Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T23:33:39.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Models of Government and Anglo-Irish Relations*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

Alan J. Ward
Get access

Extract

In 1922 the Irish Free State began life with a constitution which embodied two contradictory principles. The first recognized that all powers of government derive from the people and provided for a system of government in which the Irish Cabinet was clearly responsible to the popularly elected Irish lower house, Dail Eireann. The second recognized a monarch, King George V, as head of the Irish executive, with substantial prerogative powers derived not from the Irish people but from British common law. The constitution was a compromise between Britain and Irish republicans to end the Irish War of Independence. Though not every compromise in politics makes complete sense, for Britain this one represented more than a short-range expedient. Its contradictions represented the dying gasp in a long, often anguished, and ultimately futile attempt by Britain to devise a formula which would simultaneously permit the Irish a measure of self-government and protect vital British interests in Ireland.

This essay will review the attempts to construct a satisfactory Anglo-Irish relationship in the years between 1782 and 1949. It will concentrate on four models of government proposed for Ireland: (a) the independent Irish Parliament of the period from 1782 to 1800, (b) O'Connell's proposals to repeal the union with Britain in the 1830s and 1840s, (c) the devolution proposed in the home rule bills of 1886, 1893, 1912, and the Government of Ireland Act of 1920, and (d) the independence provided in the Irish Free State constitution of 1922 and its successor, the Irish constitution of 1937. It will also place these models in the context of the constitutional evolution of the British Empire. In the Canadian, New Zealand, Australian, and South African colonies, colonial self-government and British imperial interests were reconciled, beginning in Nova Scotia in 1848, by using a kind of constitutional double-think involving the Crown and the colonial Governor. But the problem of the troubled Anglo-Irish relationship could not be resolved so easily.

Type
Presidential Address North American Conference on British Studies 1987
Information
Albion , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , Spring 1988 , pp. 19 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This article was prepared during the author's tenure as Senior Fellow in the Institute of Irish Studies, Queen's University, Belfast.

References

1 Martin, F. X., O.S.A., “The Coming of Parliament,” in Farrell, Brian, ed., The Irish Parliamentary Tradition (Dublin, 1973), p. 40Google Scholar.

2 O'Connell, Maurice, Irish Politics and Social Conflict in the Age of the American Revolution (Philadelphia, 1965), p. 17Google Scholar; Harlow, Vincent T., The Founding of the Second British Empire, 1763–1793, 2 vols. (London, 1964), 1: 493–501Google Scholar.

3 Larabee, Leonard, Royal Government in America: A Study of the British Colonial System before 1783 (New Haven, 1930), pp. 218–267Google Scholar.

4 O'Connell, , Irish Politics and Social Conflict, pp. 319–346Google Scholar; Harlow, , Founding of the Second British Empire, 1: 527–557Google Scholar.

5 Ibid., pp. 493–557.

6 Ibid., pp. 532–533.

7 Cited in Anon, , Repeal of the Union (London, 1834), pp. 11–12Google Scholar.

8 Harlow, , Founding of the Second British Empire, 1: 539–542 and 558–614Google Scholar.

9 McDowell, R. B., Irish Public Opinion, 1750–1800 (London, 1964), p. 77Google Scholar.

10 Ibid.

11 Harlow, , Founding of the Second British Empire, 1: 623Google Scholar.

12 Ibid., pp. 550–557, 616–627; Bolton, G. C., The Passing of the Act of Union (Oxford, 1966), pp. 8–9Google Scholar.

13 Ibid., p. 16.

14 Ibid., passim; Harlow, , Founding of the Second British Empire, 1: 627–649Google Scholar.

15 See McDowell, R. B., The Irish Administration, 1801–1914 (London, 1964)Google Scholar, and Brynn, Edward, Crown and Castle: British Rule in Ireland, 1800–1830 (Dublin, 1978)Google Scholar.

16 Ibid., p. 25.

17 Nowlan, Kevin P., The Politics of Repeal (Westport, Conn., 1975), pp. 7–8Google Scholar.

18 Great Britain, Parliamentary Debates, 3rd. series, v. 4, July 4, 1831, col. 652.

19 McCaffrey, Lawrence, Daniel O'Connell and the Repeal Year (Lexington, 1966), p. 80Google Scholar.

20 See, for example, O'Connell, Daniel, “First letter to the people of Ireland, April 4, 1833,” in Cusack, M. F., ed., The Speeches and Public Letters of the Liberator, 2 vols. (Dublin, 1875), 2: 371Google Scholar.

21 Gwynn, Denis, Daniel O'Connell (London, 1947), p. 231Google Scholar; Parliamentary Debates, 3rd. series, v. xxii, April 22, 1834, cols. 1092–1158.

22 Ibid., 3rd. series, v. lxxxiii, Feb. 23, 1844, cols. 185–198.

23 McCaffrey, , Daniel O'Connell, p. 43Google Scholar.

24 MacDonagh, Michael, The Life of Daniel O'Connell (London, 1903), p. 355Google Scholar. Daniel O'Connell to the Secretary of the Loyal National Repeal Association, Oct. 12, 1844, in Fitzpatrick, W. J., ed., Correspondence of Daniel O'Connell (London, 1888), 2: 433–447Google Scholar.

