Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:21:09.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Sustainability Assessment: Introduction and Framework

from Part I - Theoretical Background

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2020

By
Pekka Halla  and
Claudia R. Binder
Edited by
Claudia R. Binder ,
Romano Wyss  and
Emanuele Massaro
Claudia R. Binder
Affiliation:
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Romano Wyss
Affiliation:
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Emanuele Massaro
Affiliation:
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Get access

Summary

Sustainability assessment aims to operationalise the popular but ambiguous concept of sustainability in the analysis of concrete problems and in decision-making situations. However, instead of being a strictly defined methodology, sustainability assessment is a field of science and practice that covers a range of possible tools and processes. To give an introduction to the topic, in this chapter we first place sustainability assessment in its societal and scientific context, and then proceed to discuss its definitions, characteristics, and current limitations based on a review of state-of-the-art literature. Furthermore, we propose a general framework of the dimensions of sustainability assessment, which makes a distinction between the assessment process itself and the broader contextual factors that influence the design of individual applications of sustainability assessment. The framework is meant to identify in a comprehensive manner the concepts, questions, and choices that a thorough design of a sustainability assessment will encounter.

Keywords

sustainabilitysustainability assessmentsustainability scienceimpact assessment
Type
Chapter
Information
Sustainability Assessment of Urban Systems , pp. 7 - 29
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Audouin, M., & de Wet, B. (2012). Sustainability thinking in environmental assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(4), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.742695.Google Scholar
Audouin, M., Burns, M., Weaver, A., et al. (2015). An introduction to sustainability science and its links to sustainability assessment. In Morrison-Saunders, A, Pope, J, & Bond, A (eds.), Handbook of Sustainability Assessment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 321–348.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Binder, C. R., Feola, G., & Steinberger, J. K. (2010). Considering the normative systemic and procedural dimensions in indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.06.002.Google Scholar
Binder, C.R, Hutter, M., Pang, M., & Webb, R. (2020). System science and sustainability assessment. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 30–64.Google Scholar
Bond, A., Morrison-Saunders, A., & Pope, J. (2012). Sustainability assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1), 53–62.Google Scholar
Bond, A., Pope, J., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2015). Introducing the roots, evolution and effectiveness of sustainability assessment. In Morrison-Saunders, A, Pope, J, & Bond, A (eds.), Handbook of Sustainability Assessment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 3–19.Google Scholar
Boulding, K. E. (1966). The economics of the coming spaceship earth. In Jarrett, H (ed.), Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our Common Future: Brundtland Report. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Christen, M., & Schmidt, S. (2012). A formal framework for conceptions of sustainability: A theoretical contribution to the discourse in sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 20(6), 400–410. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.518.Google Scholar
Cilliers, P. (2008). Complexity theory as a general framework for sustainability science. In Burns, M & Weaver, A (eds.), Exploring Sustainability Science: A Southern African Perspective. Stellenbosch, South Africa: African Sun Media, pp. 9–26.Google Scholar
Fanon, F. (1965). The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Fritz, L., & Meinherz, F. (2020). The politics of participatory sustainability assessment: an analysis of power. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). For the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasparatos, A., & Scolobig, A. (2012). Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool. Ecological Economics, 80, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.05.005.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. B. (2016a). Foundations: Sustainability and the requirements for getting there. In Gibson, R. B. (ed.), Sustainability Assessment: Applications and Opportunities. New York: Routledge, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. B. (2016b). Applications: From generic criteria to assessments in particular places and cases. In Gibson, R. B. (ed.), Sustainability Assessment: Applications and Opportunities. New York: Routledge, pp. 16–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R. B., Hassan, S., Holtz, S., Tansey, J., & Whitelaw, G. (2005). Sustainability Assessment: Criteria and Processes. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Glasson, J., Therivel, R., & Chadwick, A. (2013). Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grace, W., & Pope, J. (2015). A systems approach to sustainability assessment. In Morrison-Saunders, A, Pope, J, & Bond, A (eds.), Handbook of Sustainability Assessment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 285–320.Google Scholar
Grober, U. (2007). Deep roots: A conceptual history of ‘sustainable development’ (Nachhaltigkeit) (Discussion Papers / Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, 2007-002). Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung gGmbH.Google Scholar
Hashemian, B., Massaro, E., Bojic, I., Arias, J. M., Sobolevsky, S., & Ratti, C. (2017). Socioeconomic characterization of regions through the lens of individual financial transactions. PloS one, 12(11), e0187031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hugé, J., Waas, T., Dahdouh-Guebas, F., Koedam, N., & Block, T. (2013). A discourse-analytical perspective on sustainability assessment: Interpreting sustainable development in practice. Sustainability Science, 8(2), 187–198.Google Scholar
International Association for Impact Assessment (2012). Impact Assessment. www.iaia.org/news-details.php?ID=30 (accessed 2.5.18).Google Scholar
Jabbour, J., Keita-Ouane, F., Hunsberger, C., et al. (2012). Internationally agreed environmental goals: A critical evaluation of progress. Environmental Development, 3, 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2012.05.002.Google Scholar
James, P. (2014). Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (2010). A new climate for society. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2–3), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409361497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kates, R. W. (2011). What kind of a science is sustainability science? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(49), 19449–19450. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116097108.Google Scholar
Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., et al. (2001). Sustainability science. Science, 292(5517), 641–642. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1059386.Google Scholar
Lélé, S. M. (1991). Sustainable development: A critical review. World Development, 19(6), 607–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(91)90197-P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. (1972). The Limits to Growth. London: Earth Island.Google Scholar
Meinherz, F., Fritz, L., & Schneider, F. (2020). How Values Play into Sustainability Assessments: Challenges and a Possible Way Forward. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–86.Google Scholar
