Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:13:31.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The contribution of alternative types of care on life satisfaction among disabled older persons in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2022

Hongli Fan*
Affiliation:
School of Insurance, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan, Shandong, China
Rui Qi
Affiliation:
School of Insurance, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan, Shandong, China
Zixuan Peng
Affiliation:
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Xiaohui Zhang
Affiliation:
School of Insurance, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan, Shandong, China
Peter C. Coyte
Affiliation:
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
*
*Corresponding author. Email: 20177686@sdufe.edu.cn

Abstract

Long-term care given to disabled older adults takes many forms, with each impacting life satisfaction through different ways. Drawing data from the 2011–2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Survey, this article explores the effects of various care types on life satisfaction, with a particular focus on disabled older persons. Estimates derived from a fixed effects model with propensity score matching show that compared with formal care, informal care has significant positive effects on life satisfaction for disabled older adults. In addition, informal care has its greatest positive effect on life satisfaction on those who are mildly disabled, men and rural residents compared to their counterparts, while formal care addresses the needs of individuals with severe disability. We find that the main channels of effect occur through reduced loneliness and unhappiness, increased participation in social activities and improved physical health. This work contributes to the existing literature by demonstrating how various care types affect life satisfaction in China where filial piety, the central pillar of the Confucian ethics, is one of the common shared values among residents. These findings highlight the benefits derived from policies that promote and support the provision of informal care for older individuals. Moreover, there is a pressing need to buttress the formal care provision as a supplement to support severely disabled older adults in China.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bai, X, Guo, Y and Fu, Y (2018) Self-image and intergenerational relationships as correlates of life satisfaction in Chinese older adults: will gender make a difference? Ageing & Society 38, 15021519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, RM and Kenny, DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 11731182.10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonsang, E (2009) Does informal care from children to their elderly parent substitute for formal care in Europe? Journal of Health Economics 28, 143154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, L, Fan, H and Chu, L (2020) The double-burden effect: does the combination of informal care and work cause adverse health outcomes among females in China? Journal of Aging and Health 32, 12221232.10.1177/0898264320910916CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, M, Fu, Y and Chang, Q (2022) Life satisfaction among older adults in urban China: does gender interact with pensions, social support and self-care ability? Ageing & Society 42, 20262045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
China National Bureau of Statistics (2021) The Report of the Seventh National Census. Available at https://www.stats.gov.cn/.Google Scholar
China National Commission on Ageing (2016) The National Research Report on the Strategy of Population Ageing. Available at https://www.cncaprc.gov.cn/.Google Scholar
Cipolletta, S, Morandini, B and Tomaino, SCM (2023) Caring for a person with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study with family care-givers. Ageing & Society 43, 535555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S, McIlmail, J and Greaney, M (2020) Rural–urban differences in informal caregiving, caregiving intensity, and health-related quality of life. Innovation in Aging 4, 814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkingham, J, Evandrou, M, Qin, M and Vlachantoni, A (2020) Informal care provision across multiple generations in China. Ageing & Society 40, 19782005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, H, Yan, Q, Liu, S, Cai, J and Coyte, PC (2021) Childhood nutrition in rural China: what impact does public health insurance have? Value in Health 24, 317324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feng, Z, Glinskaya, E, Chen, H, Gong, S, Qiu, Y, Xu, J and Yip, W (2020) Long-term care system for older adults in China: policy landscape, challenges, and future prospects. China's primary health-care reform. The Lancet 396, 13621372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Ballesteros, R, Dolores Zamarrón, M and Ruíz, M (2001) The contribution of socio-demographic and psychosocial factors to life satisfaction. Ageing & Society 21, 2543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, D, Leonard, R, Rosenberg, JP and Noonan, K (2017) Home as a place of caring and wellbeing? A qualitative study of informal carers and caring networks: lived experiences of providing in-home end-of-life care. Health & Place 46, 5864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, B and Ma, S (2018) Receipt of informal care in the Chinese older population. Ageing & Society 38, 766793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, B, Lian, Y and Li, W (2016) How far is Chinese left-behind parents’ health left behind? China Economic Review 37, 1526.10.1016/j.chieco.2015.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbens, GW and Wooldridge, JM (2009) Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature 47, 586.10.1257/jel.47.1.5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, M, Van Tilburg, T, Groenewegen, P and Broese Van Groenou, M (2016) Linkages between informal and formal care-givers in home-care networks of frail older adults. Ageing & Society 36, 16041624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J, Kim, M, Malonebeach, E and Han, A (2015) A study of health perception, disability acceptance, and life satisfaction based on types of leisure activity among Koreans with a physical disability. Applied Research in the Quality of Life 11, 791804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakomý, M (2020) Is providing informal care a path to meaningful and satisfying ageing? European Societies 22, 101121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y and Zhang, Y (2017) The informal care of the dependent elderly and their mental health: an empirical analysis based on CHARLS 2013. Southern Population 32, 6478.Google Scholar
Liu, E and Zhang, Q (2018) Analysis of trend and effect of elder care provided by children for disabled older adults. Economic Perspectives 6, 92105.Google Scholar
Lu, N, Jiang, N, Lou, VWQ, Zeng, Y and Liu, M (2018) Does gender moderate the relationship between social capital and life satisfaction? Evidence from urban China. Research on Aging 40, 740761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maags, C (2020) Hybridization in China's elder care service provision. Social Policy & Administration 55, 113127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niimi, Y (2016) The ‘Costs’ of informal care: an analysis of the impact of elderly care on caregivers’ subjective well-being in Japan. Review of Economics of the Household 14, 779810.10.1007/s11150-016-9333-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paraponaris, A, Davin, B and Verger, P (2012) Formal and informal care for disabled elderly living in the community: an appraisal of French care composition and costs. European Journal of Health Economics 13, 327336.10.1007/s10198-011-0305-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pezzin, LE, Pollak, RA and Schone, BS (2009) Long-term care of the disabled elderly: do children increase caregiving by spouses? Review of Economics of the Household 7, 323339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stock, JH and Watson, MW (2008) Heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors for fixed effects panel data regression. Econometrica 76, 155174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, Q, Peng, F and Chen, J (2015) An analysis on long-term care and influencing factors of the disabled elders: based on rural–urban difference. Population and Economics 4, 6976.Google Scholar
Verbakel, E (2017) How to understand informal caregiving patterns in Europe? The role of formal long-term care provisions and family care norms. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 46, 436447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, A (2012) Improving life satisfaction for the elderly living independently in the community: care recipients’ perspective of volunteers. Social Work in Health Care 51, 125139.10.1080/00981389.2011.602579CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wooldridge, JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2015) Aging and Health. Available at https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health.Google Scholar
Wu, C, Newman, AB, Dong, BR and Odden, MC (2018) Index of healthy aging in Chinese older adults: China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 66, 13031310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yan, C (2018) Elderly care, fertility and social welfare. Economic Research Journal 53, 122135.Google Scholar
Yan, X, Su, J, Zhu, X and He, D (2012) Loneliness and subjective happiness as mediators of the effects of core self-evaluations on life satisfaction among Chinese college students. Social Indicators Research 114, 757766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhan, H and Montgomery, RJV (2003) Global perspectives on gender and elder care in China: the influence of filial piety and structural constraints. Gender & Society 17, 209229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W and Fu, M (2021) A challenge from longevity: study on the care provider of the Chinese oldest-old at the end of life. Population Journal 43, 7687.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y, Hu, Y, Smith, JP, Strauss, J and Yang, G (2014) Cohort profile: the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). International Journal of Epidemiology 43, 6168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, J and Walker, A (2016) The need for community care among older people in China. Ageing & Society 36, 13121332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar