Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-m9wwp Total loading time: 0.249 Render date: 2021-07-29T17:04:49.884Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Article contents

Colonial rule and the ‘legal factor’ in Ghana and Lesotho

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2011

Extract

This article compares and contrasts the development of the legal systems of two British colonies that occuped almost opposite ends of the colonial judicial continuum: what in colonial times were known as the Gold Coast and Basutoland. Both became British colonies in the late nineteenth century, but followed considerably different paths to that status. In the case of the Gold Coast it followed centuries of contact between Europeans and the coastal peoples in this area of West Africa. In the case of Basutoland incorporation into the European world was a nineteenth-century phenomenon and far more rapid. Nevertheless, at the turn of the century, as indirect rule became the officially accepted wisdom as to how colonial peoples should be ruled, administrators in both colonies sought to make the chiefly order an integral part of the colony's administration and award its chiefs judicial responsibilities. In the Gold Coast, however, chiefly courts remained in competition with a highly developed British-style Supreme Court. In Basutoland there were basically only chiefly courts until late in the colonial period, which applied Sesotho customary law that was written down as the Laws of Lerotholi in 1903. The two-tier judicial system of the Gold Coast allowed far more contestation and was far more flexible and responsive to social changes than was the case in Basutoland. Incremental changes over time meant that the judicial system evolved far more smoothly than in Basutoland. When in the latter colony changes did not come ‘from above’ in the 1940s, there was a serious outbreak of ‘medicine murders’ that many observers felt was directly related to the chiefs losing their judicial role. Also, the colony's high court ruled against the validity of the Laws of Lerotholi in the controversial ‘Regency case’. Apart from being a return to comparative analyses of the impact of colonial rule on former African colonies, much in vogue in the 1960s, this study is an attempt to modify the emphasis on ‘cleavage’ and the ‘coercive’ that has characterised historians' approach to the study of colonial law.

Résumé

Cet article compare et contraste le développement des systèmes légaux de deux colonies Britanniques qui occupaient presque des places opposées sur le continuum judiciaire colonial: ce qui était connu en temps coloniaux comme Gold Coast et Basutoland. Toutes les deux étaient devenues colonies Britanniques à la fin du dixneuvième siècle, mais elles avaient obtenues ce statut en suivant des chemins considerablement différents. Dans le cas de Gold Coast ceci avait suivi des siècles de contact entre les Européans et les peuples côtiers de cette partie de l'Afrique de l'ouest. Dans le cas de Basutoland l'incorporation dans le monde européen avait été phénomène du dix-neuvième siècle et avait été beaucoup plus rapide.

Neánmoins, au début du siècle, alors que le pouvoir indirect était devenu la sagesse officielle acceptée quant à la façon dont les peuples coloniaux devaient être dirigés, les administrateurs dans les deux colonies avaient cherché à mettre l'ordre principal partie intégrate de l'administration coloniale et à conférer à ses chefs des responsabilités judiciaires. Sur la Gold Coast, cependant, les Cours principales étaient restées en compétition avec une Cour Suprême extrêmement développée de style Britannique. Au Basutoland, il y avait seulement deux cours principales jusqu'à plus tard dans la période coloniale, qui pratiquaient la loi coutumière Sesotho qui fut écrite comme les Lois de Lerotholi en 1903. Le système judiciaire à deux étages de la Gold Coast permettait beaucoup plus de contestations et était beaucoup plus flexible et sensitif aux changements sociaux qu'en Basutoland. Des changements incrémentaux avec le temps ont fait que le système judiciaire avait évolué beaucoup plus facilement qu'en Basutoland.

