Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:02:41.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

VII - Fox Ideals, N-Torsion and Applications to Groups and 3-Manifolds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2010

Cynthia Hog-Angeloni
Affiliation:
Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Wolfgang Metzler
Affiliation:
Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt
Allan J. Sieradski
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, we introduce Fox ideals Im(G0) for each m ≥ 0 by means of finitely generated free partial resolutions of the group G, and describe a practical method for computing Im(G) using representations of G. Fox ideals provide powerful tests for determining the rank of G (for m = 1), the deficiency of G (m = 2) and the homological dimension of G (m ≥ 2). These are derived in §§1–2, and some (partly new) applications are given.

N-torsion groups Nm(G), introduced in §3, are the direct analogues of the Whitehead group Wh(G), with ℤG replaced by ℤG/Im(G). In general, however, Nm(G) turns out to be much richer than Wh(G), and a practical evaluation method is described (using again representations of G), which yields non-trivial values in a large variety of cases. For m = 1, they distinguish Nielsen equivalence classes of generating systems of G, and hence isotopy or homeomorphy classes of Heegaard splitting of 3-manifolds (see §4). For m = 2 (or even m ≥ 2), N-torsion provides a crucial tool for the distinction of (simple)-homotopy classes of m-dimensional cell complexes (see §5). Here Fox ideals and N-torsion values are direct and natural generalizations of the bias modulus and the bias invariant respectively, as introduced in Chapter III (see 5.4 below).

Fox ideals and N-torsion and their preliminary versions have been discovered in different contexts and with varying degree of generality by several authors; see, for example, [Dy85], [Ho-AnLaMe91], [Ho-An88], [LuMo91] or [Me90]. Our treatment here is closest to [Lu9l2], where the independence from particular resolutions of G was achieved through matrix representations, and Im(G) and Nm(G) have been established as group theoretic invariants.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×