Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T06:28:45.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Efficacy of intervention at traffic schools reducing impulsive action, and association with candidate gene variants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2019

Kadi Luht
Affiliation:
Department of Education, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia Rescue College, Estonian Academy of Security Sciences, Tallinn, Estonia
Tõnis Tokko
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Division of Neuropsychopharmacology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
Diva Eensoo
Affiliation:
Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
Mariliis Vaht
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Division of Neuropsychopharmacology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
Jaanus Harro*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Division of Neuropsychopharmacology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
*
*Author for correspondence: Jaanus Harro, Department of Psychology, Division of Neuropsychopharmacology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia. Tel: +372 737 6657; Fax: +372 737 6152; E-mail: Jaanus.Harro@ut.ee

Abstract

Objective

Road traffic injuries are the leading cause of death among young people. Recognition of the contribution of impulsive behaviour may help novice drivers to behave more safely. Previously a brief intervention focusing on impulsive traffic behaviour conducted by psychologists in driving schools had been effective. The aim of this study was an independent re-evaluation of the effect of the intervention, as conducted by driving school teachers, and assessment of the potential associations with candidate genotypes.

Methods

Driving school students (mean age 22.5, SD=7.9) were divided into intervention (n=704) and control (n=737) groups. Driving school teachers were trained to administer the intervention which consisted of a lecture and group work (1.5 h in total) on impulsivity. Traffic offences and crashes were monitored during 3 years, using police and traffic insurance fund databases. Functional polymorphisms of the dopamine transporter (DAT) and serotonin transporter genes (DAT1 VNTR and 5-HTTLPR) were assessed.

Results

The intervention significantly lowered general traffic risk and prevalence of traffic accidents. DAT1 VNTR 9R carriers, particularly males, had higher general traffic risk in the whole sample. Female 5-HTTLPR s’ allele carriers of the intervention group had the lowest general traffic risk. Intervention was most effective in female DAT1 VNTR 10R/10R homozygotes.

