Element contents
Series: Elements in Corpus Linguistics
Analysing Language, Sex and Age in a Corpus of Patient Feedback
A Comparison of Approaches
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 June 2022
Summary
This Element explores approaches to locating and examining social identity in corpora with and without the aid of demographic metadata. This is a key concern in corpus-aided studies of language and identity, and this Element sets out to explore the main challenges and affordances associated with either approach and to discern what either approach can (and cannot) show. It describes two case studies which each compare two approaches to social identity variables – sex and age – in a corpus of 14-million words of patient comments about NHS cancer services in England. The first approach utilises demographic tags to group comments according to patients' sex/age while the second involves categorising cases where patients disclose their sex/age in their comments. This Element compares the findings from either approach, with the approaches themselves being critically discussed in terms of their implications for corpus-aided studies of language and identity.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Corpus LinguisticsOnline ISBN: 9781009031042Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 21 July 2022
References
Baker, P. (2010). Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, P. (2014). ‘Bad wigs and screaming mimis’: Using corpus-assisted techniques to carry out critical discourse analysis of the representation of trans people in the British press. In Hart, C. and Cap, P., eds., Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 211–36.Google Scholar
Baker, P. (2017). Sexuality. In Friginal, E., ed., Studies in Corpus-Based Sociolinguistics. London: Routledge, pp. 159–77.Google Scholar
Baker, P. and Brookes, G. (2021). Lovely nurses, rude receptionists, and patronising doctors: Determining the impact of gender stereotyping on patient feedback. In Angouri, J. and Baxter, J., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, pp. 559–71.Google Scholar
Baker, P., Brookes, G. and Evans, C. (2019). The Language of Patient Feedback: A Corpus Linguistic Study of Online Health Communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baxter, J. (2003). Positioning Gender in Discourse: A Feminist Methodology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Benwell, B. and Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Brezina, V., Love, R. and Aijmer, K. (2018). Corpus Approaches to Contemporary British Speech: Sociolinguistic Studies of the Spoken BNC2014. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brookes, G. and Baker, P. (2021). Obesity in the News: Language and Representation in the Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brookes, G. and Harvey, K. (2016). Examining the discourse of mental illness in a corpus of online advice-seeking messages. In Pickering, L., Friginal, E. and Staples, S., eds., Talking at Work: Corpus-Based Explorations of Workplace Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 209–34.Google Scholar
Brookes, G. and McEnery, T. (2020). Corpus linguistics. In Adolphs, S. and Knight, D., eds., The Routledge Handbook of English Language and Digital Humanities. London: Routledge, pp. 378–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2005). Locating identity in language. In Llamas, C. and Watt, D., eds., Language and Identities. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 18–28.Google Scholar
Cancer Research UK. (2021a). Bladder cancer incidence statistics. Online. www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/bladder-cancer/incidence#heading-ZeroGoogle Scholar
Cancer Research UK. (2021b). Bowel cancer incidence statistics. Online. www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/bowel-cancer/incidence#heading-ZeroGoogle Scholar
Cancer Research, UK. (2021c). Cancer incidence by age. Online. www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/incidence/age#heading-ZeroGoogle Scholar
Cancer Research, UK. (2022). Kidney cancer statistics. Online. www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/kidney-cancer#heading-ZeroGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2007). Assessing and accounting. In Holt, E. and Clift, R., eds., Reporting on Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 81–119.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. (2004). Age in social and sociolinguistic theory. In Nussbaum, J. F. and Coupland, J., eds., Handbook of Communication and Aging Research, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, pp. 69–90.Google Scholar
Coupland, N., Coupland, J. and Giles, H. (1991). Language, Society and the Elderly: Discourse, Identity, and Ageing. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1993). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–99.Google Scholar
Dunning, T. (1993). Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19(1), 61–74.Google Scholar
Firth, R. J. (1957). Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fuchs, R. (2017). Do women (still) use more intensifiers than men? Recent change in the sociolinguistics of intensifiers in British English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 345–74.Google Scholar
Gabrielatos, C. (2018). Keyness analysis: Nature, metrics and techniques. In Taylor, C. and Marchi, A., eds., Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review. London: Routledge, pp. 225–58.Google Scholar
Gleason, P. (1983). Identifying identity: A semantic history. Journal of American History, 69(4), 910–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (1979). Moral Development and Ego Identity in Communication and the Evolution of Society. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Hall, S. (1996). Who needs ‘identity’? In Hall, S. and du Gay, P., eds., Questions of Cultural Identity. London: Sage, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. (2012). CQPweb: Combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(3), 380–409.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. (2014). Log Ratio: An informal introduction. Online. http://cass.lancs.ac.uk/log-ratio-an-informal-introduction/Google Scholar
Harris, D. K. (2007). Sociology of Aging, 3rd ed. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Harvey, K. (2012). Disclosures of depression: Using corpus linguistics methods to interrogate young people’s online health concerns. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(3), 349–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, D. and Brookes, G. (2020). Corpus, Discourse and Mental Health. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. and Meinhof, U. H., eds. (1997). Language and Masculinity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kendall, T. (2011). Corpora from a sociolinguistic perspective. RBLA, Belo Horizonte, 11(2), 361–89.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Laws, J., Ryder, C. and Jaworska, S. (2017). A diachronic corpus-based study into the effects of age and gender on the usage patterns of verb-forming suffixation in spoken British English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 375–402.Google Scholar
McEnery, T., Baker, P. and Hardie, A. (2000). Assessing claims about language use with corpus data: Swearing and abuse. In Kirk, J. M., ed., Corpora Galore. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 45–55.Google Scholar
McEnery, T. and Wilson, A. (2001). Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, B. (2010). Corpus and Sociolinguistics: Investigating Age and Gender in Female Talk. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Myers, G. (1999). Functions of reported speech in group discussions. Applied Linguistics, 20(3), 376–401.Google Scholar
Preece, S. (2016). Introduction: Language and identity in applied linguistics. In Preece, S., ed., The Routledge Handbook of Language and Identity. London: Routledge, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Rayson, P., Leech, G. and Hodges, M. (1997). Social differentiation in the use of English vocabulary: Some analyses of the conversational component of the British National Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 2(1), 133–52.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: a partial sketch of a systematics. In Fox, B. A. ed., Studies in Anaphora. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 437–85.Google Scholar
Sealey, A. (2009). Probabilities and surprises: A realist approach to identifying linguistic and social patterns, with reference to an oral history corpus. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 215–35.Google Scholar
Swann, J. (2002). Yes, but is it gender? In Litosseliti, L. and Sunderland, J., eds., Gender Identity and Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 43–67.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. (2016). Teen Talk: The Language of Adolescents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (2013). Searching for similarity using corpus-assisted discourse studies. Corpora, 8(1), 81–113.Google Scholar
- 6
- Cited by