Type
Controlling the colony
Information
Africa , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , January 1997 , pp. 61 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adewoye, O. 1977. The Judicial System of Southern Nigeria, 1854–1954. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Allott, A. N. 1960. Essays in African Law, with special reference to the law of Ghana London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Allott, A. N. 1962. Judicial and Legal Systems in Africa. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Allott, A. N. 1970. New Essays in African Law. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Asante, S. K. B. 1965. ‘Interests in land in the customary law of Ghana—a new appraisal’, Yale Law Journal 74 (5), 848–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asante, S. K. B. 1975. Property and Social Goals in Ghana, 1844–1966. Accra: Ghana Universities Press.Google Scholar
Ashton, H. [1952] 1967. The Basuto, second edition. London: Oxford University Press for the International African Institute.Google Scholar
Basutoland Council, 1958. Report on Constitutional Reforms and Chieftainship Affairs. Maseru: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Bennett, T. W. 1985. Application of Customary Law in Southern Africa: the conflict of personal laws. Cape Town: Juta.Google Scholar
Blackall, H. W. 1943. Report of the Native Tribunals Committee of Enquiry. Accra: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Burman, S. 1981. Chiefdom Politics and Alien Law: Basutoland under Cape rule. New York: Africana.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, A. 1949. Colonial Civil Servant. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Cassidy, R. M. 1967. ‘Britain and Basutoland: a study of men and policies from the Gun War to the Anglo-Boer War’. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Chanock, M. 1985. Law, Custom and Social Order: the colonial experience in Malawi and Zambia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crabbe, A. 1971. John Mensah Sarbah, 1864–1910. Tema and Accra: Ghana Universities Press.Google Scholar
Crook, R. C. 1986. ‘Decolonization, the colonial state, and chieftaincy in the Gold Coast’, African Affairs 85 (338), 75106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crooks, J. J. 1923. Records relating to the Gold Coast Settlements from 1750–1874. Reprinted London: Frank Cass, 1973.Google Scholar
Crowder, M. 1968. West Africa under Colonial Rule. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Daniels, W. C. E. 1964. The Common Law in West Africa. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Danquah, F. 1995. Cocoa Diseases and Politics in Ghana, 1909–66. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Danquah, J. B. 1928. Akan Laws and Customs and the Akim Abuakwa Constitution. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duncan, P. 1960. Sotho Laws and Customs: a handbook based on decided cases in Basutoland together with the laws of Lerotholi. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edsman, B. M. 1979. Lawyers in Gold Coast Politics, c. 1900–45: from Mensah Sarbah to J. B. Danquah. Uppsala: University of Uppsala.Google Scholar
Elias, T. O. 1962a. British Colonial Law: a comparative study of the interaction between English and local laws in British dependencies. London: Stevens.Google Scholar
Elias, T. O. 1962b. Ghana and Sierra Leone: the development of their laws and constitution London: Stevens.Google Scholar
Gluckman, M. 1967. The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, second edition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Gocking, R. 1990. ‘Competing systems of inheritance before the British courts of the Gold Coast Colony’, International Journal of African Historical Studies 23 (4), 601–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gocking, R. 1993. ‘British justice and the Native Tribunals of the Southern Gold Coast Colony’. Journal of African History 34 (1), 93113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gocking, R. 1990. ‘Indirect rule in the Gold Coast: competition for office and the invention of tradition’, Canadian Journal of African Studies 28 (3), 421–46.Google Scholar
Hailey, M. 1957. An African Survey Revised, 1956: a study of problems arising in Africa south of the Sahara. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haliburton, G. H. 1976. ‘Edward Lion of Lesotho’, Mohlomi, journal of Southern African historical studies 1, 6470.Google Scholar
Hamnett, I. 1975. Chieftaincy and Legitimacy: an anthropological study of executive law in Lesotho. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayford, J. E. Casely. 1903. Gold Coast Native Institutions: with thoughts upon a healthy imperial policy for the Gold Coast and Ashanti. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E., and Ranger, T. (eds). 1983. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E., and Ranger, T. 1983. ‘Introduction: inventing traditions’, in Hobsbawm, E. and Ranger, T. (eds), The Invention of Tradition, pp. 114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, G. I. 1951. Basutoland Medicine Murder: a report on the recent outbreak of ‘Diretlo’ murders in Basutoland. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Kimble, D. 1963. A Political History of Ghana: the rise of Gold Coast nationalism, 1850–1928. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kludze, A. K. P. 1973. Ghana I, Ewe Law of Property. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Kludze, A. K. P. 1988. Modern Law and Succession in Ghana. Dordrecht and Rhode Island: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Korsah, A. 1951. Report of Commission on Native Courts. Accra: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Kuczynski, R. R. 1949. Demographic Survey of the British Colonial Empire II. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
