Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:53:50.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Alessandro Roncaglia
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Roma 'La Sapienza', Italy
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Wealth of Ideas
A History of Economic Thought
, pp. 515 - 563
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akerlof, G. 1970. ‘The market for lemons’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 84: 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhtar, M. A. 1979. ‘An analytical outline of Sir James Steuart's macroeconomic model’, Oxford Economic Papers 31: 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allocati, A. (ed.) 1990. Carteggio Loria-Graziani. Roma: Ministero per i Beni Culturali e Ambientali, Pubblicazioni degli Archivi di Stato.Google Scholar
Alter, M. 1990. Carl Menger and the origins of Austrian economics. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. 1965. Pour Marx. Paris: François Maspero.Google Scholar
Andrews, P. W. S. 1993. The economics of competitive enterprise. Selected essays. Ed. Lee, F. S. and Earl, P. E.. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Anonymous 1549. A discourse of the common weal of this realm of England. New edn. by Lamond, E., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; repr. 1929.Google Scholar
Anonymous 1605. Risposta sopra il discorso fatto per Marcantonio De Santis intorno agli effetti, che fa il cambio in Regno. In De Santis, 1605b; repr. in Colapietra 1973, pp. 145–9.
Anonymous 1701. Considerations on the East India trade. London: J. Roberts; repr. in McCulloch 1856, pp. 541–629.
Anonymous 1821a. An inquiry into those principles respecting the nature of demand and the necessity of consumption, lately advocated by Mr. Malthus, from which it is concluded, that taxation and the maintenance of unproductive consumers can be conducive to the progress of wealth. London; repr. in S. Bailey, A critical dissertation on the nature, measure and causes of value, London: Frank Cass 1967.
Anonymous 1821b. Observations on certain verbal disputes in political economy, particularly relating to value, and to demand and supply. London: R. Hunter; repr. in S. Bailey, A critical dissertation on the nature, measure and causes of value, London: Frank Cass 1967.
Aquinas, Thomas. 1265–73. Summa theologiae. repr. in 5 vols., Roma 1962.Google Scholar
, Aristotle 1926. The Nicomachean ethics. With an English trans. by H. Rackham, London: Heinemann and New York: Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
Aristotle 1977. Politics. With an English trans. by H. Rackham, Loeb Classic Library, vol. 21, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
(Pseudo) Aristotle 1935. The Oeconomica. With an English trans. by G. C. Armstrong, London: Heinemann and Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Arnon, A. 1991. Thomas Tooke, pioneer of monetary theory. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. J. 1951. Social choice and individual values. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. 1962. ‘The economic implications of learning by doing’, Review of Economic Studies 26: 155–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. J. and Debreu, G. 1954. ‘Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy’, Econometrica 22: 265–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. J. and Hahn, F. H. 1971. General competitive analysis. San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Arthur, B. 1994. Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asimakopulos, A. 1991. Keynes's general theory and accumulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspromourgos, T. 1999. ‘An early attempt at some mathematical economics: William Petty's 1687 algebra letter, together with a previously undisclosed fragment’, Journal of the History of Economic Thought 21: 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspromourgos, T. 2001. ‘The mind of the oeconomist: an overview of the “Petty Papers” archive’, History of Economic Ideas 9: 39–101.Google Scholar
Augello, M. M. 1990. Joseph Alois Schumpeter: a reference guide. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auspitz, R. and Lieben, R. 1889. Untersuchungen über die Theorie des Preises. Leipzig: Dunker & Humblot.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, R. 1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Babbage, C. 1832. On the economy of machinery and manufactures. London: Charles Knight; 4th edn. 1835; repr. New York: M. Kelley 1963.Google Scholar
Backhouse, R. E. 2003. ‘The stabilization of price theory, 1920–1955’, in Samuels, Biddle and Davis (eds.), pp. 308–24.
Bacon, F. 1620. Novum organum. London: Joannem Billium; repr. in The works of Francis Bacon, ed. J. Spedding, R. Lesline Ellis and D. Demon Heath, vol. 4, London: Longman and Co. 1858.Google Scholar
Bacon, F. 1626. New Atlantis. London: J. H. for W. Lee; repr. in F. Bacon, ‘The advancement of learning’ and ‘New Atlantis’. Ed. T. Case, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Bagehot, W. 1873. Lombard Street. London: H. S. King.Google Scholar
Bailey, S. 1825. A critical dissertation on the nature, measure and causes of value. London: R. Hunter; repr. London: Frank Cass 1967.Google Scholar
Bain, J. S. 1956. Barriers to new competition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baran, P. A. 1957. The political economy of growth. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Baran, P. A. and Sweezy, P. M. 1966. Monopoly capital. An essay on the American economic and social order. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Barber, W. J. 2003. ‘American economics to 1900’, in Samuels, Biddle and Davis (eds.), pp. 231–45.
Barbon, N. 1690. A discourse of trade. London: Tho. Milbourn; repr. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Reprint 1905.Google Scholar
Barca, F. 1994. Imprese in cerca di padrone. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Barkai, H. 1967. ‘The empirical assumptions of Ricardo's 93 per cent labour theory of value’, Economica 34: 418–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkai, H. 1970. ‘The labour theory of value as an operational proposition’, Economica 37: 187–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, M. 1990. ‘The papers of Carl Menger in the Special Collections Department, William R. Parkins Library, Duke University’, in Caldwell (ed.), pp. 15–28.
Barone, E. 1908. ‘Il ministro della produzione nello stato collettivista’, Giornale degli economisti 2: 267–93 and 391–414. (English trans., ‘The ministry of production in the collectivist state’, in Hayek (ed.) 1935).Google Scholar
Barro, R. J. 1974. ‘Are government bonds net wealth?’, Journal of Political Economy 82: 1095–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R. J. and Grossman, H. I. 1971. ‘A general disequilibrium model of income and employment’, American Economic Review 61: 82–93.Google Scholar
Barton, J. 1817. On the conditions of the labouring classes. London: John and Arthur Arch.Google Scholar
Bastiat, C. F. 1850. Harmonies économiques. Paris: Guillaumin. English trans., Economic harmonies, Princeton: Van Nostrand 1964.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J. 1959. Business behaviour, value and growth. New York: Harcourt & Co.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J. 1977. ‘Say's (at least) eight laws, or what Say and James Mill may really have meant’, Economica 44: 145–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C. and Willig, R. D. 1982. Contestable markets and the theory of industry structure. San Diego, Ca.: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Beaugrand, P. 1981. Henry Thornton: un précurseur de J. M. Keynes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Becattini, G. 1975. ‘Introduzione. Invito a una rilettura di Marshall’, in A. and M. P. Marshall, Economia della produzione, Milano: Isedi, pp. ⅸ–ⅽⅹⅴ.Google Scholar
Becattini, G. 1989. ‘Riflessioni sul distretto industriale marshalliano come concetto socio-economico’, Stato e mercato, 25: 111–28.Google Scholar
Becattini, G. (ed.) 1990. Il pensiero economico: temi, problemi e scuole. Torino: Utet.Google Scholar
Becattini, G. 2000. ‘Anomalie marshalliane’, Rivista italiana degli economisti 5: 3–56.Google Scholar
Beccaria, C. 1764. Dei delitti e delle pene. Livorno: Coltellini; repr. in F. Venturi (ed.), Illuministi italiani. Tomo Ⅲ. Riformatori lombardi piemontesi e toscani, Milano-Napoli: Ricciardi 1958, pp. 27–105.Google Scholar
Beccaria, C. 1804. Elementi di economia pubblica, in Custodi, P. (ed.), Scrittori classici italiani di economia politica, Milano: Destefanis, vol. 18, pp. 17–356 and vol. 19, pp. 391–543.
Bedeschi, G. 1990. Storia del pensiero liberale. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Bellofiore, R. 1999. ‘Introduzione, Nota biografica, Nota bibliografica’, in Mises, L., Teoria della moneta e dei mezzi di circolazione, Napoli: Edizioni scientifiche italiane, pp. ⅹⅴ–ⅽⅹⅹⅵ.
Benini, R. 1907. ‘Sull'uso delle formule empiriche nell'economia applicata’, Giornale degli economisti, second series, 35: 1053–63.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. [1776]. ‘Fragment on government’, in The works of Jeremy Bentham, 9 vols., ed. J. Bowring, Edinburgh and London: William Tait-Simpkin and Marshall & Co., 1843–59, vol. 1, pp. 221–95; repr. in ‘A comment on the commentaries’ and ‘A fragment on government’, ed. J. H. Burns and H. L. A. Hart, London: Athlone Press 1977.
Bentham, J. [1787]. Defence of usury. Repr. in Jeremy Bentham's economic writings, 3 vols., W. Stark, London: Allen & Unwin with the Royal Economic Society, 1952, vol. 1, pp. 121–207.
Bentham, J. [1793–5]. Manual of political economy. Repr. in Jeremy Bentham's economic writings, 3 vols., ed. W. Stark, London: Allen & Unwin with the Royal Economic Society, 1952, vol. 1, pp. 219–73.
Bentham, J. [1801]. The true alarm. Repr. in Jeremy Bentham's economic writings, 3 vols., ed. W. Stark, London: Allen & Unwin with the Royal Economic Society, 1952, vol. 3, pp. 61–216.
Berg, M. 1980. The machinery question and the making of political economy 1815–1848. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergson, A. 1938. ‘A reformulation of certain aspects of welfare economics’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 52: 310–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berle, A. A. and Means, G. 1932. The modern corporation and private property. New York: Commerce Clearing House.Google Scholar
Bernoulli, D. 1738. ‘Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis’, Communicatio Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis, Petersburg, 5: 175–92. English trans., ‘Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk’, Econometrica 1954, 22: 23–36.Google Scholar
Bernstein, E. 1899. Die Voraussetzungen des Sozialismus und die Aufgaben der Sozialdemokratie. Stuttgart: Dietz. English trans., Evolutionary socialism, New York: Huebsch 1909; repr. New York: Schocken 1961.
Bharadwaj, K. 1978. Classical political economy and rise to dominance of supply and demand theories. Calcutta: Orient Longman.Google Scholar
Bharadwaj, K. 1983. ‘On a controversy over Ricardo's theory of distribution’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 7: 11–36.Google Scholar
Bharadwaj, K. 1989. Themes in value and distribution. London: Unwin & Hyman.Google Scholar
Bharadwaj, K. and Schefold, B. (eds.) 1990. Essays on Piero Sraffa. Critical perspectives on the revival of classical theory. London: Routledge; repr. 1992.Google Scholar
Biagini, E. 1992. Introduzione a Beccaria. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Bible. The Jerusalem Bible. London: Darton, Longman and Todd 1966.
Black, R. D. C. 1973. ‘W. S. Jevons and the foundation of modern economics’, in Black, Coats and Goodwin (eds.), pp. 98–112.
Black, R. D. C., Coats, A. W. and Goodwin, C. D. W. (eds.) 1973. The marginal revolution in economics. Interpretation and evaluation. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1962. Economic theory in retrospect. Chicago: Richard D. Irwin; 5th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1973. ‘Was there a marginal revolution?’, in Black, Coats and Goodwin (eds.), pp. 3–14.
Blaug, M. 2003. ‘The formalist revolution of the 1950s’, in Samuels, Biddle and Davis (eds.), pp. 395–410.
Bobbio, N. 1989. Thomas Hobbes. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Boettke, P. J. and Leeson, P. T. 2003. ‘The Austrian school of economics, 1950–2000’, in Samuels, Biddle and Davis (eds.), pp. 445–53.
Böhm-Bawerk, E. 1884. Kapital und Kapitalzins. I. Geschichte und Kritik der Kapitalzins-Theorien. Innsbruck: Verlag der Wagner'schen Universitäts-Buchhandlung. English trans., Capital and interest. A critical history of economical theory, London: Macmillan 1890; repr. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
Böhm-Bawerk, E. 1889. Kapital und Kapitalzins. Zweite Abteilung: Positive Theorie des Kapitales. Innsbruck: Verlag der Wagner'schen Universitäts-Buchhandlung. English trans., The positive theory of capital, London: Macmillan 1891.Google Scholar
Böhm-Bawerk, E. von 1896. ‘Zum Abschluss des Marxschen Systems’, in Boenigk, O. (ed.), Staatswissenschaftliche Arbeiten. Festgaben für Karl Knies. Berlin: Haering. English trans., Karl Marx and the close of his system, London: Fisher Unwin 1898.Google Scholar
Boisguilbert, Pierre le Pesant 1695. Le détail de la France. Rouen: no publisher; repr. in INED, 1966.Google Scholar
Bonar, J. 1931. Theories of population from Raleigh to Arthur Young. London: Allen & Unwin; repr. Bristol: Thoemmes Press 1992.Google Scholar
Bortkiewicz, L. 1906–7. ‘Wertrechnung und Preisrechnung im Marxschen System’, Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 23 (1906) no. 1 and 25 (1907) nos. 1–2. English trans., ‘Value and price in the Marxian system’, International Economic Papers 1952, 52: 5–60.Google Scholar
Bortkiewicz, L. 1907. ‘Zur Berichtigung der grundlegenden theoretischen Konstruktion von Marx im dritten Band des “Kapital”’, Conrads Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, series 3, 34: 319–35. English trans., ‘On the correction of Marx's fundamental theoretical construction in the third volume of Capital’, in Sweezy (ed.) 1949.Google Scholar
Botero, G. 1588. Delle cause della grandezza delle città. 3 vols., Roma: Giovanni Martinelli; repr. Bologna: A. Forni 1990.Google Scholar
Botero, G. 1589. Della ragion di Stato libri dieci. Venezia: Ⅰ. Gioliti; repr. Bologna: A. Forni 1990.Google Scholar
Bowles, M. 1972. ‘The precursors of Jevons – the revolution that wasn't’, Manchester School 40: 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowley, M. 1937. Nassau Senior and classical economics. London: Allen & Unwin; repr. 1967.Google Scholar
Box, G. E. P. and Jenkins, J. M. 1970. Time series analysis: forecasting and control. San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Boyer, G. 1990. An economic history of English poor laws, 1750–1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braverman, H. 1974. Labor and monopoly capital. The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Bray, J. 1839. Labour's wrongs and labour's remedy, or the age of might and the age of right. Leeds: D. Green; repr. New York: A. M. Kelley 1968.Google Scholar
Brenner, R. 1978. ‘Dobb on the transition from feudalism to capitalism’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 2: 121–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breton, Y. and Lutfalla, M. (eds.) 1991. L’économie politique en France au XIX siècle. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Brewer, A. 1988. ‘Cantillon and the land theory of value’, History of Political Economy 20: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, A. 1992. Richard Cantillon pioneer of economic theory. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridel, P. 1997. Money and general equilibrium theory. From Walras to Pareto (1870–1923). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Brock, W. A. and Dechart, W. D. 1991. ‘Non-linear dynamical systems: instability and chaos in economics’, in Hildenbrand, W. and Sonnenschein, H. (eds.), Handbook of mathematical economics, vol. 4, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 2209–35.
Bronfenbrenner, M. 1966. ‘Trends, cycles, and fads in economic writing’, American Economic Review 56: 538–52.Google Scholar
Brundtland, G. H. (ed.) 1987. Our common future (Brundtland Report, World Commission on Environment and Development). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brusco, S. 1989. Piccole imprese e distretti industriali. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Bukharin, N. 1917. English trans., Economic theory of the leisure class. New York: Monthly Review Press 1972.Google Scholar
Bukharin, N. and Preobraženskij, E. 1919. English trans., The ABC of communism. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books 1969.Google Scholar
Buonarroti, F. 1828. La conspiration pour l’égalité. Bruxelles: n.p.Google Scholar
Burmeister, E. 1977. ‘On the social significance of the reswitching controversy’, Revue d’économie politique 87: 330–50.Google Scholar
Burmeister, E. 1979. ‘Professor Pasinetti's “unobtrusive postulate”, regular economies, and the existence of a well-behaved production function’, Revue d’économie politique 89: 644–52.Google Scholar
Cairnes, J. E. 1874. Some leading principles of political economy newly expounded. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B. 1982. Beyond positivism: economic methodology in the twentieth century. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B. J. (ed.) 1990. Carl Menger and his legacy in economics. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Calzoni, G. and Rossi, E. 1980. Credito, innovazioni e ciclo economico. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Cammarota, L. 1981. Storia della musica. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Campanella, T. [1602] 1964. La città del sole. Milano: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Canard, N.-F. 1801. Principes d’économie politique. Paris: F. Buisson.Google Scholar
Candela, G. and Palazzi, M. (eds.) 1979. Dibattito sulla fisiocrazia. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Cannan, F. 1929. A review of economic theory. London: P. S. King & Son; repr., London: Frank Cass 1964.Google Scholar
Cantillon, R. 1755. Essai sur la nature du commerce en général. London: Fletcher Gyles. Repr. with English trans., Essay on the nature of trade in general, ed. H. Higgs, London: Macmillan 1931; repr., New York: M. Kelley 1964.Google Scholar
Caravale, G. (ed.) 1985. The legacy of Ricardo. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Caravale, G. and Tosato, D. 1980. Ricardo and the theory of value, distribution and growth. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Carey, H. C. 1837–40. Principles of political economy. 3 vols., Philadelphia: Carey, Lea & Blanchard.Google Scholar
Carlyle, T. 1888–9. Works. 37 vols., London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Casarosa, C. 1974. ‘La teoria ricardiana della distribuzione e dello sviluppo economico’, Rivista di politica economica 44: 959–1015.Google Scholar
Casarosa, C. 1978. ‘A new formulation of the Ricardian system’, Oxford Economic Papers 30: 38–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassel, G. 1918. Theoretische Sozialökonomie. Leipzig: C. F. Winter. English trans., Theory of social economy, London: T. F. Unwin 1923.Google Scholar
Cerroni, U. 1967. ‘Prefazione’, in Proudhon, P.-J., Che cos’è la proprietà?, Bari: Laterza, pp. ⅶ–ⅹⅹⅹⅵ.
