Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T21:32:43.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Time since birth and time left to live: opposing forces in constructing psychological wellbeing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2013

BURCU DEMIRAY*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
SUSAN BLUCK
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
*
Address for correspondence: Burcu Demiray, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Binzmuehlestrasse 14/24, 8050, Zurich, Switzerland. E-mail: b.demiray@psychologie.uzh.ch

Abstract

Ageing, by definition, involves moving across lived time. Grounded in developmental psychology, particularly lifespan developmental theory, this study examines two time-related factors that may affect psychological wellbeing in adulthood. Particularly, chronological age and perceived time left to live (i.e. future time perspective) are predicted to act as opposing forces in the construction of psychological wellbeing. Young (N = 285, 19–29 years) and middle-aged adults (N = 135, 47–64 years) self-reported their current psychological wellbeing (across six dimensions) and their sense of future time perspective. As predicted, mediation analyses show that higher levels of chronological age (being in midlife), and having a more open-ended, positive future time perspective are both related to higher psychological wellbeing. Note, however, that being in midlife is related to a more limited and negative future time perspective. As such, confirming our conceptual argument, while both age and future perspective are measures of time in a general sense, analyses show that they act as unique, opposing forces in the construction of psychological wellbeing. The current research suggests that individuals can optimise psychological wellbeing to the extent that they maintain an open-ended and positive sense of the future.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allemand, M., Hill, P. L., Ghaemmaghami, P. and Martin, M. 2012. Forgivingness and subjective well-being in adulthood: the moderating role of future time perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 1, 32–9.Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B. 1987. Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: on the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23, 5, 611–26.Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B. 1997. On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory. American Psychologist, 52, 4, 366–80.Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B., Staudinger, U. M. and Lindenberger, U. 1999. Lifespan psychology: theory and application to intellectual functioning. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 471507.Google Scholar
Bullock, J. G., Green, D. P. and Ha, S. E. 2010. Yes, but what's the mechanism? (Don't expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 4, 550–8.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L. L. 1991. Selectivity theory: social activity in life-span context. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 11, 195217.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L. L. 1995. Evidence for a life-span theory of socioemotional selectivity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 5, 151–6.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L. L. and Fredrickson, B. L. 1998. Influence of HIV status and age on cognitive representations of others. Health Psychology, 17, 6, 494503.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L. L. and Lang, F. R. 1996. Future Time Perspective Scale. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford, California.Google Scholar
Cate, R. A. and John, O. P. 2007. Testing models of the structure and development of future time perspective: maintaining a focus on opportunities in middle age. Psychology and Aging, 22, 1, 186201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark-Plaskie, M. and Lachman, M. E. 1999. The sense of control in midlife. In Willis, S. L. and Reid, J. D. (eds), Life in the Middle: Psychological and Social Development in Middle Age. Academic Press, San Diego, California, 181208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, P. J., Marshall, V. W., Ryff, C. D. and Rosenthal, C. J. 2000. Well-being in Canadian seniors: findings from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. Canadian Journal on Aging, 19, 2, 139–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, P. J., Marshall, V. W., Ryff, C. D. and Wheaton, B. 2001. Measuring psychological well-being in the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. International Psychogeriatrics, 13, 1, 7990.Google Scholar
Coudin, G. and Lima, M. L. 2011. Being well as time goes by: future time perspective and well-being. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 11, 2, 219–32.Google Scholar
Davis, J. A. 1985. The Logic of Causal Order. Sage, Beverly Hills California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Beauvoir, S. 1972. The Coming of Age. G. P. Putnam and Sons, New York, 361–7, 373–81.Google Scholar
Drake, L., Duncan, E., Sutherland, F., Abernethy, C. and Henry, C. 2008. Time perspective and correlates of wellbeing. Time and Society, 17, 1, 4761.Google Scholar
Erikson, E. 1959. Identity and the life cycle. Psychological Issues, 1, 1171.Google Scholar
Fingerman, K. L. and Perlmutter, M. 1995. Future time perspective and life events across adulthood. Journal of General Psychology, 122, 1, 95111.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L. and Carstensen, L. L. 1990. Choosing social partners: HOW old age and anticipated endings make people more selective. Psychology and Aging, 5, 3, 335–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freund, A. M. and Ritter, J. O. 2009. Midlife crisis: a debate. Gerontology, 55, 5, 582–91.Google Scholar
Fung, H. H. and Carstensen, L. L. 2006. Goals change when life's fragility is primed: lessons learned from older adults, the September 11 attacks and sars. Social Cognition, 24, 3, 248–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, H., Carstensen, L. and Lang, F. 2001. Age-related patterns in social networks among European Americans and African Americans: implications for socioemotional selectivity across the life span. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 52, 3, 185206.Google Scholar
Fung, H. H., Carstensen, L. L. and Lutz, A. M. 1999. Influence of time on social preferences: implications for life-span development. Psychology and Aging, 14, 4, 595604.Google Scholar
Hayes, A. F. 2012. PROCESS: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modeling [White paper]. Available online at http://www.afhayes.com/public.process2012.pdf [Accessed 1 June 2012].Google Scholar
Heckhausen, J. 2001. Adaptation and resilience in midlife. In Lachman, M. E. (ed.), Handbook of Midlife Development. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 345–91.Google Scholar
Helson, R. and Soto, C. J. 2005. Up and down in middle age: monotonic and nonmonotonic changes in roles, status, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 2, 194204.Google Scholar
Helson, R., Soto, C. J. and Cate, R. A. 2006. From young adulthood through the middle ages. In Mroczek, D. K. and Little, T. D. (eds), Handbook of Personality Development. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, New Jersey, 337–52.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. A., Trent, J., Davis, W. E. and King, L. A. 2012. Positive affect, meaning in life, and future time perspective: An application of socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 27, 1, 181–9. doi:10.1037/a0023965.Google Scholar
Hoppmann, C. A. and Blanchard-Fields, F. 2010. Goals and everyday problem solving: manipulating goal preferences in young and older adults. Developmental Psychology, 46, 6, 1433–43.Google Scholar
James, W. 1890/1950. The Principles of Psychology. Volume 1, St. Martin's Press, New York.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G. 1933. The stages of life. In Modern Man in Search of a Soul. Harcourt Brace, Orlando, Florida, 95114.Google Scholar
Kessler, E. and Staudinger, U. M. 2009. Affective experience in adulthood and old age: the role of affective arousal and perceived affect regulation. Psychology and Aging, 24, 2, 349–62.Google Scholar
Kooij, D. and Van de Voorde, K. 2011. How changes in subjective general health predict future time perspective, and development and generativity motives over the lifespan. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, 2, 228–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotter-Grühn, D. and Smith, J. 2011. When time is running out: changes in positive future perception and their relationships to changes in well-being in old age. Psychology and Aging, 26, 2, 381–7.Google Scholar
Lachman, M. E. and Bertrand, R. M. 2001. Personality and the self in midlife. In Lachman, M. E. (ed.), Handbook of Midlife Development. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 279309.Google Scholar
Lachman, M. E., Ziff, M. A. and Spiro, A. 1994. Maintaining a sense of control in later life. In Abeles, R. P., Gift, H. C. and Ory, M. G. (eds), Aging and Quality of Life. Springer Publishing Co., New York, 216–32.Google Scholar
Leist, A. K., Ferring, D. and Filipp, S. H. 2010. Remembering positive and negative life events: associations with future time perspective and functions of autobiographical memory. GeroPsych, 23, 3, 137–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, D. 2008. Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis. Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L. and Lockwood, C. M. 2000. Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 4, 173–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maddox, G. L. 1962. Some correlates of differences in self-assessment of health status among the elderly. Journal of Gerontology, 17, 180–5.Google Scholar
Markus, H., Ryff, C. D., Curhan, K. B. and Palmersheim, K. A. 2004. In their own words: well-being at midlife among high school-educated and college-educated adults. In Brim, O., Ryff, C. D. and Kessler, R. C. (eds), How Healthy Are We?: A National Study of Well-being at Midlife. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 273319.Google Scholar
Marshall, V. W. 1975. Age and awareness of finitude in developmental gerontology. Journal of Death and Dying, 6, 2, 113–29.Google Scholar
Martin, M. and Westerhof, G. J. 2003. Do you need to have them or should you believe you have them? Resources, their appraisal, and well-being in adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 10, 2, 99112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maslow, A. H. 1968. Toward a Psychology of Being. Second edition, Van Nostrand, New York.Google Scholar
