Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:07:37.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dead Sea Scrolls and the History of the Jewish Book

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2010

Lawrence H. Schiffman
Lawrence H. Schiffman*
Affiliation:
New York University, New York, New York
*
lawrence.schiffman@nyu.edu
Get access

Extract

The complicated process whereby the biblical books took shape and were copied and transmitted in biblical times can only be partly reconstructed based on biblical evidence, with the help of ancient Near Eastern parallels. Clearly, the biblical era constitutes the first stage in the history of the Jewish book, or more correctly, the Jewish book par excellence. However, for the period immediately following, the Second Temple period, the level of documentation for creating, editing/redacting, and copying and disseminating Jewish books is now enormous due to the discovery, publication, and analysis of the Dead Sea Scrolls. While this information relates directly to the period in which the Scrolls were copied, from the last part of the third century bce through the early first century ce, it also allows us a model with which to supplement our understanding of the biblical period, and much of it is directly relevant to the rabbinic period in which most of the same scribal conventions were in use.

Type
Symposium: The Jewish Book
Information
AJS Review , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , November 2010 , pp. 359 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Jewish Studies 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. See the exhaustive study of Tov, Emanuel, Scribal Practices and Approaches Reflected in the Texts Found in the Judean Desert. Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 54 (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2004)Google Scholar.

2. Cf. Culley, Robert C., “Oral Tradition and Biblical Studies,” Oral Tradition 1 (1986): 30–65Google Scholar.

3. Tov, Emanuel, “Hebrew Biblical Manuscripts from the Judaean Desert: Their Contribution to Textual Criticism,” Journal of Jewish Studies 39 (1988): 5–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ulrich, Eugene, “The Canonical Process, Textual Criticism, and Latter Stages in the Composition of the Bible,” in “Sha'arei Talmon”: Studies in the Bible, Qumran, and the Ancient Near East Presented to Shemaryahu Talmon, ed. Fishbane, Michael and Tov, Emanuel (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1992), 267–91Google Scholar; Schiffman, Lawrence H., Reclaiming the Dead Sea Scrolls: The History of Judaism, the Background of Christianity, the Lost Library of Qumran (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1994), 161–80Google Scholar.

4. Jaffee, Martin S., Torah in the Mouth: Writing and Oral Tradition in Palestinian Judaism, 200 BCE–400 CE (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5. Schiffman, Lawrence H., Texts and Traditions: A Source Reader for the Study of Second Temple and Rabbinic Judaism (Hoboken, NJ: KTAV, 1998), 517–20Google Scholar.

6. Schiffman, Lawrence H., The Halakhah at Qumran. Studies in Judaism in Late Antiquity 16 (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1975), 75–76Google Scholar.

7. Metso, Sarianna, “Constitutional Rules at Qumran,” in The Dead Sea Scrolls after Fifty Years: A Comprehensive Assessment, ed. VanderKam, James C. and Flint, Peter W., 2 vols. (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1998–1999), 1.186–210Google Scholar.

8. Schiffman, Halakhah at Qumran, 60–68.

9. Schiffman, Lawrence H., “Legal Texts and Codification in the Dead Sea Scrolls,” in Discussing Cultural Influences: Text, Context, and Non-text in Rabbinic Judaism, ed. Ulmer, Rivka (Studies in Judaism; Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2007), 1–39Google Scholar.

10. Schiffman, Halakhah at Qumran, 68–72.

11. Hempel, Charlotte, The Laws of the Damascus Document: Sources, Tradition and Redaction. Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 29 (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1998)Google Scholar.

12. Metso, Sarianna, The Textual Development of the Qumran Community Rule. Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 21 (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1997)Google Scholar.

13. Davies, Philip R., 1QM, the War Scroll from Qumran: Its Structure and History. Biblica et Orientalia 32 (Rome: Biblical Institute Press, 1977)Google Scholar.

14. Nitzan, Bilhah, “The Benedictions from Qumran for the Annual Covenantal Ceremony,” in The Dead Sea Scrolls, Fifty Years after Their Discovery: Proceedings of the Jerusalem Congress, July 20–25, 1997, ed. Schiffman, Lawrence H., Tov, Emanuel, and VanderKam, James C. (Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society in cooperation with the Shrine of the Book, Israel Museum, 2000), 263–71Google Scholar.

