Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:28:28.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estimating pasture biomass with active optical sensors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2017

K. Andersson*
Affiliation:
Precision Agriculture Research Group, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351Australia Cooperative Research Centre for Spatial Information, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351Australia
M. Trotter
Affiliation:
Precision Agriculture Research Group, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351Australia Cooperative Research Centre for Spatial Information, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351Australia
A. Robson
Affiliation:
Precision Agriculture Research Group, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351Australia Cooperative Research Centre for Spatial Information, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351Australia
D. Schneider
Affiliation:
Precision Agriculture Research Group, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351Australia Cooperative Research Centre for Spatial Information, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351Australia
L. Frizell
Affiliation:
Precision Agriculture Research Group, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351Australia
A. Saint
Affiliation:
Precision Agriculture Research Group, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351Australia
D. Lamb
Affiliation:
Precision Agriculture Research Group, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351Australia Cooperative Research Centre for Spatial Information, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351Australia
C. Blore
Affiliation:
Agriculture Services and Biosecurity Operations Division, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Hamilton Victoria 3300
*
Get access

Abstract

We investigated relationship between pasture biomass and measures of height and NDVI (normalised difference vegetation index). The pastures were tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea), perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne), and phalaris (Phalaris aquatica) located in Tasmania, Victoria and in the Northern Tablelands of NSW, Australia. Using the Trimble® GreenSeeker® Handheld active optical sensor (AOS) to measure NDVI, and a rising plate meter, the optimal model to estimate green dry biomass (GDM) during two years was a combination of NDVI and falling plate height index. The combined index was significantly correlated with GDM in each region during winter and spring (r2=0.62–0.77, P<0.001). Regional calibrations provided a smaller error in estimates of green biomass, required for potential application in the field, compared to a single overall calibration. Data collected in a third year will be used to test the accuracy of the models.

Type
Precision Pasture
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Flynn, ES, Dougherty, CT and Wendroth, O 2008. Assessment of pasture biomass with normalised difference vegetation index from active ground-based sensors. Agronomy Journal 100, 114121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, D, Shovelton, J, de Fegely, C, Manning, R, Beattie, L. and Trotter, M 2013. Potential for information technologies to improve decision making for the southern livestock industries. Meat & Livestock Australia Ltd, North Sydney NSW, Australia.Google Scholar
King, J, Sim, EM and Barthram, GT 1986. A comparison of spectral reflectance and sward surface height measurements to estimate herbage mass and leaf area index in continuously stocked ryegrass pastures. Grass and Forage Science 41 (3), 251258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, F, Qin, Q and Zhan, Z 2012. A novel dynamic stretching solution to eliminate saturation effect in NDVI and its application in drought monitoring. Chinese Geographical Science 22 (6), 683694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MLA 2004. More Beef from Pastures - Module 4 - Pasture Utilisation. Meat and Livestock Australia, pp. 45.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team 2014. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Reference Index Version 3.1.0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Rayburn, ER and Lozier, J 2003. A falling plate meter for estimating pasture forage mass. West Virginia University, http://mbfc.s3.amazonaws.com/reference_manual_/8.9a_westvirginia_pasture_forage_mass.pdf.Google Scholar
Schaefer, MT and Lamb, DW 2016. A Combination of Plant NDVI and LiDAR Measurements Improve the Estimation of Pasture Biomass in Tall Fescue (Festuca arundinacea var. Fletcher). Remote Sensing 8, 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trotter, M, Andersson, K, Welch, M, Chau, M, Frizell, L and Schneider, D 2016. Evaluating low-cost Lidar and Active Optical Sensors for pasture and forage biomass assessment. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Precision Agriculture (unpaginated, online). Monticello, IL: International Society of Precision Agriculture.Google Scholar
Trotter, MG, Lamb, DW, Donald, GE and Schneider, DA 2010. Evaluating an active optical sensor for quantifying and mapping green herbage mass and growth in a perennial grass pasture. Crop and Pasture Science 61, 389398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trotter, MG, Schneider, D, Lamb, D, Edwards, C and McPhee, M 2012. Examining the potential for active optical sensors to provide biomass estimation in improved and native pastures. Australian Agronomy Conference. The Regional Institute, Armidale, Australia.Google Scholar
Westwood, C 2008. Pastures for animal production: Understanding the challenges. In: S Boschma, L Serafin and J Ayres (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Grassland Society of NSW - ‘Pastures at the Cutting Edge’, Tamworth, pp. 43.Google Scholar