Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-5mhkq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-28T03:21:07.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use Of A Solid-State Detector for the Analysis of X-Rays Excited in Silicate Rocks by Alpha-Particle Bombardment*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Ernest J. Franzgrote
Ernest J. Franzgrote*
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
Get access

Abstract

The analysis of alpha-excited X-rays has been studied as a possible addition to the alpha-scattering technique used on the Surveyor spacecraft for the first in situ chemical analyses of the lunar surface.

Targets of pure elements, simple compounds, and silicate rocks have been exposed to alpha particles and other radiation from a curium-214 source and the resulting X-ray spectra measured by means of a cooled lithium-drifted silicon detector and pulse-height analysis.

Alpha-particle bombardment is a simple and efficient means of X-ray excitation for light elements. Useful spectra of silicate rocks may be obtained in a few minutes with a source activity of 50 millicuries, a detector area of 0.1 cm2 and a sample distance of 3 cm. An advantage over electron excitation is the higher characteristic response relative to the bremsstrahlung continuum. Peak-to- background ratios of greater than 100 to 1 have been obtained for elemental targets. Relative efficiencies of X-ray excitation by alpha particles and by X-rays from the curium source have been determined.

Resolution of the detector system used is approximately 150 eV for the lighter elements. This is sufficient to resolve the Kα X-rays of the geochemically important elements, Na, Mg, Al, and Si in silicate rocks. Although these and lighter elements are analyzed as well or better by the alpha-scattering and alpha-proton technique, the X-ray mode enables results to be obtained more quickly.

The study shows that the addition of an X-ray mode to the alpha-scattering analysis technique would result in a significant improvement in analytical capability for the heavier elements. In particular, important indicators of geochemical differentiation such as K and Ca (which are only marginally separated in an alpha-scattering and alpha-proton analysis) may be determined quantitatively by measuring the alpha-excited X-rays. An X-ray detector is under consideration as an addition to an alpha-scattering instrument now under development for possible use on a Mars-lander mission.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 15: Twentieth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 11-13, 1971 , 1971 , pp. 388 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper presents the results of one phase of research carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under Contract No. NAS 7-100, sponsored by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

*

This paper presents the results of one phase of research carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under Contract No. NAS 7-100, sponsored by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

References

1. Turkevich, A. L., Knolle, K., Emmert, R. A., Anderson, W. A., Patterson, J. H., and Franzgrote, E., “Instrument for Lunar Surface Chemical Analysis,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 37, 1681–1686 (1966).Google Scholar
2. Turkevich, A. L., Knolle, K., Franzgrote, E., and Patterson, J. H., “Chemical Analysis Experiment for the Surveyor Lunar Mission,” J. Geophys. Res., 72, 831–839 (1967).Google Scholar
3. Turkevich, A. L., Franzgrote, E. J., and Patterson, J. H., “Chemical Composition of the Lunar Surface in Mare Tranquillitatis,” Science, 165, 277–279 (1969).Google Scholar
4. Franzgrote, E. J., Patterson, J. H., Turkevich, A. L., Economou, T. E., and Sowinski, K. P., “Chemical Composition of the Lunar Surface in Sinus Medii,” Science, 167, 376–379 (1970).Google Scholar
5. Patterson, J. H., Turkevich, A. L., Franzgrote, E. J., Economou, T. E., and Sowinski, K. P., “Chemical Composition of the Lunar Surface in a Terra Region Near the Crater Tycho,” Science, 168, 825–828 (1970).Google Scholar
6. Economou, T. E., Turkevich, A. L., Sowinski, K. P., Patterson, J. H., and Franzgrote, E. J., “The Alpha-Scattering Technique of Chemical Analysis,” J. Geophys. Res., 75, 65l4–6523 (1970).Google Scholar
7. Merzbacher, E., Lewis, H. W., “X-Ray Production by Heavy Charged Particles,” Handbuch der Physik, 34, 166–192, Springer Verlag, Berlin/Göttingen/Heidelberg (1958).Google Scholar
8. Birks, L. S., Seebold, R. E., Batt, A. P., and Grosso, J. S., “Excitation of Characteristic X-Rays by Protons, Electrons, and Primary X-rays,” J. Appl. Physics, 35, 2578–2581 (1964).Google Scholar
9. Sellers, B. and Ziegler, C. A., “Generation and Practical Use of Monoenergetic X-Rays from Alpha-Emitting Isotopes,” 353–373, Proceedings of the Symposium on Low-Energy X- and Gamma Sources and Applications, Oct, 1964, Chicago, Illinois, published by the Atomic Energy Commission (1965).Google Scholar
10. Robert, A., “Contributions to the Analysis of Light Elements Using X-ray Fluorescence Excited by Radioelements,” Commissariat a L'Energie Atomique, Rapport CEA-R 2539, 1964.Google Scholar
11. Imamura, H., Vehida, K., Tominaya, H., “Fluorescent X-Ray Analyzer with Radioactive Sources for Mixing Control of Cement Raw Materials,” Radioisotopes, 11, 4 (1965).Google Scholar
12. Trombka, J. I., Adler, I., Schmadebeck, R., and Lamothe, R., “Non-Dispersive X-Ray Emission Analysis for Lunar Surface Geochemical Exploration,” Report No. X-641-66-344, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland (1966).Google Scholar
13. Adler, I. and Trombka, J. I., “Geochemical Exploration of the Moon and Planets,” 67–74, 175-210, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg (1970).Google Scholar
14. Ogier, W. T., Lucas, G. J., Murray, J. S., and Holzer, T. E., “Soft X-Ray Production by 1.5 MeV Protons,” Phys. Rev., 134, A1070–1072 (1964).Google Scholar
15. Flanagan, F. J., “U.S. Geological Survey Silicate Rock Standards,” Geochim.etCosmochim. Acta, 31, 289–308 (1967).Google Scholar
16. National Bureau of Standards Certificate of Analyses of Standard Samples 1A,76, and 103a, Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C., 1931, 1927, 1962).Google Scholar
17. Roubault, M., de la Roche, H. and Govindaraju, K., “Rapport sur quatreroches etalons geochimiques: Granites GR, GA, GH et Basalte BR,” Sciences de la Terre, Vol. XI, 105–121, Nancy (1966).Google Scholar
18. “Report of Nonmetallic Standards Committee, Canadian Association for Applied Spectroscopy,” Applied Spectroscopy, 15, 159–160 (1961).Google Scholar