Book contents
Chapter 2 - Strangers in a Familiar Land
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
Summary
Freedom of conscience requires secular government. But what makes secular law legitimate? That question is the starting point of Western political philosophy, and is now mired in academic controversy. But, to cut an interminable story indecently short, the consensus among modern thinkers is that the law is made legitimate by the consent of those who must obey it. This consent is shown in two ways: by a real or implied “social contract,” whereby each person agrees with every other to the principles of government; and by a political process through which each person participates in the making and enacting of the law. The right and duty of participation is what we mean, or ought to mean, by “citizenship,” and the distinction between political and religious communities can be summed up in the view that the first are composed of citizens, the second of subjects.
Roger ScrutonThe past remains. The mixture of cynicism and optimism that seems to define the thought of key strategists or policy-makers in the current United States administration, it was suggested, is evidence of a haunted relation to the past. The heritage of thought that leads from Leo Strauss to Allan Bloom to Paul Wolfowitz indicates a way of thinking that remains in many ways a reaction to the devastating events of the National Socialist period in Germany. But this haunted relation to the past is not confined to the minds of government strategists.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Violent Democracy , pp. 36 - 58Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2004