Cesarano, F. 1983. ‘On the role of the history of economic analysis’, History of Political Economy 15: 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafuen, A. A. 1986. Christians for freedom. Late-Scholastic economics. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
Chamberlin, E. 1933. The theory of monopolistic competition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chaunu, P. 1982. La civilisation de l'Europe des lumières. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Child, J. 1668. Brief observations concerning trade and interest of money. London: E. Calvert and H. Mortlock; new edn. A discourse about trade, London: A. Sowle, 1690; repr. in appendix to Letwin 1959.Google Scholar
Chilosi, A. (ed.) 1979. Kalecki. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Chiodi, G. 1983. La teoria monetaria di Wicksell. Roma: Nuova Italia Scientifica.Google Scholar
Ciocca, P. and Rinaldi, R. 1997. ‘L'inflazione in Italia, 1914–20. Considerazioni a margine della tesi di laurea di Piero Sraffa’, Rivista di storia economica 13: 3–40.Google Scholar
Cipolla, C. M. 1976. Before the industrial revolution. European society and economy, 1000–1700. London: Methuen; 3rd edn., London: Routledge 1993.Google Scholar
Clapham, J. A. 1922. ‘Of empty economic boxes’, Economic Journal 32: 305–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J. B. 1886. The philosophy of wealth: economic principles newly formulated. Boston: Ginn.Google Scholar
Clark, J. B. 1899. The distribution of wealth: a theory of wages, interests and profits. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Clark, J. B. and Clark, J. M. 1912. The control of trusts. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Clark, J. M. 1923. Studies in the economics of overhead costs, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clark, J. M. 1926. Social control of business. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clark, J. M. 1952. ‘J. B. Clark’, in Spiegel, H. W. (ed.), The development of economic thought, New York: Wiley, pp. 592–612.
Clower, R. W. 1965. ‘The Keynesian counter-revolution: a theoretical appraisal’, in Hahn, F. H. and Brechling, F. P. R. (eds.), The theory of interest rates, London: Macmillan, pp. 103–25.
Coase, R. H. 1937. ‘The nature of the firm’, Economica 41: 386–405; repr. in R. H. Coase, The firm, the market and the law, Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1988, pp. 33–55.
Coats, A. W. 1973. ‘The economic and social context of the marginal revolution of the 1980's’, in Black, Coats and Goodwin (eds.), pp. 37–58.
Cobb, C. W. and Douglas, P. H. 1928. ‘A theory of production’, American Economic Review 18 (Supplement): 139–65.Google Scholar
Colapietra, R. (ed.) 1973. Problemi monetari negli scrittori napoletani del Seicento. Roma: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei.Google Scholar
Cole, G. D. H. 1953. Socialist thought: the forerunners (1789–1850). Vol. 1, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Colletti, L. 1969a. Il marxismo e Hegel. Bari: Laterza; 3rd edn. 1971.Google Scholar
Colletti, L. 1969b. Ideologia e società. Bari: Laterza; 2nd edn. 1970.Google Scholar
Colquhoun, P. 1814. Treatise on the wealth, power and resources of the British Empire. London: J. Mawman.Google Scholar
Comte, A. 1830–42. Cours de philosophie positive. 6 vols., Paris: Bachelier.Google Scholar
Condillac, E. B. de 1776. Le commerce et le gouvernement considérés relativement l'un à l'autre. Amsterdam. English trans., Commerce and government considered in their mutual relationship, ed. , S. and Eltis, W., Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 1997.Google Scholar
Condorcet, M. J. A. N. (Caritat, Marquis de) 1794. Esquisse d'un tableau historique des progrès de l'esprit humain. Paris: Agasse. English trans., Sketch for a historical picture of the progress of the human mind, ed. Barraclough, J., London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson 1955.Google Scholar
Corry, B. A. 1959. ‘Malthus and Keynes: a reconsideration’, Economic Journal 69: 717–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corsi, M. 1984. ‘Il sistema di fabbrica e la divisione del lavoro: il pensiero di Charles Babbage’, Quaderni di storia dell'economia politica 3: 111–23.Google Scholar
Corsi, M. 1991. Division of labour, technical change and economic growth. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
Corsi, M. 1995. ‘L'approccio stocastico nelle teorie della distribuzione del reddito’, in Corsi, M. (ed.), Le diseguaglianze economiche, Torino: Giappichelli, pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
Cournot, A.-A. 1838. Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie de la richesse. Paris: Hachette. English trans., Mathematical principles of the theory of wealth, London: Macmillan 1897; repr. San Diego: James and Gordon 1995.Google Scholar
Coyer, G.-F. 1768. Chinki, histoire cochinchinoise qui peut servir à d'autres pays. London: no publisher; Italian trans., Chinki, storia cocincinese che può servire ad altri paesi, ed. Gianelli, G., Genova: Università degli studi di Genova, Facoltà di scienze politiche, Pubblicazioni dell'Istituto di studi economici.Google Scholar
Croce, B. and Einaudi, L. 1957. Liberismo e liberalismo. Ed. Solari, P., Milano-Napoli: Riccardo Ricciardi editore.Google Scholar
Cross, R. 1982. ‘The Duhem–Quine thesis, Lakatos and the appraisal of theories in macroeconomics’, Economic Journal 92: 320–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Custodi, P. 1803. ‘Notizie degli autori contenuti nel presente volume’, in Scrittori classici italiani di economia politica, parte antica, tomo 1, Milano: Destefanis.
Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. 1963. A behavioural theory of the firm. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
D'Alembert, J. 1751. ‘Discours préliminaire’, in D'Alembert, J. and Diderot, D. (eds.), Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, par une societé de gens de lettres. Livourne: Imprimerie des éditeurs, vol. 1, pp. ⅰ–ⅹⅼⅳ repr. Paris: Éditions Gauthier, 1965.
Dahrendorf, R. 1979. Lebenschancen. Anläufe zur sozialen und politischen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag. Italian trans., La libertà che cambia, Roma-Bari: Laterza 1994.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, R. 1995. Economic opportunity, civil society and political liberty. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Discussion paper no. 58.Google Scholar
Dardi, M. 1984. Il giovane Marshall: accumulazione e mercato. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection. London: Murray; 6th edn., 1872.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1871. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray; 2nd edn., 1874.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1958. The autobiography of Charles Darwin (1809–1882) with original omissions restored. Ed. Barlow, N., London: Collins. Repr. as vol. 29 of The Works of Charles Darwin, London: W. Pickering, 1989.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, A. 1993. A history of Indian economic thought. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davanzati, B. 1582. Notizia dei cambi. Repr. in Scrittori classici italiani di economia politica, ed. P. Custodi, parte antica, vol. 2, Milano: Destefanis 1804, pp. 51–69.Google Scholar
Davanzati, B. 1588. Lezione delle monete. Repr. in Scrittori classici italiani di economia politica, ed. P. Custodi, Parte antica, vol. 2, Milano: Destefanis 1804, pp. 15–50.
David, P. 1985. ‘Clio and the economics of QWERTY’, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 75: 332–7.Google Scholar
Davidson, P. 1972. Money and the real world. London: Macmillan; 2nd edn. 1978.Google Scholar
Davidson, P. 1994. Post Keynesian macroeconomic theory. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Deane, P. 1989. The state and the economic system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deane, P. 2001. The life and times of J. Neville Keynes. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debreu, G. 1959. Theory of value. An axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium. Cowles Foundation Monograph, no. 17, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cecco, M. 1993. ‘Piero Sraffa's “Monetary inflation in Italy during and after the war”: an introduction’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 17: 1–5.Google Scholar
Finetti, B. 1930. ‘Fondamenti logici del ragionamento probabilistico’, Bollettino dell'Unione matematica italiana 9: 258–61.Google Scholar
Finetti, B. 1931. Probabilismo. Saggio critico sulla teoria delle probabilità e sul valore della scienza. Napoli: Perrella.Google Scholar
Finetti, B. 1937. ‘La prévision, ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives’, Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré 7: 1–68.Google Scholar
Defoe, D. 1719. The life and strange surprizing adventures of Robinson Crusoe, of York, mariner. 3 vols., London: W. Taylor.Google Scholar
De Marchi, N. 1973. ‘Mill and Cairnes and the emergence of marginalism in England’, in Black, Coats and Goodwin (eds.), pp. 78–97.
Marchi, N. 1988. The Popperian legacy in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchi, N. and Blaug, M. (eds.) 1991. Appraising economic theories. Studies in the methodology of research programs.Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Denis, H. 1965. Histoire de la pensée économique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Italian trans., Storia del pensiero economico, 2 vols., Milano: Mondadori 1968, 2nd edn. 1973.Google Scholar
Denison, E. F. 1967. Why growth rates differ: post-war experience in nine Western countries. Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
d’épinay, L. and Galiani, F. [1769–82] 1996. Epistolario. Ed. Rapisarda, S., Palermo: Sellerio.Google Scholar
De Quincey, T. 1821–2. ‘Confessions of an English opium eater’, London Magazine, Sept. 1821–Oct. 1822; repr. in volume form, 1822; 2nd edn. 1856; repr. London: Grant Richards 1902.
De Quincey, T. 1824. ‘Dialogues of three templars on political economy’, London Magazine; repr. in T. De Quincey, Collected writings, ed. D. Masson, Edinburgh: A. and C. Black, vol. 9, repr. as Political economy and politics, New York: Augustus M. Kelley 1970, pp. 37–112.
Quincey, T. 1844. The logic of political economy. Edinburgh: William Blackwood and Sons; repr. in T. De Quincey, Collected writings, ed. D. Masson, Edinburgh: A. and C. Black, vol. 9, pp. 118–294.Google Scholar
Roover, R. 1958. ‘The concept of the just price: theory and economic policy’, Journal of Economic History 18: 418–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roover, R. 1971. La pensée économique des scholastiques. Doctrines et méthodes. Montréal: Institut d’études médiévales.Google Scholar
Santis, M. A. 1605a. Intorno alli effetti, che fa il cambio in Regno. Napoli: Costantino Vitale; repr. in Colapietra 1973, pp. 111–41.Google Scholar
Santis, M. A. 1605b. Secondo discorso intorno agli effetti che fa il cambio in Regno. Sopra una risposta, che è stata fatta avverso del primo. Napoli: Felice Stigliola; repr. in Colapietra 1973, pp. 143–62.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. 1637. Discours de la méthode. Leyda: Ⅰ. Maire. English trans., Discourse on the method for conducting one's reason well and for seeking truth in the sciences, Indianapolis: Hackett 1988.Google Scholar
Dewey, D. 1987. ‘Clark, John Bates’, in Eatwell, Milgate and Newman (eds.), vol. 1, pp. 428–31.
Diggins, J. P. 1999. Thornstein Veblen, theorist of the leisure class. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dobb, M. 1928. Russian economic development since the revolution. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dobb, M. 1946. Studies in the development of capitalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dobb, M. 1955. On economic theories and socialism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dobb, M. 1973. Theories of value and distribution since Adam Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobb, M., Sweezy, P., Takabashi, H., Hulton, R. and Hill, C. 1954. The transition from feudalism to capitalism. A symposium. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Domar, E. D. 1946. ‘Capital expansion, rate of growth and employment’, Econometrica 14: 137–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donzelli, F. 1986. Il concetto di equilibrio nella teoria economica neoclassica. Roma: NIS.Google Scholar
Donzelli, F. 1988. ‘Introduzione’, in Hayek, F. A., Conoscenza, mercato, pianificazione, Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 7–91.Google Scholar
Donzelli, F. 1997. Pareto's mechanical dream. Working Paper no. 97/07, Università degli Studi di Milano, Dipartimento di economia politica e aziendale.Google Scholar
Dorfman, R., Samuelson, P. and Solow, R. 1958. Linear programming and economic analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Dosi, G. 1988. ‘Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovations’, Journal of Economic Literature 26: 1120–71.Google Scholar
Dougherty, C. R. S. 1972. ‘On the rate of return and the rate of profit’, Economic Journal 82: 1324–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, P. H. 1934. Theory of wages. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dunlop, J. T. 1938. ‘The movement of real and money wage rates’, Economic Journal 48: 413–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemours, Du Pont P. (ed.) 1767–8. Physiocratie, ou Constitution naturelle du gouvernement le plus avantageux au genre humain. 2 vols., Paris: Merlin.Google Scholar
Nemours, Du Pont P. (ed.) 1809–11. Œuvres de M. Turgot. 9 vols., Paris: Belin.Google Scholar
Eatwell, J. 1975a. ‘The interpretation of Ricardo's “Essay on profits”’, Economica 42: 182–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eatwell, J. 1975b. ‘Mr. Sraffa's standard commodity and the rate of exploitation’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 89: 543–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (eds.) 1987. The new Palgrave. A dictionary of economics. 4 vols., London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eden, F. 1797. The state of the poor. 3 vols., London: B. and J. White; repr. London: Cass 1966.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, F. Y. 1881. Mathematical psychics. An essay on the application of mathematics to the moral sciences. London: C. Kegan Paul; repr. San Diego: James and Gordon 1995.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, F. Y. 1894a. ‘The pure theory of international values’, Economic Journal 4; repr. in Edgeworth 1925, vol. 2, pp. 3–60.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, F. Y. 1894b. ‘De Quincey, Thomas’, in R. H. I. Palgrave (ed.), Dictionary of economics; repr. in Eatwell, Milgate and Newman (eds.) 1987, vol. 1, pp. 812–13.
Edgeworth, F. Y. 1925. Papers relating to political economy. 3 vols., London: Royal Economic Society; repr., New York: Burt Franklin 1970.Google Scholar
Eggertsson, T. 1990. Economic behavior and institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egidi, M. 1975. ‘Stabilità ed instabilità degli schemi sraffiani’, Economia internazionale 28: 3–41.Google Scholar
Eichner, A. S. 1976. The megacorp and oligopoly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einaudi, L. 1931. ‘Per una nuova collana di economisti’, La riforma sociale 42: 394–99.Google Scholar
Einaudi, L. 1932. ‘Di un quesito intorno alla nascita della scienza economica’, La riforma sociale 43: 219–25.Google Scholar
Einaudi, L. 1938. ‘Una disputa a torto dimenticata fra autarcisti e liberisti’, Rivista di storia economica 3: 132–63; repr. in L. Einaudi, Saggi bibliografici e storici intorno alle dottrine economiche, Roma: Edizioni di storia e letteratura 1953, pp. 117–51.
Elias, N. 1939. Über den prozess der Zivilisation. 2 vols., Basel: Hans zum Falken. English trans., The civilizing process, Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1994.Google Scholar
Ellman, M. 1987. ‘Preobrazhensky, Evgenii Alexeyeich’, in Eatwell, Milgate and Newman (eds.), vol. 3, pp. 945–7.
Eltis, W. 1984. The classical theory of economic growth. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eshag, E. 1964. From Marshall to Keynes. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fanno, M. 1912. Le banche e il mercato monetario. Roma: Athenaeum.Google Scholar
Faucci, R. 1986. Einaudi. Torino: Utet.Google Scholar
Faucci, R. 1989. Breve storia dell'economia politica. Torino: Giappichelli; 2nd edn. 1991.Google Scholar
Faucci, R. 1995. L'economista scomodo. Vita e opere di Francesco Ferrara. Palermo: Sellerio.Google Scholar
Faucci, R. 2000. L'economia politica in Italia. Dal Cinquecento ai nostri giorni. Torino: Utet.Google Scholar
Fawcett, H. 1863. Manual of political economy. Cambridge; 4th edn., London: Macmillan 1874.Google Scholar
Ferguson, A. 1767. An essay on the history of civil society. Edinburgh: A. Kinkaid & J. Bell; repr. ed. D. Forbes, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 1966.Google Scholar
Ferrara, F. 1852. ‘Prefazione’, in Trattati italiani del secolo ⅩⅧ, Biblioteca dell'economista, Prima serie, vol. 3, Torino: Pomba, pp. ⅴ–ⅼⅹⅹ.
Fetter, F. W. 1953. ‘The authorship of economic articles in the “Edinburgh Review”, 1802–1846’, Journal of Political Economy 61: 232–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetter, F. W. 1958. ‘The economic articles in the “Quarterly Review” and their authors, 1809–1852’, Journal of Political Economy 66: 47–64 and 154–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetter, F. W. 1962a. ‘Economic articles in the “Westminster Review” and their authors, 1824–51’, Journal of Political Economy 70: 570–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetter, F. W. 1962b. ‘Robert Torrens: colonel of Marines and political economist’, Economica 29: 152–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetter, F. W. 1965. ‘Economic controversy in the British reviews, 1802–1850’, Economica 32: 424–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, P. 1975. Against method. Outline of an anarchist theory of knowledge. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Finley, M. I. 1970. ‘Aristotle and economic analysis’, Past and Present 47: 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finley, M. I. 1973. The ancient economy. Berkeley–Los Angeles: University of California Press; repr. of the 2nd edn., Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1992.Google Scholar
Fisher, I. 1892. Mathematical investigations in the theory of value and prices. New Haven: Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences; repr. New York: A. M. Kelley 1965.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, E. 1895. The life of Sir William Petty, 1623–1687. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Flux, A. W. 1894. ‘Review: K. Wicksell, Über Wert, Kapital und Rente; P. H. Wicksteed, An essay on the coordination of the laws of distribution’, Economic Journal 4: 305–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foner, P. S. (ed.) 1973. When Karl Marx died. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Forges Davanzati, G. 1994. ‘Introduzione’, in Mun, T., Il tesoro dell'Inghilterra, Napoli: Edizioni scientifiche italiane, pp. 13–42.Google Scholar
Foxwell, H. S. 1899. ‘Introduction’, in Menger, A., The right to the whole produce of labour, London: Macmillan, pp. ⅴ–ⅽⅹ repr. New York: Augustus M. Kelley 1970.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1953. ‘The methodology of positive economics’, in Essays in positive economics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press; repr. 1976, pp. 3–43.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1956. ‘The quantity theory of money. A restatement’, in Friedman, M. (ed.), Studies in the quantity theory of money, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1968. ‘The role of monetary policy’, American Economic Review 58: 1–17.Google Scholar
Frish, R. 1933. ‘Editorial’, Econometrica 1: 1–4.Google Scholar
Fuà, G. (ed.) 1976. Il ‘Modellaccio’: modello dell'economia italiana elaborato dal gruppo di Ancona. 4 vols., Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Fuà, G. (ed.) 1993. Crescita economica. Le insidie delle cifre. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Fudenberg, D. and Tirole, J. 1991. Game theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brocchieri, Fumagalli Beonio M. T. and Parodi, M. 1989. Storia della filosofia medievale. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Galbraith, J. K. 1955. The affluent society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Galbraith, J. K. 1967. The new industrial state. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Galiani, F. 1751. Della moneta. Napoli: Giuseppe Raimondi; 2nd edn. Napoli: Stamperia simoniana 1780; repr. Milano: Feltrinelli 1963 (English trans., On money, ed. Toscano, P. R., Ann Arbor: University Microfilm International 1977).Google Scholar
Galiani, F. 1770. Dialogues sur le commerce des bléds. Londres: no publisher; repr. ed. F. Nicolini, Milano-Napoli: Ricciardi 1959; Italian trans., Dialoghi sul commercio dei grani, Roma: Editori Riuniti 1978.
