The Analysis of Matter (London: Kegan Paul, 1927).

The Analysis of Mind (London: Allen & Unwin, 1921).

The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell, 3 vols., vol. 1, 1872–1914 (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1967); vol. 2, 1914–1944 (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1968); vol. 3, 1944–1967 (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1969).

Bertrand Russell on God and Religion, ed. Seckel, A. (New York: Prometheus Books, 1987).Google Scholar

The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 4, Foundations of Logic 1903–1905, ed. Urquhart, Alasdair (London: Routledge, 1994).Google Scholar

The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 6, Logic and Philosophy Papers 1901–1913, ed. Slater, John G. (London: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar

The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 7, Theory of Knowledge: The 1913 Manuscript, ed. Ramsden Eames, Elizabeth in collaboration with Blackwell, Kenneth (London: Allen & Unwin, 1984).Google Scholar

The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 8, The Philosophy of Logical Atomism and Other Essays 1914–1919, ed. Slater, John G. (London: Allen & Unwin, 1986).Google Scholar

The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 9, Essays on Language, Mind and Matter 1919–1926, ed. Slater, John G. (London: Unwin Hyman, 1988).Google Scholar

The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 10, A Fresh Look at Empiricism 1927–1942, ed. Slater, John G. (London: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar

The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 12, ed. Rempel, Richard, Brink, Andres, and Moran, Margaret (London: Allen & Unwin, 1985).Google Scholar

Essays in Analysis, ed. Lackey, D. (London: Allen & Unwin, 1973).Google Scholar

“The Essence of Religion,” in Collected Papers, vol. 12, pp. 112–122. First published in The Hibbert Journal 2 (1912): 46–62.

“A Free Man's Worship,” in Mysticism and Logic, pp. 40–47. First published in The Independent Review (December 1903).

A History of Western Philosophy (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1945).

Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1948).

The Impact of Science on Society (London: Allen & Unwin, 1952).

An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth (London: Allen & Unwin, 1940, 1966).

Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy (London: Allen & Unwin, 1919, 1953).

“Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description,” in Mysticism and Logic, pp. 152–168. First published in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (1910–1911): 108–128. Reprinted in Collected Papers, vol. 6, pp. 147–161.

“Letter of 13 August 1919,” Russell 10. 2 (1990): 101–124.

“Letter to the Editor of the Athenaeum,” in Collected Papers, vol. 8, p. 87. First published in The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 12 (1915): 391–392.

“Logical Atomism,” in Logic and Knowledge, pp. 323–343. First published in Contemporary British Philosophy: Personal Statements (London: Allen & Unwin, 1924), pp. 356–383. Reprinted in Collected Papers, vol. 9, pp. 160–180.

Logic and Knowledge: Essays by Bertrand Russell 1901–1950, ed. Marsh, Robert C. (London: Allen & Unwin, 1977).Google Scholar

“Mathematical Logic as Based on the Theory of Types,” in Logic and Knowledge, pp. 59–102. First published in The American Journal of Mathematics 30 (1908): 222–262.CrossRef

My Philosophical Development (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1959).

“Mysticism and Logic,” in Mysticism and Logic, pp. 9–30. First published in The Hibbert Journal 12 (1914): 780–803.

Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays (Totowa, N.J.: Barnes & Noble, 1976). First published 1917.

“Necessity and Possibility,” in Collected Papers, vol. 4, pp. 507–520.

“On Denoting,” in Essays in Analysis, pp. 103–19. First published in Mind 14 (1905): 479–493.

“On Fundamentals,” in Collected Papers, vol. 4, pp. 359–413.

“On ‘Insolubilia’ and Their Solution by Symbolic Logic,” in Essays in Analysis, pp. 190–214. First published as “Les paradoxes de la logique,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 14 (1906): 627–650.

“On Propositions: What They Are and How They Mean,” in Logic and Knowledge, pp. 283–320. First published in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol. 2 (1919): 1–43. Reprinted in Collected Papers, vol. 8, pp. 276–306.

“On the Logic of Relations,” in Logic and Knowledge, pp. 3–38. First published as “Sur la logique des relations,” Rivista di mathematica 7 (1901): 115–148.

“On the Nature of Acquaintance,” in Logic and Knowledge, pp. 127–174.

“On the Nature of Truth,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 7 (1907): 28–49.CrossRef

“On the Nature of Truth and Falsehood,” in Philosophical Essays (London: Longmans, 1910), ch. 7, pp. 147–159.

“On the Notion of Cause,” in Mysticism and Logic, pp. 132–151. First published in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 13 (1912): 1–26.

“On the Relation of Mathematics to Logic,” in Essays in Analysis, pp. 260–271. First published as “Sur la relation des mathématiques à la logistique,” in Revue de métaphysique et de morale 13 (1905): 906–17.

“On the Relation of Sense-Data to Physics,” in Mysticism and Logic, pp. 108–131. First published in Scientia 4 (1914). Reprinted in Collected Papers, vol. 8, pp. 3–26.

“On the Relations of Universals and Particulars,” in Logic and Knowledge, pp. 103–124.

“On Scientific Method in Philosophy”, in Mysticism and Logic, pp. 75–93. Originally given as the Herbert Spencer Lecture 1914 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1914). Reprinted in Collected Papers, vol. 8, pp. 55–73.

“On Some Difficulties in the Theory of Transfinite Numbers and Order Types,” in Essays in Analysis, pp. 135–64. First published in Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 4 (March 1906): 29–53.

“On the Substitutional Theory of Classes and Relations,” in Essays in Analysis, pp. 165–189. Manuscript received by the London Mathematical Society on 24 April 1905.

Our Knowledge of the External World, 2nd ed. with new Preface and revisions (London: Allen & Unwin, 1926). First published by Open Court, 1914.

Philosophical Essays (London: Longman, 1910).

Philosophy (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1927).

“Philosophy in the Twentieth-Century” (1924), in Collected Papers, vol. 8, pp. 450–466.

“The Philosophy of Logical Atomism,” in Logic and Knowledge, pp. 175–281. First published in The Monist 28 (1918): 495–527; 29 (Jan., Apr., July 1919): 32–63, 190–222, 345–380. Reprinted in Collected Papers, vol. 8, pp. 155–244.

Power: A New Social Analysis (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1938).

Principia Mathematica (coauthored with Whitehead, A. N), 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1925, 1957); 1st ed., vol. 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1910), vol. 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1911), vol. 3 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1913).Google Scholar

Principia Mathematica to ∗56 (coauthored with Whitehead, A. N.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1964).Google Scholar

The Principles of Mathematics, 2nd ed. (London: Allen & Unwin, 1937; 1st ed. London: Allen & Unwin, 1903).

The Problems of Philosophy (London: Oxford University Press, 1912).

The Selected Letters of Bertrand Russell, ed. Griffin, Nicholas (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1992), p. 469.Google Scholar

“Truth-Functions and Meaning-Functions” (1923), in Collected Papers, vol. 9, pp. 156–158.

“What is Meant by ‘A believes p’?” (1923), in Collected Papers, vol. 9, p. 159.

Cambridge Letters, ed. McGuinness, Brian and Wright, G. H. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1995).Google Scholar

“Extracts from Letters to Russell, 1919–1920,” Appendix III of Notebooks 1914–1916, 2nd ed.

Letters from Ludwig Wittgenstein, with a Memoir, by Englemann, Paul (Oxford: Blackwell, 1967).Google Scholar

Letters to C. K. Ogden, with an Appendix of Letters by Frank Plumpton Ramsey, ed. Wright, G. H. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1973).Google Scholar

Letters to Russell, Keynes and Moore, ed. Wright, G. H. with the assistance of McGuinness, B. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1974).Google Scholar

Notebooks 1914–1916, ed. Wright, G. H. and Anscombe, G. E. M., trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, 2nd ed. with new version of “Notes on Logic” (Oxford: Blackwell, 1979). 1st ed. 1961.Google Scholar

“Notes Dictated to G. E. Moore in Norway,” Appendix II of Notebooks 1914–1916.

“Notes on Logic,” Appendix I of Notebooks 1914–1916, 2nd ed. (An earlier version was published in Journal of Philosophy (1957) and reprinted in the 1st ed. of Notebooks 1914–1916.)

Prototractatus, ed. McGuinness, B. F., Nyberg, T., and Wright, G. H., trans. B. F. McGuinness and D. F. Pears (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1971).Google Scholar

“Some Remarks on Logical Form,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol. 9 (1929): 62–79.

Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, German text with English translation by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness (London: Routledge, 1961). First published in Annnalen der Naturphilosophie, 1921; German text with English translation by C. K. Ogden (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1922).

“Unpublished Correspondence between Russell and Wittgenstein,” ed. McGuinness, B. F. and Wright, G. H., Russell 10 (1991): 101–124.

Wittgenstein's Lectures 1932–1935, ed. Ambrose, Alice (Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 2001).Google Scholar

Anellis, Irving. “The Genesis of the Truth-Table Device,” Russell 24 (2004): 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M.An Introduction to Wittgenstein's Tractatus, 2nd ed. (New York: Harper & Row, 1959).Google Scholar

Ayer, A. J. “Bertrand Russell as a Philosopher,” in The Meaning of Life (New York: Macmillan, 1990).Google Scholar

Baker, Gordon. Wittgenstein, Frege, and the Vienna Circle (New York: Blackwell, 1988).Google Scholar

Bernays, P. “Axiomatische Untersuchungen des Aussagenkalküls der PM,” Mathematische Zeitschrift 25 (1926): 305–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, Max. A Companion to Wittgenstein's Tractatus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1964).Google Scholar

Black, Max. “The Identity of Indiscernibles,” Mind 61 (1952): 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackwell, Kenneth. “The Early Wittgenstein and the Middle Russell,” in Block, Irving, ed., Perspectives on the Philosophy of Wittgenstein (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Blackwell, Kenneth. The Spinozistic Ethics of Bertrand Russell (London: Allen & Unwin, 1985).Google Scholar

Boolos, George, and Richard, Jeffrey. Computability and Logic, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Bostock, David. Logic and Arithmetic: Natural Numbers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974), p. 10.Google Scholar

Bradley, Raymond. The Nature of All Being: A Study of Wittgenstein's Modal Atomism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Brown, George Spencer. Laws of Form (New York: Julian Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Burke, Tom. Dewey's New Logic: A Reply to Russell (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Burtt, E. A.The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Science (Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1952).Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. “The Elimination of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language,” in Ayer, A. J., ed., Logical Positivism (London: Macmillan, 1959), pp. 60–81.Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. “Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology,” Revue internationale de philosophie 4 (1950): 20–40. Reprinted in Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic, enlarged ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956), supplement.Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf.Lecture Notes: 1910–1914, ed. Reck, Erich H. and Awodey, Steve (Chicago: Open Court, 2004).Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. The Logical Structure of the World and Pseudoproblems in Philosophy, trans. R. A. George (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969). First published as Der logische Aufbau der Welt (Berlin, 1928).Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. The Logical Syntax of Language, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1956).Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. Meaning and Necessity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1947; 2nd ed., 1956).Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. “On the Character of Philosophical Problems,” Philosophy of Science 1 (1934): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. Philosophy and Logical Syntax (London: Kegan Paul, 1935).Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. “Pseudo-Problems of Philosophy,” in The Logical Structure of the World and Pseudoproblems in Philosophy, trans. R. A. George (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969). First published as Scheinprobleme der Philosophie (Berlin, 1928).Google Scholar

Carruthers, Peter. Tractarian Semantics (Oxford: Blackwell, 1989).Google Scholar

Church, Alonzo. “Comparison of Russell's Resolution of the Semantic Paradoxes with that of Tarski,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 41 (1976): 747–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Church, Alonzo. “A Note on the Entscheidungsproblem,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 1 (1936): 40–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Ronald. The Life of Bertrand Russell (New York: Knopf, 1976).Google Scholar

Cocchiarella, Nino. “The Development of the Theory of Logical Types and the Notion of a Logical Subject in Russell's Early Philosophy,” Synthese 45 (1980): 71–115. Reprinted in Logical Studies in Early Analytic Philosophy (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1987), pp. 19–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cocchiarella, Nino. “Logical Atomism and Modal Logic,” in Logical Studies in Early Analytic Philosophy (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1987), pp. 222–243.Google Scholar

Cocchiarella, Nino. “Logical Atomism, Nominalism and Modal Logic,” Philosophia, Philosophical Quarterly of Israel 4 (1974): 41–44. Reprinted in Logical Studies in Early Analytic Philosophy (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1987), pp. 244–284.Google Scholar

Cocchiarella, Nino. “Logical Necessity Based on Carnap's Criterion of Adequacy,” Korean Journal of Logic 5.2 (2002): 1–21.Google Scholar

Cocchiarella, Nino. Logical Studies in Early Analytic Philosophy (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Cocchiarella, Nino. “On the Primary and Secondary Semantics of Logical Necessity,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 4 (1975): 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cocchiarella, Nino.“Philosophical Perspectives on Quantification in Tense and Modal Logic,” in Gabbay, D. and Guenthner, F., eds., Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 2. (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1983), pp. 309–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cocchiarella, Nino.“Russell's Theory of Logical Types and the Atomistic Hierarchy of Sentences,” in Wade Savage, C. and Anderson, C. A., eds., Rereading Russell, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989), pp. 41–62. Reprinted in Logical Studies in Early Analytic Philosophy (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1987), pp. 193–221.Google Scholar

Coffa, Alberto. “Carnap's Sprachanschauung circa 1932,” Philosophy of Science Association 2 (1976): 205–241.Google Scholar

Coffa, Alberto. The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Station (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conant, James. “Elucidation and Nonsense in Frege and Early Wittgenstein,” in Carey, Alice and Read, Rupert, eds., The New Wittgenstein (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 174–217.Google Scholar

Copi, Irving. The Theory of Logical Types (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1971).Google Scholar

Copi, Irving.“Tractatus 5.542,” in Copi, Irving and Beard, Robert, eds., Essays on Wittgenstein's Tractatus (New York: Hafner Press, 1973), pp. 163–165.Google Scholar

Crabbé, Marcel. “Ramification et prédicativité,” Logique et analyse 21 (1978): 399–419.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald. “On Saying That,” Synthese 19 (1968–1969): 130–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diamond, Cora. “Does Bismark Have a Beetle in His Box? The Private Language Argument in the Tractatus,” in Carey, Alice and Read, Rupert, eds., The New Wittgenstein (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 262–292.Google Scholar

Edmonds, David, and John, Eidinson. Wittgenstein's Poker (New York: HarperCollins, 2001).Google Scholar

Engelmann, Paul. Letters from Ludwig Wittgenstein, with a Memoir (Oxford: Blackwell, 1967).Google Scholar

Favrholdt, David. An Interpretation and Critique of Wittgenstein's Tractatus (Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1965).Google Scholar

Fogelin, Robert. Wittgenstein, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1987).Google Scholar

Fogelin, Robert. “Wittgenstein's Operator N,” Analysis 42 (1982): 124–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frascolla, Pasquale. “The Early Wittgenstein's Logicism: Rejoinder to M. Wrigley,” Acta Analytica 21 (1998): 133–137.Google Scholar

Frascolla, Pasquale. “The Tractarian System of Arithmetic,” Synthese 112 (1997): 353–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frascolla, Pasquale. The Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus of Wittgenstein (Rome: Carocci, 2003).Google Scholar

Frascolla, Pasquale. Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Mathematics (London: Routledge, 1994).Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob. The Basic Laws of Arithmetic: Exposition of the System, trans. and intr. Montgomery Furth (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1964).Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob.“Concept Script,” in Heijenoort, Jean, ed., From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1967), pp. 1–82. First published as Begriffschrift: Eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens (Halle, 1879).Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob. The Foundations of Arithmetic, trans. J. L. Austin (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1980). First published as Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik: Eine Logisch-Mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl (Breslau, 1884).Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob. Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, 2 vols. (Darmstadt: Georg Olms Verlag, 1962). First published, vol. 1 (Jena, 1893), vol. 2 (Jena, 1903).Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob.“On Concept and Object,” in Geach, Peter and Black, Max, eds., Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (Oxford: Blackwell, 1977), pp. 21–41. First published as “Über Begriff und Gegenstand,” in Vierteljarsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie 14 (1892): 192–205.Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob.“On Sense and Reference,” in Geach, Peter and Black, Max, eds., Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (Oxford: Blackwell, 1977), pp. 56–78. First published as “Über Sinn und Bedeutung,” in Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100 (1892): 25–50.Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob.Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence, ed. Gabriel, Gottfried, Hermes, Hans, Kambartel, Friedrich, Thiel, Christian, Verrart, Albert, abridged from the German ed. by Brian McGuinness and trans. Hans Kaal (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Gardner, Martin. Logic Machines and Diagrams, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Geach, P. T. “Saying and Showing in Frege and Wittgenstein,” in Hintikka, J., ed., Essays in Honor of G. H. von Wight, Acta Philosophical Fennica 28 (1976).Google Scholar

