Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-ttsf8 Total loading time: 0.725 Render date: 2021-07-29T10:19:43.129Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Wellbeing of adult children and ageing parents: associations with intergenerational support and relationship quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2009

EVA-MARIA MERZ
Affiliation:
Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute, The Hague. Intercultural Institute of Human Development and Aging, Long Island University, New York, US.
NATHAN S. CONSEDINE
Affiliation:
Intercultural Institute of Human Development and Aging, Long Island University, New York, US.
HANS-JOACHIM SCHULZE
Affiliation:
Clinical Child and Family Studies, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
CARLO SCHUENGEL
Affiliation:
Clinical Child and Family Studies, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

The current study describes from an attachment-theoretical viewpoint how intergenerational support in adult child-parent relationships is associated with wellbeing in both generations. The attachment perspective and its focus on affective relationship characteristics is considered as an important theoretical framework for the investigation of special relationships across the life span. Data from the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study (N=1,456 dyads) were analysed to investigate if relationship quality moderated the association between providing intergenerational support to parents and wellbeing in adult children, on the one hand, and receiving intergenerational support from children and wellbeing of older parents on the other hand. The perspectives of both relationship partners were taken into account to allow for dependence within dyads. Intergenerational support, in terms of instrumental help provision, was negatively associated with the child's and parent's wellbeing. Being the stronger and wiser partner in adult-child parent relationships, as reflected by giving advice and being the initiator within the relationship, was beneficial for the wellbeing of both generations. Additionally, relationship quality was the strongest predictor of wellbeing in both generations. Parental wellbeing was benefited by filial support in high quality relationships. If an intergenerational relationships was of high quality, the challenges of intergenerational support provision and receipt were easier to deal with for both generations, parents and children.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, L. S. and West, S. G. 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage, Newbury Park, California.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S. 1989. Attachments beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44, 4, 709–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baltes, M. M. 1996. The Many Faces of Dependency in Old Age. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Berg, J. H. and Piner, K. E. 1990. Social relationships and the lack of social relationships. In Duck, S. and Cohen, Silver R. (eds), Personal Relationships and Social Support. Sage, London, 140–58.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. 1969/1982. Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Cassidy, J. 1999. The nature of the child's ties. In Cassidy, J. and Shaver, P. R. (eds), Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications. Guilford, New York, 320.Google Scholar
Carpenter, B. D. 2001. Attachment bonds between adult daughters and their older mothers: associations with contemporary caregiving. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 56B, 5, 257–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicirelli, V. G. 1993. Attachment and obligation as daughters' motives for caregiving behavior and subsequent effect on subjective burden. Psychology and Aging, 8, 2, 144–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, S.-T. and Chan, A. C. M. 2006. Filial piety and psychological well-being in well older Chinese. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 61B, 5, P262–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, H. and Marks, N. F. 2006. Transition to caregiving, marital disagreement, and psychological well-being. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 12, 1701–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colin, V. 1996. Human Attachment. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Crispi, E. L., Schiaffino, K. and Berman, W. H. 1997. The contribution of attachment to burden in adult children of institutionalized parents with dementia. The Gerontologist, 37, 1, 5260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dehart, G., Sroufe, L. A. and Cooper, R. G. 2004. Child Development: Its Nature and Course. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Diener, E. 1984. Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 3, 542–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doherty, N. A. and Feeney, J. A. 2004. The composition of attachment networks throughout the adult years. Personal Relationships, 11, 4, 469–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dykstra, P. A., Kalmijn, M., Knijn, T. C. M., Komter, A. E., Liefbroer, A. C. and Mulder, C. H. 2004. Codebook of the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study: A Multi-Actor, Multi-Method Panel Study on Solidarity in Family Relationships, Wave 1. NKPS Working Paper 1. Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute, The Hague.Google Scholar
Gabriel, B. and Bodenmann, G. 2006. Well being, marital and parenting satisfaction in parents in association with child behavior. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 53, 3, 213–25.Google Scholar
Hill, J., Fonagy, P., Safier, E. and Sargent, J. 2003. The ecology of attachment in the family. Family Process, 42, 2, 205–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinde, R. A. 1979. Towards Understanding Relationship. Academic, London.Google Scholar
Hinde, R. A. 1997. Relationships: A Dialectical Perspective. Psychology Press, Hove, East Sussex, UK.Google Scholar
Koropeckyj-Cox, T. 2002. Beyond parental status: psychological well-being in middle and old age. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64, 4, 957–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, G. R. and Ellithorpe, E. 1982. Intergenerational exchange and subjective well-being among the elderly. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 1, 217–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, M. J., Guacci, N. and Weber, R. A. 1992. Intergenerational support, relationship quality, and well-being: a bicultural analysis. Journal of Family Issues, 13, 4, 465–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, K. S., Zarit, S. H., Sayer, A. G. and Whitlatch, C. J. 2002. Caregiving as a dyadic process: perspectives from caregiver and receiver. Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57, 3, 195204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowenstein, A. and Daatland, S. V. 2006. Filial norms and family support in a comparative cross-national context: evidence from the OASIS study. Ageing & Society, 26, 2, 203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenstein, A., Katz, R. and Gur-Yaish, N. 2007. Reciprocity in parent-child exchange and life satisfaction among the elderly: a cross-national perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 4, 865–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcoen, A., Verschueren, K. and Geerts, G. 1997. Gehechtheid van volwassen kinderen aan hun ouders als determinanten van ouderzorg [Attachment of adult children to their parents as determinants of parent care]. In Baeyens, J. P. (ed.), Gerontologie und Geriatrie 1996. Proceedings 19th Winter Meeting Oostende. Garant, Leuven, Belgium, 332–8.Google Scholar
Marks, N. F. 1998. Does it hurt to care? Caregiving, work-family conflict, and midlife well-being. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 4, 951–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merz, E.-M. and Consedine, N. S. 2009. Attachment security moderates the links between emotional and instrumental family support and wellbeing in later life. Attachment and Human Development, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Merz, E.-M., Schuengel, C. and Schulze, H.-J. 2007. Intergenerational solidarity: an attachment perspective. Journal of Aging Studies, 21, 2, 175–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merz, E.-M., Schuengel, C. and Schulze, H.-J. 2008. Intergenerational relationships across different age groups: An attachment perspective. Ageing & Society, 28, 5, 717–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motel-Klingebiel, A., Tesch-Römer, C. and Von Kondratowitz, H.-J. 2005. Welfare states do not crowd out the family: evidence for mixed responsibility from comparative analyses. Ageing & Society, 25, 6, 863–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuengel, C. and Van IJzendoorn, M. H. 2001. Attachment in mental health institutions: a critical review of assumptions, clinical implications, and research strategies. Attachment and Human Development, 3, 304–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulze, H.-J., Tyrell, H. and Künzler, J. 1989. Vom Strukturfunktionalismus zur Systemtheorie der Familie [From structural functionalism to systems theory of the family]. In Nave-Herz, R. and Markefka, M. (eds), Handbuch der Familien- und Jugendforschung, Band I, Familienforschung [Handbook of Research on Family and Youth, Part I, Research on Family]. Luchterhand, Neuwied, Germany, 3143.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M., Chen, X. and Heller, K. 1996. Too much of a good thing? Intergenerational social support and the psychological well-being of older parents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 4, 970–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M., Conroy, S., Wang, H., Giarrusso, R. and Bengtson, V. L. 2002. Reciprocity in parent-child relations over the adult life course. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 57B, 1, S313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sroufe, L. A. and Waters, E. 1977. Attachment as an organizational construct. Child Development, 48, 4, 1184–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, H., Phibbs, E. and Woods, R. T. 2004. Coherence of mind in daughter caregivers of mothers with dementia: links with their mothers' joy and relatedness on reunion in a strange situation. Attachment and Human Development, 6, 4, 439–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, M. A. P. and Townsend, A. L. 1997. Stress of parent care: positive and negative effects of women's other roles. Psychology and Aging, 12, 2, 376–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephens, M. A. P., Townsend, A. L., Martire, L. M. and Druley, J. A. 2001. Balancing parent care with other roles: inter-role conflict of adult daughter caregivers. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 56B, 1, P2434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, A. L. and Franks, M. M. 1995. Binding ties – closeness and conflict in adult children's caregiving relationships. Psychology and Aging, 10, 3, 343–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treboux, D., Crowell, J. A. and Waters, E. 2004. When ‘new’ meets ‘old’: configurations of adult attachment representations and their implications for marital functioning. Developmental Psychology, 40, 2, 295314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Umberson, D. 1992. Relationships between adult children and their parents: psychological consequences for both generations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 3, 664–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Gaalen, R. I. and Dykstra, P. A. 2006. Solidarity and conflict between adult children and parents: a latent class analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 68, 4, 947–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitbeck, L. B., Hoyt, D. R. and Tyler, K. A. 2001. Family relationship histories, intergenerational relationship quality, and depressive affect among rural elderly people. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 20, 2, 214–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarit, S. H. and Eggebeen, D. J. 2002. Parent-child relationships in adulthood and later years. In Bornstein, M. H. (ed.), Handbook of Parenting. Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, 135–61.Google Scholar
55
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Wellbeing of adult children and ageing parents: associations with intergenerational support and relationship quality
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Wellbeing of adult children and ageing parents: associations with intergenerational support and relationship quality
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Wellbeing of adult children and ageing parents: associations with intergenerational support and relationship quality
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *