Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: February 2015

3 - Ultrasonography and hysteroscopy in gynecologic evaluation: are they competitive or complementary to each other?

from Section 1 - Techniques


1. Kratochwil A, Urban GU, Friedrich F. Ultrasonic tomography of the ovaries. Ann Chir Gynecol 1972; 61: 211.
2. Pantaleoni DC. On endoscopic examination of the cavity of the womb. Med Press Circ 1869; 8: 26.
3. de Kroon CD, Jansen FW. Saline infusion sonography in women with abnormal uterine bleeding: an update of recent findings. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 18: 653–657.
4. Brown SE, Coddington CC, Schnorr J, et al. Evaluation of outpatient hysteroscopy, saline infusion hysterosonography, and hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a prospective, randomized study. Fertil Steril 2000; 74: 1029–1034.
5. Ayida G, Chamberlain P, Barlow D, Kennedy S. Uterine cavity assessment prior to in vitro fertilization: comparison of transvaginal scanning, saline contrast hysterosonography and hysteroscopy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 10(1): 59–62.
6. Schwärzler P, Concin H, Bösch H, et al. An evaluation of sonohysterography and diagnostic hysteroscopy for the assessment of intrauterine pathology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 11: 337–342.
7. van Dongen H, Timmermans A, Jacobi CE, et al. Diagnostic hysteroscopy and saline infusion sonography in the diagnosis of intrauterine abnormalities: an assessment of patient preference. Gynecol Surg 2011; 8(1): 65–70.
8. van Dongen H, de Kroon CD, van den Tillaart S, et al. A randomized comparison of office vaginoscopic hysteroscopy with saline infusion sonography: a patient compliance study. BJOG 2008; 115: 1232–1237.
9. Büyük E, Durmusoglu F, Erenus M, Karakoç B. Endometrial disease diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound and dilatation and curettage. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999; 78: 419–422.
10. de Wit AC, Vleugels MP, de Kruif JH. Diagnostic hysteroscopy: a valuable diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of structural intra-cavital pathology and endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma? Six years of experience with non-clinical diagnostic hysteroscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003; 110: 79–82.
11. Laing FC, Brown DL, DiSalvo DN. Gynecologic ultrasound. Radiol Clin North Am 2001; 39: 523–540.
12. Bingol B, Gunenc Z, Gedikbasi A, et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of saline infusion sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy. J Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 31(1): 54–58.
13. Soares SR, Barbosa dos Reis MM, Camargos AF. Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography in patients with uterine cavity diseases. Fertil Steril 2000; 73: 406–411.
14. Cullinan JA, Fleischer AC, Kepple DM, Arnold AL. Sonohysterography: a technique for endometrial evaluation. Radiographics 1995; 15(3): 501–514; discussion 515–516.
15. Shushan A, Revel A, Rojansky N. How often are endometrial polyps malignant? Gynecol Obstet Invest 2004; 58(4): 212–215.
16. Gupta JK, Chien PFW, Voit D, Clark TJ, et al. Ultrasonographic endometrial thickness for diagnosing endometrial pathology in women with postmenopausal bleeding: a meta-analysis. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2002; 81: 799–816.
17. Cohen MA, Sauer MV, Keltz M, Lindheim SR. Utilizing routine sonohysterography to detect intrauterine pathology before initiating hormone replacement therapy. Menopause 1999; 6: 68–70
18. Sousa R, Silvestre M, Almeida e Sousa L, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonography and hysteroscopy in postmenopausal bleeding: a prospective study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001; 80(9): 856–862.
19. Runowicz CD. Can radiological procedures replace histologic examination in the evaluation of abnormal vaginal bleeding? Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 529–530.
20. Goldstein SR, Zeltser I, Horan CK. Ultrasonography-based triage for perimenopausal patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 102–108.
21. Breitkopf DM, Frederickson RA, Snyder RR. Detection of benign endometrial masses by endometrial stripe measurement in premenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 120–125.
22. Ubaldi F, Tournaye H, Camus M, et al. Fertility after hysteroscopic myomectomy. Hum Reprod Update 1995; 1: 81–90.
23. Wamsteker K, Emanuel MH, de Kruif JH. Transcervical hysteroscopic resection of submucous fibroids for abnormal uterine bleeding: results regarding the degree of intramural extension. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 736–740.
24. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Dorta M, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonography versus hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of uterine submucous myoma. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 745–748.
25. Cicinelli E, Romano F, Anastasio PS, et al. Transabdominal sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography, and hysteroscopy in the evaluation of submucous myomas. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85(1): 42–47.
26. Friedman AJ. Use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists before myomectomy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1993; 36: 650–659.
27. Jamieson WM. Hysteroscopic excision of symptomatic submucosal leiomyomas using the Nd: YAG laser. In: Corfman RS, Diamond MP, DeCherney A (Eds.) Complications of Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1993: 203–209.
28. Troiano RN, McCarthy SM. Müllerian duct anomalies: Imaging and clinical issues. Radiology 2004; 233: 19–34.
29. Raga F, Bonilla-Musoles F, Blanes J, Osborne NG. Congenital müllerian anomalies: diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound. Fertil Steril 1996; 65: 523–528.
30. Bettocchi S, Ceci O, Nappi L, et al. Office hysteroscopic metroplasty: three “diagnostic criteria” to differentiate between septate and bicornuate uteri. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007; 14(3): 324–328.
31. Donnez J, Nisolle M. Operative laser hysteroscopy in Müllerian fusion defects and uterine adhesions. In: Donnez J (Ed.) Operative Laser Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy. Leuven, Belgium: Nauwelaerts Printing; 1989: 249–261.
32. Confino E, Friberg J, Giglia RV, Fleicher N. Sonographic imaging of intrauterine adhesions. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 596–598.
33. Schlaff WD, Hurst BS. Preoperative sonographic measurement of endometrial pattern predicts outcome of surgical repair in patients with severe Asherman’s syndrome. Fertil Steril 1995; 63: 410.
34. Davis PC, O’Neill MJ, Yoder IC, et al. Sonohysterographic findings of endometrial and subendometrial conditions. Radiographics 2002; 22: 803–816.
35. Sylvestre C, Child T, Tulandi T, Tan SL. A prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of two- and three-dimensional sonohysterography in women with intrauterine lesions. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 1222–1225.
36. Molinas CR, Campo R. Office hysteroscopy and adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 20(4): 557–567.