Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2013
  • Online publication date: May 2013

3 - Pronominal gender


The expression of gender in English is confined to pronouns of the third person (he, she, it). Therefore, we will here essentially be concerned with this pronominal domain. Nevertheless, we will see that varieties of English may differ with respect to the sets of referents for which they use these pronouns. Moreover, some varieties distinguish only two genders on third person pronouns, while others have only one pronominal form. We begin by providing some background information on the category of gender. Following that, we will explore gender-marked pronouns in varieties of English. Finally, we will embark on a cross-linguistic survey of pronominal gender systems, which will allow us to assess English pronominal gender from a wider perspective.


We can define gender as a relationship of covariance between two or more sentential elements and a so-called ‘gender controller’ that determines the shape of the other elements (the ‘targets’ of the gender). Consider the examples from German in (1), where the relevant nouns (the gender controllers) determine the shape of the definite articles (the gender targets) that occur in front of them. In German, the controller of the gender also determines the shape of adjectives, pronouns, and some other elements.

  1. a. der Löffel ‘the spoon’ masculine gender

  2. b. die Gabel ‘the fork’ feminine gender

  3. c. das Messer ‘the knife’ neuter gender

Strictly speaking, English does not possess a comparable gender system, as only the pronouns of the third person show gender distinctions (he, she, it), though other sentential elements (e.g. adjectives) do not show gender marking. Moreover, the use of he, she, and it follows exclusively semantic principles, while in German and other languages with a gender system based on formal principles of gender assignment the occurrence of masculine, feminine, and neuter gender markers is primarily determined by the phonological and morphological properties of the gender-controlling noun (and therefore usually perceived as difficult to learn). The semantic principles regulating the distribution of he, she, and it are (i) humanness/animacy and (ii) sex, with male human referents triggering the use of he and female human referents the use of she, while all other referents take it, as shown in (2). An additional complication is that pronominal gender markers can occur without a preceding or following noun controlling their gender, since pronouns – besides their anaphoric uses – can also be used deictically. Hence, it is more correct to say that the distribution of these gendered pronouns is determined by the properties of the relevant referents, rather than the nouns encoding them.

Audring, Jenny. 2008. Gender assignment and gender agreement: Evidence from pronominal gender languages. Morphology 18. 93–116.
Audring, Jenny. 2009. Reinventing Pronoun Gender. Utrecht: LOT dissertation series.
Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge University Press.
Corbett, Greville G. 2011. Sex-based and non-sex-based gender systems. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 31. Available online at . Accessed 22 December 2011.
Croft, William. 2004. Typology and Universals. Cambridge University Press.
Dahl, Östen. 2000. Animacy and the notion of semantic gender. In Unterbeck, Barbara and Rissanen, Matti (eds.), Trends in Grammar and Cognition, volume I: Approaches to Gender, 99–116. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Donaldson, Bruce. 1997. Dutch: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.
Gachelin, Jean-Marc. 1991. Gender and deixis in Southwestern Dialects. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 92. 83–93.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar, with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.), Universals of Language, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Paddock, Harold. 1991. The actuation problem for gender change in Wessex versus Newfoundland. In Trudgill, Peter and Chambers, Jack K. (eds.), Dialects of English: Studies in Grammatical Variation, 29–46. London: Longman.
Pawley, Andrew. 2002. Using he and she for inanimate nouns in English: Questions of grammar and worldview. In Enfield, Nick (ed.), Ethnosyntax: Explorations in Language and Culture, 110–37. Oxford University Press.
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1993. Syntactic categories and subcategories. In Jacobs, Joachim, von Stechow, Arnim, Sternefeld, Wolfgang, and Vennemann, Theo (eds.), Syntax: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung / An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication, 9), 646–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Siemund, Peter. 2002. Mass versus count: Pronominal gender in regional varieties of Germanic languages. Zeitschrift für Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 55(3). 213–33.
Siemund, Peter. 2008. Pronominal Gender in English: A Study of English Varieties from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. London: Routledge.
Siemund, Peter and Dolberg, Florian. 2011. From lexical to referential gender: An analysis of gender change in medieval English based on two historical documents. Folia Linguistica Historica 45(2). 489–534.
Siewierska, Anna. 2011. Gender distinctions in independent personal pronouns. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 44. Available online at . Accessed 22 December 2011.
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Malcolm, RobertDixon, Ward (ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages (Linguistic Series 22), 112–71. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Svartengren, T. Hilding. 1927. The feminine gender for inanimate things in Anglo-American. American Speech 3(2). 83–113.
Wagner, Susanne. 2004. Gender in English Pronouns: Myth and Reality. . Accessed 22 December 2011.
Wahrig-Burfeind, Renate. 1989. Nominales und pronominales Genus im südlichen Nordseegebiet: Eine areallinguistische Untersuchung. Munich: Tūduv.
Further reading
Bechert, Johannes. 1982. Grammatical gender in Europe: An areal study of a linguistic category. Papiere zur Linguistik 26(1). 23–34.
Corbett, Greville G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge University Press.
Curzan, Anne. 2003. Gender shifts in the history of English. Cambridge University Press.
Kruisinga, Etsko. 1905. A Grammar of the Dialect of West Somerset: Descriptive and Historical. (Bonner Beiträge zur Anglistik 18.) Bonn: P. Hanstein Verlag.
Mathiot, Madeleine and Roberts, Marjorie. 1979. Sex roles as revealed through referential gender in American English. In Mathiot, Madeleine (ed.), Ethnolinguistics: Boas, Sapir and Whorf Revisited, 1–47. The Hague: Mouton.
Stenroos, Merja. 2008. Order out of chaos? The English gender change in the southwest Midlands as a process of semantically based reorganization. English Language and Linguistics 12(3). 445–73.