Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T23:57:29.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of liver hemodynamics according to doppler ultrasonography in alcoholic patients subtyped by Cloninger classification and non-alcoholic healthy subjects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2014

Z. Sumru Cosar
Affiliation:
Ankara Oncology Research and Training Hospital, Radiology Department
Behcet Cosar*
Affiliation:
Gazi University School of Medicine Psychiatry Department
Suna Oktar
Affiliation:
Gazi University School of Medicine Radiology Department, Ankara, Turkey
Zehra Arikan
Affiliation:
Gazi University School of Medicine Psychiatry Department
Hakan Özdemir
Affiliation:
Gazi University School of Medicine Radiology Department, Ankara, Turkey
Cem Yücel
Affiliation:
Gazi University School of Medicine Radiology Department, Ankara, Turkey
*
Behcet Cosar, MD, 38 Cadde 5/15, Mehmet Çakýr Apt. 06520 Cukurambar, Ankara, Turkey. Tel: +90 312 285 08 54; Fax: +90 312 435 87 72; E-mail: zsumrucosar@yahoo.com

Abstract

Background:

The aim of this study was to search for morphological and hemodynamic changes in hepatic and splanchnic vasculature in alcoholic patients without the signs of hepatic damage and subtyped by Cloninger classification by means of sonography, and compare the subtypes among themselves and with nonalcoholic healthy subjects.

Methods:

Thirty alcohol dependent patients and 30 healthy subjects with no alcohol problem or hepatic impairment were included in the study. Patients were subtyped by Cloninger classification and all patients were evaluated by gray-scale and spectral Doppler ultrasound. The diameter of the portal vein, portal venous velocity, peak systolic and end diastolic velocities of hepatic and superior mesenteric arteries were assessed. RI, PI and systolic/diastolic velocity ratios were also calculated.

Results:

Portal vein diameter (PV diameter), portal vein cross sectional area (PV area), portal vein velocity (PV PSV), hepatic artery peak systolic velocity (HA PSV), hepatic artery end diastolic velocity (HA EDV), hepatic artery resistive index (HA RI), hepatic artery pulsatility index (HA PI), and systolic/diastolic velocity ratios (HA S/D), superior mesenteric artery peak systolic velocity (SMA PSV), superior mesenteric artery end diastolic velocity (SMA EDV), superior mesenteric artery resistive indices (SMA RI), pulsatility index (SMA PI), and systolic/diastolic velocity rates (SMA S/D) showed no significant difference among the groups (P > 0.01). Although there is no significant difference in PV PSV, HA PSV, SMA PSV, SMA EDV values between the groups, mean values of Type II alcoholics is greater than other groups. Portal vein cross-sectional area was greater in alcoholic patients (Type I, II and III) compared to the control group (P = 0.000). Portal vein velocity, hepatic artery peak systolic and end diastolic velocity, superior mesenteric artery peak systolic and end diastolic velocity were significantly greater in alcoholic patients than in the control group (P < 0.001). No statistical difference was detected between other parameters evaluated.

Conclusion:

In alcohol dependent patients, some hemodynamic and morphologic changes occur in hepatic and splanchnic circulation, even before the signs of hepatic damage develop, which can be detected by means of Doppler and gray-scale sonography. But as there is no significant difference between the Doppler ultrasonographic findings among alcoholics subtyped by a Cloninger classification, which is a clinical classification, it suggests that psychiatric classification doesn't show any correlation with biological parameters, and because of this Cloninger classification a psychiatric classification cannot be considered as a characteristic determinative factor in the prognosis of hepatic disorder due to alcohol use. However, higher values of Type II alcoholics can be attributed to the longer alcohol intake of this subtype.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Blackwell Munksgaard