Geach, P. T.“Wittgenstein's Operator N,” Analysis 41 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giaretta, Pierdaniele. “Analysis and Logical Form in Russell: The 1913 Paradigm,” Dialectica 51 (2997): 273–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gödel, Kurt. “Russell's Mathematical Logic,” in Schilpp, Paul A., ed., The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, vol. 1 (Evanston, Ill.: Harper Torchbooks, 1963).Google Scholar

Goldfarb, Warren. “Russell's Reasons for Ramification,” in Savage, C. Wade and Anderson, C. Anthony, eds., Rereading Russell, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989), pp. 24–40.Google Scholar

Grattan-Guinness, Ivor. Dear Russell – Dear Jourdain (London: Duckworth, 1977).Google Scholar

Grayling, A. C.Wittgenstein: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, James. Wittgenstein's Logical Atomism (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1969). First published Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Griffin, Nicholas. “Russell and Wittgenstein on the Logical Form of Belief Statements,” in Harré, R. and Shosky, J., eds., Russell–Wittgenstein: Logical Form and the Project of Philosophy (Prague: Filosofia, 2006), pp. 69–103.Google Scholar

Griffin, Nicholas. “Russell on the Nature of Logic,” Synthese 45 (1980): 117–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, Nicholas. “Russell's Multiple-Relation Theory of Judgment,” Philosophical Studies 47 (1985): 213–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S.Insight and Illusion (New York: Oxford University Press, 1972).Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S.“Was He Trying to Whistle It?” in Cary, Alice and Read, Rupert, eds., The New Wittgenstein (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 353–388.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S.Wittgenstein's Place in Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996).Google Scholar

Harré, R., and Shosky, J., eds. Russell–Wittgenstein: Logical Form and the Project of Philosophy (Prague: Filosofia, 2006).Google Scholar

Hatcher, William. The Logical Foundations of Mathematics (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Hazen, A. P. “A Constructive Proper Extension of Ramified Type Theory (The Logic of Principia Mathematica, Second Edition, Appendix B),” in Link, Godehard, ed., One Hundred Years of Russell's Paradox (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2004), pp. 449–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hazen, A. P., and Davoren, J. M. “Russell's 1925 Logic,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (2000): 534–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hellman, Geoffrey. “How to Gödel a Frege-Russell: Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem and Logicism,” Noûs 15 (1981): 451–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hempel, Carl. “The Empiricist Criterion of Meaning,” in Ayer, A. J., ed., Logical Positivism (Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 1959), pp. 109–129. First published in Revue internationale de philosophie 11 (1950): 41–63.Google Scholar

Hertz, Heinrich. The Principles of Mechanics (New York: Dover, 1956).Google Scholar

Hintikka, Jaakko. “Identity, Variables, and Impredicative Definitions,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 21 (1956): 225–245.Google Scholar

Hintikka, Merrill B., and Hintikka, Jaakko. Investigating Wittgenstein (Oxford: Blackwell, 1986).Google Scholar

Hochberg, Herbert. “Propositions, Truth, and Belief: The Wittgenstein–Russell Debate,” Theoria 66 (2000): 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hochberg, Herbert.“The Role of Subsistent Propositions and Logical Forms in Russell's 1913 Philosophical Logic and in the Russell–Wittgenstein Dispute,” in Angelelli, Ignacio and Cerezo, Maria, eds., Studies on the History of Logic: Proceedings of the III Symposium on the History of Logic (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1996), pp. 317–341.Google Scholar

Huntington, Edward. “Sets of Independent Postulates for the Algebra of Logic,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 5 (1904): 288–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hylton, Peter. Russell, Idealism and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

James, William. “Does Consciousness Exist?” Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods 1 (1904): 477–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janik, Alan. “Weininger and the Two Wittgensteins,” in Stern, D. and Szabados, B., eds., Wittgenstein Reads Weininger (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 62–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenny, Anthony. Wittgenstein (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1973).Google Scholar

Kenny, Anthony, ed. The Oxford Illustrated History of Western Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar

Lampert, Timm. Wittgensteins Physikalismus: Die Sinnesdatenanalyse des Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus in ihrem historischen Kontext (Paderborn: Mentis, 2000).Google Scholar

Landini, Gregory. “The Definability of the Set of Natural Numbers in the 1925 Principia Mathematica,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (1996): 597–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landini, Gregory. “Fregean Cardinals as Concept-Correlates,” Erkentniss 65 (2006): 207–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landini, Gregory. “New Evidence Concerning Russell's Substitutional Theory,” Russell 9 (1989): 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landini, Gregory.“On ‘Insolubilia’ and Their Solution by Russell's Substitutional Theory,” in Link, Godehard, ed., One Hundred Years of Russell's Paradox (New York: De Gruyter, 2004), pp. 373–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landini, Gregory. “Quantification Theory in ∗8 of Principia Mathematica and the Empty Domain,” History and Philosophy of Logic 25 (2005): 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landini, Gregory. “Quantification Theory in ∗9 of Principia Mathematica,” History and Philosophy of Logic 21 (2000): 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landini, Gregory. Russell's Hidden Substitutional Theory (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).

Landini, Gregory.“Russell's Separation of the Logical and Semantic Paradoxes,” in Philippe de Rouilhan, ed., Russell en héritage, Revue internationale de philosophie 3 (2004): 257–294.

Landini, Gregory, and Foster, Thomas. “The Persistence of Counterexample: Re-examining the Debate Over Leibniz' Law,” Noûs 25 (1991): 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laudan, Larry. Progress and Its Problems (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Lewis, C. I.A Survey of Symbolic Logic (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1918).Google Scholar

Lewis, C. I.Mind and World Order (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1929).Google Scholar

Lewy, Casimir. “A Note on the Text of the Tractatus,” Mind 76 (1967): 416–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linsky, Bernard. “Why Russell Abandoned Russellian Propositions,” in Irvine, A. D. and Wedeking, G. A., eds., Russell and Analytic Philosophy (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1993), pp. 193–209.Google Scholar

Lowe, Victor. Alfred North Whitehead: The Man and His Work (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Marion, Mathieu. Wittgenstein, Finitism, and the Foundations of Mathematics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Mays, Wolfe. “Recollections of Wittgenstein,” in Fann, K. T., ed., Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Man and His Philosophy (New Jersey, 1967).Google Scholar

McDonough, Richard. The Argument of the Tractatus (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1986).Google Scholar

McKay, Thomas. “Essentialism and Quantified Modal Logic,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 4 (1975): 423–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGuinness, Brian. Approaches to Wittgenstein: Collected Papers of Brian McGuinness (London: Routledge, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGuinness, Brian“The Grundgedanke of the Tractatus,” in Vesey, G., ed., Understanding Wittgenstein (London: Macmillan, 1974).Google Scholar

McGuinness, Brian. “Pictures and Form,” in Approaches to Wittgenstein: Collected Papers of Brian McGuinness (London: Routledge, 2002), pp. 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGuinness, Brian. Wittgenstein: A Life (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Monk, Ray. Bertrand Russell: The Ghost of Madness 1921–1970 (New York: The Free Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Monk, Ray. Bertrand Russell: The Spirit of Solitude 1872–1921 (New York: The Free Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Monk, Ray. Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius (New York: The Free Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Moore, G. E. “External and Internal Relations,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 21 (1919): 40–62.Google Scholar

Morrell, Ottoline. Ottoline at Garsington: Memoirs of Lady Ottoline Morrell, 1915–1918, ed. Gathorne-Hardy, Robert (London: Faber & Faber, 1974).Google Scholar