Galilei, G. 1623. Il Saggiatore. Roma: Giacomo Mascardi e Accademia dei Lincei; repr. in Opere, Milano-Napoli: Ricciardi 1953, pp. 89–352.Google Scholar
Gallaway, L. and Shukla, V. 1974. ‘The neoclassical production function’, American Economic Review 64: 348–58.Google Scholar
Gårdlund, T. 1956. Knut Wicksell, rebell l det nya riket. Stockholm: Bonniers; English trans., The life of Knut Wicksell, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell 1958; new edition, Cheltenham: Elgar 1996.
Garegnani, P. 1960. Il capitale nelle teorie della distribuzione. Milano: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
Garegnani, P. 1970. ‘Heterogeneous capital, the production function and the theory of distribution’, Review of Economic Studies 37: 407–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garegnani, P. 1976a. ‘The neoclassical production function: comment’, American Economic Review 66: 424–27.Google Scholar
Garegnani, P. 1976b. ‘On a change in the notion of equilibrium in recent work on value and distribution: a comment on Samuelson’, in Brown, M., Sato, K. and Zarembka, P. (eds.), Essays in modern capital theory, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 25–45.
Garegnani, P. 1981. Marx e gli economisti classici. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Garegnani, P. 1982. ‘On Hollander's interpretation of Ricardo's early theory of profits’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 6: 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garegnani, P. 1984. ‘Value and distribution in the classical economists and Marx’, Oxford Economic Papers 36: 291–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garegnani, P. 1988. ‘Actual and normal magnitudes: a comment on Asimakopulos’, Political Economy 4: 251–8.Google Scholar
Garegnani, P. 1990. ‘Sraffa: classical versus marginalist analysis’, in Bharadwaj and Schefold (eds.), pp. 112–41.
Genovesi, A. 1765–7. Delle lezioni di commercio o sia d'economia civile. 2 vols., Napoli: Fratelli Simone; repr. in Scrittori classici italiani di economia politica, ed. P. Custodi, vols. 14–16, Milano: Destefanis, 1803.Google Scholar
George, H. 1879. Progress and poverty. An inquiry into the cause of industrial depressions and of increase of want with increase of wealth. The remedy. Middleton: J. Bagot.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1983. ‘Introduction’, in Gossen, H. H., The laws of human relations and the rules of human action derived therefrom, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1985. ‘The interplay between institutional and material factors: the problem and its status’, in Kregel, Matzner and Roncaglia (eds.), pp. 297–326.
Gherity, J. A. 1994. ‘The evolution of Adam Smith's theory of banking’, History of Political Economy 26: 423–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giacomin, A. 1996. Il mercato e il potere. Le teorie della domanda effettiva di Boisguilbert, Cantillon, Quesnay. Bologna: Clueb.Google Scholar
Gilibert, G. 1977. Quesnay. Milano: Etas libri.Google Scholar
Gilibert, G. 1990. ‘La scuola russo-tedesca di economia matematica e la dottrina del flusso circolare’, in Becattini (ed.), pp. 387–403.
Gilibert, G. 1998. ‘Mani visibili, invisibili e nascoste’, in SISSA-Laboratorio interdisciplinare, Laboratorio dell'immaginario scientifico, Adam Smith e dintorni, Napoli: Cuen, pp. 137–56.
Ginzburg, A. 1976. ‘Introduzione’, in Ginzburg, A. (ed.), I socialisti ricardiani, Milano: Isedi, pp. ⅸ–ⅼⅹⅹⅹ.Google Scholar
Giuliani, A. 1997. Giustizia ed ordine economico. Milano: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
Gleick, J. 1987. Chaos: making a new science. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Godwin, W. 1793. Enquiry concerning political justice, and its influence on morals and happiness. London: G. G. and J. Robinson; repr. ed. Ⅰ. Kramnick, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books 1976.Google Scholar
Godwin, W. 1820. Of population. An enquiry concerning the power of increase in the numbers of mankind, being an answer to Mr. Malthus's essay on that subject. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme and Brown.Google Scholar
Goldman, L. (ed.) 1989. The blind Victorian. Henry Fawcett and British liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R. M. 1967. ‘A growth cycle’, in Feinstein, C. H. (ed.), Socialism, capitalism and economic growth. Essays presented to Maurice Dobb, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 54–8.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R. M. 1970. Elementary economics from the higher standpoint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R. M. 1982. Intervista a un economista. Ed. M. Palazzi, Bologna: Biblioteca Walter Bigiavi, Facoltà di economia e commercio.
Goodwin, R. M. 1990. Chaotic economic dynamics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, D. 1965. ‘The role of the history of economic thought in the understanding of modern economic theory’, American Economic Review 55: 119–27.Google Scholar
Gossen, H. H. 1854. Entwickelung der Gesetze des menschlichen Verkehrs, und der daraus fliessenden Regeln für menschliches Handeln. Brunswick: Vieweg; 2nd edn. Berlin: Prager 1889. English trans., The laws of human relations and the rules of human action derived therefrom, ed. Georgescu-Roegen, N., Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press 1983.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. 1975. Quaderni del carcere. ed. Ⅴ. Gerratana, Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. and Sraffa, P. 1924. ‘Problemi di oggi e di domani’, Ordine nuovo, 1–15 Apr., 1: 4.Google Scholar
Graunt, J. 1662. Natural and political observations upon the bills of mortality. London: John Martyn, James Allestry and Thomas Dicas; 5th edn. London: John Martyn 1676; repr. in Petty 1899, pp. 314–435.Google Scholar
Gray, J. 1825. A lecture on human happiness. Philadelphia: D. & S. Neall.Google Scholar
Gray, J. 1984. Hayek on liberty. Oxford: Blackwell; repr. 1986.Google Scholar
Graziani, A. (ed.) 1913. Economisti del Cinque e Seicento. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Groenewegen, P. 1995. A soaring eagle: Alfred Marshall, 1842–1924. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Guger, A. and Walterskirchen, E. 1988. ‘Fiscal and monetary policy in the Keynes–Kalecki tradition’, in Kregel, Matzner and Roncaglia (eds.), pp. 103–32.
Haavelmo, T. 1944. ‘The probability approach in econometrics’, Econometrica 12 (Supplement): 1–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberler, G. 1950. ‘Joseph Alois Schumpeter, 1883–1950’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 64: 333–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. 1990. The taming of chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, F. 1982a. ‘The neo-Ricardians’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 6: 353–74.Google Scholar
Hahn, F. 1982b. ‘Stability’, in Arrow, K. and Intriligator, M. (eds.), Handbook of mathematical economics, Amsterdam: North Holland, vol. 2, ch. 16.
Hahn, F. and Matthews, R. C. O. 1964. ‘The theory of economic growth: a survey’, Economic Journal 74: 779–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halévy, E. 1900. La formation du radicalisme philosophique. La révolution et la doctrine de l'utilité (1789–1815). Paris: F. Alcan. English edn., The growth of philosophic radicalism, London: Faber and Gwyer 1928; repr. London: Faber and Faber 1972.
Hamowy, R. 1987. The Scottish Enlightenment and the theory of spontaneous order. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hands, D. W. 2001. Reflection without rules. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, A. 1938. Full recovery or stagnation?New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Harcourt, G. C. 1969. ‘Some Cambridge controversies in the theory of capital’, Journal of Economic Literature 7: 369–405.Google Scholar
Harcourt, G. C. 1972. Some Cambridge controversies in the theory of capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrod, R. F. 1930. ‘Notes on supply’, Economic Journal 40: 232–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrod, R. F. 1939. ‘An essay in dynamic theory’, Economic Journal 49: 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrod, R. F. 1951. The life of John Maynard Keynes. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Harrod, R. F. 1961. ‘Review of P. Sraffa, Production of commodities by means of commodities’, Economic Journal 71: 783–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, N. 1996. ‘Marshall's theory of value: the role of external economies’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 20: 353–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, W. 1628. Exercitatio anatomica de motu cordis et sanguinis. Francoforti: G. Fitzeri. English trans., The anatomical exercises, ed. Keynes, G., New York: Dover Publications 1995.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. M. and McPherson, M. S. 1996. Economic analysis and moral philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hawtrey, R. G. 1919. Currency and credit. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. 1931. Prices and production. London: Routledge (Italian trans., Prezzi e produzione, ed. M. Colonna, Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane 1990).Google Scholar
Hayek, F. von 1931–2. ‘Reflections on the pure theory of money of Mr. J. M. Keynes’, Economica 11 (1931): 270–95 and 12 (1932): 22–44; repr. in F. von Hayek, Contra Keynes and Cambridge, ed. B. Caldwell, The collected works of F. A. Hayek, vol. 9, Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1995, pp. 121–46 and 174–97.
Hayek, F. 1932a. ‘Money and capital: a reply’, Economic Journal 42: 237–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. 1932b. ‘A note on the development of the doctrine of “forced saving”’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 47: 123–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. (ed.) 1935. Collectivist economic planning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. 1941. The pure theory of capital. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. 1944. The road to serfdom. Chicago: Chicago University Press; repr. (with an introduction by M. Friedman) 1994.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. von 1988. Conoscenza, mercato, pianificazione. Ed. Donzelli, F., Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. von 1991. The trend of economic thinking. Essays on political economists and economic history. In Bartley, W. W. Ⅲ and Kresge, S. (eds.), The collected works of F. A. Hayek, vol. 3, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. von 1994. Hayek on Hayek. Ed. Kresge, S. and Wenar, L., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heckscher, E. F. 1931. Mercantilism. 2 vols., London: Allen & Unwin; 2nd edn. 1955.Google Scholar
Heertje, A. (ed.) 1981. Schumpeter's vision. Capitalism, socialism and democracy after 40 years. Eastburne and New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Helvetius, C. A. 1758. De l’ésprit. Paris: Durand.Google Scholar
Hennings, K. H. 1997. The Austrian theory of value and capital. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hey, J. D. and Winch, D. (eds.) 1990. A century of economics. 100 years of the Royal Economic Society and the Economic Journal. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. 1932. The theory of wages. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. 1937. ‘Mr. Keynes and the classics: a suggested interpretation’, Econometrica 5: 147–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, J. 1939. Value and capital. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2nd edn. 1946.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. 1969. A theory of economic history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. 1973. Capital and time. A neo-Austrian theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. and Allen, R. D. G. 1934. ‘A reconsideration of the theory of value’, Economica 1: 52–76 and 196–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, J. and Hollander, S. 1977. ‘Mr Ricardo and the moderns’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 91: 351–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgs, H. 1897. The physiocrats. London: Macmillan; repr. Bristol: Thoemmes Press 1993.Google Scholar
Hilferding, R. 1910. Das Finanzkapital. Wien: Wiener Volksbuchhandlung Ignaz Brand. English trans., Finance capital: a study of the latest phase of capitalist development, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1981.Google Scholar
Hirsch, F. 1976. Social limits to growth. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, A. 1977. The passions and the interests. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. 1982. ‘Rival interpretations of market society: civilizing, destructive, or feeble?’, Journal of Economic Literature 20: 1463–84.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. 1651. Leviathan. Andrew Crooke, London; repr. ed. C. B. Macpherson, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books 1968, repr. 1987.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. 1902. Imperialism: a study. London: Nisbet.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. 1914. Work and wealth. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hodgskin, T. 1820. Letter to Francis Place of May 28. Manuscript kept at the British Museum, London; Italian trans. in A. Ginzburg (ed.), Socialisti ricardiani, Milano: Isedi 1976, pp. 295–308.
Hodgskin, T. 1825. Labour defended against the claims of capital or the unproductiveness of capital proved. London: Knight and Lacey; repr. London: Hammersmith Bookshop 1964.Google Scholar
Hodgskin, T. 1827. Popular political economy. London: C. Tait.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. 2003. ‘Institutional economics’, in Samuels, Biddle and Davis (eds.), pp. 462–70.
Hollander, J. 1904. ‘The development of Ricardo's theory of value’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 18: 455–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, J. 1910. David Ricardo – a centenary estimate. Baltimore; repr. New York: McKelley 1968.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1973a. ‘Ricardo's analysis of the profit rate, 1813–15’, Economica 40: 260–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, S. 1973b. The economics of Adam Smith. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1975. ‘Ricardo and the corn profit model: reply to Eatwell’, Economica 42: 188–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, S. 1979. The economics of David Ricardo. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1985. The economics of John Stuart Mill. 2 vols., Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Horwitz, S. 2003. ‘The Austrian marginalists: Menger, Böhm-Bawerk, and Wieser’, in Samuels, Biddle and Davis (eds.), pp. 262–77.
Hosseini, H. 1998. ‘Seeking the roots of Adam Smith's division of labour in medieval Persia’, History of Political Economy 30: 653–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howey, R. S. 1960. The rise of the marginal utility school, 1870–1889. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press; repr. New York: Columbia University Press 1989.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1739–40. A treatise of human nature. 3 vols., London: John Noon; repr. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1978; repr. Bristol: Thoemmes 1990.Google Scholar
Hume, D. [1740] 1938. An abstract of a treatise on human nature. With an introduction and ed. Keynes, J. M. and Sraffa, P., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1752. Political discourses. Edinburgh: A. Kincaid and A. Donaldson; repr. in Essays: moral, political, and literary, ed. E. F. Miller, Indianapolis: Liberty Press 1987.
Hume, D. 1777. The legacy of David Hume, Esq.: written by himself. London: William Strahan; repr. in Hume, Essays: moral, political and literary cit., pp. ⅹⅹⅷ–ⅹⅼⅸ.
Huntington, S. P. 1996. The clash of civilization and the remaking of the world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, F. 1755. A system of moral philosophy. 3 vols., London: A. Millar.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T. W. 1953. A review of economic doctrines. Oxford: Oxford University Press; repr. Bristol: Thoemmes Press 1993.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T. W. 1956. ‘Bentham as an economist’, Economic Journal 66: 288–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, T. W. 1973. ‘The “marginal revolution” and the decline and fall of English classical political economy’, in Black, Coats and Goodwin (eds.), pp. 176–202.
Hutchison, T. W. 1988. Before Adam Smith. The emergence of political economy 1662–1776. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Im Hof, U. 1993. Das Europa der Aufklärung. München: C. H. Beck; Italian trans., L'Europa dell'illuminismo, Roma-Bari: Laterza 1993.Google Scholar
INED (Institut national d’études demographiques) 1958. François Quesnay et la physiocratie. 2 vols., Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
INED (Institut national d’études demographiques) 1966. Pierre de Boisguilbert or la naissance de l’économie politique. 2 vols., Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Ingram, J. K. 1888. A history of political economy. Edinburgh: A. & C. Black.Google Scholar
Ingrao, B. and Israel, G. 1987. La mano invisibile. L'equilibrio economico nella storia della scienza. Roma-Bari: Laterza. English trans., The invisibile hand. Economic equilibrium in the history of science. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Ingrao, B. and Ranchetti, F. 1996. Il mercato nel pensiero economico. Milano: Ulrico Hoepli.Google Scholar
Institute of Statistics, Oxford University. 1944. The economics of full employment. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Isnard, A. N. 1781. Traité des richesses. 2 vols., London and Lausanne: F. Grasset.Google Scholar
Jaffé, W. 1983. Essays on Walras. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
James, P. 1979. Population Malthus: his life and times. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jennings, R. 1855. Natural elements of political economy. London: Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. 1865. The coal question. London: Macmillan; repr. New York: Augustus M. Kelley 1965.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. 1871. The theory of political economy. London: Macmillan; 2nd edn. 1879; repr. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books 1970.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. 1874. The principles of science: a treatise on logic and scientific method. London: Macmillan; 2nd edn. 1877.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. 1881. ‘Richard Cantillon and the nationality of political economy’, Contemporary Review, January; repr. in R. Cantillon, Essai sur la nature du commerce en général, ed. H. Higgs, London: Macmillan 1931 (repr. New York: Kelley 1964), pp. 333–60.
Jevons, W. S. 1972–81. Papers and correspondence. 7 vols., ed. R. D. Collison Black and R. Könekamp, London: Macmillan.
Johnson, H. G. 1962. ‘Review of Production of commodities by means of commodities’, Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 28: 464–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judges, A. V. 1939. ‘The idea of a mercantile state’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 4th series 21: 41–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadish, A. and Freeman, R. D. 1990. ‘Foundation and early years’, in Hey and Winch (eds.), pp. 22–48.
Kahn, R. F. 1931. ‘The relation of home investment to unemployment’, Economic Journal 41: 173–98; repr. in Kahn, 1972, pp. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, R. F. 1954. ‘Some notes on liquidity preference’, Manchester School 22: 229–57; repr. in Kahn 1972, pp. 72–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, R. F. 1972. Selected essays on employment and growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, R. F. 1973. ‘SDR and aid’, Lloyd Bank Review, October, 1–18.Google Scholar
Kahn, R. F. 1974. On re-reading Keynes. Proceedings of the British Academy, vol. 60, pp. 361–92; repr. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1975.
Kahn, R. F. [1929] 1983. L'economia del breve periodo. Ed. M. Dardi, Torino: Boringhieri; English edn., The economics of the short period, New York: St. Martin's Press 1989.
