that many American archaeologists are faced with the issue of determining site significance. In this essay, we turn to critical theory as a way of complementing the positivist basis for determining site significance. Among the critical theorists, Jurgen Habermas offers a way of examining and understanding a connection between knowledge about the past and the interests of contemporary Americans.

Resumen

Resumen

Una gran parte de la arqueología se desarrolla en el marco de la preservación histórica, lo que significa que muchos arqueólogos norteamericanos se ven enfrentados al problema de cómo determinar la relevancia de cada yacimiento. En este trabajo, utilizamos la teoría crítica como complemento de una base positivista para establecer la importancia de un yacimiento. El teórico Jurgen Habermas ofrece un modo de analizar y comprender la relación entre el conocimiento del pasado y los intereses de la población actual de los Estados Unidos.

Type
Forum
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , January 1992 , pp. 137 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Althusser, L. 1971 Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. In Lenin and Philosophy, translated by Brewster, B., pp. 127–186. Monthly Review Press, New York.Google Scholar
Binford, L. 1962 Archaeology as Anthropology. American Antiquity 28 : 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, W. 1987 Significance and Other Frustrations in the CRM Process. American Antiquity 52 : 820–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G. 1957 Archaeology and Society. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Doyel, D. 1982 Medicine Men, Ethnic Significance, and Cultural Resource Management. American Antiquity 47 : 634–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glassow, M. 1977 Issues in Evaluating the Significance of Archaeological Resources. American Antiquity 42 : 413–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, L., and Kintigh, K. 1990 Ethics and the Reburial Controversy. American Antiquity 55 : 585–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 1970 Toward a Theory of Communicative Competence. In Recent Sociology No. 2, edited by Dreitzel, H. P., pp. 114–148. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1976 Legitimation Crisis. Translated by T. McCarthy. Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1979 Communication and the Evolution of Society. Translated by T. McCarthy. Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Handler, R. 1988 Nationalism and the Politics of Culture in Quebec. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.Google Scholar
Held, D. 1980 Introduction to Critical Theory : Horkheimer to Habermas. University of California Press, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. 1991 Interpretive Archaeology and Its Role. American Antiquity 56 : 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, H. 1983 A Cultural Resource Management Dilemma : Anasazi Ruins and the Navajo. American Antiquity 48 : 594–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, R. 1988 Planning, Public Hearings, and the Politics of Discourse. In Critical Theory and Public Life, edited by Forester, J., pp. 177–201. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Klesert, A., and Andrews, M. 1988 The Treatment of Human Remains on Navajo Lands. American Antiquity 53 : 310–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynott, M. 1980 The Dynamics of Significance : An Example from Central Texas. American Antiquity 45 : 117–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mac Cannell, D. 1976 The Tourist : A New Theory of the Leisure Class. Shocken Books, New York.Google Scholar
McCarthy, T. 1978 The Critical Theory ofJurgen Habermas. Cambridge, MIT Press.Google Scholar
McClelland, L. 1986 Guidelines for Completing National Register of Historic Places Forms. National Register Bulletin No. 16. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Parker, P., and King, T. 1990 Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Traditional Properties. National Register Bulletin No. 38. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Potter, P. 1989 Archaeology in Public in Annapolis : An Experiment in the Application of Critical Theory to Historical Archaeology. Ph. D. dissertation. Brown University. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Potter, P. 1991 What is the Use of Plantation Archaeology? Historical Archaeology 25(3) : 94–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raab, L., and Klinger, T. 1977 A Critical Appraisal of “Significance” in Contract Archaeology. American Antiquity 42 : 629–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanks, M., and Tilley, C. 1987 Reconstructing Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sharrock, F., and Grayson, D. 1979 “Significance” in Contract Archaeology. American Antiquity 44 : 327–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tainter, J., and Lucas, G. 1983 Epistemology of the Significance Concept. American Antiquity 48 : 707–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, C. 1989 Archaeology as Socio-Political Action in the Present. In Critical Traditions in Contemporary Archaeology, edited by Pinsky, V. and Wylie, A., pp. 104–116. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. 1985 Natives and Newcomers. McGill-Queens University Press, Kingston and Montreal.Google Scholar
Wallace, M. 1986a Reflections on the History of Historic Preservation. In Presenting the Past : Essays on History and the Public, edited by Benson, S. P., Brier, S, and Rosensweig, R., pp. 165–199. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Wallace, M. 1986b Visiting the Past : History Museums in the United States. In Presenting the Past : Essays on History and the Public, edited by Benson, S. P., Brier, S, and Rosensweig, R., pp. 137–161. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Watson, P., Leblanc, S., and Redman, C. 1971 Explanation in Archaeology : An Explicitly Scientific Approach. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Watson, R. 1991 What the New Archaeology has Accomplished. Current Anthropology 32 : 275–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. 1990 We've Got Thousands of These! What Makes an Historic Farmstead Significant? Historical Archaeology 24(2) : 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar