Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:28:01.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Perspectives on Evolutionary Macroeconomics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2018

Ulrich Witt
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute, Jena
Andreas Chai
Affiliation:
Griffith University, Queensland
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Understanding Economic Change
Advances in Evolutionary Economics
, pp. 155 - 212
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., and Robinson, J. A. 2005. Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth. In: Aghion, P. and Durlauf, S. (eds.) Handbook of Economic Growth. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Binford, L. 1968. Post Pleistocene Adaptations. In: Leane, M. (ed.) New Perspectives in Archaeology. Chicago: Aldine Publishers.Google Scholar
Boserup, E. 1981. Population and Technological Change: A Study of Long-term Trends. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. 1977. The Food Crisis in Prehistory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Currie, T. E., Mace, R., Gray, R. D., Greenhill, S. J., and Hasegawa, T. 2010. Rise and Fall of Political Complexity in Island South-East Asia and the Pacific. Nature, 467, 801804.Google Scholar
Day, R. H. 1967. The Economics of Technological Change and the Demise of the Sharecropper. The American Economic Review, 57, 427449.Google Scholar
Day, R. H. 1975. Adaptive Processes and Economic Theory. In: Day, R. H. and Groves, T. (eds.) Adaptive Economic Models. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Day, R. H. 1978. Modelling Economic Change: The Recursive Programming Approach. In: Day, R. (ed.) Modeling Economic Change. Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland.Google Scholar
Day, R. H. 1993. Nonlinear Dynamics and Evolutionary Economics. In: Day, R. and Chen, P. (eds.) Nonlinear Dynamics and Evolutionary Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Day, R. H. 1999. Complex Economic Dynamics, Vol. II: An Introduction to Macroeconomic Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Day, R. H. and Groves, T. 1975. Adaptive Economic Models. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Day, R. H., Kim, K.-H., and Macunovich, D. 1989. Complex Demo-economic Dynamics. Journal of Population Economics, 2, 139159.Google Scholar
Day, R. H. and Pavlov, O. 2001. Qualitative Dynamics and Macroeconomic Evolution in the Very Long Run. In: Punzo, L. (ed.) Cycles, Growth and Structural Change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Day, R. H. and Walter, J. L. 1989. Economic Growth in the Very Long Run: On the Multiple-Phase Interaction of Population, Technology, and Social Infrastructure. In: Barnett, W., Geweke, J., and Shell, K. (eds.) Economic Complexity: Chaos, Sunspots, Bubbles and Nonlinearity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Day, R. H. and Zou, G. 1994. Infrastructure, Restricted Factor Substitution and Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 23, 149166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, M. L. 1989. The Cahokia Atlas: A Historical Atlas of Cahokia Archaeology. Springfield, IL: Historical Preservation Agency.Google Scholar
Friedman, B. M. 2017. Work and Consumption in an Era of Unbalanced Technological Advance. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 27, 221237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iseminger, W. R. 1996. Mighty Cahokia. Archaeology, 49, 3035.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, K. G. 1984. Prehistoric Political Dynamics. Dekalb, IL: NIU Press.Google Scholar
Nissen, H. J. 1988. The Early History of the Ancient Near East, 9000–2000 B.C. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
North, D. C. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Pollard, K. 1995. An Analysis of a Model for Socioeconomic Evolution Based on a Reading of Economic Growth in the Very Long Run by Richard Day and Jean-Luc Walter. Working Paper. Claremont College.Google Scholar
Sagan, E. 1985. At the Dawn of Tyranny. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Saggs, H. W. F. 1989. Civilization before Greece and Rome. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scarre, C. 2005. The Human Past: World Prehistory and the Development of Human Societies. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar

References

Amendola, M. and Gaffard, J. 1998. Out of Equilibrium. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Arthur, B. 1994. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciarli, T., Lorentz, A., Savona, M., and Valente, M. 2010. The Effect of Consumption and Production Structure on Growth and Distribution. A Micro to Macro Model. Metroeconomica, 61(1), 180218.Google Scholar
Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., and Soete, L. 1988, Technical Change and Economic Theory. Pinter: London.Google Scholar
Fabricant, S. 1942. Employment in manufacturing, 1899–1939: An analysis of its relation to the volume of production, Technical report, NBER.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1957. A Model of Economic Growth. Economic Journal, 67(268) December, 591624.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1960. Essays on Economic Stability and Growth. Glenchoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1966. Causes of the Slow Rate of Growth in the United Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1972. The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics. Economic Journal, 82(328), 12371255.Google Scholar
Knell, M. 2004. Structural Change and the Kaldor-Verdoorn Law in the 1990s. Revue d’Economie Industrielle, 105, 7184.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. 1997. Development, Geography and Economic Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kwasnicki, W. 2003. Evolutionary Models’ Comparative Analysis. Methodology Proposition Based on Selected Neo-Schumpeterian Models of Industrial Dynamics. The ICFAI Journal of Managerial Economics 1(2).Google Scholar
Llerena, P. and Lorentz, A. 2004a. Co-evolution of Macro-dynamics and Technical Change: An Alternative View on Growth. Revue d’Economie Industrielle, 105, 4770.Google Scholar
Llerena, P. and Lorentz, A. 2004b. Cumulative Causation and Evolutionary Micro-founded Technical Change: On the Determinants of Growth Rates Differences. Revue Economique, 55(6), 11911214.Google Scholar
Lorentz, A. 2005. Essays on the Determinants of Growth Rates Differences among Economies: Bringing Together Evolutionary and Post-Keynesian Growth Theories, PhD dissertation, University Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg and Sant’Anna School for Advance Studies, Pisa.Google Scholar
Lorentz, A. 2015a. Sectoral Specialisation in an Evolutionary Growth Model with a Kaldorian Flavour. International Journal of Computational Economics and Econometrics, 5(3), 319344.Google Scholar
Lorentz, A. 2015b. Structural Change, Sectoral Specialisation and Growth Rates Differences in an Evolutionary Growth Model with Demand Shocks. Journal of Innovation Economics and Management, 16, 217248.Google Scholar
Lorentz, A., Ciarli, T., Savona, M., and Valente, M. 2016. The Effect of Demand-Driven Structural Transformations on Growth and Technological Change. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 26(1), 219246.Google Scholar
Lorentz, A. and Savona, M. 2010. Structural Change and Business Cycles: An Evolutionary Approach, Papers on Economics and Evolution. Jena: Max Planck Institute of Economics.Google Scholar
McCombie, J. 2002. Increasing Returns and the Verdoorn Law from a Kaldorian Perspective. In: McCombie, J., Pugno, M., and Soro, B. (eds.) Productivity Growth and Economic Performance: Essays on the Verdoorn’s Law. London: MacMillan, 64114.Google Scholar
McCombie, J., Pugno, M., and Soro, B. 2002. Productivity Growth and Economic Performance: Essays on the Verdoorn’s Law. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J. 1998. Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalfe, S., Foster, J., and Ramlogan, R. 2006. Adaptive Economic Growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30, 732.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. and Winter, S. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Romer, P. M. 1986. Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 10021037.Google Scholar
Romer, P. M. 1990. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 5(98), S71S102.Google Scholar
Silverberg, G. and Lehnert, D. 1993. Long Waves and “Evolutionary Chaos” in a Simple Schumpeterian Model of Embodied Technical Change. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 4(1), 937.Google Scholar
Silverberg, G. and Verspagen, B. 1994. Learning, Innovation and Economic Growth: A Long Run Model of Industrial Dynamics. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(1), 199223.Google Scholar
Silverberg, G. and Verspagen, B. 1995. An Evolutionary Model of Long-Term Cyclical Variations of Catching-Up and Falling Behind. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 5(3), 209227.Google Scholar
Silverberg, G. and Verspagen, B. 1998. Economic Growth as an Evolutionary Process. In: Lesourne, J., and Orlean, A. (eds.) Advances in Self-Organization and Evolutionary Economics. Washington: Brooking Institutions Press.Google Scholar
Silverberg, G. and Verspagen, B. 2005. Evolutionary Theorizing on Economic Growth. In: Dopfer, K. (ed.) The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 506539.Google Scholar
Verdoorn, P. 1949. Fattori che regolano lo svilluppo della produttivitá del lavoro. L’Industria, 1, 4553.Google Scholar
Verspagen, B. 2002. Evolutionary Macroeconomics: A Synthesis between Neo-Schumpeterian and Post-Keynesian Lines of Thought. The Electronic Journal of Evolutionary Modelling and Economic Dynamics n1007.Google Scholar
Witt, U. 2008. What Is Specific about Evolutionary Economics? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18(5), 547575.Google Scholar
Young, A. 1928. Increasing Returns and Economic Progress. Economic Journal, 38, 527554.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×