25 The Repeal Association supported the permanent basing of United Kingdom troops in Ireland. See Sturge, Joseph to O'Connell, Daniel in O'Connell, Maurice, ed., The Correspondence of Daniel O'Connell (Dublin, 1972–1974), 7: 244–245Google Scholar.

26 Fitzpatrick, , Correspondence of O'Connell, 2: 443–446Google Scholar.

27 Porter, J. G. V., Ireland (London, 1844), passimGoogle ScholarPubMed.

28 Lefevre, G. Shaw, Peel and O'Connell (London, 1887), pp. 231–232Google Scholar; Trench, Charles Chevenix, The Great Dan: A Biography of Daniel O'Connell (London, 1984), pp. 293–294Google Scholar. In a book in preparation, Dr. Richard Davis of the University of Tasmania discusses the attitudes of Young lrelanders to British imperialism.

29 MacDonagh, , Life of O'Connell, p. 358Google Scholar.

30 Parliamentary Debates, 3rd series, v. xxiii, April 25, 1934, col. 89.

31 Macintyre, Angus, The Great Liberator: Daniel O'Connell and the Irish Party, 1830–1847 (London, 1965), p. 14Google Scholar.

32 Ward, Alan J., “Exporting the British Constitution: Responsible Government in New Zealand, Canada, Australia and Ireland,” Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 25 (March 1987): 3–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 McCaffrey, Lawrence, Irish Federalism in the 1870s: A Study in Conservative Nationalism (Philadelphia, 1962)Google Scholar.

34 Parliamentary Debates, 3rd. series, v. 218, March 20, 1874, cols. 110–133; v. 220, June 30, 1874, cols. 700–740.

35 See papers of William Ewart Gladstone, British Library, London, Files 44,770 to 44,772; Bogdanor, Vernon, Devolution (Oxford, 1979), pp. 14–15Google Scholar.

36 Ibid., pp. 10–41. The bills are printed in Great Britain, House of Commons, Sessional Papers, 1886 (181–Sess. 1) II, 461; 1893–94 (201) III, 251; 1912–13 (136) II, 505; and 1920 (39) II, 185.

37 Magnus, Philip, Gladstone (London, 1954), p. 77Google Scholar.

38 Parliamentary Debates, 3rd. series, v. 306, June 7, 1886, col. 1172.

39 Mansergh, Nicholas, The Commonwealth Experience, 2nd ed., 2 vols. (London, 1982), 1: 225CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40 Bew, Paul, C. S. Parnell (Dublin, 1980), p. 70Google Scholar.

41 Murphy, John A., “One hundred years of ‘Ulster Says No’,” Irish Times, June 9, 1986, p. 13Google Scholar.

42 Bogdanor, , Devolution, pp. 19–35Google Scholar; Ward, Alan J., The Easter Rising (Arlington Heights, Ill., 1980), pp. 75–94Google Scholar.

43 Parliamentary Debates, 3rd. series, v. 218, March 20, 1874, col. 130.

44 Magnus, , Gladstone, p. 412Google Scholar.

45 Lyons, F. S. L., Charles Stewart Parnell (London, 1977), p. 346Google ScholarPubMed.

46 Magnus, , Gladstone, p. 412Google Scholar.

47 Parliamentary Debates, 4th. series, v. 8, Feb. 14, 1893, col. 1427.

48 Ibid., 3rd. series, v. 306, June 7, 1886, col. 1173.

49 Redmond, John, “Notes on the Home Rule Bill: The Mutual Safeguards,” Contemporary Review 163 (March 1893): 312Google Scholar.

50 Thring, Lord, “Home Rule and Imperial Unity,” Contemporary Review 51 (March 1887): 304Google Scholar.

51 Duffy, G. Gavan, “Mr. Gladstone's Irish Constitution,” Contemporary Review 49 (May 1886): 609–620Google Scholar. See also his, “An Australian Example,” Contemporary Review 53 (January 1888): 1–31Google Scholar.

52 Duffy, G. Gavan, “A Fair Constitution for Ireland,” Contemporary Review 52 (September 1887): 301–332Google Scholar.

53 Ward, Alan J., Ireland and Anglo-American Relations, 1899–1921 (London, 1969), pp. 19–20Google Scholar.

54 Smith, Goldwin, “The Canadian Constitution,” Contemporary Review 52 (July 1887): 2–3Google Scholar.

55 Dicey, A. V., “Ireland and Victoria,” Contemporary Review 49 (February 1886): 171–172Google Scholar. See also his England's Case Against Home Rule (London, 1886)Google Scholar; A Leap in the Dark (London, 1893)Google Scholar, and A Fool's Paradise (London, 1913)Google Scholar.