Müller, Eugen. Abriss der Algebra der Logik; in Schröder, E., ed., Algebra der Logik, vol. 3 (New York: Chelsea Publishing Co., 1966), pp. 652–808.Google Scholar

Myhill, John. “The Undefinability of the Set of Natural Numbers in the Ramified Principia,” in Nakhnikian, George, ed., Bertrand Russell's Philosophy (New York: Barnes & Noble, 1974), pp. 19–27.Google Scholar

Nicod, Jean. “A Reduction in the Number of the Primitive Propositions of Logic,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 19 (1917): 32–41.Google Scholar

Noonan, Harold. Frege (Oxford: Polity, 2001).Google Scholar

Norton, Bryan. Linguistic Frameworks and Ontology: A Reexamination of Carnap's Metaphilosophy (The Hague: Mouton, 1977).Google Scholar

Parsons, Terence. “Essentialism and Quantified Modal Logic,” Philosophical Review 78 (1969): 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pears, David. The False Prison, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. “Qualitative Logic,” in The Writings of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 5, 1884–1886, ed. Kloesel, Christian (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993). First published 1886.Google Scholar

Pinsent, David. A Portrait of Wittgenstein as a Young Man, ed. Wright, G. H. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990).Google Scholar

Poincaré, Henri. “Les mathématiques et la logistique,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 13 (1905): 813–835; 14 (1906): 17–34, 294–317.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl. “Philosophy of Science: A Personal Report,” in Mace, C. A., ed., British Philosophy in the Mid-century: A Cambridge Symposium (London: Allen & Unwin, 1957), pp. 163–164.Google Scholar

Post, Emil. “Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions,” Ph.D. diss., Columbia University, 1920.

Post, Emil. “Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions,” American Journal of Mathematics 43 (1921): 163–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Potter, Michael. Reason's Nearest Kin: Philosophies of Mathematics from Kant to Carnap (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. “Carnap's Views on Ontology,” in The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1976), pp. 203–211.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O.Mathematical Logic (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1940).Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O.“On Derivability,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 2. 3 (1937): 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quine, W. V. O.“Ontological Relativity,” in Ontological Relativity and Other Essays (New York: Columbia University Press, 1969), pp. 26–68.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O.“Russell's Ontological Development,” Journal of Philosophy 63 (1941): 657–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quine, W. V. O.Set Theory and Its Logic (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Ramsey, Frank. Critical Notice of the Tractatus, Mind 32 (1923): 465–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramsey, Frank.“Facts and Propositions,” in The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays by Frank Plumpton Ramsey, ed. Braithwaite, R. B. (New York: Harcourt Brace & Co., 1931), pp. 138–155.Google Scholar

Ramsey, Frank.“The Foundations of Mathematics,” in The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays by Frank Plumpton Ramsey, ed. Braithwaite, R. B. (New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1931), pp. 1–61. First published in Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 25 (1925): 338–384.Google Scholar

Ramsey, Frank.“General Propositions and Causality,” in The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays by Frank Plumpton Ramsey, ed. Braithwaite, R. B. (New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1931), pp. 237–255.Google Scholar

Ramsey, Frank.Letter to Moore of 6 February 1924, in Rothhaupt, Josef, ed., Farbthemen in Wittgensteins Gesamtnachlass: Philologisch-philosophische Untersuchungen im Längschnitt und Querschnitten, Monografien Philosophie 273 (Weinheim: Beltz, 1966).Google Scholar

Ramsey, Frank.“Mathematical Logic,” in The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays by Frank Plumpton Ramsey, ed. Braithwaite, R. B. (New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1931), pp. 62–81.Google Scholar

Ramsey, Frank.Notes on Philosophy, Probability and Mathematics, ed. Galavotti, Maria Carla (Naples: Bibliopolis, 1991).Google Scholar

Ramsey, Frank.“On a Problem of Formal Logic,” in The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays by Frank Plumpton Ramsey, ed. Braithwaite, R. B. (New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1931), pp. 82–111.Google Scholar

Ramsey, Frank.“Philosophy,” in The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays by Frank Plumpton Ramsey, ed. Braithwaite, R. B. (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co., 1931), pp. 263–269.Google Scholar

Ramsey, Frank. Review of the 2nd ed. of Principia Mathematica, Nature 116 (1925): 127–128.Google Scholar

Rescher, Nicholas. “Russell's Modal Logic,” in Roberts, George, ed., Bertrand Russell Memorial Volume (London: Allen & Unwin, 1979), pp. 139–149.Google Scholar

Ricketts, Thomas. “Wittgenstein Against Frege and Russell,” in Reck, Erich, ed., From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 217–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothaupt, Josef, ed. Farbthemen Wittgensteins Gesamtnachlass: Philologisch-philosophische Untersuchungen im Längschnitt und Querschnitten, Monografien Philosophie 273 (Weinheim: Beltz, 1966).Google Scholar

Philippe, Rouilhan. Russell et le cercle des paradoxes (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1996).Google Scholar

Sackur, Jérôme. Formes et faits (Paris: J. Vrin, 2005).Google Scholar

Salmon, Wesley C., ed. Zeno's Paradoxes (New York: Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1977).Google Scholar

Savage, C. Wade, and Anderson, C. A.Rereading Russell, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Scharle, Thomas. “Axiomatization of Propositional Calculus with Sheffer Functors,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 6 (1965): 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schilpp, Paul A.The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, vol. 1 (Evanston, Ill.: Harper Torchbooks, 1963).Google Scholar

Schröder, Ernst. Algebra der Logik, vol. 3 (New York: Chelsea Publishing Co., 1966).Google Scholar

Schütte, K.Beweistheorie (Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1960).Google Scholar

Sheffer, H. “A Set of Five Independent Postulates for Boolean Algebras, with Application to Logical Constants,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 14 (1913): 481–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shosky, John. “Russell's Use of Truth-Tables,” Russell 17 (1997): 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, David. “The Methods of the Tractatus: Beyond Positivism and Metaphysics?” Parrini, Paolo, Salmon, Wes, and Salmon, Merrilee, eds., Logical Empiricism: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Stern, David. Wittgenstein on Mind and Language (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stout, G. F. “The Object of Thought and Real Being,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 11 (1911): 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sullivan, Peter. “Wittgenstein on ‘The Foundations of Mathematics,’ June 1927,” Theoria 61 (1995): 105–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tully, Robert. “Russell's Neutral Monism,” in Griffin, Nicholas, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Bertrand Russell (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 332–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tully, Robert. “Three Studies of Russell's Neutral Monism,” Russell 13 (1993): 5–35.Google Scholar

Heijenoort, Jean. “Logic as Calculus and Logic as Language,” Synthese 17 (1967): 324–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Venn, John. “On the Diagrammatic and Mechanical Representation of Propositions and Reasonings,” Philosophical Magazine 10 (July 1880): 1–15.Google Scholar

Vesey, G.Understanding Wittgenstein (London: Macmillan, 1974).Google Scholar

Wright, G. H.Wittgenstein (Oxford: Blackwell, 1982).Google Scholar

Wahl, Russell. “Impossible Propositions and the Forms of Objects in Wittgenstein's Tractatus,” Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1995): 190–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waismann, Friedrich. Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle, ed. McGuinness, Brian, trans. Joachim Schulte and Brian McGuinness (Oxford: Blackwell, 1979).Google Scholar

Wang, Hao. A Survey of Mathematical Logic (Peking: Science Press, 1962).Google Scholar

Wehmeier, Kai. “Wittgenstein's Predicate Logic,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 45 (2004): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Westfall, Richard. The Construction of Modern Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Whitehead, A. N.An Introduction to Mathematics (London: Williams & Norgate, 1911).Google Scholar

Whitehead, A. N.“Indication, Class, Number, Validation,” Mind 43 (1934): 281–297; “Corrigenda,” Mind 43 (1934): 543. Reprinted in A. N. Whitehead, Essays in Science and Philosophy (New York: Philosophical Library, 1948), pp. 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitehead, A. N., and Russell, Bertrand. Principia Mathematica, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1925, 1957).Google Scholar

Whitehead, A. N., and Russell, Bertrand. Principia Mathematica to ∗56, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1964).Google Scholar

Wrigley, Michael. “A Note on Arithmetic and Logic in the Tractatus,” Acta Analytica 21 (1998): 129–131.Google Scholar

The Analysis of Matter (London: Kegan Paul, 1927).

The Analysis of Mind (London: Allen & Unwin, 1921).

The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell, 3 vols., vol. 1, 1872–1914 (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1967); vol. 2, 1914–1944 (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1968); vol. 3, 1944–1967 (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1969).

Bertrand Russell on God and Religion, ed. Seckel, A. (New York: Prometheus Books, 1987).Google Scholar

The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 4, Foundations of Logic 1903–1905, ed. Urquhart, Alasdair (London: Routledge, 1994).Google Scholar

The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 6, Logic and Philosophy Papers 1901–1913, ed. Slater, John G. (London: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar

The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 7, Theory of Knowledge: The 1913 Manuscript, ed. Ramsden Eames, Elizabeth in collaboration with Blackwell, Kenneth (London: Allen & Unwin, 1984).Google Scholar

The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 8, The Philosophy of Logical Atomism and Other Essays 1914–1919, ed. Slater, John G. (London: Allen & Unwin, 1986).Google Scholar

The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 9, Essays on Language, Mind and Matter 1919–1926, ed. Slater, John G. (London: Unwin Hyman, 1988).Google Scholar

The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 10, A Fresh Look at Empiricism 1927–1942, ed. Slater, John G. (London: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar

The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, vol. 12, ed. Rempel, Richard, Brink, Andres, and Moran, Margaret (London: Allen & Unwin, 1985).Google Scholar

Essays in Analysis, ed. Lackey, D. (London: Allen & Unwin, 1973).Google Scholar

“The Essence of Religion,” in Collected Papers, vol. 12, pp. 112–122. First published in The Hibbert Journal 2 (1912): 46–62.

“A Free Man's Worship,” in Mysticism and Logic, pp. 40–47. First published in The Independent Review (December 1903).

A History of Western Philosophy (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1945).

Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1948).

The Impact of Science on Society (London: Allen & Unwin, 1952).

An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth (London: Allen & Unwin, 1940, 1966).

Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy (London: Allen & Unwin, 1919, 1953).

“Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description,” in Mysticism and Logic, pp. 152–168. First published in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (1910–1911): 108–128. Reprinted in Collected Papers, vol. 6, pp. 147–161.

“Letter of 13 August 1919,” Russell 10. 2 (1990): 101–124.

“Letter to the Editor of the Athenaeum,” in Collected Papers, vol. 8, p. 87. First published in The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 12 (1915): 391–392.

“Logical Atomism,” in Logic and Knowledge, pp. 323–343. First published in Contemporary British Philosophy: Personal Statements (London: Allen & Unwin, 1924), pp. 356–383. Reprinted in Collected Papers, vol. 9, pp. 160–180.

Logic and Knowledge: Essays by Bertrand Russell 1901–1950, ed. Marsh, Robert C. (London: Allen & Unwin, 1977).Google Scholar

“Mathematical Logic as Based on the Theory of Types,” in Logic and Knowledge, pp. 59–102. First published in The American Journal of Mathematics 30 (1908): 222–262.CrossRef

My Philosophical Development (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1959).

“Mysticism and Logic,” in Mysticism and Logic, pp. 9–30. First published in The Hibbert Journal 12 (1914): 780–803.

Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays (Totowa, N.J.: Barnes & Noble, 1976). First published 1917.

“Necessity and Possibility,” in Collected Papers, vol. 4, pp. 507–520.

“On Denoting,” in Essays in Analysis, pp. 103–19. First published in Mind 14 (1905): 479–493.

“On Fundamentals,” in Collected Papers, vol. 4, pp. 359–413.

“On ‘Insolubilia’ and Their Solution by Symbolic Logic,” in Essays in Analysis, pp. 190–214. First published as “Les paradoxes de la logique,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 14 (1906): 627–650.

“On Propositions: What They Are and How They Mean,” in Logic and Knowledge, pp. 283–320. First published in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol. 2 (1919): 1–43. Reprinted in Collected Papers, vol. 8, pp. 276–306.

“On the Logic of Relations,” in Logic and Knowledge, pp. 3–38. First published as “Sur la logique des relations,” Rivista di mathematica 7 (1901): 115–148.

“On the Nature of Acquaintance,” in Logic and Knowledge, pp. 127–174.

“On the Nature of Truth,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 7 (1907): 28–49.CrossRef

“On the Nature of Truth and Falsehood,” in Philosophical Essays (London: Longmans, 1910), ch. 7, pp. 147–159.

“On the Notion of Cause,” in Mysticism and Logic, pp. 132–151. First published in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 13 (1912): 1–26.

“On the Relation of Mathematics to Logic,” in Essays in Analysis, pp. 260–271. First published as “Sur la relation des mathématiques à la logistique,” in Revue de métaphysique et de morale 13 (1905): 906–17.

“On the Relation of Sense-Data to Physics,” in Mysticism and Logic, pp. 108–131. First published in Scientia 4 (1914). Reprinted in Collected Papers, vol. 8, pp. 3–26.

“On the Relations of Universals and Particulars,” in Logic and Knowledge, pp. 103–124.

“On Scientific Method in Philosophy”, in Mysticism and Logic, pp. 75–93. Originally given as the Herbert Spencer Lecture 1914 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1914). Reprinted in Collected Papers, vol. 8, pp. 55–73.

“On Some Difficulties in the Theory of Transfinite Numbers and Order Types,” in Essays in Analysis, pp. 135–64. First published in Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 4 (March 1906): 29–53.

“On the Substitutional Theory of Classes and Relations,” in Essays in Analysis, pp. 165–189. Manuscript received by the London Mathematical Society on 24 April 1905.

Our Knowledge of the External World, 2nd ed. with new Preface and revisions (London: Allen & Unwin, 1926). First published by Open Court, 1914.

Philosophical Essays (London: Longman, 1910).

Philosophy (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1927).

“Philosophy in the Twentieth-Century” (1924), in Collected Papers, vol. 8, pp. 450–466.

“The Philosophy of Logical Atomism,” in Logic and Knowledge, pp. 175–281. First published in The Monist 28 (1918): 495–527; 29 (Jan., Apr., July 1919): 32–63, 190–222, 345–380. Reprinted in Collected Papers, vol. 8, pp. 155–244.

Power: A New Social Analysis (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1938).

Principia Mathematica (coauthored with Whitehead, A. N), 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1925, 1957); 1st ed., vol. 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1910), vol. 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1911), vol. 3 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1913).Google Scholar

Principia Mathematica to ∗56 (coauthored with Whitehead, A. N.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1964).Google Scholar

The Principles of Mathematics, 2nd ed. (London: Allen & Unwin, 1937; 1st ed. London: Allen & Unwin, 1903).

The Problems of Philosophy (London: Oxford University Press, 1912).

The Selected Letters of Bertrand Russell, ed. Griffin, Nicholas (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1992), p. 469.Google Scholar

“Truth-Functions and Meaning-Functions” (1923), in Collected Papers, vol. 9, pp. 156–158.

“What is Meant by ‘A believes p’?” (1923), in Collected Papers, vol. 9, p. 159.

Cambridge Letters, ed. McGuinness, Brian and Wright, G. H. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1995).Google Scholar

“Extracts from Letters to Russell, 1919–1920,” Appendix III of Notebooks 1914–1916, 2nd ed.

Letters from Ludwig Wittgenstein, with a Memoir, by Englemann, Paul (Oxford: Blackwell, 1967).Google Scholar

Letters to C. K. Ogden, with an Appendix of Letters by Frank Plumpton Ramsey, ed. Wright, G. H. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1973).Google Scholar

Letters to Russell, Keynes and Moore, ed. Wright, G. H. with the assistance of McGuinness, B. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1974).Google Scholar

Notebooks 1914–1916, ed. Wright, G. H. and Anscombe, G. E. M., trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, 2nd ed. with new version of “Notes on Logic” (Oxford: Blackwell, 1979). 1st ed. 1961.Google Scholar

“Notes Dictated to G. E. Moore in Norway,” Appendix II of Notebooks 1914–1916.

“Notes on Logic,” Appendix I of Notebooks 1914–1916, 2nd ed. (An earlier version was published in Journal of Philosophy (1957) and reprinted in the 1st ed. of Notebooks 1914–1916.)

Prototractatus, ed. McGuinness, B. F., Nyberg, T., and Wright, G. H., trans. B. F. McGuinness and D. F. Pears (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1971).Google Scholar

“Some Remarks on Logical Form,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol. 9 (1929): 62–79.

Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, German text with English translation by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness (London: Routledge, 1961). First published in Annnalen der Naturphilosophie, 1921; German text with English translation by C. K. Ogden (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1922).

“Unpublished Correspondence between Russell and Wittgenstein,” ed. McGuinness, B. F. and Wright, G. H., Russell 10 (1991): 101–124.

Wittgenstein's Lectures 1932–1935, ed. Ambrose, Alice (Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 2001).Google Scholar

Anellis, Irving. “The Genesis of the Truth-Table Device,” Russell 24 (2004): 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M.An Introduction to Wittgenstein's Tractatus, 2nd ed. (New York: Harper & Row, 1959).Google Scholar

Ayer, A. J. “Bertrand Russell as a Philosopher,” in The Meaning of Life (New York: Macmillan, 1990).Google Scholar

Baker, Gordon. Wittgenstein, Frege, and the Vienna Circle (New York: Blackwell, 1988).Google Scholar

Bernays, P. “Axiomatische Untersuchungen des Aussagenkalküls der PM,” Mathematische Zeitschrift 25 (1926): 305–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, Max. A Companion to Wittgenstein's Tractatus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1964).Google Scholar

Black, Max. “The Identity of Indiscernibles,” Mind 61 (1952): 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackwell, Kenneth. “The Early Wittgenstein and the Middle Russell,” in Block, Irving, ed., Perspectives on the Philosophy of Wittgenstein (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Blackwell, Kenneth. The Spinozistic Ethics of Bertrand Russell (London: Allen & Unwin, 1985).Google Scholar

Boolos, George, and Richard, Jeffrey. Computability and Logic, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Bostock, David. Logic and Arithmetic: Natural Numbers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974), p. 10.Google Scholar

Bradley, Raymond. The Nature of All Being: A Study of Wittgenstein's Modal Atomism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Brown, George Spencer. Laws of Form (New York: Julian Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Burke, Tom. Dewey's New Logic: A Reply to Russell (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Burtt, E. A.The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Science (Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1952).Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. “The Elimination of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language,” in Ayer, A. J., ed., Logical Positivism (London: Macmillan, 1959), pp. 60–81.Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. “Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology,” Revue internationale de philosophie 4 (1950): 20–40. Reprinted in Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic, enlarged ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956), supplement.Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf.Lecture Notes: 1910–1914, ed. Reck, Erich H. and Awodey, Steve (Chicago: Open Court, 2004).Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. The Logical Structure of the World and Pseudoproblems in Philosophy, trans. R. A. George (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969). First published as Der logische Aufbau der Welt (Berlin, 1928).Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. The Logical Syntax of Language, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1956).Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. Meaning and Necessity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1947; 2nd ed., 1956).Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. “On the Character of Philosophical Problems,” Philosophy of Science 1 (1934): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. Philosophy and Logical Syntax (London: Kegan Paul, 1935).Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. “Pseudo-Problems of Philosophy,” in The Logical Structure of the World and Pseudoproblems in Philosophy, trans. R. A. George (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969). First published as Scheinprobleme der Philosophie (Berlin, 1928).Google Scholar

Carruthers, Peter. Tractarian Semantics (Oxford: Blackwell, 1989).Google Scholar

Church, Alonzo. “Comparison of Russell's Resolution of the Semantic Paradoxes with that of Tarski,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 41 (1976): 747–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Church, Alonzo. “A Note on the Entscheidungsproblem,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 1 (1936): 40–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Ronald. The Life of Bertrand Russell (New York: Knopf, 1976).Google Scholar

Cocchiarella, Nino. “The Development of the Theory of Logical Types and the Notion of a Logical Subject in Russell's Early Philosophy,” Synthese 45 (1980): 71–115. Reprinted in Logical Studies in Early Analytic Philosophy (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1987), pp. 19–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cocchiarella, Nino. “Logical Atomism and Modal Logic,” in Logical Studies in Early Analytic Philosophy (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1987), pp. 222–243.Google Scholar

Cocchiarella, Nino. “Logical Atomism, Nominalism and Modal Logic,” Philosophia, Philosophical Quarterly of Israel 4 (1974): 41–44. Reprinted in Logical Studies in Early Analytic Philosophy (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1987), pp. 244–284.Google Scholar

Cocchiarella, Nino. “Logical Necessity Based on Carnap's Criterion of Adequacy,” Korean Journal of Logic 5.2 (2002): 1–21.Google Scholar

Cocchiarella, Nino. Logical Studies in Early Analytic Philosophy (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Cocchiarella, Nino. “On the Primary and Secondary Semantics of Logical Necessity,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 4 (1975): 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cocchiarella, Nino.“Philosophical Perspectives on Quantification in Tense and Modal Logic,” in Gabbay, D. and Guenthner, F., eds., Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 2. (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1983), pp. 309–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cocchiarella, Nino.“Russell's Theory of Logical Types and the Atomistic Hierarchy of Sentences,” in Wade Savage, C. and Anderson, C. A., eds., Rereading Russell, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989), pp. 41–62. Reprinted in Logical Studies in Early Analytic Philosophy (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1987), pp. 193–221.Google Scholar

Coffa, Alberto. “Carnap's Sprachanschauung circa 1932,” Philosophy of Science Association 2 (1976): 205–241.Google Scholar

Coffa, Alberto. The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Station (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conant, James. “Elucidation and Nonsense in Frege and Early Wittgenstein,” in Carey, Alice and Read, Rupert, eds., The New Wittgenstein (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 174–217.Google Scholar

Copi, Irving. The Theory of Logical Types (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1971).Google Scholar

Copi, Irving.“Tractatus 5.542,” in Copi, Irving and Beard, Robert, eds., Essays on Wittgenstein's Tractatus (New York: Hafner Press, 1973), pp. 163–165.Google Scholar

Crabbé, Marcel. “Ramification et prédicativité,” Logique et analyse 21 (1978): 399–419.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald. “On Saying That,” Synthese 19 (1968–1969): 130–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diamond, Cora. “Does Bismark Have a Beetle in His Box? The Private Language Argument in the Tractatus,” in Carey, Alice and Read, Rupert, eds., The New Wittgenstein (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 262–292.Google Scholar

Edmonds, David, and John, Eidinson. Wittgenstein's Poker (New York: HarperCollins, 2001).Google Scholar

Engelmann, Paul. Letters from Ludwig Wittgenstein, with a Memoir (Oxford: Blackwell, 1967).Google Scholar

Favrholdt, David. An Interpretation and Critique of Wittgenstein's Tractatus (Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1965).Google Scholar

Fogelin, Robert. Wittgenstein, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1987).Google Scholar

Fogelin, Robert. “Wittgenstein's Operator N,” Analysis 42 (1982): 124–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frascolla, Pasquale. “The Early Wittgenstein's Logicism: Rejoinder to M. Wrigley,” Acta Analytica 21 (1998): 133–137.Google Scholar

Frascolla, Pasquale. “The Tractarian System of Arithmetic,” Synthese 112 (1997): 353–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frascolla, Pasquale. The Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus of Wittgenstein (Rome: Carocci, 2003).Google Scholar

Frascolla, Pasquale. Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Mathematics (London: Routledge, 1994).Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob. The Basic Laws of Arithmetic: Exposition of the System, trans. and intr. Montgomery Furth (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1964).Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob.“Concept Script,” in Heijenoort, Jean, ed., From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1967), pp. 1–82. First published as Begriffschrift: Eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens (Halle, 1879).Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob. The Foundations of Arithmetic, trans. J. L. Austin (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1980). First published as Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik: Eine Logisch-Mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl (Breslau, 1884).Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob. Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, 2 vols. (Darmstadt: Georg Olms Verlag, 1962). First published, vol. 1 (Jena, 1893), vol. 2 (Jena, 1903).Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob.“On Concept and Object,” in Geach, Peter and Black, Max, eds., Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (Oxford: Blackwell, 1977), pp. 21–41. First published as “Über Begriff und Gegenstand,” in Vierteljarsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie 14 (1892): 192–205.Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob.“On Sense and Reference,” in Geach, Peter and Black, Max, eds., Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (Oxford: Blackwell, 1977), pp. 56–78. First published as “Über Sinn und Bedeutung,” in Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100 (1892): 25–50.Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob.Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence, ed. Gabriel, Gottfried, Hermes, Hans, Kambartel, Friedrich, Thiel, Christian, Verrart, Albert, abridged from the German ed. by Brian McGuinness and trans. Hans Kaal (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Gardner, Martin. Logic Machines and Diagrams, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Geach, P. T. “Saying and Showing in Frege and Wittgenstein,” in Hintikka, J., ed., Essays in Honor of G. H. von Wight, Acta Philosophical Fennica 28 (1976).Google Scholar