SirLagden, Godfrey. 1901. ‘Basutoland and the Basutos’, Scottish Geographical Magazine XVII (vii), 347–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machobane, L. B. 1990. Government and Change in Lesotho, 1800–1966: a study of political institutions. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahomed, I. 1985. ‘The future of Roman-Dutch law in southern Africa, particularly in Lesotho’, Lesotho Law Journal 1 (2), 357–64.Google Scholar
Mann, K., and Roberts, R. 1991. Law in Colonial Africa. Portsmouth, N. H.: Heinemann; London: James Currey.Google Scholar
Mensah-Brown, A. K. 1970 ‘The Traditional Courts and their Successors in Ghana's Legal History, 1800–1914’. Ph.D. thesis, London University.Google Scholar
Moore, S. F. 1986. Social Facts and Fabrication: customary law on Kilimanjaro, 1880–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, C. 1981. Families Divided: the impact of migrant labour in Lesotho. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Native Authorities Ordinance. 1927. ‘An ordinance to define and to regulate the exercise of certain powers and jurisdictions by native authorities, and to assign certain functions to the Provincial Councils, and for purposes connected therewith’, in The Laws of the Gold Coast Colony. London: published for the government of the Gold Coast by the Crown Agents for the Colonies.Google Scholar
Native Jurisdiction (Amendment) Ordinance. 1910. The Gold Coast Native Jurisdiction (Amendment) Ordinance, 1910. Accra: Government Press.Google Scholar
Native Jurisdiction Ordinance. 1883. ‘An ordinance to facilitate and regulate the exercise of certain powers and jurisdictions by native authorities’, in The Ordinance of the Gold Coast Colony with the rules and orders made thereunder, 1910. London: Stevens.Google Scholar
Ollennu, N. M. 1961. ‘The influence of English law on West Africa’, Journal of African Law V, 2135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ollennu, N. M. 1962. Principles of Customary Land Tenure in Ghana. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Ollennu, N. M. 1966. The Law of Testate and Intestate Succession in Ghana. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1989. The Enigma of Colonialism: British policy in West Africa. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Arthur. 1955. ‘The legal factor in a changing Africa’, African Affairs 54, 280–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pim, A. 1935. Financial and Economic Position of Basutoland: report of the Commission appointed by the Secretary of State for Dominion Affairs. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Poulter, S. 1972. ‘The place of the laws of Lerotholi in the legal system of Lesotho’, African Affairs 283, 144–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulter, S. 1976. Family Law and Litigation in Basotho Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Poulter, S. 1979. Legal Dualism in Lesotho: a study of the choice of law question in family matters. Morija: Sesuto Book Depot.Google Scholar
Ranger, T. 1983. ‘The invention of tradition in colonial Africa’, in Ranger, T. and Hobsbawm, E. (eds), The Invention of Tradition, pp. 211–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ranger, T. 1993. ‘The invention of tradition revisited: the case of colonial Africa’, in Ranger, T. and Vaughan, O. (eds), Legitimacy and the State in Twentieth Century Africa: essays in honour of A. H. M. Kirk-Greene. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathbone, R. 1993. Murder and Politics in Colonial Ghana. New Haven, Conn., and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. 1972. Botswana I, Tswana Family Law. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Roberts-Wray, K. 1966. Commonwealth and Colonial Law. London: Stevens & Sons.Google Scholar
Rugege, S. 1987. ‘The struggle over the restructuring of the Basotho or chiefs' courts in Lesotho, 1903–50’, Lesotho Law Journal 3 (2), 159–91.Google Scholar
Sarbah, J. M. 1897. Fanti Customary Law. Third edition, 1968. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Schapera, I. 1935. A Handbook of Tswana Law and Custom. London: Oxford University Press for the International African Institute, [reprinted 1994, LIT].Google Scholar
Slater, R. 1931. Native Administration in the Gold Coast and its Dependencies. Accra: Gold Coast Government Printer.Google Scholar
Stone, R. 1975. ‘Colonial Administration and Rural Politics in South-central Ghana’. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Van Tromp, J. 1947. Xhosa Law of Persons: a treatise on the legal principles of family relations among the Ama Xhosa. Cape Town: Juta Press.Google Scholar
Woodman, G. R. 1985. ‘Customary law, state courts, and the notion of institutionalization of norms in Ghana and Nigeria’, in Allot, A. and Woodman, G. (eds), People's Law and State Law: the Bellagio papers, pp. 143–63. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
2
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Colonial rule and the ‘legal factor’ in Ghana and Lesotho
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Colonial rule and the ‘legal factor’ in Ghana and Lesotho
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Colonial rule and the ‘legal factor’ in Ghana and Lesotho
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *