Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T16:39:10.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Co-Creation of Knowledge by the Hopi Tribe and Archaeologists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2017

T. J. Ferguson ,
Stewart B. Koyiyumptewa  and
Maren P. Hopkins
T. J. Ferguson
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, 6655 W. Sweetwater Dr., Tucson, AZ 85641
Stewart B. Koyiyumptewa
Affiliation:
Hopi Cultural Preservation Office, P.O. Box 215 Kykotsmovi, AZ 86039
Maren P. Hopkins
Affiliation:
Anthropological Research, LLC, 19461 S. Sonoita Hwy., Vail, AZ 85641
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For two decades, the Hopi Cultural Preservation Office has worked with archaeologists to co-create knowledge about the past and document contemporary values associated with heritage sites. Much of this work has been accomplished within the framework of research mandated by the National Historic Preservation Act and National Environmental Policy Act. Here we describe a case study that illustrates the processes of this community-based participatory research, including research design, implementation of fieldwork, peer review of research findings, and reporting. The case study is a project conducted in 2014 by the Hopi Tribe in partnership with Anthropological Research, LLC, to investigate traditional cultural properties associated with an Arizona Public Service Company transmission line. The Hopi Tribe’s collaborative research with archaeologists provides intellectual benefits for the management of archaeological resources and the humanistic and scientific understanding of the past.

Durante dos décadas, la Oficina de Preservación Cultural de la Comunidad Hopi (Hopi Cultural Preservation Office), ubicada en el norte de Arizona, ha trabajado con arqueólogos para aumentar el conocimiento sobre el pasado y documentar los valores contemporáneos asociados con sitios patrimoniales. Este trabajo se ha realizado en el marco de investigación dispuesto por el Acta Nacional de Preservación Histórica (National Historic Preservation Act and National Environmental Policy Act) y el Acta Nacional de Política Ambiental (National Environmental Policy Act). Nuestro estudio de caso ilustra los procesos de esta investigación participativa basada en la comunidad, incluyendo el diseño de la investigación, la ejecución del trabajo de campo, la revisión por pares de los resultados de la investigación y la presentación de informes. El presente caso de estudio es un proyecto llevado a cabo en 2014 por la tribu Hopi en colaboración con Anthropological Research, LLC, para investigar las propiedades culturales tradicionales asociadas con una línea de transmisión de Arizona Public Service Company. La investigación en colaboración con la tribu Hopi y los arqueólogos ofrece beneficios intelectuales para la gestión de los recursos arqueológicos y la comprensión humanística y científica del pasado.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in Archaeological Practice , Volume 3 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Co-Creation , August 2015 , pp. 249 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2015

References

References Cited

Adler, Michael, and Bruning, Susan 2008 Navigating the Fluidity of Social Identity: Collaborative Research into Cultural Affiliation in the American Southwest. In Collaboration in Archaeological Practice, edited by Colwell-Chanthaphonh, Chip and Ferguson, T. J., pp. 35–54. AltaMira, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Atalay, Sonya 2012 Community-Based Archaeology: Research With, By, and For Indigenous and Local Communities. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Atalay, Sonya, Clauss, Lee Rains, McGuire, Randall H., and Welch, John R. 2014 Transforming Archaeology: Activist Practices and Prospects. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
Bender, Barbara 1993 Introduction, Landscape-Meaning and Action. In Landscape Politics and Perspectives, edited by Bender, Barbara, pp. 1–17. Berg, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bollwerk, Elizabeth, Connolly, Robert, and McDavid, Carol 2015 Co-Creation and Public Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Practice 3:178–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, John N., Lee, Joyce, Smith, Linda L., and Lyle, Yorks 2000 Collaborative Inquiry in Practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
Chambers, Erve J. 2004 Epilogue: Archaeology, Heritage, and Public Endeavor. In Places in Mind: Public Archaeology as Applied Anthropology, edited by Shackel, Paul A. and Chambers, Erve J., pp. 193–208. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Dowdall, Katherine M., and Parrish, Otis O. 2003 A Meaningful Disturbance of the Earth. Journal of Social Archaeology 3:99–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, T. J. 1996 Native Americans and the Practice of Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 25:63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, T. J., and Anyon, Roger 2001 Hopi and Zuni Cultural Landscapes: Implications of History and Scale for Cultural Resources Management. In Native Peoples of the Southwest, edited by Weinstein, Laurie, pp. 99–122. Bergin and Garvey,Westport, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Ferguson, T.J. and Colwell-Chanthaphonh, Chip 2006 History Is in the Land: Multivocal Tribal Traditions in Arizona’s San Pedro Valley. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Ferguson, T.J., Dongoske, Kurt, Jenkins, Leigh, Yeatts, Mike, and Polingyouma, Eric 1993 Working Together, the Roles of Archeology and Ethnohistory in Hopi Cultural Preservation. CRM 16, Special Issue:27–37. Electronic document, http://npshistory.com/newsletters/crm/crm-v16-special.pdf, accessed March 26, 2015.Google Scholar
Ferguson, T.J., and Lomayestewa, Lee Wayne 2007 Kwaatu: Collection and Use of Golden Eagles on the Hopi Indian Reservation. Manuscript on file, Hopi Cultural Preservation Office, Kykotsmovi, AZ.Google Scholar
Fewkes, Jesse Walter 1900 a Tusayan Migration Traditions. In 19th Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology for the Years 1897–1898, Pt. 2, pp. 573–634. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Fewkes, Jesse Walter 1900b Property-Right in Eagles among the Hopi. American Anthropologist 2:690–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckenberger, Michael J. 2008 Entering the Agora: Archaeology, Conservation and Indigenous Peoples in the Amazon. In Collaboration in Archaeological Practice, edited by Colwell-Chanthaphonh, Chip and Ferguson, T. J., pp. 243–272. AltaMira, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Hedquist, Saul L., Koyiyumptewa, Stewart B., Whiteley, Peter M., Kuwanwisiwma, Leigh J. , Hill, Kenneth C., and Ferguson, T. J. 2014 Recording Toponyms to Document the Endangered Hopi Language. American Anthropologist 116:324–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopi Dictionary Project 1998 Hopi Dictionary/Hopìikwa Lavàytutuveni: A Hopi-English Dictionary of the Third Mesa Dialect. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Maren P., Hedquist, Saul L., Ferguson, T. J., and Koyiyumptewa, Stewart B. 2014 Talwi’pikit Tuuwuhiyat Ang Hopit Navoti’at: Hopi Traditional Knowledge on the Arizona Public Service 500kV El Dorado Transmission Line. Hopi Cultural Preservation Office, Hopi Tribe, Kykotsmovi, Arizona.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Maren P., Koyiyumptewa, Stewart B., Kuwanwisiwma, Leigh J., and Ferguson, T. J. 2014 Comprehending Hopi Footprints: Hopi History and Traditions at Glen Canyon National Recreation Area and Rainbow Bridge National Monument. Paper presented at the Arizona Archaeological Council Fall Conference, Arizona Museum of Natural History, Mesa, Arizona, November 7, 2014.Google Scholar
Jett, Stephen C., and Spencer, Virginia E. 1981 Navajo Architecture: Forms, History, Distributions. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Kuwanwisiwma, Leigh J., and Ferguson, T. J. 2009 Hopitutskwa and Ang Kuktota. In The Archaeology of Meaningful Places, edited by Bowser, Brenda J. and Zedeño, María Nieves, pp. 90–106. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Laurila, Erick M., Bild, David A., and Davis, Erin 2011 A Cultural Resources Survey of 34 Miles (927 Acres) of Hopi Tribal Lands for the Arizona Public Service Company 500-1 (Four Corners–Moenkopi–El Dorado) 500-kV Transmission Line, Coconino and Navajo Counties, Arizona. LSD Technical Report No. 075107 (500-1e), Logan Simpson Design Inc., Tempe, Arizona.Google Scholar
Little, Barbara J., and Shackel, Paul A. 2014 Archaeology, Heritage, and Civic Engagement. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
Lomaomvaya, Micah, and Ferguson, T. J. 2003 Hisatqasit Aw Maamatslala—Comprehending our Past Lifeways: Thoughts about a Hopi Archaeology. In Indigenous People and Archaeology, edited by Oetelaar, G., Peck, T., and Siegfried, E., pp. 43–51. Proceedings of the Chacmool Conference, University of Calgary, Canada.Google Scholar
McDavid, Carol 2002 Archaeologies That Hurt; Descendants that Matter: A Pragmatic Approach to Collaboration in the Public Interpretation of African-American Archaeology. World Archaeology 34:303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskell, Lynn, and Van Damme, Lynette Sibongile Masuku 2008 Heritage Ethics and Descendant Communities. In Collaboration in Archaeological Practice, edited by Colwell-Chanthaphonh, Chip and Ferguson, T. J., pp. 131–150. AltaMira, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Mindeleff, Victor 1891 A Study of Pueblo Architecture in Tusayan and Cibola. In Eighth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnography for the Years 1886-1887, pp. 573—633. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
National Park Service 2002 How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation. National Register Bulletin 15, U.S. Department of the Interior. Electronic document, http://www.nps.gov/nr/publications/bulletins/nrb15/, accessed November 8, 2014.Google Scholar
Parker, Patricia L., and King, Thomas F. 1998 Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Traditional Cultural Properties. National Register Bulletin 38. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Rubertone, Patricia E. 2000 The Historical Archaeology of Native Americans. Annual Review of Anthropology 29:425–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, Carl 1963 The Morphology of Landscape. In Land and Life: A Selection of the Writings of Carl Sauer. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Shackel, Paul A., and Gadsby, David A. 2008 “I Wish for Paradise”: Memory and Class in Hampden, Baltimore. In Collaboration in Archaeological Practice, edited by Colwell-Chanthaphonh, Chip and Ferguson, T. J., pp. 225–242. AltaMira, Lanham, Maryland. Google Scholar
Simon, Nina 2010 The Participatory Museum. Museum 2.0, Santa Cruz. Electronic document, http://www.participatorymuseum.org/read/, accessed March 26, 2015.Google Scholar
Swidler, Nina, Eck, David C., Ferguson, T. J., Kuwanwisiwma, Leigh J., Anyon, Roger, Panteah, Loren, Kelley, Klara, and Francis, Harris 2000 Multiple Views of the Past: Integrating Archaeology and Ethnography in the Jeddito Valley. CRM 23(9):49–53. Electronic document, http://npshistory.com/newsletters/crm/crm-v23n9.pdf, accessed March 26, 2015.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Peter 1988 Deliberate Acts. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Young, Jane M. 1987 Toward an Understanding of “Place” for Southwestern Indians. New Mexico Folklore Record 16:1–13.Google Scholar
Zedeño, María Nieves 1997 Landscapes, Land Use, and the History of Territory Formation: An Example from the Puebloan Southwest. Journal of Archeological Method and Theory 4:67–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar