Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-66d7dfc8f5-6zwsx Total loading time: 1.039 Render date: 2023-02-08T17:18:44.535Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

The Economic Feasibility of Poultry Litter Composting Facilities in Eastern West Virginia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

David A. Fritsch
Affiliation:
Division of Resource Management, West Virginia University
Alan R. Collins
Affiliation:
Division of Resource Management, West Virginia University
Get access

Abstract

Centralized, off-farm compost facilities were evaluated as a disposal option for poultry litter. Disposal fees to growers were required to develop an economically feasible facility for a private investor. The potential for a compost facility to compete with current litter alternatives depends upon development of compost markets comparable to urban areas along with a depressed market price for litter. Given disposal fees and uncertainty associated with market development, further expansion of land application and cattle feeding disposal alternatives is recommended.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albrecht, R. Marketing Report For Poultry Manure Compost. Ron Albrecht Associates, Inc., Annapolis, MD, September 1991.Google Scholar
Bachman, L.J. Nitrates in the Columbia Aquifer, Central Delmarva Peninsula, Maryland. U.S. Geological Survey, Report No. 84-4322, Towson, MD, 1984.Google Scholar
Bidinotto, R.J.The Great Apple Scare.” Reader's Digest, 137 (1990): 5358.Google Scholar
Biocycle staff. “The Present and Futures of Compost Marketing.” Biocycle 26, No. 5 (1985): 3436.Google Scholar
Bosch, D.J. and Napit, K.B.Economics of Transporting Poultry Litter to Achieve More Effective Use as Fertilizer.” J. Soil and Water Cons., 47, No. 4 (1992): 342346.Google Scholar
Carlton, W. Personal Communication, Rocco Turkey. Telephone Conversation, July 30, 1991.Google Scholar
Carpenter, D. Personal Communication, Wampler-Longacre Turkey. Telephone Conversation, July 29, 1991.Google Scholar
Carpenter, G. Personal Communication, West Virginia Extension Service, Poultry Specialist. Personal Interview, September 16, 1991.Google Scholar
Collins, A.R.How Much Can Farmers Pay For MSW Compost.” Biocycle, 32, No. 10 (1991): 6669.Google Scholar
Consumer Reports. “Alar: Not Gone, Not Forgotten.” 54 (1989): 288292.Google Scholar
Diaz, L.F., Savage, G.M., and Golueke, C.G. Resource Recovery from Solid Wastes. Florida: CRC Press, Inc., 1982.Google Scholar
Dick, W.A. and McCoy, E.L.Enhancing Soil Fertility by Addition of Compost.” In: Science and Engineering of Composting: Design, Environmental, Microbiological and Utilization Aspects, Hoitink, H.A. and Keener, H.M., Eds., pp. 622644. Worthington, OH: Renaissance Publications, 1992.Google Scholar
Diener, R.G., Collins, A.R., Martin, J.H., and Byran, W.B.Composting of Source-Separated Municipal Solid Waste for Agricultural Utilization—A Conceptual Approach for Closing the Loop.” Applied Engineering in Agriculture, In press.Google Scholar
Edwards, D.R. and Daniel, T.C.Abstractions and Runoff from Fescue Plots Receiving Poultry Litter and Swine Manure.” Transactions of the ASAE, 36, No. 2 (1993): 405411.Google Scholar
Ellington, M. Personal Communication, Grower Serviceman, Wampler-Longacre Chicken. Personal Interview, July 25, 1991.Google Scholar
Holden, C.Process Technology and Market Development For Composted Poultry Manure: An Overview of Challenges and Opportunities.” In: Proceedings, 1990 National Poultry Waste Management Symposium. Auburn, AL: Auburn University Printing Service, 1990.Google Scholar
Holden, C. Personal Communication, President, Sustain Corp. Telephone Interview, September 9, 1991.Google Scholar
Holden Farms. 1986 Test and Demonstration Plots on Agri Brand Compost. Northfield, MN: Holden Farms, Inc., 1987.Google Scholar
Leibhardt, W.C., Golt, C., and Tupin, J.Nitrate and Ammonium Concentrations of Ground Water Resulting from Poultry Manure Applications.” Journal of Environmental Quality, 8 (1979): 211215.Google Scholar
Long, B. Personal Communication, Owner and Operator of Virginia Dehydrating, Inc. Personal Interview, July 24, 1991.Google Scholar