Kahn, R. F. 1984. The making of Keynes's general theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1942. ‘Professor Hayek and the concertina effect’, Economica 9: 359–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1956. ‘Alternative theories of distribution’, Review of Economic Studies 23: 94–100.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1957. ‘A model of economic growth’, Economic Journal 67: 591–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1961. ‘Capital accumulation and economic growth’, in Lutz, F. A. (ed.), The theory of capital, London: Macmillan, pp. 177–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1966. ‘Marginal productivity and the macro-economic theories of distribution’, Review of Economic Studies 33: 309–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1972. ‘The irrelevance of equilibrium economics’, Economic Journal 82: 1237–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, N. and Mirrlees, J. 1962. ‘A new model of economic growth’, Review of Economic Studies 29: 174–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalecki, M. 1943. Studies in economic dynamics. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kalecki, M. 1954. Theory of economic dynamics: an essay on cyclical and long-run changes in capitalist economy. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kalecki, M. 1967. ‘Zagadnienie realizacji u Tugana-Baranowskiego i Rózy Luksemburg’, Ekonomista 2: 241–9. English trans., ‘The problem of effective demand with Tugan-Baranowski and Rosa Luxemburg’, in Kalecki 1971, pp. 146–55.
Kalecki, M. 1971. Selected essays on the dynamics of the capitalist economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kalecki, M. 1972, Selected essays on the economic growth of the socialist and the mixed economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1784. ‘Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht’, Berlinische Monatsschrift 4: 385–411. Italian trans., Idea di una storia universale dal punto di vista cosmopolitico, in Ⅰ. Kant, Scritti politici, Torino: Utet 1956, 3rd edn. 1995, pp. 123–39 (English trans., Perpetual peace, ed. by M. Campbell Smith, New York: Garland 1972).
Kauder, E. 1965. A history of marginal utility theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauder, E. 1970. ‘Austro-Marxism vs. Austro-Marginalism’, History of Political Economy 2: 398–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kautilya [fourth century bc] 1967. Arthasastra. Ed. Shamasastri, R., Mysore: Mysore Printing and Publishing House.Google Scholar
Kaye, F. B. 1924. ‘Introduction’, in B. Mandeville, The fable of the bees, ed. F. B. Kaye, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. ⅹⅶ–ⅽⅹⅼⅵ repr. Indianapolis: Liberty Press 1988.
Keynes, J. M. 1913. Indian currency and finance. London: Macmillan; repr. in J. M. Keynes, Collected writings, vol. 1, London: Macmillan 1971.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1919. The economic consequences of the peace. London: Macmillan; repr. in J. M. Keynes, Collected writings, vol. 2, London: Macmillan 1971.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1921. A treatise on probability. London: Macmillan; repr. in J. M. Keynes, Collected writings, vol. 8, London: Macmillan 1973.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1923. Atract on monetary reform. London: Macmillan; repr. in J. M. Keynes, Collected writings, vol. 4, London: Macmillan 1971 (Italian trans., ed. P. Sraffa, La riforma monetaria, Milano: Fratelli Treves 1925).Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1924. ‘Alfred Marshall, 1842–1924’, Economic Journal 34: 311–72 and 627–37. Repr. (first part only) in Keynes 1933, pp. 150–266 (pp. 161–231 of the 1972 edn.).
Keynes, J. M. 1925. The economic consequences of Mr. Churchill. London: Hogarth Press; repr. in Keynes 1931, pp. 207–30 and in J. M. Keynes, Collected writings, vol. 9, pp. 272–94.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1926. The end of laissez-faire. London: Hogarth Press; partly repr. in Keynes 1931.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1930. A treatise on money. 2 vols., London: Macmillan; repr. in J. M. Keynes, Collected writings, vols. 5 and 6, London: Macmillan 1971.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1931. Essays in persuasion. London: Macmillan; repr. in J. M. Keynes, Collected writings, vol. 9, London: Macmillan 1972.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1933. Essays in biography. London: Macmillan; repr. in J. M. Keynes, Collected writings, vol. 10, London: Macmillan 1972.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1936. The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Macmillan; repr. in J. M. Keynes, Collected writings, vol. 7, London: Macmillan 1973.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1937. ‘The general theory of employment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 51: 200–23, repr. in Keynes 1973, vol. 14, pp. 109–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1940. How to pay for the war. London: Macmillan; repr. in J. M. Keynes, Collected writings, vol. 9, London: Macmillan 1972, pp. 367–439.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1973. The general theory and after. In Collected writings, vols. 13 (Part I: preparation) and 14 (Part Ⅱ: defense and development), ed. D. Moggridge, London: Macmillan.
Keynes, J. N. 1891. The scope and method of political economy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, C. P. 1978. Manias, panics and crashes. A history of financial crisis. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindleberger, C. P. 1989. Economic laws and economic history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, C. P. 1996. World economic primacy: 1500 to 1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, L. R. 1991. ‘Econometric contributions of the Cowles Commission, 1944–47. A retrospective view’, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 44: 107–17.Google Scholar
Knight, F. H. 1921. Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Konus, A. A. 1970. ‘The empirical assumptions of Ricardo's 93% labor theory of value’, Economica 37: 185–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kregel, J. A. 1976. ‘Economic methodology in the face of uncertainty. The modelling methods of Keynes and the post-Keynesians’, Economic Journal 86: 209–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kregel, J. A. 1983. ‘Effective demand: origins and development of the notion’, in Kregel, J. A. (ed.), Distribution, effective demand and international economic relations, London: Macmillan, pp. 50–68.CrossRef
Kregel, J. A. 1992. ‘Walras’ auctionneer and Marshall's well informed dealers: time, market prices and normal supply prices’, Quaderni di storia dell'economia politica 10: 531–51.Google Scholar
Kregel, J. A. 1996. Origini e sviluppo dei mercati finanziari. Arezzo: Banca Popolare dell'Etruria e del Lazio.Google Scholar
Kregel, J. A., Matzner, E. and Roncaglia, A. (eds.) 1988. Barriers to full employment. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P. R. 1990. Rethinking international trade. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2nd edn. 1970.Google Scholar
Kula, W. 1958. Rozwazania o historii. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. Italian trans., Riflessioni sulla storia, Venezia: Marsilio 1990 (English trans., The problems and methods of economic history, Aldershot: Ashgate 2001).Google Scholar
Kula, W. 1962. Teoria ekonomiczna ustroju feudalnego. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawn-ictwo Naukowe. English trans., An economic theory of the feudal system, London: New Left Books 1976.Google Scholar
Kula, W. 1970. Miary i ludzie. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. English trans. Measures and men, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kurz, H. and Salvadori, N. 1995. Theory of production. A long period analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kydland, F. E. and Prescott, E. C. 1982. ‘Time to build and aggregate fluctuations’, Economica 50: 1345–70.Google Scholar
Lafargue, P. 1880. ‘Le droit à la paresse’, L’égalité; repr. Paris: Maspero 1969. English trans., The right to be lazy, Chicago: C. H. Kerr 1989.
Laidler, D. 1981. ‘Adam Smith as a monetary economist’, Canadian Journal of Economics 14: 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, I. 1970. ‘Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes’, in Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, I. 1978. The methodology of scientific research programmes. Philosophical papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, K. J. 1971. Consumer demand: a new approach. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Landes, D. S. 1986. ‘What do bosses really do?’, Journal of Economic History 46: 585–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, O. 1936–7. ‘On the economic theory of socialism’, Review of Economic Studies 4: 53–71 and 123–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langholm, O. 1987. ‘Scholastic economics’, in Lowry (ed.) 1987b, pp. 115–35.
Langholm, O. 1998. The legacy of Scholasticism in economic thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lansdowne. H. 1927. ‘Introduction’, in W. Petty, Papers, 2 vols., London: Constable, pp. ⅹⅲ–ⅹⅼⅰ.
Latsis, S. (ed.) 1976. Method and appraisal in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauerdale (James Maitland, count of) 1804. Inquiry into the nature and origins of public wealth. 2nd edn. 1819; repr., New York: Augustus M. Kelley 1962.
Leijonhufvud, A. 1968. On Keynesian economics and the economics of Keynes. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lenin (Vladimir Ilyich Ulianov) 1898. English trans., The development of capitalism in Russia, Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House 1956.
Lenin (Vladimir Ilyich Ulianov) 1916. English trans., Imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism, London: Junius 1996.
Leontief, W. 1941. The structure of the American economy, 1919–1939. New York: Oxford University Press; 2nd edn. 1951.Google Scholar
Leontief, W., Carter, A. P. and Petri, P. A. 1977. The future of the world economy. A United Nations study. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, A. and Colander, D. 1980. MAP, a market anti-inflation plan. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Letwin, W. 1959. Sir Josiah Child, merchant economist. Boston: Harvard Graduate School of Business.Google Scholar
Levhari, D. 1965. ‘A nonsubstitution theorem and switching of techniques’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 79: 98–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levhari, D. and Samuelson, P. 1966. ‘The nonswitching theorem is false’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 518–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, D. M. 2001. How the dismal science got its name. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippi, M. 1976. Marx. Il valore come costo sociale reale. Milano: Etas libri. English trans., Value and naturalism in Marx, London: New Left Books, 1979.Google Scholar
Lippi, M. 1979. I prezzi di produzione. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Lipsey, R. G. and Lancaster, K. 1956. ‘The general theory of second best’, Review of Economic Studies 24: 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, F. 1841. Das nationale System der politischen Oekonomie. Stuttgart: J. G. Cotta. English trans., The national system of political economy, ed. S. S. Lloyd, London: Longmans, Greene and Co. 1909.
Lloyd, W. F. 1837. Lectures on population, value, poor laws and rent. London; repr. New York: A. M. Kelley 1968.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1689. An essay concerning human understanding. London: Thomas Basset; repr. ed. P. H. Nidditch, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1975.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1690. Two treatises of government. London: Awnsham and John Churchill; critical edn., ed. P. Laslett, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1960; edn. quoted, London: J. M. Dent (Everyman's Library) 1975.
Locke, J. 1692. Some considerations on the consequences of the lowering of interest, and raising the value of money. London: A. and J. Churchill; repr. in Locke on money, 2 vols., ed. P. H. Kelly, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1991.Google Scholar
Longfield, M. 1834. Lectures on political economy. Dublin: R. Milliken & Son.Google Scholar
Longfield, M. 1835. Three lectures on commerce, and one on absenteeism. Dublin: William Curry, Junior & Co.Google Scholar
Lowry, S. T. 1987a. ‘The Greek heritage in economic thought’, in Lowry 1987b, pp. 7–30.
Lowry, S. T. (ed.) 1987b. Pre-classical economic thought. Boston-Dordrecht-Lancaster: Kluwer Academic Publishers; repr. 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, S. T. 2003. ‘Ancient and medieval economics’, in Samuels, Biddle and Davis (eds.), pp. 11–27.
Lucas, R. E. 1972. ‘Expectations and the neutrality of money’, Journal of Economic Theory 4: 103–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R. E. 1976. ‘Econometric policy evaluation: a critique’, in K. Brenner and A. M. Meltzer (eds.), The Phillips curve and labor markets, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 19–46.
Luxemburg, R. 1913. Die Akkumulation des Kapitals. Ein Beitrag zur ökonomischen Erklärung des Imperialismus. Berlin: Paul Singer. Italian trans., L'accumulazione del capitale, Torino: Einaudi 1960; repr. 1968. English trans., The accumulation of capital, London: Routledge 2003.
Macfie, A. L. 1967. The individual in society. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, N. [1513] 1960. Il principe. Milano: Feltrinelli. English transl., The prince, ed. R. M. Adams, New York: Norton 1992.
Maddison, A. 1984. ‘Origins and impact of the welfare state, 1883–1983’, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 37: 55–87.Google Scholar
Magnusson, L. (ed.) 1993. Mercantilist economics. Boston-Dordrecht-Lancaster: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, L. 2003. ‘Mercantilism’, in Samuels, Biddle and Davis (eds.), pp. 46–60.
Malcom, N. 1958. Ludwig Wittgenstein: a memoir. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malinvaud, E. 1977. The theory of unemployment reconsidered. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Maloney, J. 1985. The professionalization of economics. Alfred Marshall and the dominance of orthodoxy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2nd edn., New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers 1991.Google Scholar
Malthus, T. R. 1798. An essay on the principle of population as it affects the future improvement of society. London: J. Johnson; 2nd edn. 1803; critical edn., ed. P. James, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1989.
Malthus, T. R. 1800. An investigation of the cause of the present high price of provisions. London: J. Johnson.Google Scholar
Malthus, T. R. 1815. An inquiry into the nature and progress of rent and the principles by which it is regulated. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Malthus, T. R. 1820. Principles of political economy. London: John Murray; 2nd edn., London: William Pickering 1836; repr. New York: Augustus M. Kelley 1964.Google Scholar
Malthus, T. R. 1823. The measure of value stated and illustrated, with an application of it to the alterations in the value of the English currency since 1970. London: John Murray; repr. in D. Ricardo, Notes on Malthus's ‘Measure of Value’, ed. P. Porta, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1992.Google Scholar
Mandeville, B. 1705. The grumbling hive: or, knaves turn'd honest. London: Ballard; repr. in Mandeville 1714, pp. 17–37 of the 1924 edn.Google Scholar
Mandeville, B. 1714. The fable of the bees, or private vices, public benefits. London: J. Roberts; critical edn., ed. F. B. Haye, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1924; repr. Indianapolis: Liberty Press 1988.Google Scholar
Mandeville, B. 1720. Free thoughts on religion. London: Roberts.Google Scholar
Mandeville, B. 1732. A letter to Dion. London: Roberts; repr., ed. J. Viner, Augustan Reprint Society no. 41, 1953.Google Scholar
Mangoldt, K. E. 1863. Grundriss der Volkswirtschaftslehre. Stuttgart: Maier.Google Scholar
Mann, T. 1901. Buddenbrooks. Verfall einer Familie. München: Fisher.Google Scholar
Mantoux, E. 1946. The Carthaginian peace, or the economic consequences of Mr. Keynes. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marcet, J. 1806. Conversations on chemistry. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees & Orme.Google Scholar
Marcet, J. 1816. Conversations in political economy. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees & Orme.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H. 1956. One-dimensional man. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Marcuzzo, M. C. and Rosselli, A. 1986. La teoria del gold standard. Bologna: il Mulino. English trans., Ricardo and the gold standard. The foundations of international monetary order, London: Macmillan 1991.Google Scholar
Marcuzzo, M. C. and Rosselli, A., — 1994. ‘Ricardo's theory of money matters’, Revue économique 45: 1251–67.Google Scholar
Marglin, S. A. 1974. ‘What do bosses do?’, Review of Radical Political Economy 6: 60–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marris, R. 1964. The economic theory of ‘managerial’ capitalism. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, A. 1872. ‘Mr. Jevons's Theory of political economy’, Academy, 1 April; repr. in Marshall 1925, pp. 93–100.
Marshall, A. (and Mary Paley). 1879a. The economics of industry. London: Macmillan; Italian trans., Economia della produzione, Milano: Isedi 1975.
Marshall, A. 1879b. The pure theory of foreign trade. The pure theory of domestic values. Cambridge: Privately printed; repr. in Marshall 1975, vol. 2, pp. 117–236.
Marshall, A. 1890. Principles of economics. London: Macmillan; 8th edn. 1920; critical edn., ed. C. W. Guillebaud, 2 vols., London: Macmillan 1961.
Marshall, A. 1892. Elements of the economics of industry. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1919. Industry and trade. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1923. Money, credit and commerce. London: Macmillan; repr., Fairfield: Augustus M. Kelley 1991.
Marshall, A. 1925. Memorials of Alfred Marshall. Ed. A. C. Pigou, London: Macmillan.
Marshall, A. 1926. Official papers. Ed. J. M. Keynes, London: Macmillan.
Marshall, A. 1975. The early economic writings of Alfred Marshall, 1867–1890. Ed. J. K. Whitaker, 2 vols., London: Macmillan.
Marshall, A. 1995. Lectures to women. Ed. T. Raffaelli, E. Biagini and R. McWilliams Tullberg, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
Marshall, A. 1996a. The correspondence of Alfred Marshall, economist. Ed. Whitaker, J. K., 3 vols., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1996b. Official papers of Alfred Marshall. A supplement. Ed. Groenewegen, P., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martineau, H. 1832–4. Illustrations of political economy. 9 vols., London: Charles Fox.Google Scholar
Marx, K. [1844] 1932. Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte aus dem Jahre 1844. In Karl Marx – Friedrich Engels Historisc-kritische Gesamtausgabe, ed. V. Adoratskij, Berlin: Marx-Engels Gesamtausgabe (MEGA). English trans., ‘Economic and philosophical manuscripts’, in K. Marx, Early writings, ed. T. B. Bottomore, London: C. A. Watts & Co. 1963, pp. 61–219.
Marx, K. [1845] 1888. ‘Feuerbach’, appendix to F. Engels, Ludwig Feuerbach, Stuttgart: Dietz. English trans., ‘Theses on Feuerbach’, in Marx and Engels 1959, pp. 283–6.
Marx, K. 1847. Misère de la philosophie. Réponse à la philosophie de la misère de M. Proudhon. Paris: A. Frank, and Bruxelles: C. G. Vogler. English trans., The poverty of philosophy, Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House 1962.
Marx, K. 1852. Der achtzelinte Brumaire von Louis Bonaparte. Die Revolution, no. 1. English trans., excerpts, ‘The eighteenth brumaire of Louis Bonaparte’, in Marx and Engels 1959, pp. 358–88.
Marx, K. 1857. Zur Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie. Berlin: Dietz. English trans., Contributions to the critique of political economy, London: Lawrence & Wishart 1970; passages quoted from Marx and Engels 1959, pp. 83–7.
Marx, K. [1857–8] 1939–41. Grundrisse der Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. 2 vols., Moscow: Marx-Engels-Lenin Institute; repr. Berlin: Dietz Verlag 1953. English trans., Foundations of a critique of political economy, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books 1972.
Marx, K. 1867–94. Das Kapital. 3 vols., Hamburg: O. Meissner. English trans., Capital, London: Dent 1946 (for vols. 1 and 2) and Harmondsworth: Penguin Books 1976, repr. 1986 (for vol. 3).
Marx, K. 1905–10. Theorien über den Mehrwert. Ed. K. Kautsky, Stuttgart: Dietz. English trans., Theories of surplus-value. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House and London: Lawrence and Wishart, Part 1, 1963; Part 2, 1969; Part 3, 1972.
Marx, K. and Engels, F. [1845–6] 1932. Die Deutsche Ideologie. Berlin: Marx-Engels Gesamtausgabe (MEGA). English trans., The German ideology, London: Lawrence and Wishart 1939; passages quoted from Marx and Engels 1959, pp. 287–302.
Marx, K. and Engels, F., — 1848. Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei. London.: J. E. Burghard, Bildungs-Gesellschaft für Arbeiter; Italian trans., Manifesto del partito comunista, Torino: Einaudi, 4th edn. 1966. English trans., ‘Manifesto of the Communist Party’, in Marx and Engels 1959, pp. 43–82.
Marx, K. and Engels, F., — 1878. ‘Kritik des Gothaer Programms’, Die Neue Zeit, no. 18. English trans., ‘Critique of the Gotha programme’, in Marx and Engels 1959, pp. 153–73.
Marx, K. and Engels, F., — 1959. Basic writings on politics and philosophy. Ed. L. S. Feuer, New York: Anchor Books; new edn., London and New York: Fontana-Collins, 1969.
Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D. and Green, J. R. 1995. Microeconomic theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Massie, J. 1750. An essay on the governing causes of the rate of interest. London: T. Payne; repr. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press 1912.
Mays, W. 1962. ‘Jevons's conception of scientific method’, Manchester School 30: 223–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, D. 1985. The rhetoric of economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, D. 1994. Knowledge and persuasion in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, McCord D. 1950. ‘Schumpeter and Keynes’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 65: 185–96.Google Scholar
McCulloch, J. R. 1825. The principles of political economy. Edinburgh: William and Charles Tait, and London: Longmans and Co.Google Scholar
McCulloch, J. R. 1845. The literature of political economy. London: Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans; repr., Fairfield: Augustus M. Kelley 1991.Google Scholar
McCulloch, J. R. (ed.) 1856. A select collection of early English tracts on commerce. London: Political Economy Club; repr. Cambridge: Economic History Society 1952; repr. McCulloch 1995, vol. 1.Google Scholar
McCulloch, J. R. (ed.) 1995. Classical writings in economics. 6 vols., London: Pickering & Chatto.Google Scholar
McKenzie, L. W. 1954. ‘On equilibrium in Graham's model of world trade and other competitive systems’, Econometrica 2: 147–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, I. and Hewitt, F. 1994. ‘Introduction’, in Condorcet, Foundations of social choice and political theory, Aldershot: Edward Elgar, pp. 1–90.Google Scholar
Meade, J. E. 1972. ‘The theory of labour-managed firms and of profit sharing’, Economic Journal 82: 402–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, D. H., , Meadows D. L., , Randers D. L. and , Beherens W. W.1972. The limits to growth. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Medio, A. 1972. ‘Profits and surplus value: appearance and reality in capitalist production’, in Hunt, E. K. and Schwartz, J. G. (eds.), A critique of economic theory, Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 312–46.Google Scholar
Meek, R. L. 1950–1. ‘Thomas Joplin and the theory of interest’, Review of Economic Studies 18: 154–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meek, R. L. (ed.) 1953. Marx and Engels on Malthus. London: Lawrence and Wishart; repr. Marx and Engels on the population bomb, Berkeley: Ramparts Press Inc. 1971.Google Scholar
Meek, R. L. 1956. Studies in the labour theory of value. London: Lawrence and Wishart; 2nd edn. 1973.Google Scholar
Meek, R. L. 1961. ‘Mr. Sraffa's rehabilitation of classical economics’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy 8: 119–36; repr. in Meek 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meek, R. L. 1962. The economics of physiocracy. Essays and translations. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Meek, R. L. 1967. Economics and ideology and other essays. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Meek, R. L. 1976. Social science and the ignoble savage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meek, R. L. 1977. Smith, Marx and after. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meenai, S. A. 1956. ‘Robert Torrens – 1780–1864’, Economica 22: 49–61.Google Scholar
Meikle, S. 1995. Aristotle's economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meldolesi, L. 1971. ‘Il contributo di Bortkiewicz alla teoria del valore, della distribuzione e dell'origine del profitto’, in L. von Bortkiewicz, La teoria economica di Marx e altri saggi, Torino: Einaudi, pp. ⅸ–ⅼⅹⅹⅹⅲ.
Menger, A. 1886. Das Recht auf den vollen Arbeitsertrag. Stuttgart: J. C. Cotta; 2nd edn. 1891. English trans., The right to the whole produce of labour, London: Macmillan 1899; repr. New York: Augustus M. Kelley 1970.
Menger, A. 1871. Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre. Wien: Braumuller; 2nd edn., ed. K. Menger, 1923. English trans., Principles of economics, New York: New York University Press 1981.
Menger, A. 1883. Untersuchungen über die Methode der Sozialwissenschaften und der politischen Oekonomie insbesondere. Berlin: Dunker & Humblot. English trans., Problems of economics and sociology, Urbana: University of Illinois Press 1963; repr. as Investigations into the method of the social sciences with special reference to economics, New York: New York University Press 1985.
Menger, A. 1884. Die Irrthümer des Historismus in den deutschen Nationalökonomie. Wien: Hölder; Italian trans., Gli errori dello storicismo, Milano: Rusconi 1991.
Rivière, Mercier P.-P. 1767. L'ordre naturel et essentiel des sociétés politiques. 2 vols., Londres: Jean Nourse.Google Scholar
Milgate, M. 1979. ‘On the origin of the notion of intertemporal equilibrium’, Economica 44: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgate, M. 1987. ‘Carlyle, Thomas’, in Eatwell, Milgate and Newman (eds.), vol. 1, p. 371.
Mill, J. 1807. Commerce defended, London: C. and R. Baldwin; repr. in J. Mill, Selected economic writings, ed. D. Winch, Edinburgh and London: Oliver & Boyd 1966, pp. 85–159.
Mill, J. 1818. ‘Colonies’, in Supplement to the Encyclopaedia Britannica (4th, 5th and 6th edns.), vol. 3, pp. 257–73.
Mill, J. 1821. Elements of political economy. London: Baldwin, Cradock and Joy; repr. in J. Mill, Selected economic writings, ed. D. Winch, Edinburgh and London: Oliver & Boyd 1966, pp. 203–366.
Mill, J. S. 1838. ‘Bentham’, London and Westminster Review, no. 29: 467–506; repr. in J. S. Mill and J. Bentham, Utilitarianism and other essays, ed. A. Ryan, London: Penguin Books 1987, pp. 132–75.
Mill, J. S. 1840. ‘Coleridge’, London and Westminster Review, no. 33: 257–302; repr. in J. S. Mill and J. Bentham, Utilitarianism and other essays, ed. A. Ryan, London: Penguin Books 1987, pp. 177–226.
Mill, J. S. 1843. A system of logic. 2 vols., London: John W. Parker.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1844. Essays on some unsettled questions of political economy. London: John W. Parker; 2nd edn. 1874; repr. Clifton: Augustus M. Kelley, 1974; Italian trans., Alcuni problemi insoluti dell'economia politica, Milano: Isedi 1976.
Mill, J. S. 1848. Principles of political economy. London: John W. Parker.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1859. On liberty. London: J. W. Parker. Repr. Northbrook, Ill.: AHM Publishing Co. 1947.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1861. ‘Utilitarianism’, Fraser's Magazine 64: 383–4; repr. in J. S. Mill and J. Bentham, Utilitarianism and other essays, ed. A. Ryan, London: Penguin Books 1987, pp. 272–338.
Mill, J. S. 1869. ‘Thornton on labour and its claims’, Fortnightly Review, May–June, pp. 505–18 and 680–700.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1873. Autobiography. London: Longmans, Green, Read and Dyer; repr., London: Oxford University Press 1971.
Minsky, H. P. 1975. John Maynard Keynes. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minsky, H. P. 1982. Can ‘it’ happen again? Essays on instability and finance. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Mirabeau (Victor Riquetti, Marquis de) 1756. L'ami des hommes. Avignon: no publisher.
Mirowski, P. 1989. More heat than light. Economics as social physics, physics as nature's economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, P. 2002. Machine dreams. Economics becomes a cyborg science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mises, L. von 1912. Theorie des Geldes und der Umlaufsmittel. Munich and Leipzig: Dunker & Humblot; 2nd edn. 1924; Italian trans., Teoria della moneta e dei mezzi di circolazione. Napoli: Edizioni scientifiche italiane, 1999.
Mises, L. 1920. ‘Die Wirtschaftsrechnung im Sozialistischen Gemeinwesen’, Arkiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 47: 86–121; English transl. in Hayek (ed.) 1935.Google Scholar
Mishan, E. J. 1967. The costs of economic growth. London: Staples Press.Google Scholar
Modigliani, F. 1944. ‘Liquidity preference and the theory of interest and money’, Econometrica 12: 45–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modigliani, F. 1958. ‘New developments on the oligopoly front’, Journal of Political Economy 66: 215–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modigliani, F. 1963. ‘The monetary mechanism and its interaction with real phenomena’, Review of Economics and Statistics 45 (Supplement): 79–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. 1958. ‘The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment’, American Economic Review 48: 161–97.Google Scholar
Moggridge, D. E. 1976. Keynes. Glasgow: Collins; 2nd edn. London: Macmillan 1980.Google Scholar
Moggridge, D. E. 1992. Maynard Keynes. An economist's biography. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Montchrétien, A. 1615. Traicté de l'oeconomie politique. Paris; critical edn., ed. F. Billacois, Genève: Droz 1999.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, C.-L. de Secondat de 1748. De l'esprit des lois. 2 vols., Genève: Barillot et Fils. English trans., The spirit of the laws, ed. A. M. Cohler, B. C. Miller and H. S. Stone, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1989.
More, T. 1516. Utopia. Louvain: T. Martens. English trans., Utopia, in The complete works of St Thomas More, vol. 4, ed. E. Surtz and J. H. Hexter, New Haven: Yale University Press 1965; repr. 1979.
, Morelly, 1775. Code de la nature. Paris: Chez le vrai sage.Google Scholar
Morishima, M. 1973. Marx's economics. A dual theory of value and growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morishima, M. 1977. Walras’ economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moulin, H. and Young, H. P. 1987. ‘Condorcet, Marie Jean Antoine Nicolas Caritat, Marquis de’, in Eatwell, Milgate and Newman (eds.), vol. 1, pp. 566–7.
Mun, T. 1621. A discourse of trade from England unto the East-Indies. London: John Piper; repr. in McCulloch 1856, pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
Morishima, M. [c. 1630] 1664. England's treasure by forraign trade. London: Thomas Clark; repr. in McCulloch 1856, pp. 115–209; Italian trans., Il tesoro dell'Inghilterra, Napoli: Edizioni scientifiche italiane 1994.
Murphy, A. E. 1986. Richard Cantillon: entrepreneur and economist. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, A. E. 1997. John Law. Economic theorist and policy-maker. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muth, J. F. 1961. ‘Rational expectations and the theory of price movements’, Econometrica 29: 315–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naldi, N. 1989. ‘Petty's labour theory of prices’, Quaderni di storia dell'economia politica 7: 3–36.Google Scholar
Naldi, N. 1998a. ‘Some notes on Piero Sraffa's biography, 1917–27’, Review of Political Economy 10: 493–515.CrossRef
Naldi, N. 1998b. ‘Sraffa a Perugia: novembre 1923–febbraio 1926’, History of Economic Ideas 6: 105–32.
Naldi, N. 1998c. ‘Dicembre 1922: Piero Sraffa e Benito Mussolini’, Rivista italiana degli economisti 3: 271–99.
Napoleoni, C. 1962. ‘La posizione del consumo nella teoria economica’, La rivista trimestrale, no. 1: 3–26.Google Scholar
Napoleoni, C. 1965. L'equilibrio economico generale. Studio introduttivo. Torino: Boringhieri.Google Scholar
Napoleoni, C. 1972. Lezioni sul Capitolo sesto inedito di Marx. Torino: Boringhieri.Google Scholar
Napoleoni, C. 1976. Il valore. Milano: Isedi.Google Scholar
Nash, J. F. 1950. ‘Equilibrium points in N-person games’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 36: 48–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neisser, H. 1932. ‘Lohnhohe und beschäftigungsgrad in Marktgleichgewicht’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 36: 415–55.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. and Winter, S. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Neumann, J. von 1937. ‘Über ein ökonomisches Gleichungssystem und eine Verallgemeinerung des Brouwerschen Fixpunktsatzes’, in K. Menger (ed.), Ergebrisse eines mathematischen Kolloquiums, 1935–36, vol. 8, pp. 73–83, Wien: Deuticke. English trans., ‘A model of general economic equilibrium’, Review of Economic Studies 13 (1945): 1–9.
Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. 1944. Theory of games and economic behaviour. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2nd edn. 1947; 3rd edn. 1953.Google Scholar
Niehans, J. 1990. A history of economic theory. Classic contributions, 1720–1980. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Nikolaevskij, B. and Maenchen-Helfen, O. 1963, Karl Marx. Eine Biographie. Hannover: Dietz. English trans., Karl Marx: man and fighter, Harmondsworth: Penguin 1976.
North, D. 1691. Discourses upon trade. London: Basset; repr. in McCulloch 1856, pp. 509–40.Google Scholar
North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nove, A. 1970. ‘M. I. Tugan-Baranowsky (1865–1919)’, History of Political Economy 2: 246–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuccio, O. 1984–7. Il pensiero economico italiano. I. Le fonti (1050–1450). 3 vols. (1984, 1985, 1987), Sassari: Edizioni Gallizzi.Google Scholar
O'Brien, D. P. 1970. J. R. McCulloch. A study in classical economics. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
O'Brien, D. P. 1975. The classical economists. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
O'Brien, D. P. 2003. ‘Classical economics’, in Samuels, Biddle and Davis (eds.), pp. 112–29.
O'Donnell, R. 1990. Adam Smith's theory of value and distribution. A reappraisal. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortes, G. 1790. Riflessioni sulla popolazione delle nazioni in rapporto all'economia nazionale. Firenze, s.e., repr. in P. Custodi (ed.), Scrittori classici italiani di economia politica, Parte moderna, vol. 24, Milano: Destefanis 1804, pp. 5–111.
Overstone (S. Jones Lloyd, Lord) 1971. The correspondence of Lord Overstone, ed. D. P. O'Brien, 3 vols., London: Cambridge University Press.
Owen, R. 1813. A new view of society. London: Cadell and Davies; repr. in R. Owen, Report to the county of Lanark. A new view of society, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books 1970, pp. 85–198.
Owen, R. 1820. Report to the county of Lanark. Lanark, 1 May; repr. in Owen 1857–8, vol. 2, pp. 261–310; repr. in R. Owen, Report to the county of Lanark. A new view of society, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books 1970, pp. 199–270.
Owen, R. 1857–8. The life of Robert Owen, written by himself. 2 vols., London: Effingham Wilson; repr. Fairfield: Augustus M. Kelley 1977.Google Scholar
Oxley, G. 1974. Poor relief in England and Wales, 1601–1834. London: David and Charles.Google Scholar
Pack, S. J. 1991. Capitalism as a moral system. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Paine, T. 1776. Common sense. London: J. Almon; repr. in Common sense, rights of man and other essential writings, New York: Signet Classic 2003.Google Scholar
Paine, T. 1791. Rights of man. London: J. S. Jordan; repr. in Common sense, rights of man and other essential writings, New York, Signet Classic 2003.Google Scholar
Pantaleoni, M. 1883. ‘Contributo alla teoria del riparto delle spese pubbliche’, Rassegna italiana, 15 ottobre; repr. in M. Pantaleoni, Scritti vari di economia, vol. 1, Milano-Palermo-Napoli: Remo Sandron 1904, pp. 49–110.
Pantaleoni, M. 1889. Principii di economia pura. Firenze: G. Barbera; 2nd edn. 1894. English trans., Pure economics, London: Macmillan 1898.
Pantaleoni, M. 1895. ‘La caduta della Società Generale di Credito Mobiliare Italiano’, Giornale degli economisti, aprile, pp. 357–417; maggio, pp. 517–64; novembre, pp. 437–503; repr. in M. Pantaleoni, Scritti vari di economia, vol. 3, Roma: Castellani 1910, pp. 323–615.
Pantaleoni, M. 1898. ‘Dei criteri che devono informare la storia delle dottrine economiche’, Giornale degli economisti, 4 novembre, repr. in Pantaleoni 1925, pp. 211–45.
Pantaleoni, M. 1925. Erotemi di economia. 2 vols., Bari: Laterza; repr. Padova: Cedam 1963.
Pareto, V. 1896. ‘La courbe de la répartition de la richesse’, in Recueil publié par la Faculté de Droit de l'Université de Lausanne à l'occasion de l'Exposition nationale de 1896, pp. 373–87. Italian trans., La curva di ripartizione della ricchezza, in M. Corsi (ed.), Le diseguaglianze economiche, Torino: Giappichelli 1995, pp. 51–70.
Pareto, V. 1896–7. Cours d’économie politique. 2 vols., Lausanne: F. Rouge.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1901–2. Les systèmes socialistes. 2 vols., Paris: Giard et Brière; 2nd edn. 1926.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1906. Manuale di economia politica. Milano: Società editrice libraria; repr. Roma: Bizzarri 1965.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1916. Trattato di sociologia generale. 2 vols., Firenze: Barbera; repr. Roma: Bizzarri 1964.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1960. Lettere a Pantaleoni. 3 vols., Roma: Banca Nazionale del Lavoro.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1964–89. Oeuvres complètes. 30 vols., ed. Busino, G., Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
Pareto, V. 1973. Epistolario, 1890–1923. 2 vols., ed. Busino, G., Roma: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei.Google Scholar
Parrinello, S. 1970. ‘Introduzione a una teoria neoricardiana del commercio internazionale’, Studi economici 25: 267–321.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. 1960. ‘A mathematical formulation of the Ricardian system’, Review of Economic Studies 27: 78–98 (repr. in Pasinetti 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. 1962. ‘Rate of profit and income distribution in relation to the rate of economic growth’, Review of Economic Studies 29: 267–79 (repr. in Pasinetti 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. 1965. ‘A new theoretical approach to the problems of economic growth’, Academiae Pontificiae Scientiarum Scripta Varia, no. 28: 571–696.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. 1966. ‘Changes in the rate of profits and switches of techniques’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 503–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. 1969. ‘Switches of technique and the “rate of return” in capital theory’, Economic Journal 79: 508–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. 1970. ‘Again on capital theory and Solow's “rate of return”’, Economic Journal 80: 428–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. 1972. ‘Reply to Mr. Dougherty’, Economic Journal 82: 1351–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. 1973. ‘The notion of vertical integration in economic analysis’, Metroeconomica 25: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. 1974. Growth and income distribution. Essays in economic theory. CambridgeCambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. 1975. Lezioni di teoria della produzione. Bologna: il Mulino. English trans., Lectures on the theory of production, London: Macmillan 1977.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. (ed.) 1977. Contributi alla teoria della produzione congiunta. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. 1979a. ‘The unpalatability of the reswitching of techniques’, Revue d’économie politique 89: 637–42.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. 1979b. ‘The “unobtrusive postulate” of neoclassical economic theory’, Revue d’économie politique 89: 654–6.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. 1981. Structural change and economic growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. 1984. ‘The difficulty, and yet the necessity, of aiming at full employment: a comment on Nina Shapiro's Note’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 7: 246–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. 2000. ‘Critique of the neoclassical theory of growth and distribution’, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 53: 383–431.Google Scholar
Pasquinelli, A. and Marzetti Dall'Aste Brandolini, S. 1994. ‘Introduzione’, in J. M. Keynes, Trattato sulla probabilità, Bologna: Clueb, pp. ⅸ–ⅹⅹⅵ.
Patinkin, D. 1956. Money, interest and prices. An interpretation of money and value theory. Evanston, Ill.: Peterson; 2nd edn., abridged, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press 1989.
Patinkin, D. 1976. Keynes's monetary thought: a study of its development. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Patinkin, D. 1987. ‘Keynes, John Maynard’, in Eatwell, Milgate and Newman (eds.), vol. 3, pp. 19–41.
Peach, T. 1993. Interpreting Ricardo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, S. J. and Levy, D. M. 2003. ‘Post-Ricardian British economics, 1830–1870’, in Samuels, Biddle and Davis (eds.), pp. 130–47.
Pecchio, G. 1832. Storia dell'economia pubblica in Italia. Lugano: Ruggia; repr. Milano: Sugarco 1992.Google Scholar
Perrotta, C. 1988. Produzione e lavoro produttivo nel mercantilismo e nell'illuminismo. Galatina: Congedo.Google Scholar
Perrotta, C. 1991. ‘Is the mercantilist theory of the favorable balance of trade really erroneous?’, History of Political Economy 23: 301–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrotta, C. 1993. ‘Early Spanish mercantilism: the first analysis of underdevelopment’, in Magnusson (ed.) 1993, pp. 17–58.
Perrotta, C. 1997. ‘The preclassical theory of development: increased consumption raises productivity’, History of Political Economy 29: 295–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesciarelli, E. 1989. ‘Introduzione’, in A. Smith, Lezioni di Glasgow, Milano: Giuffrè, pp. ⅸ–ⅹⅽⅶ.
Petty, W. 1662. A treatise of taxes and contributions. London: N. Brooke; repr. in Petty 1899, pp. 1–97.Google Scholar
Petty, W. 1674. The discourse made before the Royal Society, the 26 November 1674 concerning the use of duplicate proportion in sundry important particulars. London: John Martyn; partially repr. in Petty 1899, pp. 622–4.Google Scholar
Petty, W. 1690. Political arithmetick. London: Robert Clavel and Henry Mortlock; repr. in Petty 1899, pp. 233–313.Google Scholar
Petty, W. 1691a. The political anatomy of Ireland. London: D. Brown and W. Rogers; repr. in Petty 1899, pp. 121–231.Google Scholar
Petty, W. 1691b. Verbum sapienti. In appendix to W. Petty 1691a; repr. in Petty 1899, pp. 99–120.
Petty, W. 1695. Quantulumcumque concerning money. London: A. and J. Churchill; repr. in Petty 1899, pp. 437–48.Google Scholar
Petty, W. 1899. Economic writings. Ed. C. Hull, 2 vols., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; repr. New York: Augustus M. Kelley 1963.Google Scholar
Petty, W. 1927. Papers. 2 vols., ed. H. Lansdowne, London: Constable.Google Scholar
Petty, W. 1928. Petty–Southwell correspondence 1676–1687. Ed. H. Lansdowne, London: Constable.Google Scholar
Petty, W. 1977. ‘A dialogue on political arithmetic’, in S. Matsukawa, ‘Sir William Petty: an unpublished manuscript’, Hitostubashi Journal of Economics 17: 33–50.Google Scholar
Phelps, E. S. 1967. ‘Phillips curves, expectations of inflation and optimal unemployment over time’, Economica 34: 254–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, A. W. 1958. ‘The relationship between unemployment and the rate of change of money wage rates in the United Kingdom, 1861–1957’, Economica 25: 283–99.Google Scholar
Pietranera, G. 1963. La teoria del valore e dello sviluppo capitalistico in Adamo Smith. Milano: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1912. Wealth and welfare. London: Macmillan; new edn., The economics of welfare, London: Macmillan 1920.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1922. ‘Empty economic boxes: a reply’, Economic Journal 32: 458–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1927a. Industrial fluctuations. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1927b. ‘The laws of diminishing and increasing cost’, Economic Journal 37: 188–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1928. ‘An analysis of supply’, Economic Journal 38: 238–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1933. The theory of unemployment. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1950. Keynes's General Theory: a retrospective view. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Place, F. 1822. Illustrations and proofs of the principle of population. London: Longman and Co.; repr. London: Allen & Unwin 1930.Google Scholar
Plato, 1926. Laws. Ed. R. G. Burey, Loeb Classic Library, London: Heinemann and Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato 1930. The republic. Books 1–5 (vol. 1), with an English trans. by P. Shorey, Loeb Classic Library, London: Heinemann and Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Poinsot, L. 1803. Éléments de statique. Paris; 8th edn. Paris: Bachelier 1842.Google Scholar
Political Economy Club 1882. Minutes of proceedings. vol. 4, London: Macmillan.
Political Economy Club 1921. Minutes of proceedings, 1899–1920, Roll of members and questions discussed, 1821–1920, with documents bearing on the history of the Club. London: Macmillan.
Pollard, S. 1968. The idea of progress. London: C. A. Watts; repr. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books 1971.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1934. Logik der Forschnung. Wien: Springer. Enlarged English edn., The logic of scientific discovery, London: Hutchinson 1959.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1944–5. ‘The poverty of historicism’, Economica 11: 86–103 and 119–37; 12: 69–89; repr. in volume, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1957; 2nd edn. 1960; repr. 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1945. The open society and its enemies. 2 vols., London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 5th edn. 1966.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1969. Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1976. Unended quest. An intellectual autobiography. Glasgow: Fontana-Collins.Google Scholar
Postlethwayt, M. 1751–5. Universal dictionary of trade and commerce. London: W. Strahan.Google Scholar
Pownall, T. 1776. A letter from Governor Pownall to Adam Smith, L.L.D. F.R.S., being an examination of several points of doctrine, laid down in his ‘Inquiry in to the nature and causes of the wealth of nations’. London; repr. New York: Augustus M. Kelley 1967; repr. in Smith 1977, pp. 337–76.Google Scholar
Preobrazhensky, E. A. 1922. Ot nepa k sotzializmu. Moscow. English trans., The new economics, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1965.Google Scholar
Pribram, K. 1983. A history of economic reasoning. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Proudhon, P.-J. 1840. Qu'est-ce que la propriété? Paris: Brocard. English trans., What is property?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1994.
Pufendorf, S. 1672. De iure naturae et gentium libri octo. Lund: A. Junghans. English trans. by C. and W. Oldfather, The classics of international law, vol. 2 no. 17, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1934.
Pyle, A. (ed.) 1994. Population. Contemporary responses to Thomas Malthus. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Quesnay, F. 1756. ‘Fermiers’, in Encyclopédie, vol. 6, pp. 528–40; repr. in INED, 1958, pp. 427–58.
Quesnay, F. 1757. ‘Grains’, in Encyclopédie, vol. 7, pp. 812–31; repr. in INED, 1958, pp. 793–812.
Quesnay, F. 1758–9. Tableau économique. Paris (1st edn. 1758; 2nd edn. 1759; 3rd edn. 1759). Repr. with an English trans. in M. Kuczynski and R. L. Meek, Quesnay's tableau économique, London: Macmillan and New York: Kelley 1972.
Quesnay, F. 1765. ‘Observations sur le droit naturel des hommes réunis en société’, Journal de l'agriculture, du commerce et des finances 2 (first part): 1–35; repr. in INED 1958, pp. 729–42.
Quine, W. V. O. 1951. ‘Two dogmas of empiricism’, Philosophical Review 60: 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinton, A. 1968. ‘The later philosophy of Wittgenstein’, in Pitcher, G. (ed.), Wittgenstein. A collection of critical essays, London: Macmillan, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Radcliffe Report 1959. Committee on the working of the monetary system, London: HMSO.
Rae, J. 1834. Statement of some new principles on the subject of political economy. Boston: Hilliard Gray and Co.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. 1928. ‘A mathematical theory of saving’, Economic Journal 38: 543–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. 1931. The foundations of mathematics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L. 1976. ‘Introduction’ to Smith 1759, critical edn., pp. 1–52.
Rau, K. H. 1826. Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre. Heidelberg: C. F. Winter; 4th edn. 1841; 7th edn. 1863.Google Scholar
Rauner, R. M. 1961. Samuel Bailey and the classical theory of value. London: G. Bell and Sons.Google Scholar
Ravenstone, P. 1821. A few doubts as to the correctness of some opinions generally entertained on the subject of population and political economy. London: J. Andrews; repr. New York: A. M. Kelley 1970.Google Scholar
Ravix, J. and Romani, P.-M. (eds.) 1997. Turgot. Formation et distribution des richesses. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Realfonzo, R. and Graziani, A. 1992. ‘La Teoria del credito e della circolazione di Marco Fanno’, in Fanno, M., Teoria del credito e della circolazione, Napoli: Edizioni scientifiche italiane, pp. ⅺ–ⅼⅹⅹⅲ.Google Scholar
Remak, R. 1929. ‘Kann die Volkswirtschaftslehre eine exakte Wissenschaft werden?’, Jahrbucher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 131: 703–36.Google Scholar
Riazanov, D. 1927. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. London: Martin Lawrence.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1951–5. Works and correspondence. 10 vols., ed. Sraffa, P., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (vol. 11, Indexes, 1973).Google Scholar
Rickett, W. A. 1985–98. Guanzi. 2 vols., Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ridolfi, M. 1972. ‘Aspetti del sistema teorico di Alfred Marshall: una revisione critica di interpretazioni moderne’, Annali della Facoltà di scienze politiche, Università degli studi di Perugia 2: 119–204.Google Scholar
Ridolfi, M. 1973. ‘Introduzione’, in Quesnay, F., Il ‘tableau économique’ e altri scritti di economia, Milano: Isedi, pp. ⅸ–lⅹⅹⅺ.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. 1928. ‘The representative firm’, Economic Journal 38: 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, L. 1932. An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. 1958. Robert Torrens and the evolution of classical economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. 1971. Autobiography of an economist. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, D. 1915. A study of industrial fluctuations. London: P. S. King & Son; repr., London School of Economics and Political Science 1948.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. 1924. ‘Those empty boxes’, Economic Journal 34: 16–30.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. 1926. Banking policy and the price level. An essay in the theory of trade cycle. London: King and Son.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. 1930. ‘The trees of the forest’, Economic Journal 40: 80–9.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. 1933. The economics of imperfect competition. London: Macmillan; 2nd edn. 1969.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. 1953. ‘The production function and the theory of capital’, Review of Economic Studies 21: 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. 1956. The accumulation of capital. London: Macmillan; 3rd edn. 1969.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. 1961. ‘Prelude to a critique of economic theory’, Oxford Economic Papers 13: 53–8.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. 1977. ‘Michal Kalecki on the economics of capitalism’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 39: 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roll, E. 1945. A history of economic thought. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Romer, P. 1986. ‘Increasing returns and long-run growth’, Journal of Political Economy 94: 1002–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roncaglia, A. 1972. ‘Introduzione’, in Torrens, R., Saggio sulla produzione della ricchezza, Milano: Isedi, pp. ⅸ–ⅹⅹⅻ.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. 1973. ‘La riduzione di lavoro complesso a lavoro semplice’, Note economiche 6: 97–112.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. 1974. ‘Labour-power, subsistence wage and the rate of wages’, Australian Economic Papers 13: 133–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roncaglia, A. 1975. Sraffa e la teoria dei prezzi. Roma-Bari: Laterza; 2nd edn. 1981. English trans. Sraffa and the theory of prices, Chichester: Wiley 1977.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. 1977. Petty: la nascita dell'economia politica. Milano: Etas Libri. English trans. Petty. The origins of political economy, Armonk: M. E. Sharpe 1985.
Roncaglia, A. 1982. ‘Hollander's Ricardo’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 4: 339–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roncaglia, A. 1983a. L'economia del petrolio. Roma-Bari: Laterza 1983. English trans. The international oil market, London: Macmillan 1985.
Roncaglia, A. 1983b. ‘Piero Sraffa: una bibliografia ragionata’, Studi economici 38: 137–66.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. 1987. Schumpeter. È possibile una teoria dello sviluppo economico?Arezzo: Banca Popolare dell'Etruria.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. 1988. ‘William Petty and the conceptual framework for the analysis of economic development’, in K. Arrow (ed.), The balance between industry and agriculture in economic development, vol. 1. Basic issues, London: Macmillan, pp. 157–74.
Roncaglia, A. 1989. ‘Italian economic growth: a Smithian view’, Quaderni di storia dell'economia politica 7: 227–34.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. 1990a. ‘Le scuole sraffiane’, in Becattini (ed.), pp. 233–74. English trans., ‘The Sraffian schools’, Review of Political Economy 1991, 3: 187–219.
Roncaglia, A. 1990b. ‘Is the notion of long-period positions compatible with classical political economy?’, Political Economy 6: 103–11.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. 1993. ‘Toward a post-Sraffian theory of income distribution’, Journal of Income Distribution 3: 3–27.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. 1994. ‘Antonio Serras Theorie und ihre Rezeption’, in Heertje, A. et al., Antonio Serra und sein ‘Breve Trattato’, Düsseldorf: Verlag Wirtschaft un Finanzen GmbH, pp. 41–64.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. 1995a. ‘Introduzione’, in Smith, A., La ricchezza delle nazioni, Roma: Newton, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. 1995b. ‘On the compatibility between Keynes's and Sraffa's viewpoints on output levels’, in Harcourt, G., Roncaglia, A. and Rowley, R. (eds.), Income and employment in theory and practice, London: Macmillan, pp. 111–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roncaglia, A. 1995c. ‘Comment’, History of Political Economy 27: 189–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roncaglia, A. 1999. Sraffa: la biografia, l'opera, le scuole. Roma-Bari: Laterza. English trans., Piero Sraffa. His life, thought and cultural heritage, London: Routledge 2001.
Roncaglia, A. and Tonveronachi, M. 1985. ‘The pre-Keynesian roots of the neoclassical synthesis’, Cahiers d’économie politique 10: 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. 1984. ‘The historiography of philosophy’, in Rorty, R., Schnewind, J. B. and Skinner, Q. (eds.), Philosophy in History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 49–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roscher, W. 1854. Die Grundlagen der Nationalökonomie. Stuttgart: Gotta'schen Buchhandlung. English trans., Principles of political economy, Chicago: Callaghan 1878.Google Scholar
Rosdolsky, R. 1955. Zur Entstehungsgeschichte des Marxschen ‘Kapital’. Frankfurt: Europäische Verlagsanstalt. English trans., The making of Marx's ‘Capital’, ed. P. Burgess, London: Pluto Press 1977.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. 1965. ‘Adam Smith on the division of labour: two views or one?’, Economica 32: 127–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, I. S. 1995. The life of Adam Smith. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, S. 1973. ‘The economic theory of agency: the principal's problem’, American Economic Review 63: 134–9.Google Scholar
Rosselli, A. 1985. ‘The theory of the natural wage’, in Caravale (ed.), pp. 239–54.
Rosselli, A. 1995. ‘Antonio Serra e la teoria dei cambi’, in A. Roncaglia (ed.), Alle origini del pensiero economico in Italia. 1. Moneta e sviluppo negli economisti napoletani dei secoli XVII–XVIII, Bologna: il Mulino, pp. 37–58.
Rossi, E. 1946. Abolire la miseria. La fiaccola; repr. ed. P. Sylos Labini, Roma-Bari: Laterza 1977.Google Scholar
Rossi, P. 1962. I filosofi e le macchine, 1400–1700. Milano: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Rossi, P. 1997. La nascita della scienza moderna in Europa. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Rostow, W. W. 1960. The stages of economic growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rotelli, C. 1982. Le origini della controversia monetaria (1797–1844). Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Rothschild, E. 1992. ‘Adam Smith and conservative economics’, Economic History Review 45: 74–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, E. 1994. ‘Adam Smith and the invisible hand’, American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings 84: 319–22.Google Scholar
Rothschild, E. 1995. ‘Social security and laissez faire in eigtheenth-century political economy’, Population and Development Review 21: 711–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, E. 2001. Economic sentiments. Adam Smith, Condorcet and the Enlightenment. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. 1762. Du contrat social. Amsterdam: M. Rey. English trans., The social contract, London: J. M. Dent & Sons 1973.