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

World Health Organisation (WHO). 10th Revision of The International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). WHO, Geneva, 1992. Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4rd edn (DSM-IV). APA, Washington, DC, 1994. Google Scholar
Keller, M, McCormick, M, Efron, V. A dictionary of words about alcohol, 2nd edn. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center of Alcohol Studies, 1982. Google Scholar
Silva, G, Fluxa, F, Breski, Get al. Splanchnic and systemic hemodynamics in early abstinence and after ethanol administration in non-cirrhotic alcoholic patients. J Hepatol 1994;20: 494499. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iturriaga, H, Ugarte, G, Israel, Y. Hepatic vein oxygenation, liver blood flow and the rate of ethanol metabolism in recently abstinent alcoholic patients. Eur J Clin Invest 1980;10: 211218. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyakawa, H, Iida, S, Leo, MAet al. Pathogenesis of precirrhotic portal hypertension in alcohol-fed baboons. Gastroenterology 1985;88: 143150. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blendis, LM, Orrego, H, Crossley, IRet al. The role of hepatocyte enlargement in hepatic pressure in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic alcoholic liver disease. Hepatology 1982;2: 539546. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cloninger, CR. Neurogenetic adaptive mechanisms in alcoholism. Science 1987;236 (1):410416. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohman, M, Sigvardsson, S, Cloninger, CR. Maternal inheritance of alcohol abuse: cross-fostering analysis of adopted women. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981;38: 965969. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cloninger, CR, Sigvardsson, S, Bohman, M. Childhood personality predicts alcohol abuse in young adults. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1988;12 (4):494505. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merkel, C, Bolognesi, M, Bellon, Set al. Prognostic usefulness of hepatic vein catheterization in patients with cirrhosis and esophageal varices. Gastroenterology 1992;102 (3):973979. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vorobioff, J, Groszmann, R J, Picabea, Eet al. Prognostic value of hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements in alcoholic cirrhosis: a 10-year prospective study. Gastroenterology 1996;111 (3):701709. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taourel, P, Blanc, P, Dauzat, Met al. Doppler study of mesenteric, hepatic and portal circulation in alcoholic cirrhosis: relationship between quantitative doppler measurements and the severity of portal hypertension and hepatic failure. Hepatology 1998;28 (4):932936. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolondi, L, Gaiani, S, Barbara, L. Liver and portal hypertension. In: Taylor, KJW, Burns, PN, Wells, PNT, eds. Clinical applications of doppler ultrasound, 2nd edn. New York: Raven Press, 1995: 133154.Google Scholar
Sacerdoti, D, Merkel, C, Bolognesi, Met al. Hepatic arterial resistance in cirrhosis with and without portal vein thrombosis: relationships with portal hemodynamics. Gastroenterology 1995;108 (4):11521158. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joynt, LK, Platt, JF, Rubin, JMet al. Hepatic artery resistance before and after standard meal in subjects with diseased and healthy livers. Radiology 1995;196 (2):489492. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zironi, G, Gaiani, S, Fenyves, Det al. Value of measurement of mean portal flow velocity by Doppler flowmetry in the diagnosis of portal hypertension. J Hepatol 1992;16 (3):298303. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zoli, M, Marchesini, G, Cordiani, MRet al. Echo-Doppler measurement of splancnic blood flow in control and cirrhotic subjects. J Clin Ultrasound 1986;14 (6):429435. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, JF, Rubin, JM, Ellis, JH. Hepatic artery changes in portal vein thrombosis. Radiology 1995;196 (1):9598. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolognesi, M, Sacerdoti, D, Merkel, Cet al. Splenic Doppler impedance indices: influence of different portal hemodynamic conditions. Hepatology 1996;23 (5):10351040. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vorobioff, J, Bredfeldt, JE, Groszmann, RJ. Hyperdynamic circulation in portal hypertensive rat model: a primary factor for maintenance of chronic portal hypertension. Am J Physiol 1983;244 (1):5257. Google Scholar
Luca, A, Garcia-Pagan, JC, Bosch, Jet al. Effects of ethanol consumption on hepatic hemodynamics in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 1997;112 (4):12841289. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Israel, Y, Orrego, H. Hypermetabolic state, hepatocyte expansion and liver blood flow: an interaction traid in alcoholic liver injury. Ann NY Acad Sci 1987;492: 303323. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colli, A, Cocciolo, M, Mumoli, Net al. Hepatic artery resistance in alcoholic liver disease. Hepatology 1998;28 (5):11821186. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bredfeldt, JE, Riley, EM, Groszmann, RJ. Compensatory mechanisms in response to an elevated hepatic oxygen consumption in chronically ethanol-fed rats. Am J Physiol 1985;245: 507511. Google Scholar
Orrego, H, Carmichael, FJ, Israel, Y. New insights on the mechanism of the alcohol-induced increase in portal blood flow. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1988;66 (1):19[Review].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balaban, RS, Blum, JJ. Hormone-induced changes in NADH fluorescence and oxygen consumption of rat hepatocysts. Am J Physiol 1982;242 (3):172177. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rector, WG, Hoefs, JC, Hossack, KFet al. Hepatofugal portal flow in cirrhosis: observations on hepatic hemodynamics and the nature of arterioportal communications. Hepatology 1988;8 (1):1620. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed