Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-888d5979f-67m56 Total loading time: 0.29 Render date: 2021-10-26T02:54:34.370Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Article contents

Manufacturing dissent: work, gender and the politics of meaning in a peasant society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

Extract

This article addresses the changing nature of farm work in a peasant society in The Gambia, West Africa. The practice of farm labour has been transformed in the most palpable way by the advent of radically new technical and social relations of production associated with mechanised double-cropping of irrigated rice. Technical change, agricultural intensification and a new labour process are, however, all built upon the bedrock of household production, since peasant growers are socially integrated into the new scheme as contract farmers, specifically as contracted sharecroppers. Family labour continues to be the dominant social form in which labour power is mobilised, but under conditions directly determined and shaped by the contractors, namely project management. Irrigated double-cropping of rice production is particularly labour-demanding and makes expanded claims on customary structures of domestic labour recruitment. These new economic practices subject the culturally dominant representations of work, labour obligations and property rights—the constituents of custom and tradition— to the test of social practice. In our examination of Mandinka rice growers we suggest, following T. J. Clark, that ‘society is a battlefield of representations on which the limits and coherence of any given set are being fought for and regularly spoilt’ (Clark, 1984: 6). The introduction of a new production regime has converted rural Mandinka society into a contested social terrain; the primary struggle is a contest over gender and the conjugal contract in which property, or more accurately constellations of property rights, is at stake. By seeing economic life as, among other things, a realm of representations, we argue that the struggles over meaning and the manufacture of symbolic and material dissent in central Gambia—a proliferation of intrahousehold conflicts, juridical battles over divorce in the local courts, renegotiations of the conjugal contract—are the idioms of what Burawoy (1985) calls production politics.

Résumé

Désaccord au niveau de la production: ravaux, famille et politiques au sein d'une société paysanne

L'article se penche sur le caractère en pleine mutation des travaux à la ferme dans une société paysanne de la Gambie. Le travail à la ferme a été transformé par l'arrivée des techniques tout à fait nouvelles et par une modification des relations sociales de production en raison de l'émergence de la culture associée mécanisée dans des rizières irriguées. La culture associée irriguée en matière de production de riz demande beaucoup de travail et par conséquent elle constitue un fardeau supplémentaire pour le foyer, désormais considéré comme une source de main d'oeuvre. Mais c'est entre hommes et femmes que se livre le principal combat, au niveau des droits de propriété des terres; cette lutte se traduit par des conflits d'ordre domestique, des batailles juridiques en cas de divorce et la renégociation du contrat de mariage. L'article examine les politiques au sein des foyers d'une rizière de Jahaly-Pacharr, et passe également en revue les résultats médiocres des programmes de cultures irriguées gambiens au cours des quarante dernières années.

