Element contents
Kant on the Rationality of Morality
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 July 2019
Summary
Kant claims that the fundamental principle of morality is given by pure reason itself. Many have interpreted Kant to derive this principle from a conception of pure practical reason (as opposed to merely prudential reasoning about the most effective means to empirically given ends). But Kant maintained that there is only one faculty of reason, although with both theoretical and practical applications. This Element shows how Kant attempted to derive the fundamental principle and goal of morality from the general principles of reason as such, defined by the principles of non-contradiction and sufficient reason and the ideal of systematicity.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108529761Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 11 July 2019
Bibliography
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
Kant, Immanuel (1900–). Kants gesammelte Schriften. Edited by the Royal Prussian (later German, then Berlin-Brandenburg) Academy of Sciences. 29 vols. Berlin: Georg Reimer (later Walter de Gruyter). (Akademie edition)Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1992). Lectures on Logic. Edited and translated by Young, J. Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1993). Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770. Edited and translated by Walford, David E in collaboration with Meerbote, Ralf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996a). Practical Philosophy. Edited and translated by Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996b). Religion and Rational Theology. Edited and translated by Wood, Allen W. and di Giovanni, George. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1997). Lectures on Ethics. Edited by Heath, Peter and Schneewind, J. B., translated by Peter Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment. Edited by Paul Guyer, translated by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2004). Vorlesung zur Moralphilosophie. Edited by Stark, Werner and Kuehn, Manfred. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2005). Notes and Fragments. Edited by Guyer, Paul, translated by Curtis Bowman, Paul Guyer, and Frederick Rauscher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2006). Anthropology, History, and Education. Edited by Louden, Robert B. and Zöller, Günter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2016). Lectures and Drafts on Political Philosophy. Edited by Rauscher, Frederick, translated by Frederick Rauscher and Kenneth R. Westphal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1739–40). A Treatise of Human Nature. Ed. Fate, David and Norton, Mary J.. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1969). Philosophical Papers and Letters. Translated and edited by Loemker, Leroy E.. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Meier, Georg Friedrich (1762–74). Philosophische Sittenlehre. Second, improved edition. 5 vols. Halle: Carl Hermann Hemmerde.Google Scholar
Meier, Georg Friedrich (1764). Allgemeine practische Weltweisheit. Magdeburg: Carl Hermann Hemmerde.Google Scholar
Meier, Georg Friedrich (2016). Excerpt from the Doctrine of Reason. Trans. Aaron Bunch, in collaboration with Axel Gelfert and Ricardo Pozzo. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (2009). Prize Essay on the Basis of Morals, in The Two Fundamental Problems of Ethics. Translated and edited by Janaway, Christopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. (2010). The World as Will and Representation. 2nd ed. Edited by Norman, Judith, Welchman, Alistair, and Janaway, Christopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry (1888). “The Kantian Conception of Free Will,” Mind XIII (1888): 405–12. Reprinted in The Methods of Ethics, 7th ed. (London: Macmillan, 1907), pp. 511–16.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Johann Heinrich, August (1788). Euleutheriologie oder über Freiheit und Nothwendigkeit. Jena: Cröker.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (1990). Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (2004). Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. 2nd ed. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (2011). Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bagnoli, Carla, ed. (2013). Constructivism in Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Busch, Werner (1979). Entstehung der kritischen Rechtsphilosophie Kants. Kant-Studien Ergänzungshefte 110. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
dos Santos, Robinson, and Schmidt, Elke Elisabeth, eds. (2018). Realism and Antirealism in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Kant-Studien Erganzungshefte 199. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Formosa, Paul (2017). Kantian Ethics, Dignity and Perfection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Forster, Michael N. (2008). Kant and Skepticism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1987). Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1992). The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1995). “The Possibility of the Categorical Imperative,” Philosophical Review 104: 353–85. Reprinted in Guyer, Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), pp. 172–206.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1997). “From a Practical Point of View: Kant’s Conception of a Postulate of Pure Practical Reason.” Philosophisches Jahrbuch 104: 1–18. Reprinted in Guyer 2000, pp. 333–71.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1998). “The Value of Reason and the Value of Freedom.” Ethics 109: 22–35.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2000). Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2001). “From Nature to Morality: Kant’s New Argument in the ‘Critique of Teleological Judgment’.” Pp. 375–404 in Fulda, Hans-Friedrich and Stoltzenberg, Jürgen, eds., Architektonik und System in der Philosophie Kants. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag. Reprinted in Guyer 2005, pp. 314–42.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2002). “Kant’s Deductions of the Principles of Right.” Pp. 24–64 in Timmons, Mark, ed., Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reprinted in Guyer 2005, pp. 198–242.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2003). “Kant on Common Sense and Skepticism,” Kantian Review 7 (2003): 1–37. Reprinted in Guyer 2008a, pp. 23–70.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2005). Kant’s System of Nature and Freedom: Selected Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2006). The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2007a). Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Reader’s Guide. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2007b). “Naturalistic and Transcendental Moments in Kant’s Moral Philosophy.” Inquiry 50 (2007): 444–64.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2008a). Knowledge, Reason, and Taste: Kant’s Response to Hume. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2008b). “Proving Ourselves Free.” Pp. 115–37 in Rhoden, Valerio, Terra, Ricardo R., de Almeida, Guido, and Ruffings, Margit, eds. Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants: Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. 5 vols. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter. Vol. 1. Reprinted in Guyer 2016a, pp. 146–62.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2009a). “Problems with Freedom: Kant’s Argument in Groundwork III and its Subsequent Emendation.” Pp. 176–202 in Timmermann, Jens, ed., Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2009b). “Is and Ought: From Hume to Kant, and Now.” In German in Klemme, Heiner F., ed., Kant und die Zukunft der Aufklarung. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 210–32. Translated in Guyer 2016a, pp. 21–25.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2011). “Kantian Communities.” Pp. 88–120 in Payne, Charlton and Thorpe, Lucas, eds., Kant and the Concept of Community, North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy 9. Rochester: University of Rochester Press. Reprinted in Guyer 2016a, pp. 275–302.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2013). “Constructivism and Self-Constitution.” Pp. 176–200 in Timmons, Mark and Baiasu, Sorin, eds., Kant on Practical Justification: Interpretive Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2016a). Virtues of Freedom: Selected Essays on Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2016b). “Kant, Mendelssohn, and Immortality.” Pp. 157–79 in Höwing, Thomas, ed., The Highest Good in Kant’s Philosophy. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2016c). “The Twofold Morality of Recht: Once More Unto the Breach.” Kant-Studien 107: 34–63.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2017). “Transcendental Idealism: What and Why?” Pp. 71–90 in Altman, Matthew C., ed., The Palgrave Kant Handbook. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2018a). “The Struggle for Freedom: Freedom of Will in Kant and Reinhold.” Pp. 120–37 in Watkins, Eric, ed., Kant on Persons and Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2018b). “Principles of Justice, Primary Goods, and Categories of Right: Rawls and Kant.” Kantian Review 23: 581–613.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara (1993). The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. (1986). “Kant’s Formula of Universal Law,” Kant-Studien 77 (1986): 183–202. Reprinted in Korsgaard 1996a, pp. 77–105.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. (1989). “Kant’s Analysis of Obligation: The Argument of Groundwork I.” Monist 72 (1989): 311–40. Reprinted in Korsgaard 1996a, pp. 43–76.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. (1996a). Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. (1996b). The Sources of Normativity. Edited by O’Neill, Onora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. (2009). Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krasnoff, Larry (2013). “Constructing Practical Justification: How Can the Categorical Imperative Justify Desire-based Actions?” Pp. 87–109 in Timmons, Mark and Baiasu, Sorin, eds., Kant on Practical Justification. Oxford: Oxford Univesity Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (1989). Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (1992). “Vindicating Reason.” Originally in Guyer 1992, pp. 280–308. Reprinted in O’Neill 2015, pp. 13–37.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (2004). “Autonomy, Plurality and Public Reason.” Pp. 181–94 in Brender, Natalie and Krasnoff, Larry, eds., New Essays on the History of Autonomy: A Collection Honoring J.B. Schneewind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (2013). Acting on Principle: An Essay on Kantian Ethics. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (2015). Constructing Authorities: Reason, Politics and Interpretation in Kant’s Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Piper, Adrian M. S. (1997). “Kant on the Objectivity of the Moral Law.” Pp. 240–69 in Reath, Andrews, Herman, Barbara, and Korsgaard, Christine M., eds. Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays for John Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Piper, Adrian M. S. (2012). “Kant’s Self-Legislation Procedure Reconsidered.” Kant Studies Online, pp. 203–77.Google Scholar
Piper, Adrian M. S. (2013). Rationality and the Structure of the Self, 2nd ed. 2 vols. Berlin: APRA Foundation.Google Scholar
Piper, Adrian M. S. (2018). “The Logic of Kant’s Categorical ‘Imperative’.” Pp. 2037–46 in Waibel, Violetta L., Ruffing, Margit, and Wagner, David, eds., Natur und Freiheit: Akten des XII. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. 5 vols. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter. Vol. 3.Google Scholar
Rauscher, Frederick (2015). Naturalism and Realism in Kant’s Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1980). “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory.” Journal of Philosophy 77: 515–72. Reprinted in Rawls 1999b, Collected Papers, ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 303–58.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1999a). A Theory of Justice, revised edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1999b). Collected Papers, ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (2000). Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Edited by Herman, Barbara. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. B. (2010). “Voluntarism and the Foundations of Ethics.” Pp. 202–21 in Schneewind, Essays on the History of Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. (2001). “The Moral Law as a System of Formulas.” Pp. 287–306 in Fulda, Hans-Friedrich and Stolzenberg, Jürgen, eds., Architektonik und System in der Philosophie Kants. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. (2006). “The Supreme Principle of Morality.” In Guyer 2006, pp. 342–80.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. (2014). The Free Development of Each: Studies on Freedom, Right, and Ethics in Classical German Philosophv. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. (2017). Formulas of the Moral Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wuerth, Julian (2014). Kant on Mind, Action, and Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 7
- Cited by