Meirelles, J., Pagani, , A., Athanassiadis, A., & Binder, C.R. (2020). Sustainability issues in urban systems from a metabolic perspective. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 261–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, R. K. (2012). Environmental impact assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.661557.Google Scholar
Mori, K., & Christodoulou, A. (2012). Review of sustainability indices and indicators: Towards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI). Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 32(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison-Saunders, A., Pope, J., Gunn, J. A. E., Bond, A., & Retief, F. (2014). Strengthening impact assessment: A call for integration and focus. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32(1), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2013.872841.Google Scholar
Ness, B., Urbel-Piirsalu, E., Anderberg, S., & Olsson, L. (2007). Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 60, 498–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norgaard, R. B. (1994). Development Betrayed: The End of Progress and a Coevolutionary Revisioning of the Future. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Osorio, L. A. R., Lobato, M. O., & Del Castillo, X. Á. (2009). An epistemology for sustainability science: A proposal for the study of the health/disease phenomenon. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 16(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500902760571.1Google Scholar
Patterson, M., McDonald, G., & Hardy, D. (2017). Is there more in common than we think? Convergence of ecological footprinting, energy analysis, life cycle assessment and other methods of environmental accounting. Ecological Modelling, 362, 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.07.022.Google Scholar
Pearce, D. W., & Turner, R. K. (1990). Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Phillis, Y. A., Kouikoglou, V. S., & Verdugo, C. (2017). Urban sustainability assessment and ranking of cities. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 64, 254–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.03.002.Google Scholar
Pintér, L., Hardi, P., Martinuzzi, A., & Hall, J. (2012). Bellagio STAMP: Principles for sustainability assessment and measurement. Ecological Indicators, 17, 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.07.001.Google Scholar
Pope, J., Bond, A., Hugé, J., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2017). Reconceptualising sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 62, 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.11.002.Google Scholar
Raworth, K. (2012). A safe and just space for humanity: Can we live within the doughnut? Oxfam Policy and Practice: Climate Change and Resilience, 8(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
Redclift, M. (2005). Sustainable development (1987–2005): An oxymoron comes of age. Sustainable Development, 13(4), 212–227.Google Scholar
Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., et al. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, , et al. (2009). Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03180-140232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Sala, S., Ciuffo, B., & Nijkamp, P. (2015). A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 119, 314–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.015.Google Scholar
Scerri, A., & James, P. (2010). Accounting for sustainability: Combining qualitative and quantitative research in developing “indicators” of sustainability. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570902864145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilling, T., Mühlemeier, S., Wyss, R., & Binder, C. R. (2020). A Concept for Sustainability Transition Assessment (STA): A Dynamic Systems Perspective Informed by Resilience Thinking. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 123–138.Google Scholar
Science for Environment Policy. (2018). Indicators for Sustainable Cities. In-depth Report 12. Produced for the European Commission DG Environment by the Science Communication Unit, UWE, Bristol.Google Scholar
Sengers, F., Wieczorek, A. J., & Raven, R. (2016). Experimenting for sustainability transitions: A systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.031.Google Scholar
Sharifi, A., & Murayama, A. (2013). A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 38, 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.06.006.Google Scholar
Shen, L. Y., Jorge Ochoa, J., Shah, M. N., & Zhang, X. (2011). The application of urban sustainability indicators: A comparison between various practices. Habitat International, 35(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.03.006.Google Scholar
Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2012). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 15(1), 281–299.Google Scholar
Slaper, T., & Hall, T. (2011). The triple bottom line: What is it and how does it work? Indiana Business Review, 86, 4–8.Google Scholar
Stagl, S. (2012). Value articulating institutions and changing social preferences. In Brousseau, E, Dedeurwaerdere, T, & Siebenhüner, B, eds., Reflexive Governance for Global Public Goods. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 225–240. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262017244.003.0237.Google Scholar
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., et al. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855.Google Scholar
Thabrew, L., Wiek, A., & Ries, R. (2009). Environmental decision making in multi-stakeholder contexts: Applicability of life cycle thinking in development planning and implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.03.008.Google Scholar
Turcu, C. (2013). Re-thinking sustainability indicators: Local perspectives of urban sustainability. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(5), 695–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2012.698984.Google Scholar
UN. (2017). Sustainable Development Goal 11. Make Cities and Human Settlements Inclusive, Safe, Resilient and Sustainable. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg11 (accessed 2.5.18).Google Scholar
Waas, T., Hugé, J., Block, T., Wright, T., Benitez-Capistros, F., & Verbruggen, A. (2014). Sustainability assessment and indicators: Tools in a decision-making strategy for sustainable development. Sustainability, 6(9), 5512–5534. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6095512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waas, T., Hugé, J., Verbruggen, A., & Wright, T. (2011). Sustainable development: A bird’s eye view. Sustainability, 3(12), 1637–1661. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3101637.Google Scholar
Webb, R., Rissik, D., Petheram, L., Beh, J. L., & Stafford Smith, M. (2018). Co-designing adaptation decision support: Meeting common and differentiated needs. Climatic Change, 2018, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2165-7.Google Scholar
White, M. A. (2013). Sustainability: I know it when I see it. Ecological Economics, 86, 213–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.020.Google Scholar
Wiek, A., & Binder, C. (2005). Solution spaces for decision-making: A sustainability assessment tool for city-regions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(6), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.09.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiek, A., Ness, B., Schweizer-Ries, P., Brand, F. S., & Farioli, F. (2012). From complex systems analysis to transformational change: A comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects. Sustainability Science, 7 (S1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0148-y.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×