Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:05:50.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Interpretation of Middle Paleolithic Scraper Morphology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2017

Harold L. Dibble
Harold L. Dibble*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Bordes's typology for the Lower and Middle Paleolithic, he defines four major classes of side scrapers: single, double, convergent, and transverse forms. Data from three Middle Paleolithic assemblages, one from Iran and two from France, suggest that these scraper classes may be interpreted as representing stages in reduction of flake blanks through continued reuse and remodification.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , January 1987 , pp. 109 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Beyries, S. 1984 Approche Fonctionelle de la Variabilite des Fades du Mousterien. These de 3eme Cycle, Universite de Paris X.Google Scholar
Bordes, F. 1953 Essai de Classification des Industries Mousteriennes. Bulletin de la Societe Prehistorique Francaise 50: 457–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordes, F. 1955 La Stratigraphie de la Grotte de Combe Grenal (Dordogne). Note Preliminaire. Bulletin de la Societe Prehistorique Francaise 52: 426–429.Google Scholar
Bordes, F. 1961 a Typologie du Paleolithique Ancien et Moyen. CNRS, Paris.Google Scholar
Bordes, F. 1961b Mousterian Cultures in France. Science 134: 803–810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bordes, F. 1972 A Tale of Two Caves. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Coon, C. 1951 Cave Explorations in Iran, 1949. University Museum Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Coon, C. 1957 The Seven Caves. New York, Knopf.Google Scholar
Dibble, H. L. 1981 Technological Strategies of Stone Tool Production at Tabun Cave (Israel. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Arizona. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Dibble, H. L. 1984a Interpreting Typological Variation of Middle Paleolithic Scrapers: Function, Style, or Sequence of Reduction? Journal of Field Archaeology 11: 431–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dibble, H. L. 1984b The Mousterian Industry from Bisitun Cave (Iran). Paleorient 10(2): 23–34.Google Scholar
Dibble, H. L. 1985a Technological Aspects of Flake Variation. American Archaeology, 5: 236–240.Google Scholar
Dibble, H. L. 1985b Raw-Material Variation in Levallois Flake Manufacture. Current Anthropology 26: 391–393.Google Scholar
Dibble, H., and Whittaker, J. 1981 New Experimental Evidence on the Relation Between Percussion Flaking and Flake Variation. Journal of Archaeological Science 6: 283–296.Google Scholar
Jelinek, A. J. 1976 Form, Function and Style in Lithic Analysis. In Cultural Change and Continuity, edited by Cleland, C. B., pp. 19–33. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Martin, H. 1923 Recherches sur I' Evolution du Mousterien dans le Gisement de La Quina (Charente). Memoires de la Societe Archaeologique et historique de la Charente, Angouleme.Google Scholar
Rolland, N. 1977 New Aspects of Middle Palaeolithic Variability in Western Europe. Nature 266: 251–252.Google Scholar
Rolland, N. 1981 The Interpretation of Middle Paleolithic Variability. Man 16: 15–42.Google Scholar
Skinner, J. 1965 The Flake Industries of Southwest Asia: A Typological Study. Ph. D. dissertation, Columbia University. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Speth, J. 1972 The Mechanical Basis of Percussion Flaking. American Antiquity 37: 34–60.Google Scholar
Speth, J. 1974 Experimental Investigations of Hard-hammer Percussion Flaking. Tebiwa 17: 7–36.Google Scholar
Speth, J. 1975 Miscellaneous Studies in Hard-hammer Percussion Flaking: The Effects of Oblique Impact. American Antiquity 40: 203–207.Google Scholar
Speth, J. 1981 The Role of Platform Angle and Core Size in Hard-hammer Percussion Flaking. Lithic Technology 10: 16–21.Google Scholar