Conclusions

Brief impulsivity-centred intervention appears as a promising strategy for preventing risk-taking behaviour in novice drivers and can be fully integrated to driving school curriculum.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Scandinavian College of Neuropsychopharmacology 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. World Health Organization (2016) Global Health Estimates 2015: Deaths by Cause, Age, Sex, by Country and by Region, 2000–2015. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
2. Ouimet, MC, Pradhan, AK, Brooks-Russell, A, Ehsani, JP, Berbiche, D Simons-Morton, BG (2015) Young drivers and their passengers: a systematic review of epidemiological studies on crash risk. J Adolesc Health 57(Suppl. 1):S2435.Google Scholar
3. Panayiotou, G (2015) The bold and the fearless among us: elevated psychopathic traits and levels of anxiety and fear are associated with specific aberrant driving behaviors. Accid Anal Prevent 79, 117125.Google Scholar
4. Sagberg, F, Selpi, S, Piccinini, GF Engström, J (2015) A review of research on driving styles and road safety. Hum Factors 57, 12481275.Google Scholar
5. Smorti, M Guarnieri, S (2016) Do aggressive driving and negative emotional driving mediate the link between impulsiveness and risky driving among young Italian drivers? J Soc Psychol 156, 669673.Google Scholar
6. Fuermaier, AB, Tucha, L, Evans, BL, Koerts, J, De Waard, D, Brookhuis, K, Aschenbrenner, S, Thome, J, Lange, KW Tucha, O (2017) Driving and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Neural Transm 124(Suppl. 1):5567.Google Scholar
7. Maes, S Boersma, SN (2004) Applications in health psychology: how effective are interventions? In: Sutton S, Baum A, Johnston M, editors. The Sage Handbook of Health Psychology, London: Sage, p. 299−325.Google Scholar
8. Frank, RG Lee, AM (2007) Accidents and unintentional injuries. In: Ayers S, Baum A, McManus C, Newman S, Wallston K, Weinman J, West R, editors. Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine, New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 527−529.Google Scholar
9. Makeham, P (2000) Traffic education strategy. In: von Holst H, Nygren Å, Andersson ÅE, editors. Transportation. Traffic Safety and Health: Human Behaviour, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, p. 133−162.Google Scholar
10. Carney, C, Mcgehee, D, Lee, J, Reyes, M Raby, M (2010) Using an event-triggered video intervention system to expand the supervised learning of newly licensed adolescent drivers. Am J Public Health 100, 11011106.Google Scholar
11. Jonah, BA (1997) Sensation seeking and risky driving: a review and synthesis of the literature. Accid Anal Prev 29, 651665.Google Scholar
12. Barkley, RA Cox, DA (2007) Review of driving risks and impairments associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and the effects of stimulant medication on driving performance. J Safety Res 38, 113128.Google Scholar
13. Bicaksiz, P Özkan, T (2016) Impulsivity and driver behaviors, offences and accident involvement: a systematic review. Transp Res Part F 38, 194223.Google Scholar
14. Alavi, SS, Mohammadi, MR, Souri, H, Kalhori, SM, Jannatifard, F Sepahbodi, G (2017) Personality, driving behavior and mental disorders factors as predictors of road traffic accidents based on logistic regression. Iran J Med Sci 42, 2431.Google Scholar
15. Panksepp, J (1998) Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
16. Paaver, M, Eensoo, D, Kaasik, K, Vaht, M, Mäestu, J Harro, J (2013) Predicting risky driving: a novel and efficient brief intervention focusing on acknowledgement of personal risk factors. Accid Anal Prev 50, 430437.Google Scholar
17. Eensoo, D, Paaver, M, Vaht, M, Loit, HM Harro, J (2018) Risky driving and the persistent effect of a randomized intervention focusing on impulsivity: the role of the serotonin transporter promoter polymorphism. Accid Anal Prev 113, 1924.Google Scholar
18. Evenden, JL. Varieties of impulsivity. Psychopharmacology. 1999; 146, 348361.Google Scholar
19. Takahashi H, Takano H, Camerer CF, Ideno T, Okubo S, Matsui H, Tamari Y, Takemura K, Arakawa R, Kodaka F, Yamada M, Eguchi Y, Murai T, Okubo Y, Kato M, Ito H and Suhara T (2012) Honesty mediates the relationship between serotonin and reaction to unfairness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109, 42814284.Google Scholar
20. Cunningham, KA Anastasio, NC (2014) Serotonin at the nexus of impulsivity and cue reactivity in cocaine addiction. Neuropharmacology 76(B):460478.Google Scholar
21. Tomson, K, Vaht, M, Laas, K, Veidebaum, T Harro, J (2016) Effect of a human serotonin 5-HT2A receptor gene polymorphism on impulsivity: dependence on cholesterol levels. J Affect Disord 206, 2330.Google Scholar
