Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T18:41:48.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inference in Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Richard A. Watson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The science of archaeology is based on a multi-leveled interdisciplinary system of descriptions, laws, and explanations. Archaeologists try to provide systemic descriptions and to confirm hypotheses about past social structures on the assumption that they are represented by selected parts of extant material remains. Inferences are about and based on processes and relations among social structure, material culture, and its unaltered, altered, and selected remains. Archaeological inference depends on principles of cultural behavior, the accumulation and alteration of material, and archaeologists' methods. These physico-chemical, geological, biological, psychological, sociological, anthropological, and methodological principles derive from the present behavior of men and material.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , January 1976 , pp. 58 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Binford, Lewis R. 1962 Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity 28:217-25.10.2307/278380 S0002731600006247 Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1968 Post-Pleistocene adaptations. In New perspectives in archeology, edited by Sally, R. Binford and Lewis, R. Binford, pp. 313-41. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Braidwood, Robert J. 1952 The Near East and the foundations for civilization. Oregon State System of Higher Education, Eugene.Google Scholar
Braidwood, Robert J., and Bruce, Howe 1962 Southwestern Asia beyond the lands of the Mediterranean Littoral. In Courses toward urban life, edited by Robert, J. Braidwood and Gordon, R. Willey. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Daniel, Glyn 1963 The idea of prehistory. World, Cleveland.Google Scholar
Fritz, John M. 1970 Archeological systems for indirect observation (abstract). XXXV Annual Meeting, Society for American Archaeology, Book of Abstracts, p. 31. Museo Nacional de Antropologia, Mexico, DF.Google Scholar
Fritz, John M., and Fred, Plog 1970 The nature of archaeological explanation. American Antiquity 35:405-12.10.2307/278113 S0002731600085425 Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. 1963 Explanation and prediction by covering laws. In Philosophy of science: the Delaware Seminar, Vol. I, edited by Bernard, Baumerin, pp. 107-33. Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. 1965 Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hole, Frank, Kent, V. Flannery, and James, A. Neely 1969 Prehistory and human ecology of the Deh Luran Plain: an early village sequence from Khuzistan, Iran. University of Michigan, Museum of Anthropology, Memoir 1. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Lenski, Gerhard E. 1966 Power and privilege: a theory of social stratification. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Longacre, William A. 1970 Archaeology as anthropology: a case study. University of Arizona, Anthropological Papers 17. Tucson.Google Scholar
Redman, Charles L., and Patty, Jo Watson 1970 Systemic, intensive surface collection. American Antiquity 35:279-91.10.2307/278339 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scriven, Michael 1959a Explanation and prediction in evolutional theory: satisfactory explanation of the past is possible even when prediction of the future is impossible. Science 130:477-82.10.1126/science.130.3374.477 Google Scholar
Scriven, Michael 1959b Truisms as the grounds for historical explanation. In Theories of history, edited by Patrick, Gardiner, pp. 443-75. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Scriven, Michael 1963 The temporal asymmetry of explanations and predictions. In Philosophy of science: the Delaware Seminar, Vol. I, edited by Bernard, Baumerin, pp. 97-105. Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
Watson, Patty Jo, Steven, A. LeBlanc, and Charles, L. Redman 1971 Explanation in archeology: an explicitly scientific approach. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Watson, Richard A. 1966 Is geology different? A critical discussion of The fabric of geology. Philosophy of Science 33:172-85.Google Scholar
Watson, Richard A. 1969 Explanation and prediction in geology. Journal of Geology 77:488-94.10.1086/628374 Google Scholar
Watson, Richard A. 1972 The “new archeology” of the 1960s. Antiquity 46:210-15.10.1017/S0003598X00053631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Richard A., and Patty Jo, Watson 1969 Man and nature: an anthropological essay in human ecology. Harcourt Brace and World, New York.Google Scholar
Wright, H. E. Jr., Natural environment of early food production north of Mesopotamia: climatic change 11,000 years ago may have set the stage for primitive farming in the Zagros Mountains. Science 161:334-39.10.1126/science.161.3839.334 Google Scholar