Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dvmhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T16:58:57.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determination of the Unstressed Lattice Parameter “a0” for (Triaxial) Residual Stress Determination by Xrays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Ismail Cevdet Noyan
Ismail Cevdet Noyan*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Northwestern University, EvanstonIL
Get access

Extract

Stress gradients in the direction of the surface normal influence the shape of the interplanar spacing “d” vs. sin2ψ (where ψ is the specimen tilt) plot obtained from the surface layers of a specimen.(1-3) If the gradients are caused by the shear stresses σ13, σ23, the “d” vs. sin2ψ plot exhibits “psi-splitting”, that is the “d” values measured at positive ψ tilts are different from the values measured at negative if tilts. (2) If the shear stresses σ13, σ23, are zero, but the normal stress σ33 exists in the layets penetrated by the x-ray beam, “d” vs. sin2ψ, plot exhibits curvature. (3) Various methods have been proposed to obtain the complete stress tensor from split or curved “d” vs. sin2ψ data, and all of these methods require the “unstressed” lattice spacing “d0” for their calculations.

Type
VIII. X-Ray Strain and Stress Determination
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 28: Thirty-Third Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, July 30 - August 3, 1984 , 1984 , pp. 281 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cohen, J. B., Dolle, H., James, M.R., Determining Stresses from X-ray Powder Patterns, NBS Special Publication 567 (1980).Google Scholar
2. Dolle, K., Hauk, V., Systematik moglicher Gitterdehnungsverteilungen bei mechanisch beanspruchten metallischen Werkstoffen, Metallkde, Z. F.. 68:725 (1977).Google Scholar
3. Noyan, I. C., Effect of Gradients in Multi-Axial Stress States on Residual Stress Measurements with X-rays, Met. Trans. A. 14A: 249 (1983).Google Scholar
4. Hauk, V. M., Oudelhoven, R. W. M., Vaessen, G. J. H., The State of Residual Stress in the Near Surface Region of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Materials after Grinding, Met. Trans. A. 13A: 1239 (1982).Google Scholar
5. Torbaty, S., Sprauel, J. M., Maeder, G. and Markho, P.H., On The X-ray Diffraction Method of Measurement of Triaxial Stresses with Particular Reference to the Angle 2, Adv. X-ray Anal. 26: 246 (1982).Google Scholar
6. Dolle, H., Cohen, J. B., Residual Stresses in Ground Steels, Met. Trans. A. llA: 831 (1980).Google Scholar
7. Dolle, H., Influence of Multiaxial Stress States, Stress Gradients and Elastic Aniostropy on the Evaluation of Residual Stresses with X-rays, J. Appl. Cryst. 12:489 (1979).Google Scholar
8. Noyan, I. C., Equilibrium Conditions for the Average Stresses Measured by X-rays, Met. Trans. A. 14A: 249 (1983).Google Scholar
9. Noyan, I. C., Ph. D. Thesis, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL (1984).Google Scholar
10. Mikkola, D. E., Ph.D. Thesis, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL (1964).Google Scholar
11. Rothman, R. L., Ph.D. Thesis, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. (1969).Google Scholar