56 Parliamentary Debates, 3rd. series, v. 218, March 20, 1874, cols. 154–155.

57 Bogdanor, , Devolution, pp. 19–24Google Scholar; Lawrence, R. J., The Government of Northern Ireland: Public Finance and Public Service, 1921–1964 (Oxford, 1965), p. 181Google Scholar.

58 Lyons, , Parnell, pp. 343–344Google Scholar.

59 Lawrence, , Government of Northern Ireland, p. 189Google Scholar.

60 Parliamentary Debates, 3rd. series, v. 306, June 7, 1886, col. 1171.

61 Lyons, , Parnell, p. 346Google ScholarPubMed.

62 Ibid., p. 348; Parliamentary Debates, 3rd. series, v. 306, June 7, 1886, col. 1172.

63 C. S. Parnell to J. J. O'N. Daunt, July 15, 1885, Mss. 5934, National Library of Ireland, Dublin.

64 Ward, , Ireland and Anglo-American Relations, p. 19Google Scholar.

65 Harkness, David, “Britain and the Independence of the Dominions: the 1921 Crossroads,” in Moody, T. W., ed., Nationality and the Pursuit of National Independence (Belfast, 1978)Google Scholar.

66 Ibid., p. 149.

67 The Anglo-Irish treaty is printed as appendix II in Curran, Joseph, The Making of the Irish Free State (University, Ala., 1980), p. 284Google Scholar.

68 Mansergh, , The Commonwealth Experience, 1: 239Google Scholar.

69 Harkness, , “Britain and the Independence of the Dominions,” p. 156Google Scholar.

70 Canning, Paul, British Policy Towards Ireland: 1921–1941 (Oxford, 1985), p. 8Google Scholar.

71 Akenson, D. H. and Fallin, J. F., “The Irish Civil War and the Drafting of the Irish Free State Constitution,” Eire–Ireland 5 (Winter 1970): 36–37Google Scholar. For a detailed account of the drafting of the Irish Free State constitution see ibid., 5 (Spring 1970): 10–26; 5 (Summer 1970): 42–93; 5 (Winter 1970): 28–70. See also Curran, Making of the Irish Free State, ch. 14.

72 Canning, , British Policy Towards Ireland, p. 41Google Scholar.

73 Meeting of Irish and British representatives, May 27, 1922, File S8955A, State Papers Office, Dublin Castle.

74 Memorandum by Law Officers, May 29, 1922, File S8955A, State Papers Office, Dublin Castle, and CAB 43/3, p. 191, Public Records Office, London.

75 The Irish Free State constitution is printed in full in Kohn, Leo, The Constitution of the Irish Free State (London, 1932), pp. 389–418Google Scholar.

76 Mansergh, , The Commonwealth Experience, 1: 24Google Scholar.

77 Keith, Arthur Berriedale, Speeches and Documents on the British Dominions, 1918–1931 (London, 1932), pp. 83–84Google Scholar.

78 May 29, 1922. File S8955A, State Papers Office, Dublin Castle.

79 Dicey, , “Ireland and Victoria,” p. 172Google Scholar.

80 See Harkness, David, The Restless Dominion (New York, 1970), passimGoogle Scholar.

81 Moynihan, Maurice, Speeches and Statements by de Valera, 1917–1973 (Dublin, 1980), pp. 90–91Google Scholar.

82 Ibid., p. 150.

83 Chubb, Basil, ed., A Source Book of Irish Government (Dublin, 1964), p. 16Google Scholar.

84 McMahon, Deirdre, Republicans and Imperialists: Anglo-Irish Relations in the 1930s (New Haven, 1984), pp. 99–128Google Scholar.

85 Keith, , Speeches and Documents, p. 460Google Scholar.

86 McMahon, , Republicans and Imperialists, pp. 63–64, and 93–99Google Scholar; Longford, Lord and O'Neill, Thomas P., Eamon de Valera, (London, 1970) p. 285Google Scholar.

87 McMahon, , Republicans and Imperialists, pp. 198–200Google Scholar.

88 Lyons, F. S. L., Ireland Since the Famine (London, 1971), pp. 513–514Google Scholar.

89 McMahon, , Republicans and Imperialists, p. 130Google Scholar.

90 Ibid., p. 158.

91 Ibid., p. 43.

92 Ibid., pp. 172–177.

93 Ibid., pp. 183–184.

94 Canning, , British Policy Towards Ireland, p. 174Google Scholar.

95 Mansergh, , The Commonwealth Experience, 2: 139Google Scholar.

96 Ward, , Ireland and Anglo-American Relations, pp. 218–219Google Scholar.

97 McMahon, , Republicans and Imperialists, p. 8Google Scholar.

98 Ibid., pp. 243–244.

99 Ibid., pp. 173, 280, 194–295; Canning, , British Policy Towards Ireland, pp. 176–219Google Scholar.

100 Mansergh, , The Commonwealth Experience, 2: 140Google Scholar.

101 Chubb, Basil, The Government and Politics of Ireland, 2nd. ed. (Stanford, 1982), p. 46Google Scholar.

102 McMahon, , Republicans and Imperialists, p. 186Google Scholar.