Routh, G. 1975. The origins of economic ideas. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. 1945. A history of Western philosophy. New York: Simon and Schuster; paperback edn., tenth repr. 1964.Google Scholar
Russell, B. and Whitehead, A. N. 1910–13. Principia mathematica. 3 vols., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rutheford, M. 2003. ‘American institutional economics in the interwar period’, in Samuels, Biddle and Davis (eds.), pp. 360–76.
Sabbatini, R. 1989. ‘Il progetto di Keynes di stabilizzazione dei prezzi delle materie prime’, Quaderni di storia dell'economia politica 7: 55–73.Google Scholar
Salvadori, M. L. 1976. Kautsky e la rivoluzione socialista, 1880–1938. Milano: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Samuels, W. J., Biddle, J. E. and Davis, J. B. (eds.) 2003. A companion to the history of economic thought. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1938. ‘A note on the pure theory of consumers’ behaviour’, Economica 5: 632–56.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1947. Foundations of economic analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1948a. Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1948b. ‘International trade and the equalization of factor prices’, Economic Journal 58: 163–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1962. ‘Parable and realism in capital theory: the surrogate production function’, Review of Economic Studies 29: 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1966. ‘A summing up’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 568–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1987. ‘Sraffian economics’, in Eatwell, Milgate and Newman (eds.), vol. 4, pp. 452–61.
Sardoni, C. 1987. Marx and Keynes on economic recession. The theory of unemployment and effective demand. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Savage, L. J. 1954. The foundation of statistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Savary, J. 1675. Le parfait negociant. Paris: Louis Billaine; repr., Düsseldorf: Verlag Wirtschaft und Finanzen 1993.Google Scholar
Say, J. B. 1803. Traité d’économie politique. Paris: Deterville. English trans. A treatise on political economy, New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers 2000.
Scaruffi, G. 1582. L'Alitinolfo. Reggio: Hercoliano Bartoli; repr. as Discorso sopra le monete e della vera proporzione tra l'oro e l'argento, in P. Custodi (ed.), Scrittori classici italiani di economia politica, Parte antica, vol. 2, Milano: Destefanis 1804, pp. 71–322.
Schabas, M. 1990. A world ruled by number. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schefold, B. 1989. Mr Sraffa on joint production and other essays. London: Unwin & Hyman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelle, G. 1913–23. Œuvres de Turgot et documents le concernant. 5 vols., Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Schultz, H. 1938. Theory and measurement of demand. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1906. ‘Über die mathematische Methode der theoretischen Ökonomie’, Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft, Sozialpolitik und Verwaltung 15: 30–49.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1908. Das Wesen und der Hauptinhalt der theoretischen Nationalökonomie. München-Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot. Italian trans., L'essenza e i principi dell'economia teorica, Roma-Bari: Laterza 1982.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1912. Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. München-Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot; 2nd edn. 1926; 3rd edn. 1931; 4th edn. 1935. English edn. The theory of economic development, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1934; repr. New York: Oxford University Press 1961; Italian trans. of the 2nd German edn., Teoria dello sviluppo capitalistico. Firenze: Sansoni 1971; repr. 1977.
Schumpeter, J. 1914. ‘Epochen der Dogmen- und Methodengeschichte’, in Grundriss der Sozialökonomie, Tübingen: Mohr, first part, pp. 19–124. English trans., Economic doctrine and method: an historical sketch, London: Allen & Unwin and New York: Oxford University Press, 1954.
Schumpeter, J. 1928. ‘The instability of capitalism’, Economic Journal 38: 361–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1939. Business cycles. A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. 2 vols., New York and London: McGraw-Hill; repr., Philadelphia: Porcupine Press 1982; partial repr. ed. R. Fels, New York and London: McGraw-Hill 1964.
Schumpeter, J. 1942. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper & Bros.; 2nd edn. 1947; 3rd edn. 1950; 4th edn. 1954; 5th edn. 1976; repr. London: Routledge 1994.
Schumpeter, J. 1946. ‘L'avenir de l'entreprise privée devant les tendences socialistes modernes’, in Comment sauvegarder l'entreprise privée, Editions Association Professionelle des Industriels, Canada, pp. 103–8.
Schumpeter, J. 1951a. Ten great economists: from Marx to Keynes. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1951b. Imperialism and social classes. New York: Kelley.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1954. History of economic analysis. Ed. Schumpeter, E. Boody, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1970. Das Wesen des Geldes. Ed. F. K. Mann, Göttingen: Vanderlöck und Ruprecht; Italian trans., L'essenza della moneta, Torino: Cassa di risparmio di Torino 1990.
Schwartz, P. 1968. The new political economy of J. S. Mill. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Screpanti, E. and Zenezini, M. (eds.) 1978. Accumulazione del capitale e progresso tecnico. Milano: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
Scribano, M. E. 1974. ‘Introduzione’, in Mandeville, B., Ricerca sulla natura della società, Roma-Bari: Laterza, pp. ⅶ–ⅹⅹⅻ.Google Scholar
Scrope, G. P. 1833. Principles of political economy. London: Longman; repr. New York: Augustus M. Kelley 1969.Google Scholar
Sebastiani, M. (ed.) 1989. Kalecki's relevance today. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebastiani, M. 1994. Kalecki and unemployment equilibrium. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligman, E. 1903. ‘On some neglected British economists’, Economic Journal 13: 335–63, 511–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. 1984. Resources, values and development. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; Italian trans., Risorse, valori e sviluppo, Torino: Bollati-Boringhieri 1992.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1987. ‘Rational behaviour’, in Eatwell, Milgate and Newman (eds.), vol. 4, pp. 68–76.
Sen, A. 1991. Money and value: on the ethics and economics of finance. Roma: Edizioni dell'Elefante.Google Scholar
Sen, A. and Williams, B. (eds.) 1982. Utilitarianism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, S. R. 1957. The economics of Sir James Steuart. London: Bell.Google Scholar
Senior, W. N. 1827. An introductory lecture on political economy. London: J. Mawman.Google Scholar
Senior, W. N. 1836. An outline of the science of political economy. London: W. Cloves and Sons.Google Scholar
Senior, W. N. 1837. Letters on the Factory Act. London: B. Fellowes.Google Scholar
Serra, A. 1613. Breve trattato delle cause che possono far abbondare li regni d'oro e d'argento dove non sono miniere con applicazione al Regno di Napoli. Napoli: L. Scorriggio; repr., Düsseldorf: Verlag Wirtschaft und Finanzen GmbH 1994.Google Scholar
Seton, F. 1957. ‘The “transformation problem”’, Review of Economic Studies 23: 149–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper, count of, 1711. Characteristics of men, manners, opinions, times. 3 vols., s.e., London; repr. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund 2001.
Shaw, G. B. (ed.) 1889. Fabian essays in socialism. London: Walter Scott; repr. Gloucester, Mass.: Peter Smith 1967.Google Scholar
Shove, G. F. 1928. ‘Varying costs and marginal net products’, Economic Journal 38: 258–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shove, G. F. 1930. ‘The representative firm and increasing returns’, Economic Journal 40: 94–116.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1957. Models of man. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A.Simon, H. A. 1979. Models of thought. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sims, C. A. 1980. ‘Macroeconomics and reality’, Econometrica 48: 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, C. A. 1982. ‘Policy analysis with econometric models’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, no. 1: 107–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sismondi, S. de 1819. Nouveaux principes d’économie politique, ou De la richesse dans ses rapports avec la population. Paris: Delaunay; 2nd edn., Paris: Treuttel et Würst 1827. English trans., New principles of political economy, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers 1991.
Skidelsky, R. 1983. John Maynard Keynes. Hopes betrayed. 1883–1920. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Skidelsky, R. 1992. John Maynard Keynes. The economist as saviour, 1920–1937. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Skidelsky, R. 2000. John Maynard Keynes. Fighting for Britain, 1937–1946. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Skinner, A. and Jones, P. (eds.) 1992. Adam Smith reviewed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, A. and Wilson, T. (eds.) 1975. Essays on Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slutsky, E. 1915. ‘Sulla teoria del bilancio del consumatore’, Giornale degli economisti e rivista di statistica 51: 1–26. English trans., ‘On the theory of the budget of the consumer’, in K. E. Boulding and G. J. Stigler (eds.), Readings in price theory, London: Allen & Unwin 1953, pp. 26–56.
Smith, A. 1759. The theory of moral sentiments. London: A. Millar; critical edn., ed. D. D. Raphael and A. L. Macfie, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. 1776. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell; critical edn., ed. R. H. Campbell and A. S. Skinner, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. 1795. Essays on philosophical subjects. London: T. Cadell and W. Davies; critical edn., ed. W. P. D. Wightman and J. C. Bryce, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. 1977. Correspondence. Ed. Mossner, E. C. and Ross, I. S., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1978. Lectures on jurisprudence. Ed. Meek, R. L., Raphael, D. D. and Stein, P. G., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. 1983. Lectures on rhetoric and belles lettres. Ed. Bryce, J. C., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Solow, R. M. 1956. ‘A contribution to the theory of economic growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 79: 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, R. M. 1957. ‘Technical change and the aggregate production function’, Review of Economics and Statistics 39: 312–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, R. M. 1963. Capital theory and the rate of return. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Solow, R. M. 1967. ‘The interest rate and transition between techniques’, in Feinstein, C. H. (ed.), Socialism, capitalism and economic growth. Essays presented to Maurice Dobb, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 30–9.Google Scholar
Solow, R. M. 1970. ‘On the rate of return: reply to Pasinetti’, Economic Journal 80: 423–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, R. M. 2000. ‘The neoclassical theory of growth and distribution’, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 53: 349–81.Google Scholar
Sowell, T. 1960. ‘Marx's “increasing misery” doctrine’, American Economic Review 50: 111–20.Google Scholar
Sowell, T. 1972. Say's law: an historical analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spaventa, L. 1968. ‘Realism without parables in capital theory’, in Recherches récentes sur la fonction de production, Centre d’études et de recherches universitaire de Namur, pp. 15–45.
Spence, W. 1807. Britain independent of commerce. London: T. Cadell and W. Davies.Google Scholar
Spiegel, H. W. 1971. The growth of economic thought. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 3rd edn. 1991, Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Spiegel, H. W. 1987. ‘Scholastic economic thought’, in Eatwell, Milgate and , Newman (eds.), vol. 4, pp. 259–61.
Spini, G. 1992. Le origini del socialismo. Da Utopia alla bandiera rossa. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. 1920. L'inflazione monetaria in Italia durante e dopo la guerra. Milano: Scuola tipografica salesiana. English trans., ‘Monetary inflation in Italy during and after the war’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 1993, 17: 7–26.
Sraffa, P. 1922a. ‘The bank crisis in Italy’, Economic Journal 32: 178–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sraffa, P. 1922b. ‘Italian banking today’, Manchester Guardian Commercial. The reconstruction of Europe, 7 December, no. 11: 675–6.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. 1923. ‘Opinioni’, La rivoluzione liberale 2: 128.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. 1924. ‘Obituary. Maffeo Pantaleoni’, Economic Journal 34: 648–53.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. 1925. ‘Sulle relazioni fra costo e quantità prodotta’, Annali di economia 2: 277–328. English trans., ‘On the relations between cost and quantity produced’, Italian Economic Papers, 1998, 3: 323–63.
Sraffa, P. 1926. ‘The laws of returns under competitive conditions’, Economic Journal 36: 535–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sraffa, P. 1927. ‘Due lettere a Tasca’, Stato operaio 1: 1089–95; repr. as Il vero significato della ‘quota 90’, in L. Villari (ed.), Il capitalismo italiano del Novecento, Bari: Laterza 1972, pp. 180–91.
Sraffa, P. 1930a. ‘A criticism’ and ‘A Rejoinder’, in ‘Symposium on increasing returns and the representative firm’, Economic Journal 40: 89–93.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. 1930b. ‘An alleged correction of Ricardo’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 44: 539–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sraffa, P. 1932. ‘Dr. Hayek on money and capital’ and ‘A rejoinder’, Economic Journal 42: 42–53, 249–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sraffa, P. 1951. ‘Introduction’, in Ricardo 1951–5, vol. 1, pp. ⅹⅲ–ⅼⅻ.
Sraffa, P. 1960. Production of commodities by means of commodities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. 1962. ‘Production of commodities: a comment’, Economic Journal 72: 477–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sraffa, P. 1991. Lettere a Tania per Gramsci. Ed. V. Gerratana, Roma: Editori Riuniti.
Stackelberg, H. 1933. ‘Zwei kritische Bemerkungen zur Preistheorie Gustav Cassel’, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 4: 456–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steedman, I. 1972. ‘Jevons's theory of capital and interest’, Manchester School 40: 31–52; repr. in Steedman 1989, pp. 145–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steedman, I. 1977. Marx after Sraffa. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Steedman, I. 1979. Trade amongst growing economies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steedman, I. 1984. ‘Natural prices, differential profit rates and the classical competitive process’, Manchester School 52: 123–39; repr. in Steedman 1989, pp. 98–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steedman, I. 1987. ‘Wicksteed, Philip Henry’, in Eatwell, Milgate and Newman (eds.), vol. 4, pp. 915–19.
Steedman, I. 1989. From exploitation to altruism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Steedman, I. 1991. ‘Research programmes: a Sraffian view’, in De Marchi and Blaug (eds.), pp. 435–50.
Steedman, I. 1992. ‘Introduction’, in Wicksteed, P. H., The co-ordination of the laws of distribution, Aldershot: Edward Elgar, pp. 3–45.Google Scholar
Steedman, I. (ed.) 1995. Socialism and marginalism in economics, 1870–1930. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steindl, J. 1945. Small and big business. Economic problems of the size of firms. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; new Italian edn., Piccola e grande impresa. Problemi economici della dimensione dell'impresa, Milano: Franco Angeli 1991.
Steindl, J. 1952. Maturity and stagnation in American capitalism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; repr. New York: Monthly Review Press 1976.Google Scholar
Steindl, J. 1965. Random processes and the growth of firms. London: Griffin.Google Scholar
Steindl, J. 1990. Economic papers, 1941–88. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steuart, J. 1767. An inquiry into the principles of political oeconomy. 2 vols., London: A. Millar and T. Cadell; critical edn., ed. A. S. Skinner, Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd 1966.Google Scholar
Stewart, D. 1794. ‘Account of the life and writings of Adam Smith LL. D.’, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 3: 55–137; repr. in Smith 1795 (1980), pp. 269–332.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. 1941. Production and distribution theories. The formative period. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. 1950. ‘The development of utility theory’, Journal of Political Economy 58: 307–27 and 373–96; repr. in Stigler 1965, pp. 66–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G. J. 1951. ‘The division of labor is limited by the extent of the market’, Journal of Political Economy 59: 185–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G. J. 1952. ‘The Ricardian theory of value and distribution’, Journal of Political Economy 60: 187–207; repr. in Stigler 1965, pp. 156–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G. J. 1958. ‘Ricardo and the 93% labour theory of value’, American Economic Review 48: 357–67; repr. in Stigler 1965, pp. 326–42.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. 1965. Essays in the history of economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. 1973. ‘The adoption of the marginal utility theory’, in Black, Coats and Goodwin (eds.), pp. 305–20.
Stolper, W. F. 1951. ‘Reflection on Schumpeter's writings’ in Harris, S. E. (ed.), Schumpeter social scientist, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, pp. 102–9; repr. in Review of Economics and Statistics 33, 1951: 170–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, R. 1997. Some British empiricists in the social sciences, 1650–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strachey, L. 1931. Portraits in miniature and other essays. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Streissler, E. W. 1973. ‘To what extent was the Austrian school marginalist?’, in Black, Coats and Goodwin (eds.), pp. 160–75.
Streissler, E. W. 1990a. ‘The influence of German economics on the work of Menger and Marshall’, in Caldwell (ed.), pp. 31–68.
Streissler, E. W. 1990b. ‘Carl Menger on economic policy: the lectures to Crown Prince Rudolf’, in Caldwell (ed.), pp. 107–30.
Streissler, E. W. and Streissler, M. (eds.) 1994. Carl Menger on economic policy: the lectures to Crown Prince Rudolf of Austria. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Swan, T. W. 1956. ‘Economic growth and capital accumulation’, Economic Record 32: 334–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swedberg, R. 1991. Schumpeter. A biography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sweezy, P. 1942. The theory of capitalist development. New York: Monthly Review Press; repr. 1968.Google Scholar
Sweezy, P. (ed.) 1949. Karl Marx and the close of his system. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
Sweezy, P. 1951. ‘Introduction’, in Schumpeter 1951b; repr. in S. E. Harris (ed.), Schumpeter social scientist, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1951, pp. 119–24.
Labini, Sylos P. 1950. ‘Le problème des cycles économiques de longue durée’, Economie Appliquée 3 : 481–95.Google Scholar
Sylos Labini, P. 1954. ‘Il problema dello sviluppo economico in Marx ed in Schumpeter’, in G. U. Papi (ed.), Teoria dello sviluppo economico, Milano: Giuffrè. English trans., ‘The problem of economic growth in Marx and Schumpeter’, in Sylos Labini 1984, pp. 37–78.
Sylos Labini, P. 1956. Oligopolio e progresso tecnico. Milano: Giuffrè 4th edn. Torino: Einaudi 1967. English trans., Oligopoly and technical progress, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1962; 2nd edn. 1969.
Labini, Sylos P. 1967. ‘Prices, distribution and investment in Italy 1951–1966: an interpretation’, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 20: 316–75.Google Scholar
Labini, Sylos P. 1972. Sindacati, inflazione e produttività. Roma-Bari: Laterza. English trans., Trade unions, inflation and productivity, Westmead: Saxon House 1974.Google Scholar
Labini, Sylos P. (ed.) 1973. Prezzi relativi e distribuzione del reddito. Torino: Boringhieri.Google Scholar
Labini, Sylos P. 1974. Saggio sulle classi sociali. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Sylos Labini, P. 1976. ‘Competition: the product markets’, in Wilson and Skinner (eds.), pp. 200–32.
Labini, Sylos P. 1983. Il sottosviluppo e l'economia contemporanea. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Labini, Sylos P. 1984. The forces of economic growth and decline. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Labini, Sylos P. 2000. Sottosviluppo. Una strategia di riforme. Roma-Bari: Laterza. English trans., Underdevelopment. A strategy for reform, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001.Google Scholar
Tagliacozzo, G. (ed.) 1937. Economisti napoletani dei sec. ⅩⅦ e ⅩⅧ. Bologna: Cappelli.Google Scholar
Tarantelli, E. 1978. Il ruolo economico del sindacato. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Tarantelli, E. 1986. Economia politica del lavoro. Torino: Utet.Google Scholar
Tarascio, V. 1971. ‘Some recent developments in the history of economic thought in the United States’, History of Political Economy 3: 419–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarascio, V. 1973. ‘Vilfredo Pareto and marginalism’, in Black, Coats and Goodwin (eds.), pp. 140–59.
Targetti, F. 1988. Nicholas Kaldor. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Tarshis, L. 1939. ‘Changes in real and money wages’, Economic Journal 49: 150–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tawney, R. H. 1926. Religion and the rise of capitalism. London: Murray; repr. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books 1975.Google Scholar
Taylor, F. W. 1947. Scientific management. New York: Harper & Bros.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. 1824. An inquiry into the principles of the distribution of wealth most conducive to human happiness. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green-Wheatley and Adlard.Google Scholar
Thornton, H. 1802. Enquiry into the nature and effects of the paper credit of Great Britain. London: Hatchard; repr. ed. F. Hayek, London School of Economics, 1939.Google Scholar
Thornton, W. T. 1869. On labour: its wrongful claims and rightful dues, its actual present and possible future. London: Macmillan; 2nd edn. 1870.Google Scholar
Thünen, J. H. von 1826–50. Der isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie. Part one, Hamburg: Perthes 1826; Part two, Rostock: Leopold 1850; Part three, Rostock: Leopold 1850 and 1863. English trans. of Part one, Isolated state, ed. P. Hall, Oxford: Pergamon Press 1966.
Thweatt, W. O. 1976. ‘James Mill and the early development of comparative advantage’, History of Political Economy 8: 207–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiberi, M. 1969. La distribuzione del reddito nei modelli di sviluppo e di equilibrio economico generale. Milano: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
Tirole, J. 1988. The theory of industrial organization. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tobin, J. 1958. ‘Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk’, Review of Economic Studies 25: 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Togliatti, P. (ed.) 1962. La formazione del gruppo dirigente del Partito comunista italiano. Roma: Editori Riuniti.Google Scholar
Tonveronachi, M. 1982. ‘Monetarism and fixed rules in H. C. Simons’, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 35: 181–203.Google Scholar
Tonveronachi, M. 1983. J. M. Keynes. Dall'instabilità ciclica all'equilibrio di sottoccupazione. Roma: NIS.Google Scholar
Tonveronachi, M. 1988. Struttura ed evoluzione dei sistemi finanziari. Arezzo: Banca Popolare dell'Etruria e del Lazio.Google Scholar
Tonveronachi, M. 1990. ‘Teorie monetarie a Chicago’, in Becattini (ed.), pp. 349–85.
Tonveronachi, M. 1991. ‘Alcune considerazioni in tema di teorie finanziarie e processi di valorizzazione’, in Kregel, J. A. (ed.), Nuove interpretazioni dell'analisi monetaria di Keynes, Bologna: il Mulino, pp. 59–66.
Tooke, T. 1838–57. History of prices, 1793–1856. 6 vols., London: Longman, Orme, Brown, Green & Longmans.Google Scholar
Tooke, T. 1844. An inquiry into the currency principle. London: Longman, Brown, Green & Longmans; repr., Series of reprints of scarce works in political economy, no. 15, London School of Economics and Political Sciences 1959.
Torrens, R. 1808. The economists refuted. London: S. A. Oddy, and Dublin: C. LaGrange.Google Scholar
Torrens, R. 1812. An essay on money and paper currency. London: J. Johnson & Co.Google Scholar
Torrens, R. 1815. An essay on the external corn trade. London: J. Hatchard.Google Scholar
Torrens, R. 1817. ‘A paper on the means of reducing the poors rates and of affording effectual and permanent relief to the labouring classes’, The Pamphleteer no. 20: 509–28.Google Scholar
Torrens, R. 1818. ‘Strictures on Mr. Ricardo's doctrine respecting exchangeable value’, Edinburgh Magazine, Oct., pp. 335–8.Google Scholar
Torrens, R. 1821. An essay on the production of wealth. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown & Longmans.Google Scholar
Torrens, R. 1835. Colonization of South Australia. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown & Green.Google Scholar
Torrens, R. 1837. A letter to the Right Honourable Lord Viscount Melbourne on the causes of the recent derangement in the money market and on bank reform. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown & Green.Google Scholar
Torrens, R. 2000. Collected works. Ed. Vivo, G., 8 vols., Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Triffin, R. 1940. Monopolistic competition and general equilibrium theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tsuru, S. 1942. ‘On reproduction schemes’, in appendix to Sweezy, pp. 365–74.
Tucker, G. 1960. Progress and profits in British economic thought 1650–1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tugan-Baranovsky, M. J. 1905. Theoretische Grundlagen des Marxismus. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Turgot, A.-R.-J. [1759]. Éloge de Vincent de Gournai. Original text in Schelle 1913–23; repr. in Ravix and Romani 1997, pp. 123–53.
Turgot, A.-R.-J. [1766]. Réflexions sur la formation et la distribution des richesses. Publ. in 1769–70 in Ephémérides du citoyen with changes introduced by Du Pont de Nemours; original text in Schelle, 1913–23, vol. 2, pp. 533–601; repr. in Ravix and Romani 1997, pp. 157–226.
Urbinati, N. 2002. Mill on democracy. From the Athenian polis to representative government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ure, A. 1835. The philosophy of manufacture. London: Knight.Google Scholar
Vaggi, G. 1987. The economics of François Quesnay. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaggi, G. 1993. ‘Teorie della ricchezza dal mercantilismo a Smith’, in Lunghini, G. (ed.), Valori e prezzi, Torino: Utet, pp. 21–62.Google Scholar
Valeriani, L. M. 1806. Del prezzo delle cose tutte mercatabili. Bologna: Ulisse Ramponi.Google Scholar
Vanek, J. 1970. The general theory of labor managed market economies. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Veblen, T. 1899. The theory of the leisure class. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Veblen, T. 1904. The theory of business enterprise. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Veblen, T. 1919. The place of science in modern civilization. New York: Huebsch.Google Scholar
Venturi, F. (ed.) 1958. Illuministi italiani. Tomo Ⅲ. Riformatori lombardi, piemontesi e toscani. Milano-Napoli: Ricciardi.Google Scholar
Venturi, F. (ed.) 1962. Illuministi italiani. Tomo V. Riformatori napoletani. Milano-Napoli: Ricciardi.Google Scholar
Venturi, F. 1969–90. Settecento riformatore. 5 vols., Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Verdoorn, P. 1949. ‘Fattori che regolano lo sviluppo della produttività del lavoro’, L'industria 1: 3–10.Google Scholar
Verri, P. 1781. Discorsi sull'indole del piacere e del dolore; sulla felicità e sulla economia politica. Milano: Giuseppe Marelli; repr. Roma: Archivi Edizioni 1974.Google Scholar
Vianello, F. 1973. ‘Pluslavoro e profitto nell'analisi di Marx’, in Sylos Labini (ed.), pp. 75–117.
Vicarelli, F. 1977. Keynes. L'instabilità del capitalismo. Milano: Etas libri. English trans., Keynes: the instability of capitalism, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press 1984.
Vicarelli, S. 1975. ‘Il “problema della trasformazione”: fine di una controversia’, Note economiche 8: 91–138.Google Scholar
Vilar, P. 1960. Oro y moneda en la historia (1450–1920). Barcelona: Ediciones Ariel; English trans., A history of gold and money, London: Verso 1991.Google Scholar
Villetti, R. 1978. ‘Lavoro diviso e lavoro costrittivo’, in R. Villetti (ed.), Socialismo e divisione del lavoro, Quaderni di Mondoperaio, no. 8, Roma: Mondo Operaio-Edizioni Avanti!, pp. ⅸ–ⅼⅹⅻ.
Viner, J. 1927. ‘Adam Smith and laissez-faire’, Journal of Political Economy 35: 198–232; repr. in Viner 1991, pp. 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viner, J. 1931. ‘Cost curves and supply curves’, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 3: 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viner, J. 1937. Studies in the theory of international trade. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Viner, J. 1949. ‘Bentham and J. S. Mill: the utilitarian background’, American Economic Review 39: 360–82; repr. in Viner 1991, pp. 154–75.Google Scholar
Viner, J. 1953. ‘Introduction’, in B. de Mandedville, A letter to Dion [1732], Augustan Reprint Society, no. 41, Berkeley: University of California, pp. 1–15; repr. in Viner 1991, pp. 176–88.
Viner, J. 1978. ‘Religious thought and economic society: four chapters of an unfinished work’, ed. and with an introduction by J. Melitz and D. Winch, History of Political Economy 10: 1–192.
Viner, J. 1991. Essays on the intellectual history of economics. Ed. Irwin, D. A., Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vint, J. 1994. Capital and wages. A Lakatosian history of the wages fund doctrine. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Wakefield, E. G. 1829. A letter from Sidney, the principal town of Australasia. London: Joseph Cross.Google Scholar
Wakefield, E. G. 1833. England and America. 2 vols., London: R. Bentley.Google Scholar
Wald, A. 1936. ‘Über einige Gleichungssysteme der Mathematischen Ökonomie’, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 7: 637–70. English trans., ‘On some systems of equations of mathematical economics’, Econometrica 19 (1951): 368–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. A. 1987. ‘Bibliography of the writings of Léon Walras’, History of Political Economy 19: 667–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. A. 1996. Walras's market models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. A. 2003. ‘Early general equilibrium economics’, in Samuels, Biddle and Davis (eds.), pp. 278–93.
Wallace, R. 1761 Various prospects of mankind, nature and providence. London: A. Millar.Google Scholar
Walras, A. A. 1831. De la nature de la richesse et de l'origine de la valeur. Paris: Alexandre Johanneau.Google Scholar
Walras, A. A. 1849. Théorie de la richesse sociale ou résumé des principes fondamentaux de l’économie politique. Paris: Guillaumin.Google Scholar
Walras, L. 1858. Francis Sauveur. Paris: E. Dentu.Google Scholar
Walras, L. 1867. ‘La Bourse et le credit’, in Paris guide, par les principaux écrivains et artistes de la France, deuxième partie, Paris: Librairie Internationale, pp. 1731–51; repr. in Auguste et Leon Walras, Oeuvres économiques complètes. Vol. 7, Mélanges d’économie politique et sociale, Paris: Economica 1987, pp. 180–200.
Walras, L. 1874. Éléments d’économie politique pure. Lausanne: Corbaz; second part, 1877; 2nd edn. 1889, 3rd edn. 1896, 4th edn. 1900, ‘definitive’ edn. 1926. English trans. of the 1926 edn., ed. W. Jaffé, Elements of pure economics, London: Irwin Inc. 1954; repr. London: Allen & Unwin 1965.
Walras, L. 1880. ‘La Bourse, la spéculation et l'agiotage’, Bibliothèque Universelle et Revue Suisse no. 5 (March): 452–76 and no. 6 (April): 66–94.Google Scholar
Walras, L. 1896. Études d’économie sociale. Théorie de la répartition de la richesse sociale. Lausanne: Corbaz; repr. Paris: Economica 1990.Google Scholar
Walras, L. 1898. Études d’économie politique appliquée. Théorie de la production de la richesse sociale. Ed. definitive ed. by G. Leduc, Lausanne 1936; repr. Paris: Economica 1992.
Walras, L. 1965a. Correspondence and related papers. Ed. Jaff, W.é, 3 vols., Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Walras, L. [1909] 1965b. ‘Notice autobiographique’, in Walras 1965a, vol. 1, pp. 1–15. Italian trans., Nota autobiografica, in Ingrao and Ranchetti 1996, pp. 258–71.
Weber, M. 1904–5. ‘Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus’, Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 20–1; 2nd edn. in Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie, Tübingen: Mohr 1922. English trans., The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism, London: Allen & Unwin 1930.
Weber, M. 1922. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. 2 vols., Tübingen: Mohr. English trans., Economy and society, New York: Bedminster Press 1968.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. R. 1991. Stabilizing dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, E. 1815. Essay on the application of capital to land. London: T. Underwood.Google Scholar
West, E. G. 1976. Adam Smith. The man and his works. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
Whately, R. 1831. Introductory lectures on political economy. London: B. Fellowes; 2nd edn. 1832.Google Scholar
Whitaker, J. K. 1990. ‘What happened to the second volume of the Principles? The thorny path to Marshall's last books’, in J. K. Whitaker (ed.), Centenary essays on Alfred Marshall, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 193–222.
Wicksell, K. 1893. Über Wert, Kapital, und Rente. Jena: G. Fischer. English trans., Value, capital and rent, London: Allen & Unwin 1954.Google Scholar
Wicksell, K. 1898. Geldzins und Güterpreise bestimmenden Ursachen. Jena: G. Fischer. English trans., Interest and prices, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wicksell, K. 1900. ‘Om gränsproduktivitaten såsom grundval för den nationalekonomiska fördelningen’, Ekonomisk Tidskrift 2: 305–37. English trans., ‘Marginal productivity as the basis for distribution in economics’, in K. Wicksell, Selected papers on economic theory, London: Allen & Unwin 1958, pp. 93–121.
Wicksell, K. 1901–6. Forelasningar i nationalekonomi. 2 vols., Stockholm-Lund: Fritzes-Berlingska. English trans., Lectures on political economy, 2 vols., London: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1934–5.
Wicksell, K. 1919. ‘Professor Cassels ekonomiska system’, Ekonomisk Tidskrift 21: 195–226. English trans., ‘Professor Cassel's system of economics’, in K. Wicksell, Lectures on political economy, 2 vols., London: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1934–5, pp. 93–121.
Wicksell, K. 1923. ‘Realkapital och kapitalränta’, Ekonomisk Tidskrift 25: 145–80. English trans., ‘Real capital and interest’, in K. Wicksell, Lectures on political economy, 2 vols., London: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1934–5, vol. 1, pp. 258–99.
Wicksteed, P. H. 1884. ‘Das Kapital: a criticism’, To-Day 2: 388–409; repr. in P. H. Wicksteed, The common sense of political economy and selected papers and reviews on economic theory, ed. L. Robbins, London: Routledge 1934, vol. 2, pp. 705–24.
Wicksteed, P. H. 1888. The alphabet of economic science. Part Ⅰ, Elements of the theory of value or worth. London: Macmillan.
Wicksteed, P. H. 1894. An essay on the co-ordination of the laws of distribution. London: Macmillan; repr. ed. I. Steedman, Aldershot: Edward Elgar 1992.Google Scholar
Wicksteed, P. H. 1910. The common sense of political economy. London: Macmillan; repr. ed. L. Robbins, 2 vols., London: Routledge 1933.Google Scholar
Wieser, F. 1884. Über den Ursprung und die Hauptgesetze des wirtschaftlichen Wertes. Wien: Hölder.Google Scholar
Wicksteed, P. H. 1889. Der Natürliche Werth. Wien: Hölder. English trans., Natural value, London: Macmillan 1893.Google Scholar
Wicksteed, P. H. 1914. Theorie der gesellschaftlichen Wirtschaft. In Grundriss der Sozialökonomik, vols. 1 and 2, Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck. English trans., Social economics, New York: Greenberg 1927.
Wicksteed, P. H. 1926. Das Gesetz der Macht. Wien: Springer.Google Scholar
Wiles, R. C. 1986. ‘The development of mercantilist economic thought’. In Lowry (ed.), pp. 147–73.
Williams, K. 1981. From pauperism to poverty. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. 1986. Economic organization. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.Google Scholar
Wilson, T. 1572. A discourse uppon usurye. Londini: Rychardi Tottelli; repr. ed. R. H. Tawney, London: Bell 1926; repr. London: Frank Cass 1963.Google Scholar
Wilson, T. and Skinner, A. S. (eds.) 1976. The market and the state. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Winch, D. 1962. ‘What price the history of economic thought?’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy 9: 193–204.Google Scholar
Winch, D. 1965. Classical political economy and colonies. London: Bell & Sons.Google Scholar
Winch, D. 1978. Adam Smith's politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winch, D. 1987. Malthus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Winternitz, J. 1948. ‘Values and prices: a solution of the so-called transformation problem’, Economic Journal 58: 276–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1921. ‘Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung’, Annalen der Naturphilosophie, 14: 185–262. English edn. with revisions and the German text, Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London: Kegan Paul, 1922.
Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophische Untersuchungen (with English trans., Philosophical investigations). Ed. G. E. M. Anscombe and R. Rhees, Oxford: Blackwell; repr. 1972.
Wood, A. 1975. A theory of profits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, D. 2002. Medieval economic thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, G. H. 1955. ‘Ludwig Wittgenstein: a biographical sketch’, Philosophical Review64; repr. in Malcom 1958, pp. 5–28.Google Scholar
Xenophon 1914. Cyropaedia. English trans. by W. Miller, Loeb Classic Library, London: Heinemann and New York: Putnam's Sons.
Xenophon 1923. Memorabilia and Oeconomicus. Ed. E. Capps, T. E. Page and W. H. D. Rouse, Loeb Classic Library, London: Heinemann and New York: Putnam's Sons.
Young, A. 1928. ‘Increasing returns and economic progress’, Economic Journal 38: 527–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeuthen, F. 1933. ‘Das Prinzip der Knappheit, technische Kombination und ökonomische Qualität’, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 4: 1–24.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Alessandro Roncaglia, Università degli Studi di Roma 'La Sapienza', Italy
  • Book: The Wealth of Ideas
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492341.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Alessandro Roncaglia, Università degli Studi di Roma 'La Sapienza', Italy
  • Book: The Wealth of Ideas
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492341.020
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Alessandro Roncaglia, Università degli Studi di Roma 'La Sapienza', Italy
  • Book: The Wealth of Ideas
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492341.020
Available formats
×