Mather, M. and Carstensen, L. L. 2005. Aging and motivated cognition: the positivity effect in attention and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 10, 496502.Google Scholar
Neugarten, B. L. 1973. Personality change in late life: a developmental perspective. In Eisdorfer, C. and Lawton, M. (eds), The Psychology of Adult Development and Aging. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, 311–35.Google Scholar
Neugarten, B. L. 1996. The middle years. In Neugarten, D. A. (ed.), The Meanings of Age: Selected Papers of Bernice L. Neugarten. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 135–59.Google Scholar
Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R. and Greenwald, A. G. 2002. E-research: ethics, security, design, and control in psychological research on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 1, 161–76.Google Scholar
Okun, M. A., Dittburner, J. L. and Huff, B. P. 2006. Perceived changes in well-being: the role of chronological age, target age, and type of measure. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 63, 4, 259–78.Google Scholar
Pew Internet and American Life Project 2012. Who's Online: Internet User Demographics. Available online at http://pewinternet.org/Trend-Data-(Adults)/Whos-Online.aspx [Accessed 2 October 2012].Google Scholar
Preacher, K. J. and Hayes, A. F. 2004. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 36, 4, 717–31.Google Scholar
Preacher, K. J. and Hayes, A. F. 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 3, 879–91.Google Scholar
Rappaport, H., Enrich, K. and Wilson, A. 1985. Relation between ego identity and temporal perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 6, 1609–20.Google Scholar
Riley, L. D. and Bowen, C. 2005. The sandwich generation: challenges and coping strategies of multigenerational families. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 13, 1, 52–8. doi:10.1177/1066480704270099.Google Scholar
Rogers, C. R. 1961. On Becoming a Person. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
Ryff, C. D. 1989 a. Beyond Ponce de Leon and life satisfaction: new directions in quest of successful ageing. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12, 1, 3555.Google Scholar
Ryff, C. D. 1989 b. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 6, 1069–81.Google Scholar
Ryff, C. D. 1991. Possible selves in adulthood and old age: a tale of shifting horizons. Psychology and Aging, 6, 2, 286–95.Google Scholar
Ryff, C. D. and Keyes, C. M. 1995. The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 4, 719–27.Google Scholar
Ryff, C. D., Lee, Y. H., Essex, M. J. and Schmutte, P. S. 1994. My children and me: Midlife evaluations of grown children and of self. Psychology and Aging, 9, 2, 195205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryff, C. D. and Singer, B. H. 2006. Best news yet on the six-factor model of well-being. Social Science Research, 35, 4, 1103–19.Google Scholar
Schaie, K. 1993. The Seattle Longitudinal Study: a thirty-five-year inquiry of adult intellectual development. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie, 26, 3, 129–37.Google Scholar
Schulz, R. and Heckhausen, J. 1996. A life span model of successful aging. American Psychologist, 51, 7, 702–14.Google Scholar
Seijts, G. H. 1998. The importance of future time perspective in theories of work motivation. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 132, 2, 154–68. doi:10.1080/00223989809599156.Google Scholar
Shrout, P. E. and Bolger, N. 2002. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 4, 422–45.Google Scholar
Sobel, M. E. 1982. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In Leinhardt, S. (ed.), Sociological Methodology 1982. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 290312.Google Scholar
Stahl, S. T. and Patrick, J. H. 2011. Adults' future time perspective predicts engagement in physical activity. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67B, 4, 413–6.Google Scholar
Staudinger, U. M. and Bluck, S. 2001. A view on midlife development from life-span theory. In Lachman, M. E. (ed.), Handbook of Midlife Development. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 339.Google Scholar
Staudinger, U. M. and Kunzmann, U. 2005. Positive adult personality development: adjustment and/or growth? European Psychologist, 10, 4, 320–9.Google Scholar
Staudinger, U. M., Marsiske, M. and Baltes, P. B. 1995. Resilience and reserve capacity in later adulthood: potentials and limits of development across the life span. In Cicchetti, D. and Cohen, D. J. (eds), Developmental Psychopathology, Volume 2: Risk, Disorder, and Adaptation. John Wiley and Sons, Oxford, 801–47.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. 2001. Computer-assisted Research Design and Analysis., Allyn and Bacon, Boston.Google Scholar
Wrosch, C., Heckhausen, J. and Lachman, M. E. 2000. Primary and secondary control strategies for managing health and financial stress across adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 15, 3, 387–99.Google Scholar
Yeung, D. Y., Fung, H. H. and Lang, F. R. 2007. Gender differences in social network characteristics and psychological well-being among Hong Kong Chinese: the role of future time perspective and adherence to Renqing. Aging and Mental Health, 11, 1, 4556.Google Scholar
Zimbardo, P. G. and Boyd, J. N. 1999. Putting time in perspective: a valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 6, 1271–88.Google Scholar