Type
Research Article
Information
Africa , Volume 60 , Issue 2 , April 1990 , pp. 207 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adanson, M. 1759. A Voyage to Senegal, the Isle of Goree, and the River Gambia. London: Nourse and Johnston.Google Scholar
Asano-Tamanoi, M. 1988. ‘Farmers, industries and the state: the culture of contract farming in Spain and Japan’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 30 (3): 432–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, R. 1987. ‘The agrarian origins of Mau Mau’, Agricultural History, 61 (1): 128.Google Scholar
Berry, S. 1984. ‘Households, decision-making and rural development’. Development Discussion Paper no. 167. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University, Institute for International Development.Google Scholar
Berry, S. 1988. ‘Concentration without privatization: agrarian consequences of changing patterns of rural land use controls in Africa’, in Reyna, S. (ed.), Land and Society in Contemporary Africa, pp. 5375. Hanover: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Berry, S. 1989. ‘Social institutions and access to resources’, Africa, 59 (1): 4155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1985. ‘The social space and the genesis of groups’, Theory and Society, 14 (6): 723–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, J. von, and Johm, K. 1987. ‘Tradeoffs in the rapid expansion of smallholder rice production in The Gambia’. Paper prepared for the Conference on Cereal Consumption in West Africa, Dakar.Google Scholar
Braun, J. von, and Webb, P. 1987. ‘Effects of new agricultural technology and commercialization on women farmers in a West African setting’. Washington: IFPRI.Google Scholar
Braun, J. von, and Webb, P. 1989. ‘The impacts of a new crop technology on the agricultural division of labour in a West African setting’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 37 (3): 513–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brautigam, D. 1984. ‘The People's Republic of China irrigated rice project in The Gambia’. Working Document no. 42, Gambia River Basin Studies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Brenner, R. 1986. ‘The social basis of economic development’, in Roemer, J. (ed.), Analytical Marxism, pp. 2353. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burawoy, M. 1985. The Politics of Production. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Carney, J. 1984a. ‘Gambia rice cultivation systems’. Working Document no. 23, Gambia River Basin Studies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Carney, J. 1984b. ‘Socio-economic and environmental considerations relative to an anti-salinity barrage on die Gambia River’. Working Document no. 46, Gambia River Basin Studies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Carney, J. 1986. ‘The Social History of Gambian Rice Production’, PhD thesis, Department of Geography, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Carney, J. 1987. ‘Contract farming in irrigated rice production’. Working Paper no. 9. Binghamton, NY: Institute of Development Anthropology.Google Scholar
Carney, J. 1988. ‘Struggles over crop rights within contract farming households in a Gambian irrigated rice project’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 15 (3): 334–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carney, J. and Watts, M. Forthcoming. ‘Disciplining women’, Signs, 16.Google Scholar
Certeau, M. de. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Clark, T. J. 1984. The Painting of Modern Life. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Cowen, M. 1983. ‘Early years of die Colonial Development Corporation’. Paper delivered to die Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
Davis, J. 1980. ‘Capitalist agricultural development and die exploitation of die propertied labourer’, in Buttel, F. and Newby, H. (eds.), The Rural Sociology of Advanced Societies: critical perspectives, pp. 133–53. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Department of Agriculture, The Gambia. 19801984. Irrigated Rice Program Reports.Google Scholar
Dey, J. 1980. ‘Women and Rice in The Gambia: die impact of irrigated rice development on the farming system’, PhD diesis, Department of Sociology, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Dey, J. 1981. ‘Gambian women: unequal partners in rice development projects’, Journal of Development Studies, 17(3): 109–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dey, J. 1982. ‘Development planning in The Gambia: the gap between planners' and farmers' perceptions, expectations and objectives’, World Development, 10 (5): 377–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunsmore, J. R.et al. 1976. The Agricultural Development of the Gambia. Land Resources Study no. 22. London: Ministry of Overseas Development Land Resources Division.Google Scholar
Evans, G. 1987. ‘Sources of peasant consciousness in South-east Asia’, Social History, 12: 193211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feder, G., and Noronha, G. 1987. ‘Land rights systems and agricultural development in Sub Saharan Africa’, World Bank Research Observer, 2: 143–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, V. 1951. Description de la Côte Occidentale da'Afrique. Mémoire no. 11 (translated from Portuguese by Monod, T., Teixera da Mota, A. and Mauny, R.). Bissau: Centro de Estudos de Guiné Portuguesa.Google Scholar
Folbre, N. 1986. ‘Hearts and spades: paradigms of household economics’, World Development, 14 (2): 245–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Friedmann, H. 1979. ‘Household economy and the national economy’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 7 (2): 159–83.Google Scholar
Friedmann, H. 1986a. ‘Postscript’, Labour, Capital and Society, 19(1): 126.Google Scholar
Friedmann, H. 1986b. ‘Patriarchy and property’, Sociologia Ruralis, 26 (2): 186–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamble, D. 1958. ‘Kerewan: An Analysis of the Economic Conditions and Underlying Factors in a Gambian Mandinka Community’, PhD thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of London.Google Scholar
Genovese, E. 1974. Roll, Jordan, Roll. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Gloves, D. 1984. ‘Contract farming and smallholder outgrower schemes in CDCs’, World Development, 12 (11): 1143–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of the Gambia. 1981. Food Strategy Report: Part 1. Banjul: The Gambia.Google Scholar
Government of The Gambia. 1983. Irrigated Rice Development Project: seasonal rice cropping reports 1977–82. Sapu: The Gambia.Google Scholar
Guyer, J., and Peters, P. 1987. ‘Conceptualizing the household’, Development and Change, 18 (2): 197213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardcastle, J. 1961. A Report on a Visit to the Gambia and Senegal (17 pp.). Rokpur: West African Rice Research Station.Google Scholar
Haswell, M. 1963. The Changing Pattern of Economic Activity in a Gambian Village. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Haswell, M. 1975. The Nature of Poverty. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) 1981. Revised Appraisal Report, Jahaly and Pacharr Smallholders Project. The Gambia: Ministry of Agriculture, IFAD and ADF.Google Scholar
International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)/ADF. 1984. Supervision Mission Memo Jahaly Pacharr Project, The Gambia. Project mimeo.Google Scholar
Jeng, A. 1978. ‘An Economic History of The Gambian Groundnut Industry’, PhD thesis, Department of History, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Jones, C. 1986. ‘Intra-household bargaining in response to the introduction of new crops: a case study from North Cameroon’, in Moock, J. (ed.), Understanding Rural Africa's Households and Farming Systems, pp. 105–23. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Kautsky, K. 1906. La Question Agraire. Paris, Maspero.Google Scholar
Lehmann, D. 1986. ‘Sharecropping and capitalist transition in agriculture’, Journal of Development Economics, 23: 333–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewicki, T. 1974. West African Food in the Middle Ages. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mbilinyi, M. 1988. ‘Agribusiness and women peasants in Tanzania’, Development and Change, 19 (4): 549–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medick, H. 1987. ‘Missionaries in the row boat’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 29 (1): 7698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medick, H. and Sabean, D. 1984. ‘Introduction’, in Medick, H. and Sabean, D. (eds.), Interest and Emotion, pp. 118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mintz, S. 1985. Sweetness and Power. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Moock, J. (ed.). 1986. Understanding Rural Africa's Households and Farming Systems. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Moore, F. 1738. Travels into the Inland Parts of Africa. London: Edward Cave.Google Scholar
Moore, H. 1986. Space, Text and Gender: an anthropological study on the Marakwet of Kenya. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
National Archives (NAG). Banjul.Google Scholar
Okali, C. 1983. Cocoa and Kinship in Ghana. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul for the International African Institute.Google Scholar
Okoth-Ogendo, H. 1986. ‘The issue of theory in the study of tenure relations in African agriculture’. Paper presented to the African Studies Association Annual Meeting, Madison.Google Scholar
Okoth-Ogendo, H. 1989. ‘Some issues of theory in the study of tenure relations in African agriculture’, Africa, 59 (1): 5672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, M. 1954 [1799] Travels in the Interior of Africa. London: Eland.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. 1987. The Dynamics of Productive Relationships: African share contracts in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodden, G. M. 1943. A Report on Rice Cultivation in The Gambia. Session Paper no. 2. Banjul: National Archives.Google Scholar
Sanderson, S. 1986. The Transformation of Mexican Agriadture: international structure and the politics of rural change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: everyday f arms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J. 1987. ‘Resistance without protest and without organization’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 29: 434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storper, M., and Scott, A. 1986. Production, Work, Territory. London: George Allen and Un win.Google Scholar
Taussig, M. 1987. ‘History as commodity’. Unpublished manuscript. Bogotà.Google Scholar
Turton, A. 1984. ‘Limits of ideological domination and the formation of social consciousness’, in Turton, A. and Tanabe, S. (eds.), History of Peasant Consciousness in South-east Asia, pp. 4572. Suita: National Museum of Ethnography.Google Scholar
Vergopolous, K. 1985. ‘The end of agribusiness or the emergence of biotechnology’. Journal of International Social Science, 37: 389400.Google Scholar
Watts, M. 1986. ‘Contract farming in Africa’. Working Paper no. 1. Binghamton, NY: Institute of Development Anthropology.Google Scholar
Watts, M. 1990. ‘Peasants under contract’, in Bernstein, H. and Mackintosh, M. (eds.), The Food Question. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Watts, M. Forthcoming (a). Manufacturing Discontent: production politics in a peasant society. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Watts, M. Forthcoming (b). ‘Idioms of land and labor’, in Bassett, T. J. (ed.), Land Tenure in Africa. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Webb, P. 1984. ‘Of rice and men: the story behind The Gambia's decision to dam its river’, in Goldsmith, E. and Hildyard, N. (eds.), The Social and Environmental Effects of Large Dams, vol. 2, pp. 120–30. Britain: Wadebridge Ecological Centre.Google Scholar
Weil, P. 1968. ‘Mandinka Mansaya: the Role of the Mandinka in the Political System of The Gambia’, PhD thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Weil, P. 1971. ‘Political structure and process among die Gambia Mandinka: the village parapolitical system’, in Hodge, C. (ed.), Papers on the Manding, pp. 249–72. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Wells, M. 1984. ‘The resurgence of sharecropping: historical anomaly or political strategy?’, American Journal of Sociology, 90: 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, A. 1981. ‘I'm hungry mum: the politics of domestic budgeting’, in Young, K., Wolkowitz, C. and McCullagh, R. (eds.), Of Marriage and the Market, pp. 88111. London: CSE Books.Google Scholar
Willis, P. 1981. Learning to Labor. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, D. 1986. ‘Factory Daughters, Their Families and Rural Industrialization in Central Java’, PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca.Google Scholar
186
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Manufacturing dissent: work, gender and the politics of meaning in a peasant society
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Manufacturing dissent: work, gender and the politics of meaning in a peasant society
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Manufacturing dissent: work, gender and the politics of meaning in a peasant society
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *