Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T13:14:22.860Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Facial Reconstruction of Famous Historical Figures: Between Science and Art

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2017

Christopher M. Stojanowski
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
William N. Duncan
Affiliation:
East Tennessee State University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Studies in Forensic Biohistory
Anthropological Perspectives
, pp. 191 - 212
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andelković, B. and Harker, J. (2011). Identity restored: Nesmin forensic facial reconstruction in context. Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology, 6(3), 715728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babelon, J. P. (2009). Henri IV. Paris: Fayard edn.Google Scholar
Bailly, J. C. (1998). L'apostrofe muta, Saggio sui ritratti del Fayum. Macerata, Italy: Quodlibet.Google Scholar
Benazzi, S., Fantini, M., De Crescenzio, F., et al. (2009a). The face of the poet Dante Alighieri reconstructed by virtual modeling and forensic anthropology techniques. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36(2), 278283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benazzi, S., Stansfield, E., Kullmer, O., et al. (2009b). Geometric morphometric methods for bone reconstruction: The mandibular condylar process of Pico della Mirandola, Anatomical Records, 292(8), 10881097.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benazzi, S., Bertelli, P., Lippi, B., et al. (2010). Virtual anthropology and forensic arts: The facial reconstruction of Ferrante Gonzaga. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37(7), 15721578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, S. and Ferguson, E. (2011). Forensic Anthropology 2000–2010. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogdanowicz, W., Allen, M., Branicki, W., et al. (2009). Genetic identification of putative remains of the famous astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(30), 1227912282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bottum, J. (2005). Death and politics. First things, an America’s founding and future lecture November 9, Princeton University, James Madison Program.Google Scholar
Buckley, R., Morris, M., Appleby, J., et al. (2013). “The king in the car park”: New light on the death and burial of Richard III in the Grey Friars church, Leicester, in 1485. Antiquity, 87(336), 519538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattaneo, C. (2007). Forensic anthropology: Developments of a classic discipline in the new millennium. Forensic Science International, 165(2–3), 185193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cesarani, F., Martina, M. C., Grilletto, R., et al. (2004). Facial reconstruction of a wrapped Egyptian mummy using MDCT. American Journal Roentgenology, 183(3), 755758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlier, P. (2010). Multidisciplinary medical identification of a French king’s head (Henri IV). BMJ, 341, 13261327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlier, P. (2014). Naming the body (or the bones): Human remains, anthropological/medical collections, religious beliefs, and restitution. Clinical Anatomy, 27(3), 291295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlier, P., Lalueza Fox, C., and Hervè, C. (2013). La tête d'Henri IV: Identification et problématique éthique. La Revue du Praticiene, 63(2), 289293.Google Scholar
Corruccini, R. S. (1994). Integrative paths to the past: Reaganomics and the fate of the progressive Neanderthals. In Integrative Paths to the Past: Paleoanthropological Advances in Honor of F. Clark Howell, eds. Corruccini, R. S. and Ciochon, R. L.. New York: Prentice Hall, pp. 697708.Google Scholar
Crossland, Z. (2009). Acts of estrangement: The post-mortem making of self and other. Archaeological Dialogues, 16(1), 102125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, A. (2006). Copernicus unearthed. Smithsonian Magazine, 37(2), 22.Google Scholar
Davy-Jow, S. (2013). The devil is in the details: A synthesis of psychology of facial perception and its applications in forensic facial reconstruction. Science and Justice, 53(2), 230235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davy-Jow, S., Decker, S. J., and Ford, J. M. (2012). A simple method of nose tip shape validation for facial approximation. Forensic Science International, 214(1–3), 208.e1208.e3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Greef, S. and Willems, G. (2005). Three-dimensional cranio-facial reconstruction in forensic identification: Latest progress and new tendencies in the 21st century. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 50(1), 12821288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerasimov, M. M. (1971). The Face Finder. New York: Lippincott.Google Scholar
Ghosh, A. and Krishan, K. (2012). Facial reconstruction: The art of the science. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2, 4344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handwerk, B. (2005). King Tut’s new face: Behind the forensic reconstruction. National Geographic, May 11. Available at: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/05/0511_050511_kingtutface.html (accessed August 10, 2016).Google Scholar
Helmer, R., Rohricht, S., Petersen, D., et al. (1989). Plastische Gesichtsrekonstruktion als Möglichkeit der Identizierung unbekannter Schädel (II) [Plastic face reconstruction as a possibility for identifying unknown skulls (II). An evaluation of the reliability of the reconstruction technic by a double-blind trial]. Arch Kriminol, 184(5–6), 142160.Google Scholar
Holland, L. A. (1956). The purpose of the warrior image from Capestrano. American Journal of Archaeology, 60(3), 243247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearl, M. C. (2014). The proliferation of skulls in popular culture: A case study of how the traditional symbol of mortality was rendered meaningless. Mortality, 20(1), 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krogman, W. M. and Iscan, M. Y. (1986). The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Lalueza-Fox, C., Römpler, H., Caramelli, D., et al. (2007). A melanocortin 1 receptor allele suggests varying pigmentation among Neanderthals. Science, 318(5855), 14531455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landau, T. (1989) About Faces: The Evolution of the Human Face. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group Inc.Google Scholar
Leary, M. R. and Buttermore, N. R. (2003). The evolution of the human self: Tracing the natural history of self-awareness, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 33(4), 365404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, W. J., Wilkinson, C. M., and Hwang, H. S. (2012). An accuracy assessment of forensic computerized facial reconstruction employing cone-beam computed tomography from live subjects. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 57(2), 318327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, W. J., Yoon, A. Y., Song, M. K., et al. (2014). The archaeological contribution of forensic craniofacial reconstruction to a portrait drawing of a Korean historical figure. Journal of Archaeological Science, 49(2), 228e236e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. E. (2008). Identifying sword marks on bone: Criteria for distinguishing between cut marks made by different classes of bladed weapons. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35(7), 20012008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombroso, C. (2013 [1897]). L'uomo delinquente – quinta edizione – 1897. Torino: Bompiani.Google Scholar
McLean, S. (2008). Bodies from the bog: Metamorphosis, non-human agency and the making of “collective” memory. Trames, 3, 299308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neave, R. A. H. (1998). Age changes in the face in adulthood. In Craniofacial Identification in Forensic Medicine, eds. Clement, J. G. and Ranson, D. L.. Sydney: Arnold Publications, pp. 215231.Google Scholar
Omstead, J. (2007). Facial reconstruction. Totem: The University of Western Ontario Journal of Anthropology, 10(1), 3746.Google Scholar
Papagrigorakis, M. J., Synodinosb, P. N., Antoniadis, A., et al. (2011). Facial reconstruction of an 11-year-old female resident of 430 BC Athens. Angle Orthodontist, 81(1), 169177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, V. M., (2000). Skeletal remains identification by facial reconstruction. Paper presented at the 9th Biennial Meeting of the International Association for Craniofacial Identification, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Plinius Secundus, Caius. (2008) Naturalis Historiae. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Prag, J. (1990). Reconstructing King Philip II: The “nice” version. American Journal of Archaeology, 94(2), 237247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prag, J. and Neave, R. (1997). Making Faces: Using Forensic and Archaeological Evidence. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Rhine, S. (1998). Facial reproductions in court. In Human Identification: Case Studies in Forensic Anthropology, eds. Rathbun, T. A. and Buikstra, J. E.. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher, pp. 357361.Google Scholar
Sanders, K. (2009). Bodies in the Bog and the Archaeological Imagination. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schiermeier, Q. (2005). Copernicus unearthed? Nature, November 7. doi: 10.1038/news051107-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scognamiglio, E. (2001). Il volto di Dio nelle religioni: Una indagine storica, filosofica e teologica. Rome: Paoline.Google Scholar
Snow, C. C., Gatliff, B. P., and McWilliams, K. R. (1970). Reconstruction of facial features from the skull: An evaluation of its usefulness in forensic anthropology. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 33(2), 221228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starbuck, J. M. and Ward, R. E. (2007). The effect of tissue depth variation on craniofacial reconstructions. Forensic Science International, 172(2), 130136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stojanowski, C. M. and Duncan, W. N. (2015). Engaging bodies in the public imagination: Bioarchaeology as social science, science, and humanities. American Journal of Human Biology, 27(1), 5160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, K. (2001). Forensic Art and Illustration. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Trinkaus, E. and Shipman, P. (1993). The Neandertals: Changing the Image of Mankind. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Tyrell, A. J., Evison, M. P., Chamberlain, A. T., and Green, M. A. (1997). Forensic three dimensional facial reconstruction: Historical review and contemporary developments. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 42(4), 653661.Google Scholar
Vanezis, P., Blowes, R. W., Linney, A. D., et al. (1989). Application of 3D computer graphics for facial reconstruction and comparison with sculpting techniques. Forensic Science International, 42(1), 6984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verzé, L. (2009). History of facial reconstruction. Acta Biomedica, 80(1), 512.Google ScholarPubMed
Whitnall, S. E. (1921). The Anatomy of the Human Orbit and Accessory Organs of Vision. London: Oxford.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, C. M. (2003). “Virtual” sculpture as a method of computerised facial reconstruction. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Reconstruction of Soft Facial Parts (RSFP), Potsdam, pp. 5963.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, C. M. (2004). Forensic Facial Reconstruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, C. M. (2007). The facial reconstruction of Grauballe man. In Grauballe Man: An Iron Age Bog Body Revisited, eds. Asingh, P. and Lynnerup, N.. Aarhaus: Aarhaus University Press, pp. 260273.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, C. M. (2008). The facial reconstruction of ancient Egyptians. In Egyptian Mummies and Modern Science, ed. David, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 162180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, C. M. (2010). Facial reconstruction: Anatomical art or artistic anatomy? Journal of Anatomy, 216(2), 235250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkinson, C. M. and Mautner, S. A. (2003). Measurement of eyeball protrusion and its application in facial reconstruction. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 48(1), 1216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkinson, C. M. and Neave, R. A. H. (2003). The reconstruction of faces showing healed wounds. Journal of Archaeological Science, 30(10), 13431348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, C. M., Rynn, C., Peters, H. et al. (2006). A blind accuracy assessment of computer modeled forensic facial reconstruction using computed tomography data from live subjects. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology, 2(3), 179187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zegers, R. H. C. (2005). The eyes of Johann Sebastian Bach. Archaeological Ophthalmology, 123(10), 14271430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zegers, R. H., Maas, M., Koopman, A. T. G., and Maat, G. J. R. (2009). Are the alleged remains of Johann Sebastian Bach authentic? A critical assessment of the remains analysis. Medical Journal of Australia, 190(4), 213216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×