No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 July 2014
1 Of course these were not fixed polarities: justices of the peace were the objects of others' rule and sometimes even of criminal judgment by their peers.
2 See the works cited above, p. 592, n. 2 and also McIntosh, Marjorie K., A Community Transformed: The Manor and Liberty of Havering, 1500–1620 (Cambridge, 1991), chs. 5–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 Fletcher, Anthony, Reform in the Provinces: The Government of Stuart England (New Haven, 1986), pp. 137–38Google Scholar.
4 Roberts, S., Recovery and Restoration in an English County: Devon Local Administration 1646–1670 (Exeter, 1985), pp. 33–35Google Scholar.
5 Ibid., p. 146.
6 Ibid., pp. 186, 189; quotation at p. 190.
7 Fletcher, Reform in the Provinces, ch. 4; Forster, G. C. F., “Government in Provincial England Under the Later Stuarts,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series, 33 (1983): 37–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rosenheim, J. M., “County governance and elite withdrawal in Norfolk, 1660–1720,” in Beier, A. L., Cannadine, David, and Rosenheim, James M., eds., The First Modern Society: Essays in English History in Honour of Lawrence Stone (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 119–22Google Scholar.
8 Goody, Jack, The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society (Cambridge, 1986), p. 124CrossRefGoogle Scholar.