Geach, P. T.“Wittgenstein's Operator N,” Analysis 41 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giaretta, Pierdaniele. “Analysis and Logical Form in Russell: The 1913 Paradigm,” Dialectica 51 (2997): 273–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gödel, Kurt. “Russell's Mathematical Logic,” in Schilpp, Paul A., ed., The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, vol. 1 (Evanston, Ill.: Harper Torchbooks, 1963).Google Scholar

Goldfarb, Warren. “Russell's Reasons for Ramification,” in Savage, C. Wade and Anderson, C. Anthony, eds., Rereading Russell, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989), pp. 24–40.Google Scholar

Grattan-Guinness, Ivor. Dear Russell – Dear Jourdain (London: Duckworth, 1977).Google Scholar

Grayling, A. C.Wittgenstein: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, James. Wittgenstein's Logical Atomism (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1969). First published Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Griffin, Nicholas. “Russell and Wittgenstein on the Logical Form of Belief Statements,” in Harré, R. and Shosky, J., eds., Russell–Wittgenstein: Logical Form and the Project of Philosophy (Prague: Filosofia, 2006), pp. 69–103.Google Scholar

Griffin, Nicholas. “Russell on the Nature of Logic,” Synthese 45 (1980): 117–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, Nicholas. “Russell's Multiple-Relation Theory of Judgment,” Philosophical Studies 47 (1985): 213–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S.Insight and Illusion (New York: Oxford University Press, 1972).Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S.“Was He Trying to Whistle It?” in Cary, Alice and Read, Rupert, eds., The New Wittgenstein (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 353–388.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S.Wittgenstein's Place in Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996).Google Scholar

Harré, R., and Shosky, J., eds. Russell–Wittgenstein: Logical Form and the Project of Philosophy (Prague: Filosofia, 2006).Google Scholar

Hatcher, William. The Logical Foundations of Mathematics (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Hazen, A. P. “A Constructive Proper Extension of Ramified Type Theory (The Logic of Principia Mathematica, Second Edition, Appendix B),” in Link, Godehard, ed., One Hundred Years of Russell's Paradox (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2004), pp. 449–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hazen, A. P., and Davoren, J. M. “Russell's 1925 Logic,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (2000): 534–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hellman, Geoffrey. “How to Gödel a Frege-Russell: Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem and Logicism,” Noûs 15 (1981): 451–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hempel, Carl. “The Empiricist Criterion of Meaning,” in Ayer, A. J., ed., Logical Positivism (Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 1959), pp. 109–129. First published in Revue internationale de philosophie 11 (1950): 41–63.Google Scholar

Hertz, Heinrich. The Principles of Mechanics (New York: Dover, 1956).Google Scholar

Hintikka, Jaakko. “Identity, Variables, and Impredicative Definitions,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 21 (1956): 225–245.Google Scholar

Hintikka, Merrill B., and Hintikka, Jaakko. Investigating Wittgenstein (Oxford: Blackwell, 1986).Google Scholar

Hochberg, Herbert. “Propositions, Truth, and Belief: The Wittgenstein–Russell Debate,” Theoria 66 (2000): 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hochberg, Herbert.“The Role of Subsistent Propositions and Logical Forms in Russell's 1913 Philosophical Logic and in the Russell–Wittgenstein Dispute,” in Angelelli, Ignacio and Cerezo, Maria, eds., Studies on the History of Logic: Proceedings of the III Symposium on the History of Logic (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1996), pp. 317–341.Google Scholar

Huntington, Edward. “Sets of Independent Postulates for the Algebra of Logic,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 5 (1904): 288–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hylton, Peter. Russell, Idealism and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

James, William. “Does Consciousness Exist?” Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods 1 (1904): 477–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janik, Alan. “Weininger and the Two Wittgensteins,” in Stern, D. and Szabados, B., eds., Wittgenstein Reads Weininger (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 62–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenny, Anthony. Wittgenstein (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1973).Google Scholar

Kenny, Anthony, ed. The Oxford Illustrated History of Western Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar

Lampert, Timm. Wittgensteins Physikalismus: Die Sinnesdatenanalyse des Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus in ihrem historischen Kontext (Paderborn: Mentis, 2000).Google Scholar

Landini, Gregory. “The Definability of the Set of Natural Numbers in the 1925 Principia Mathematica,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (1996): 597–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landini, Gregory. “Fregean Cardinals as Concept-Correlates,” Erkentniss 65 (2006): 207–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landini, Gregory. “New Evidence Concerning Russell's Substitutional Theory,” Russell 9 (1989): 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landini, Gregory.“On ‘Insolubilia’ and Their Solution by Russell's Substitutional Theory,” in Link, Godehard, ed., One Hundred Years of Russell's Paradox (New York: De Gruyter, 2004), pp. 373–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landini, Gregory. “Quantification Theory in ∗8 of Principia Mathematica and the Empty Domain,” History and Philosophy of Logic 25 (2005): 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landini, Gregory. “Quantification Theory in ∗9 of Principia Mathematica,” History and Philosophy of Logic 21 (2000): 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landini, Gregory. Russell's Hidden Substitutional Theory (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).

Landini, Gregory.“Russell's Separation of the Logical and Semantic Paradoxes,” in Philippe de Rouilhan, ed., Russell en héritage, Revue internationale de philosophie 3 (2004): 257–294.

Landini, Gregory, and Foster, Thomas. “The Persistence of Counterexample: Re-examining the Debate Over Leibniz' Law,” Noûs 25 (1991): 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laudan, Larry. Progress and Its Problems (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Lewis, C. I.A Survey of Symbolic Logic (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1918).Google Scholar

Lewis, C. I.Mind and World Order (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1929).Google Scholar

Lewy, Casimir. “A Note on the Text of the Tractatus,” Mind 76 (1967): 416–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linsky, Bernard. “Why Russell Abandoned Russellian Propositions,” in Irvine, A. D. and Wedeking, G. A., eds., Russell and Analytic Philosophy (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1993), pp. 193–209.Google Scholar

Lowe, Victor. Alfred North Whitehead: The Man and His Work (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Marion, Mathieu. Wittgenstein, Finitism, and the Foundations of Mathematics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Mays, Wolfe. “Recollections of Wittgenstein,” in Fann, K. T., ed., Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Man and His Philosophy (New Jersey, 1967).Google Scholar

McDonough, Richard. The Argument of the Tractatus (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1986).Google Scholar

McKay, Thomas. “Essentialism and Quantified Modal Logic,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 4 (1975): 423–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGuinness, Brian. Approaches to Wittgenstein: Collected Papers of Brian McGuinness (London: Routledge, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGuinness, Brian“The Grundgedanke of the Tractatus,” in Vesey, G., ed., Understanding Wittgenstein (London: Macmillan, 1974).Google Scholar

McGuinness, Brian. “Pictures and Form,” in Approaches to Wittgenstein: Collected Papers of Brian McGuinness (London: Routledge, 2002), pp. 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGuinness, Brian. Wittgenstein: A Life (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Monk, Ray. Bertrand Russell: The Ghost of Madness 1921–1970 (New York: The Free Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Monk, Ray. Bertrand Russell: The Spirit of Solitude 1872–1921 (New York: The Free Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Monk, Ray. Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius (New York: The Free Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Moore, G. E. “External and Internal Relations,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 21 (1919): 40–62.Google Scholar

Morrell, Ottoline. Ottoline at Garsington: Memoirs of Lady Ottoline Morrell, 1915–1918, ed. Gathorne-Hardy, Robert (London: Faber & Faber, 1974).Google Scholar

Müller, Eugen. Abriss der Algebra der Logik; in Schröder, E., ed., Algebra der Logik, vol. 3 (New York: Chelsea Publishing Co., 1966), pp. 652–808.Google Scholar

