Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T01:29:39.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spacecraft control with constrained fast reorientation and accurate pointing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

G. Mengali  and
A. A. Quarta
G. Mengali
Affiliation:
Università di Pisa, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale, Pisa, Italy, London, UK
A. A. Quarta
Affiliation:
Università di Pisa, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale, Pisa, Italy, London, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper we study large angle rotational manoeuvres of spacecraft. The problem of attitude control is formulated and solved through potential functions, thus simplifying frequent reorientation manoeuvres. A combination of gas jet and FEEP thrusters is employed in order to obtain short settling times while meeting stringent pointing requirements. In this way, spacecraft reorientation is achieved in two integrated steps by means of a discrete/continuous control law. Autonomous avoidance of undesired space orientations is obtained and constraints due to the solar array pointing requirements are satisfied. A case study is discussed where the methodology is applied to a large space telescope.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 108 , Issue 1080 , February 2004 , pp. 85 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sorenson, A. M. ISO Attitude maneuver strategies, American Astronautical Society, Paper AAS 93-317, 1993, pp 975–987.Google Scholar
2. Frakes, J.P., Henretty, D.A., Flatley, T.W., Markley, F.L., San, J.K. and Lightsey, E.G. SAMPEX Science pointing with velocity avoidance, AAS/AIAA Spaceflight Mechanics Meeting, Paper AAS 92-182, 1992, pp 949–966.Google Scholar
3. Singh, G., Macala, G., Wong, E. and Rasmussen, R. A Constraint monitor algorithm for the Cassini spacecraft, AIAA Guidance, Navigation & Control Conference, 1997, Reston, VA, pp 272–282.Google Scholar
4. Hablani, H. B. Attitude commands avoiding bright objects and maintaining communication with ground station, J Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, November-December 1999, 22, (6), pp 759–767.Google Scholar
5. McInnes, C.R. Large angle slew manoeuvres with autonomous sun vector avoidance, J Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 1994, 17, (4), pp 875–877.Google Scholar
6. Radice, G. and McInnes, C.R. Contrained on-board attitude control using gas jet thrusters, Aeronaut J, December 1999, 103, (1030), pp 549–556.Google Scholar
7. Wie, B. and Barba, P.M. Quaternion feedback for spacecraft large angle maneuvers, J Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, May-June 1985, 8, (3), pp 360–365.Google Scholar
8. Marcuccio, S., Genovese, A. and Andrenucci, M. Experimental performance of field emission microthrusters, J Propulsion and Power, September-October 1998, 14, (5), pp 774–781.Google Scholar
9. Marcuccio, S., Genovese, A. and Andrenucci, M. FEEP Microthruster technology status and prospects, Proceedings of the 48th International Astronautical Federation Congress, 1997, Turin, Italy.Google Scholar
10. Leech, K. and Pollock, A.M.T. ISO – The Satellite and its data, II SAI/99-082/Dc, July 2000, Space Science Department of ESA, Villafranca, P.O. Box 50727, E-28080 Madrid, Spain, Version 1.0.Google Scholar