Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:40:22.659Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 3 - Inadequacy of theodicy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2020

Jeff Hearn
Affiliation:
University of South Africa
Get access

Summary

Suffering arises not only from worldly issues or natural disasters, but also from and between sensemaking approaches which are termed religions or religious persuasions – even between different groupings within the same religion, being sects or denominations. Even the way that a human being approaches and makes use of the Bible as Holy Scripture demands a comprehensive sensemaking decision from that human being. Within this work an awareness of three basic approaches regarding texts, theories, natural processes and human doings underpins the debate. These approaches are termed mirroring-fundamentalist, interpretational-hermeneutical and consensible-negotiation approaches and a short discussion on these approaches is presented in the Appendix.

God outside (transcendent) and inside (immanent) reality

A favourite question of theologians grappling with the issue of theodicy is how a good omnipotent and all powerful, omniscient God could inject, introduce or allow evil in the world. Surely this question not only suggests a dualistic God, but distances God from the world. The question is not solved by quick and pious answers like ‘it is for our own good’. In many instances the good in ‘for our own good’ is not evident, especially, for example, in the case of a new born baby infected by HIV and ravaged by AIDS.

In terms of the ideology of theologism, several questions are being asked regarding God's role towards human beings and nature:

  • • Why did God instruct the offering of animals as part of the sacrificial system? (Assuming God directly delivered the instruction to people instead of people of the past who somewhere along the line ascribed offering of animals as an instruction from God.)

  • • Why does God allow human beings to kill, in His name, those who worship Him such as has happened with many missionaries as well as with the World Trade Centre in the USA on 9/11/2001? This is as if God is the all-initiating agent producing evil things in people's hearts and minds.

  • • Why does God allow natural disasters such as the devastation of the tsunami on 26/12/05 in Asia? Again, this is as if God is the all-initiating agent producing evil things in nature through the shifting of the tectonic plates way down below the surface of the ocean.

  • • Why did God not in His mercy just forgive his wayward creation? Such a theologistic question smacks of the utmost theological arrogance.

Type
Chapter
Information
Towards A Theology of HIV/AIDS
Evil, suffering and world religions
, pp. 50 - 69
Publisher: University of South Africa
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Inadequacy of theodicy
  • Jeff Hearn, University of South Africa
  • Book: Towards A Theology of HIV/AIDS
  • Online publication: 18 February 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.25159/874-0.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Inadequacy of theodicy
  • Jeff Hearn, University of South Africa
  • Book: Towards A Theology of HIV/AIDS
  • Online publication: 18 February 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.25159/874-0.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Inadequacy of theodicy
  • Jeff Hearn, University of South Africa
  • Book: Towards A Theology of HIV/AIDS
  • Online publication: 18 February 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.25159/874-0.004
Available formats
×