22. Laas, K, Kiive, E, Mäestu, J, Vaht, M, Veidebaum, T Harro, J (2017) Nice guys: homozygocity for the TPH2 -703G/T (rs4570625) minor allele promotes low aggressiveness and low anxiety. J Affect Disord 215, 230236.Google Scholar
23. Eensoo, D, Paaver, M, Pulver, A, Harro, M Harro, J (2004) Low platelet MAO activity associated with high dysfunctional impulsivity and antisocial behavior: evidence from drunk drivers. Psychopharmacology 172, 356358.Google Scholar
24. Paaver, M, Eensoo, D, Pulver, A Harro, J (2006) Adaptive and maladaptive impulsivity, platelet monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity and risk-admitting in different types of risky drivers. Psychopharmacology 186, 3240.Google Scholar
25. Luht, K, Eensoo, D, Tooding, LM Harro, J (2018) The association of measures of the serotonin system, personality, alcohol use, and smoking with risk-taking traffic behavior in adolescents in a longitudinal study. Nord J Psychiatry 72, 916.Google Scholar
26. Lesch K-P, Bengel D, Heils A, Sabol SZ, Greenberg BD, Petri S, Benjamin J, Müller CR, Hamer DH and Murphy DL (1996) Association of anxiety-related traits with a polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene regulatory region. Science 274, 15271531.Google Scholar
27. Canli, T Lesch, K (2007) Long story short: the serotonin transporter in emotion regulation and social cognition. Nat Neurosci 10, 11031109.Google Scholar
28. Brody, G, Beach, S, Philibert, R, Chen, Y Murry, V (2009) Prevention effects moderate the association of 5‐HTTLPR and youth risk behavior initiation: gene × environment hypotheses tested via a randomized prevention design. Child Dev 80, 645661.Google Scholar
29. Steiger H, Joober R, Israël M, Young SN, Ng Ying Kin NM, Gauvin L, Bruce KR, Joncas J and Torkaman-Zehi A (2005) The 5HTTLPR polymorphism, psychopathologic symptoms, and platelet [3H]paroxetine binding in bulimic syndromes. Int J Eat Disord 37, 5760.Google Scholar
30. Paaver, M, Kurrikoff, T, Nordquist, N, Oreland, L Harro, J (2008) The effect of 5-HTT gene promoter polymorphism on impulsivity depends on family relations in girls. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 32, 12631268.Google Scholar
31. Merenäkk L, Mäestu J, Nordquist N, Parik J, Oreland L, Loit H-M and Harro J (2011) Effects of the serotonin transporter (5-HTTLPR) and α2A-adrenoceptor (C-1291G) genotypes on substance use in children and adolescents: a longitudinal study. Psychopharmacology 215, 1322.Google Scholar
32. Vaht, M, Merenäkk, L, Mäestu, J, Veidebaum, T Harro, J (2014) Serotonin transporter gene promoter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) and alcohol use in general population: interaction effect with birth cohort. Psychopharmacology 231, 25872594.Google Scholar
33. De Oliveira CE, Oda JM, Ariza CB, Guembarovski RL, Hirata BK, de Almeida FC, André ND, Fungaro MH and Watanabe MA (2016) Genetic polymorphism in the promoter region of serotonin transporter: implications for ethanol abuse in children and adolescents. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 25, 4349.Google Scholar
34. Cope LM, Munier EC, Trucco EM, Hardee JE, Burmeister M, Zucker RA and Heitzeg MM (2017) Effects of the serotonin transporter gene, sensitivity of response to alcohol, and parental monitoring on risk for problem alcohol use. Alcohol 59, 716.Google Scholar
35. Thombs DL, O’Mara RJ, Hou W, Wagenaar AC, Dong HJ, Merves ML, Goldberger BA, Weiler RM, Dodd VJ and Clapp JD (2011) 5-HTTLPR genotype and associations with intoxication and intention to drive: results from a field study of bar patrons. Addict Biol 16, 133141.Google Scholar
36. Homberg, JR Lesch, K-P (2011) Looking on the bright side of serotonin transporter gene variation. Biol Psychiatry 69, 513519.Google Scholar
37. De Wit, H, Enggasser, J Richards, J (2002) Acute administration of d-amphetamine decreases impulsivity in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology 27, 813825.Google Scholar
38. Friedel, R (2004) Dopamine dysfunction in borderline personality disorder: a hypothesis. Neuropsychopharmacology 29, 10291039.Google Scholar
39. Thapar, A, O’donovan, M Owen, MJ (2005) The genetics of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Hum Mol Genet 14(Suppl. 2):R275R282.Google Scholar
40. Fried R, Petty CR, Surman CB, Reimer B, Aleardi M, Martin JM, Coughlin JF and Biederman J (2006) Characterizing impaired driving in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry 67, 567574.Google Scholar