15. Schuller, Eileen M., “The Cave 4 Hodayot Manuscripts: A Preliminary Description,” in Qumranstudien: Vorträge und Beiträge der Teilnehmer des Qumranseminars auf dem internationalen Treffen der Society of Biblical Literature, Münster, 25.–26. Juli 1993, ed. Fabry, Heinz-Joseph, Lange, Armin, and Lichtenberger, Hermann (Schriften des Institutum Judaicum Delitzschianum 4; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1996), 87–100Google Scholar; , Schuller, “The Classification Hodayot and Hodayot-like (with Particular Attention to 4Q433, 4Q433a and 4Q440),” in Sapiential, Liturgical and Poetical Texts from Qumran: Proceedings of the Third Meeting of the International Organization for Qumran Studies, Oslo 1998, Published in Memory of Maurice Baillet, Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 35, ed. Falk, Daniel K., Martínez, Florentino García, and Schuller, Eileen M. (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2000), 182–93Google Scholar.

16. Wilson, Andrew M. and Wills, Lawrence, “Literary Sources of the Temple Scroll,” Harvard Theological Review 75 (1982): 275–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wise, Michael O., A Critical Study of the Temple Scroll from Qumran Cave 11 (SAOC 49; Chicago: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, 1990Google Scholar; Schiffman, Lawrence H., “The Deuteronomic Paraphrase of the Temple Scroll,” Revue de Qumrân 15 (1992): 543–68Google Scholar.

17. This is also the case, for example, with certain laws found in the Damascus Document and Miscellaneous Rules.

18. Baumgarten, Joseph M., “The Cave 4 Versions of the Qumran Penal Code,” Journal of Jewish Studies 43 (1992): 268–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19. Ulrich, Eugene C., “Multiple Literary Editions: Reflections toward a Theory of the History of the Biblical Text,” in Current Research and Technological Developments on the Dead Sea Scrolls: Conference on the Texts from the Judean Desert, Jerusalem, 30 April 1995, Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 20, ed. Parry, Donald W. and Ricks, Stephen D. (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1996), 78–105Google Scholar.

20. Tov, Scribal Practices, 31–129.

21. Ibid., 274–76; Lawrence H. Schiffman, “Hilkhot Sofrim u-Sefarim bi-Megillot Midbar Yehudah uve-Sifrut Ḥazal,” forthcoming in Meghillot.

22. Tov, Scribal Practices, 222–30.

23. Ibid., 18–19.

24. Ibid., 11.

25. Schiffman, Reclaiming, 399–403.

26. Tov, Emanuel, Hebrew Biblical Manuscripts from the Judaean Desert: Their Contribution to Textual Criticism,” Journal of Jewish Studies 39 (1988): 5–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27. Dimant, Devorah, “The Qumran Manuscripts: Contents and Significance,” in Time to Prepare the Way in the Wilderness: Papers on the Qumran Scrolls by Fellows of the Institute for Advanced Studies of the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 1989–90, Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 16, ed. Dimant, Devorah and Schiffman, Lawrence H. (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1995), 23–58Google Scholar.

28. Tov, Scribal Practices, 301.

29. Pfann, Stephen J., “Reassessing the Judean Desert Caves: Libraries, Archives, ‘Genizas’ and Hiding Places,” Bulletin of the Anglo-Israel Archaeological Society 25 (2007): 147–70Google Scholar.

30. Golb, Norman, “The Dead Sea Scrolls: A New Perspective,” American Scholar (1989): 177–207Google Scholar; , Golb, “Khirbet Qumran and the Manuscripts of the Judaean Wilderness: Observations on the Logic of Their Investigations,” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 49 (1990): 103–114Google Scholar; , Golb, “Who Wrote the Dead Sea Scrolls?” The Sciences (May/June 1987): 40–49Google Scholar; Hirshfeld, Yizhar, “Qumran bi-Tequfat Bayit Sheni: Ha'arakhah Meḥudeshet shel Mimṣa'e ha-Ḥafirah, Cathedra 109 (2004): 5–50Google Scholar.

31. Tov, Scribal Practices, 40–41.

32. Pfann, Stephen J., “Kelei Dema': Tithe Jars, Scroll Jars and Cookie Jars,” in Copper Scroll Studies, ed. Brooke, George J. and Davies, Philip R. (Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha, Suppl. 40; London: Sheffield Academic Press, 2002), 163–79Google Scholar.

33. Schiffman, Lawrence H., “Pseudepigrapha in the Pseudepigrapha: Mythical Books in Second Temple Literature,” Revue de Qumrân 21, no. 3 (2004): 429–38Google Scholar.

34. Eugene Ulrich, “The Canonical Process,” 267–91.

35. Schiffman, Reclaiming, 161–80.

36. Ibid., 400, 407.