Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T22:34:23.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Confidence in Truthful Revelation of Private Values

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Gregory M. Parkhurst  and
Clifford Nowell
Gregory M. Parkhurst*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics at Weber State University
Clifford Nowell
Affiliation:
Department of Economics at Weber State University
*
Correspondence: Department of Economics, Weber State University, 3107 University Circle, Ogden, UT 84408, Phone 801.626.6792, Email gregoryparkhurst@weber.edu.
Get access

Abstract

Recent research shows that disparities between willingness to pay (WTP) and willingness to accept (WTA) disappear with market experience and training. In effect, preferences can be refined by eliminating subjects’ misconceptions regarding elicitation procedures. We use a stated measure of confidence as a proxy for misconceptions and test the influence of confidence on truthful revelation of induced values in WTP and WTA auctions using the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (BDM) mechanism. The results indicate that confidence matters for buyers and sellers. With confidence, WTA and WTP measures converge, and people with greater confidence choose the dominant bidding strategy more frequently.

Keywords

BDMBecker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanismconfidenceinduced valuetruthful revelationwillingness to acceptwillingness to pay
Type
Research Article
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , August 2014 , pp. 193 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barber, B.M., and Odean, T. 2001. “Boys Will Be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(1): 261–292.Google Scholar
Becker, G., DeGroot, M., and Marschak, J. 1964. “Measuring Utility by a Single-response Sequential Method.” Behavioral Science 9(3): 226–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohm, P., Linden, J., and Sonnegard, J. 1997. “Eliciting Reservation Prices: Becker-DeGroot-Marschak Mechanisms versus Markets.” The Economic Journal 107(443): 1079–1089.Google Scholar
Braga, J., Humphrey, S.J., and Starmer, C. 2009. “Market Experience Eliminates Some Anomalies—and Creates New Ones.” European Economic Review 53(4): 401–416.Google Scholar
Brown, T.C. 2005. “Loss Aversion without the Endowment Effect and Other Explanations for the WTA-WTP Disparity.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 57(3): 367–379.Google Scholar
Camerer, C., and Lovallo, D. 1999. “Overconfidence and Excess Entry: An Experimental Approach.” American Economic Review 89(1): 306–318.Google Scholar
Cason, T.N., and Plott, C. 2012. “Misconceptions and Game Form Recognition of the BDM Method: Challenges to Theories of Revealed Preference and Framing.” DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2151661.Google Scholar
Corrigan, J.R., and Rousu, M.C. 2008. “Testing Whether Field Auction Experiments Are Demand Revealing in Practice.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 33(2): 290–301.Google Scholar
Coursey, D., Hovis, J.J., and Schulze, W.D. 1987. “The Disparity between Willingness to Accept and Willingness to Pay.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 102(3): 291–297.Google Scholar
De Long, J.B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L.H., and Waldmann, R.J. 1991. “The Survival of Noise Traders in Financial Markets.” Journal of Business 64(1): 1–19.Google Scholar
Du, N., Shelton, S., and Whittington, R. 2012. “Does Supplementing Outcome Feedback with Performance Feedback Improve Probability Judgments?” International Journal of Financial Research 3(4): 19–32.Google Scholar
Engelmann, D., and Hollard, G. 2010. “Reconsidering the Effect of Market Experience on the “Endowment Effect.” Econometrica 78(6): 2005–2019.Google Scholar
Gervais, S., and Odean, T. 2001. “Learning to Be Overconfident.” Review of Financial Studies 14(1): 1–27.Google Scholar
Griffin, D., and Tversky, A. 1992. “The Weighing of Evidence and the Determinants of Confidence.” Cognitive Psychology 24(3): 411–435.Google Scholar
Grossman, Z., and Owens, D. 2012. “An Unlucky Feeling: Overconfidence and Noisy Feedback.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 84(2): 510–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, J. 2006. “The Becker-DeGroot-Marschak Mechanism Is Not Necessarily Incentive Compatible Even for Nonrandom Goods.” Economics Letters 93(1): 6–11.Google Scholar
Horowitz, J., and McConnell, K. 2002. “A Review of WTA/WTP Studies.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44(3): 426–447.Google Scholar
Isoni, A., Loomes, G., and Sugden, R. 2011. “The Willingness to Pay — Willingness to Accept Gap, the ‘Endowment Effect,’ Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations: Comment.” American Economic Review 101(2): 991–1011.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L., and Thaler, R.H. 1990. “Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem.” Journal of Political Economy 98(6): 1325–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klayman, J., Soll, J.B., González-Vallejo, C., and Barlas, S. 1999. “Overconfidence: It Depends on How, What, and Whom you Ask.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 79(3): 216–247.Google Scholar
Knetsch, J.L., Tang, F., and Thaler, R.H. 2001. “The Endowment Effect and Repeated Market Trials: Is the Vickrey Auction Demand Revealing?” Experimental Economics 4(3): 257–269.Google Scholar
Knez, P., Smith, V., and Williams, A. 1985. “Individual Rationality, Market Rationality, and Value Estimation.” American Economic Review 75(2): 396–402.Google Scholar
Kovalchik, S., Camerer, C.F., Grether, D.M., Plott, C.R., and Allman, J.M. 2005. “Aging and Decision Making: A Comparison between Neurologically Healthy Elderly and Young Individuals.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 58(1): 79–94.Google Scholar
List, J.A. 2003. “Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(1): 41–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, J.A. 2004. “Neoclassical Theory versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace.” Econometrica 72(2): 615–625.Google Scholar
List, J.A. 2011. “Does Market Experience Eliminate Anomalies? The Case of Exogenous Market Experience.” American Economic Review 101(3): 313–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomes, G., Starmer, C., and Sugden, R. 2003. “Do Anomalies Disappear in Repeated Markets?” The Economic Journal 113(486): C153–C166.Google Scholar
Loomes, G., Starmer, C., and Sugden, R. 2010. “Preference Reversals and Disparities between Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept in Repeated Markets.” Journal of Economic Psychology 31(3): 374–387.Google Scholar
Lucking-Riley, D. 2000. “Vickrey Auctions in Practice: From Nineteenth Century Philately to Twenty-first Century E-Commerce.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(3): 183–192.Google Scholar
Lusk, J.L. 2003. “Using Experimental Auctions for Marketing Applications: A Discussion.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 35(2): 349–360.Google Scholar
Moore, D.A., and Cain, D.M. 2007. “Overconfidence and Underconfidence: When and Why People Underestimate (and Overestimate) the Competition.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 103(2): 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, G.C. 2000. “WTP and WTA in Repeated Trial Experiments: Learning or Leading?” Journal of Economic Psychology 21(1): 57–72.Google Scholar
Noussair, C., Robin, S., and Ruffieux, B. 2004. “Revealing Consumers’ Willingness-to-Pay: A Comparison of the BDM Mechanism and the Vickrey Auction.” Journal of Economic Psychology 25(6): 725–741.Google Scholar
Plott, C.R., and Zeiler, K. 2005. “The Willingness to Pay — Willingness to Accept Gap, the ‘Endowment Effect,’ Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations.” American Economic Review 95(3): 530–545.Google Scholar
Plott, C.R., and Zeiler, K. 2007. “Exchange Asymmetries Incorrectly Interpreted as Evidence of Endowment Effect Theory and Prospect Theory?” American Economic Review 97(4): 1449–1466.Google Scholar
Plott, C.R., and Zeiler, K. 2011. “The Willingness to Pay — Willingness to Accept Gap, the ‘Endowment Effect,’ Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations: Reply.” American Economic Review 101(2): 1012–1028.Google Scholar
Pulford, B.D., and Colman, A.M. 1997. “Overconfidence: Feedback and Item Difficulty Effects.” Personality and Individual Differences 23(1): 125–133.Google Scholar
Samuelson, W., and Zeckhauser, R. 1988. “The Status Quo Bias in Decision Making.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1(1): 7–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayman, S., and Oncular, A. 2005. “Effects of Study Design Characteristics on the WTA-WTP Disparity: A Meta Analytical Framework.” Journal of Economic Psychology 26(2): 289–312.Google Scholar
Shogren, J.F., Margolis, M., Koo, C., and List, J.A. 2001. “A Random Nth-price Auction.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 46(4): 409–421.Google Scholar
Shogren, J.F., Shin, S.Y., Hayes, D.J., and Kliebenstein, J.B. 1994. “Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept.” American Economic Review 84(1): 255–270.Google Scholar
Smith, V.L. 1976. “Experimental Economics: Induced Value Theory.” American Economic Review 66(2): 274–279.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. 2009. “Market Simulation and the Provision of Public Goods: A Nonpaternalistic Response to Anomalies in Environmental Evaluation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 57(1): 87–103.Google Scholar
Thomas, M., and Menon, G. 2007. “When Internal Reference Prices and Price Expectations Diverge: The Role of Confidence.” Journal of Marketing Research 44(3): 401–409.Google Scholar
Tsai, C.I., Klayman, J., and Hastie, R. 2008. “Effects of Amount of Information on Judgment Accuracy and Confidence.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 107(2): 97–105.Google Scholar
Vickrey, W. 1961. “Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders.” Journal of Finance 16(1): 8–37.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, J. 2006. Introductory Econometrics. Mason, OH: South-Western.Google Scholar
Yates, J.F., Lee, J.W., and Bush, J.G. 1997. “General Knowledge Overconfidence: Cross-national Variations, Response Style, and ‘Reality’.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 70(2): 87–94.Google Scholar