41. Congdon, E, Lesch, KP Canli, T (2008) Analysis of DRD4 and DAT polymorphisms and behavioral inhibition in healthy adults: implications for impulsivity. Am J Med Genet 147, 2732.Google Scholar
42. Chen, N Reith, ME (2000) Structure and function of the dopamine transporter. Eur J Pharmacol 405, 329339.Google Scholar
43. Fuke, S, Suo, S, Takahashi, N, Koike, H, Sasagawa, N Ishiura, S (2001) The VNTR polymorphism of the human dopamine transporter (DAT1) gene affects gene expression. Pharmacogenomics J 1, 152156.Google Scholar
44. Mill, J, Asherson, P, Browes, B, D’souza, U Craig, I (2002) Expression of the dopamine transporter gene is regulated by the 39 UTR VNTR: evidence from brain and lymphocytes using quantitative RT-PCR. Am J Med Genet 114, 975979.Google Scholar
45. Vanness, SH, Owens, MJ Kilts, CD (2005) The variable number of tandem repeats element in DAT1 regulates in vitro dopamine transporter density. BMC Genet 6, 55.Google Scholar
46. Van De Giessen, EM, De Win, ML, Tanck, MT, Van Den Brink, W, Baas, F Booij, J (2009) Striatal dopamine transporter availability associated with polymorphisms in the dopamine transporter gene SLC6A3. J Nucl Med 50, 4552.Google Scholar
47. Faraone, SV, Spencer, TJ, Madras, BK, Zhang-James, Y Biederman, J (2014) Functional effects of dopamine transporter gene genotypes on in vivo dopamine transporter functioning: a meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry 19, 880889.Google Scholar
48. Heitland, I, Oosting, RS, Baas, JM, Massar, SA, Kenemans, JL Böcker, KB (2012) Genetic polymorphisms of the dopamine and serotonin systems modulate the neurophysiological response to feedback and risk taking in healthy humans. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 12, 678691.Google Scholar
49. Forbes, E, Brown, S, Kimak, M, Ferrell, R, Manuck, S Hariri, A (2009) Genetic variation in components of dopamine neurotransmission impacts ventral striatal reactivity associated with impulsivity. Mol Psychiatry 14, 6070.Google Scholar
50. Dickman, SJ (1990) Functional and dysfunctional impulsivity: personality and cognitive correlates. J Pers Soc Psychol 58, 95102.Google Scholar
51. Laas, K, Reif, A, Herterich, S, Eensoo, D, Lesch, KP Harro, J (2010) The effect of a functional NOS1 promoter polymorphism on impulsivity is moderated by platelet MAO activity. Psychopharmacology 209, 255261.Google Scholar
52. Eensoo, D, Paaver, M, Harro, M Harro, J (2005) Predicting drunk driving: contribution of alcohol use and related problems, traffic behaviour, personality and platelet monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity. Alcohol Alcohol 40, 140146.Google Scholar
53. Anchordoquy, HC, Mcgeary, C, Liu, L, Krauter, KS Smolen, A (2003) Genotyping of three candidate genes after whole-genome preamplification of DNA collected from buccal cells. Behav Genet 33, 7378.Google Scholar
54. Tomson, K, Merenäkk, L, Loit, H-M, Mäestu, J Harro, J (2011) The relationship between serotonin transporter gene promoter polymorphism and serum lipid levels at young age in a longitudinal population-representative study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 35, 18571862.Google Scholar
55. Maksimov, M, Vaht, M, Murd, C, Harro, J Bachmann, T (2015) Brain dopaminergic system related genetic variability interacts with target/mask timing in metacontrast masking. Neuropsychologia 71, 112118.Google Scholar
56. Turner, C Mcclure, R (2003) Age and gender differences in risk-taking behaviour as an explanation for high incidence of motor vehicle crashes as a driver in young males. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot 10, 123130.Google Scholar
57. Harper, S, Charters, T Strumpf, E (2015) Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in motor vehicle accident deaths in the United States, 1995–2010. Am J Epidemiol 182, 606614.Google Scholar
58. Eensoo, D, Harro, M, Pullmann, H, Allik, J Harro, J (2007) Association of traffic behavior with personality and platelet monoamine oxidase activity among schoolchildren. J Adolesc Health 40, 311317.Google Scholar
59. Van Dyke, N Fillmore, MT (2014) Alcohol effects on simulated driving performance and self-perceptions of impairment in DUI offenders. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 22, 484493.Google Scholar
60. Guo, G, Cai, T, Guo, R, Wang, H Harris, KM (2010) The dopamine transporter gene, a spectrum of most common risky behaviors, and the legal status of the behaviors. PLoS One 5, e9352.Google Scholar
61. Tokko, T, Eensoo, D, Vaht, M, Lesch, KP, Reif, A Harro, J (2018) Relapse of drunk driving and association with traffic accidents, alcohol-related problems, and biomarkers of impulsivity. Acta Neuropsychiatr 19.Google Scholar