Myhill, John. “The Undefinability of the Set of Natural Numbers in the Ramified Principia,” in Nakhnikian, George, ed., Bertrand Russell's Philosophy (New York: Barnes & Noble, 1974), pp. 19–27.Google Scholar

Nicod, Jean. “A Reduction in the Number of the Primitive Propositions of Logic,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 19 (1917): 32–41.Google Scholar

Noonan, Harold. Frege (Oxford: Polity, 2001).Google Scholar

Norton, Bryan. Linguistic Frameworks and Ontology: A Reexamination of Carnap's Metaphilosophy (The Hague: Mouton, 1977).Google Scholar

Parsons, Terence. “Essentialism and Quantified Modal Logic,” Philosophical Review 78 (1969): 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pears, David. The False Prison, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. “Qualitative Logic,” in The Writings of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 5, 1884–1886, ed. Kloesel, Christian (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993). First published 1886.Google Scholar

Pinsent, David. A Portrait of Wittgenstein as a Young Man, ed. Wright, G. H. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990).Google Scholar

Poincaré, Henri. “Les mathématiques et la logistique,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 13 (1905): 813–835; 14 (1906): 17–34, 294–317.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl. “Philosophy of Science: A Personal Report,” in Mace, C. A., ed., British Philosophy in the Mid-century: A Cambridge Symposium (London: Allen & Unwin, 1957), pp. 163–164.Google Scholar

Post, Emil. “Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions,” Ph.D. diss., Columbia University, 1920.

Post, Emil. “Introduction to a General Theory of Elementary Propositions,” American Journal of Mathematics 43 (1921): 163–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Potter, Michael. Reason's Nearest Kin: Philosophies of Mathematics from Kant to Carnap (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. “Carnap's Views on Ontology,” in The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1976), pp. 203–211.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O.Mathematical Logic (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1940).Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O.“On Derivability,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 2. 3 (1937): 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quine, W. V. O.“Ontological Relativity,” in Ontological Relativity and Other Essays (New York: Columbia University Press, 1969), pp. 26–68.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O.“Russell's Ontological Development,” Journal of Philosophy 63 (1941): 657–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quine, W. V. O.Set Theory and Its Logic (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Ramsey, Frank. Critical Notice of the Tractatus, Mind 32 (1923): 465–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramsey, Frank.“Facts and Propositions,” in The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays by Frank Plumpton Ramsey, ed. Braithwaite, R. B. (New York: Harcourt Brace & Co., 1931), pp. 138–155.Google Scholar

Ramsey, Frank.“The Foundations of Mathematics,” in The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays by Frank Plumpton Ramsey, ed. Braithwaite, R. B. (New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1931), pp. 1–61. First published in Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 25 (1925): 338–384.Google Scholar

Ramsey, Frank.“General Propositions and Causality,” in The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays by Frank Plumpton Ramsey, ed. Braithwaite, R. B. (New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1931), pp. 237–255.Google Scholar

Ramsey, Frank.Letter to Moore of 6 February 1924, in Rothhaupt, Josef, ed., Farbthemen in Wittgensteins Gesamtnachlass: Philologisch-philosophische Untersuchungen im Längschnitt und Querschnitten, Monografien Philosophie 273 (Weinheim: Beltz, 1966).Google Scholar

Ramsey, Frank.“Mathematical Logic,” in The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays by Frank Plumpton Ramsey, ed. Braithwaite, R. B. (New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1931), pp. 62–81.Google Scholar

Ramsey, Frank.Notes on Philosophy, Probability and Mathematics, ed. Galavotti, Maria Carla (Naples: Bibliopolis, 1991).Google Scholar

Ramsey, Frank.“On a Problem of Formal Logic,” in The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays by Frank Plumpton Ramsey, ed. Braithwaite, R. B. (New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1931), pp. 82–111.Google Scholar

Ramsey, Frank.“Philosophy,” in The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays by Frank Plumpton Ramsey, ed. Braithwaite, R. B. (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co., 1931), pp. 263–269.Google Scholar

Ramsey, Frank. Review of the 2nd ed. of Principia Mathematica, Nature 116 (1925): 127–128.Google Scholar

Rescher, Nicholas. “Russell's Modal Logic,” in Roberts, George, ed., Bertrand Russell Memorial Volume (London: Allen & Unwin, 1979), pp. 139–149.Google Scholar

Ricketts, Thomas. “Wittgenstein Against Frege and Russell,” in Reck, Erich, ed., From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 217–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothaupt, Josef, ed. Farbthemen Wittgensteins Gesamtnachlass: Philologisch-philosophische Untersuchungen im Längschnitt und Querschnitten, Monografien Philosophie 273 (Weinheim: Beltz, 1966).Google Scholar

Philippe, Rouilhan. Russell et le cercle des paradoxes (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1996).Google Scholar

Sackur, Jérôme. Formes et faits (Paris: J. Vrin, 2005).Google Scholar

Salmon, Wesley C., ed. Zeno's Paradoxes (New York: Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1977).Google Scholar

Savage, C. Wade, and Anderson, C. A.Rereading Russell, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Scharle, Thomas. “Axiomatization of Propositional Calculus with Sheffer Functors,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 6 (1965): 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schilpp, Paul A.The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, vol. 1 (Evanston, Ill.: Harper Torchbooks, 1963).Google Scholar

Schröder, Ernst. Algebra der Logik, vol. 3 (New York: Chelsea Publishing Co., 1966).Google Scholar

Schütte, K.Beweistheorie (Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1960).Google Scholar

Sheffer, H. “A Set of Five Independent Postulates for Boolean Algebras, with Application to Logical Constants,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 14 (1913): 481–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shosky, John. “Russell's Use of Truth-Tables,” Russell 17 (1997): 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, David. “The Methods of the Tractatus: Beyond Positivism and Metaphysics?” Parrini, Paolo, Salmon, Wes, and Salmon, Merrilee, eds., Logical Empiricism: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives (Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Stern, David. Wittgenstein on Mind and Language (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stout, G. F. “The Object of Thought and Real Being,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 11 (1911): 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sullivan, Peter. “Wittgenstein on ‘The Foundations of Mathematics,’ June 1927,” Theoria 61 (1995): 105–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tully, Robert. “Russell's Neutral Monism,” in Griffin, Nicholas, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Bertrand Russell (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 332–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tully, Robert. “Three Studies of Russell's Neutral Monism,” Russell 13 (1993): 5–35.Google Scholar

Heijenoort, Jean. “Logic as Calculus and Logic as Language,” Synthese 17 (1967): 324–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Venn, John. “On the Diagrammatic and Mechanical Representation of Propositions and Reasonings,” Philosophical Magazine 10 (July 1880): 1–15.Google Scholar

Vesey, G.Understanding Wittgenstein (London: Macmillan, 1974).Google Scholar

Wright, G. H.Wittgenstein (Oxford: Blackwell, 1982).Google Scholar

Wahl, Russell. “Impossible Propositions and the Forms of Objects in Wittgenstein's Tractatus,” Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1995): 190–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waismann, Friedrich. Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle, ed. McGuinness, Brian, trans. Joachim Schulte and Brian McGuinness (Oxford: Blackwell, 1979).Google Scholar

Wang, Hao. A Survey of Mathematical Logic (Peking: Science Press, 1962).Google Scholar

Wehmeier, Kai. “Wittgenstein's Predicate Logic,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 45 (2004): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Westfall, Richard. The Construction of Modern Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Whitehead, A. N.An Introduction to Mathematics (London: Williams & Norgate, 1911).Google Scholar

Whitehead, A. N.“Indication, Class, Number, Validation,” Mind 43 (1934): 281–297; “Corrigenda,” Mind 43 (1934): 543. Reprinted in A. N. Whitehead, Essays in Science and Philosophy (New York: Philosophical Library, 1948), pp. 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitehead, A. N., and Russell, Bertrand. Principia Mathematica, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1925, 1957).Google Scholar

Whitehead, A. N., and Russell, Bertrand. Principia Mathematica to ∗56, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1964).Google Scholar

Wrigley, Michael. “A Note on Arithmetic and Logic in the Tractatus,” Acta Analytica 21 (1998): 129–131.Google Scholar