McLeod, R.V. and Hegg, R.O.Pasture Runoff Quality from Application of Inorganic and Organic Nitrogen Sources.” J. Environmental Quality, 13 (1984): 122126.Google Scholar
Miller, F.C. Personal Communication, Director of Research and Development, Sylvan Foods, Inc. Letter dated June 5, 1992.Google Scholar
Malone, G.W.Nutrient Enrichment in Integrated Broiler Production Systems.” Poultry Science, 71, No. 7 (1992): 11171122.Google Scholar
National Research Council. Underutilized Resources As Animal Feedstuffs. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 1983.Google Scholar
North, M.O. and Bell, D.D. Commercial Chicken Production Manual, 4th edition. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1990.Google Scholar
Payne, V.W.E. and Donald, J.O. Poultry Waste Management and Environmental Protection Manual. Alabama Cooperative Extension Service Circular ANR-580, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 1990.Google Scholar
Riley, M.S.The Economic Impact of Mandatory Nutrient Management Programs on Poultry Growers: A Case Study of Rockingham County, Virginia.” Unpublished undergraduate Thesis, James Madison University, 1991.Google Scholar
Ritter, W.F. and Chirnside, A.E.Impacts of Land Use on Ground Water Quality in Southern Delaware.” Ground Water, 22 (1984): 3945.Google Scholar
Robertson, F.N.The Quality and Potential Problems of GroundWater in Sussex County, DE.” Water Resources Center, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 1977.Google Scholar
Russell, R.W. Personal Communication, Assistant Professor, Animal and Veterinary Science, West Virginia University. Personal Interview, December 9, 1991.Google Scholar
Rynk, R., ed. On-Farm Composting Handbook. Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service, Ithaca, NY, 1992.Google Scholar
Safley, C.D. and Safley, L.M. Jr.Economic Analysis of Alternative Poultry Litter Composting Systems.” Economic Information Report No. 85, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, November 1991.Google Scholar
Souder, G.H. Personal Communication, President, Valley Resource Exchange. Personal Interview, July 26, 1991.Google Scholar
Sweeten, J.M.Composting Manure And Sludge.” In: Proceedings of the 1988 National Poultry Waste Management Symposium, pp. 1318. Department of Poultry Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 1988.Google Scholar
Troy, L. Almanac of Business and Industrial Financial Ratios. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1991.Google Scholar
Weaver, W.D. and Souder, G.H.Feasibility And Economics of Transporting Poultry Waste.” Proceedings of the 1990 National Poultry Waste Management Symposium. Published by National Poultry Waste Management Committee, October 1990.Google Scholar
Warnick, B. Personal Communication, Non-Point Pollution Coordinator, WV Soil Conservation Agency. Telephone Conversation, July 21, 1993.Google Scholar
West Virginia Agricultural Statistics Service. West Virginia Agricultural Statistics 1992. C.R. Bulletin No. 23, West Virginia Department of Agriculture, Charleston, WV, 1992.Google Scholar
West Virginia Department of Agriculture. General Groundwater Protection Rules for Fertilizers and Manures. Legislative rules, title 61, series 6A, Charleston, WV, July 1992.Google Scholar
Westerman, P.W. and Overcash, M.R.Short-term Attenuation of Runoff Pollution Potential for Land-Applied Swine and Poultry Manure.” In: Livestock Waste: A Renewable Resource. Proc. Fourth Int. Symp. on Livestock Wastes, pp. 289292. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 1980.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Census. 1987 Census of Agriculture. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, 1989.Google ScholarPubMed
7
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Economic Feasibility of Poultry Litter Composting Facilities in Eastern West Virginia
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Economic Feasibility of Poultry Litter Composting Facilities in Eastern West Virginia
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Economic Feasibility of Poultry Litter Composting Facilities in Eastern West Virginia
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *