Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:46:25.060Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Fifty Four - Carotid Artery Surgery

from Treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2022

Louis R. Caplan
Affiliation:
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre
Aishwarya Aggarwal
Affiliation:
John F. Kennedy Medical Center
Get access

Summary

Although the artery was successfully ligated, the patient died a week later; inflammation and sepsis caused the wound to swell, choking the patient. Cooper improved his technique and made yet another attempt to ligate a carotid artery three years later. He succeeded this time, and the patient lived for the next 13 years [3].

Type
Chapter
Information
Stories of Stroke
Key Individuals and the Evolution of Ideas
, pp. 529 - 540
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes and References

Fisher, CM. Occlusion of the internal carotid artery. AMA Arch. Neurol. Psychiatry 1951;65:346377.Google Scholar
Pearce, JMS. Historical note on carotid disease and ligation. Eur. Neurol. 2014;72:2629.Google Scholar
Cooper, A. Account of the first successful operation performed on the common carotid artery for aneurysm in the year 1808, with post-mortem examination in 1821. Guy’s Hosp. Rep. 1836;1:5359.Google Scholar
Chiari, H. Uber das Verhalten des Tielungswinkels der Carotis communis bei der Endarteritis chronica deformans. Verhandl. deutschpath. Gesellsch. 1905;9:326330. Chapter 15 includes more information about Hans Chiari and his work.Google Scholar
The work of Moniz and the later evolution of cerebral angiography is discussed in detail in Chapter 31.Google Scholar
Seldinger, SI. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography. Acta Radiol. 1953;39:368376.Google Scholar
Chao, WH, Kwan, ST, Lyman, RS, et al. Thrombosis of the left internal carotid artery. Arch. Surg. 1938:37:100111.Google Scholar
Conley, J, Pack, G. Surgical procedure for lessening the hazard of carotid bulb excision. Surgery 1952;31:845858.Google Scholar
Fisher, CM. Occlusion of the carotid arteries: Further experiences. AMA Arch. Neurol. Psychiatry 1954;72;187204.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Carrea, R, Molins, M, Murphy, G. Surgical treatment of spontaneous thrombosis of the internal carotid artery in the neck: Carotid carotideal anastomosis. Acta Neurol. Latinoamer. 1955;1:7178.Google Scholar
Eastcott, H, Pickering, G, Rob, C. Reconstruction of internal carotid artery in a patient with intermittent attacks of hemiplegia. Lancet 1954;267(2):994996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Dos Santos, JC. From embolectomy to endarterectomy or the fall of a myth. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1976;17:113128.Google Scholar
Strully, KJ, Hurwitt, ES, Blankenberg, HW. Thromboendarterectomy for thrombosis of the internal carotid artery in the neck. J. Neurosurg. 1953;10:474482.Google Scholar
DeBakey, M. Successful carotid endarterectomy for cerebrovascular insufficiency: Nineteen-year follow-up. JAMA 1975;233:10831085.Google Scholar
Cooley, D, Al-Naaman, Y, Carton, C. Surgical treatment of arteriosclerotic occlusion of common carotid artery. J. Neurosurg. 1956;13:500506.Google Scholar
Bahnson, H, Spencer, F, Quattlebaum, JJ. Surgical treatment of occlusive disease of the carotid artery. Ann. Surg. 1959;149:711720.Google Scholar
Fields, WS, Maslenikov, V, Meyer, JS, et al. Joint Study of Extracranial Artery Occlusion: V. Progress report of prognosis following surgery or non- surgery treatment for transient ischemic attacks and cervical carotid artery lesions. JAMA 1970;211:19932003.Google Scholar
National Center for Health Statistics. Detailed Diagnosis and Procedures, National Hospital Discharge Survey. Vital and Health Statistics. Series 13. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1992–1997.Google Scholar
Barnett, HJM, Plum, F, Walton, JN. An expression of concern. Stroke 1984;15(6):942943.Google Scholar
Spence, JD, Hachinski, V. In memoriam. Henry J. M. Barnett, 1922–2016. Stroke 2017;48(1):24.Google Scholar
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991;325:445453.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: Final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 1998;351(9113):13711387.Google Scholar
Charles Picton Warlow. Prabook. Available at https://prabook.com/web/charles_picton.warlow/315427.Google Scholar
DeRango, P, Brown, MM, Didier, L, et al. Management of carotid stenosis in women: Consensus document. Neurology 2013;80(24):22582268.Google Scholar
Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 1995;273:14211428.Google Scholar
Halliday, A, Mansfield, A, Marro, J, et al. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: Randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;363(9420):14911502.Google Scholar
Benavente, O, Moher, D, Pham, B. Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: A meta-analysis. BMJ 1998;317:14771480.Google Scholar
Caplan, LR, Brott, TG. Of horse races, trials, meta-analyses, and carotid artery stenosis (Editorial). Arch. Neurol. 2011;68:157159.Google Scholar
Brott, TG, Hobson, RW II, Howard, G, et al. CREST Investigators. Stenting vs endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;363:1123.Google Scholar
Bangalore, S, Kumar, S, Wetterslev, J, et al. Carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy: Meta-analysis and diversity-adjusted trial sequential analysis of randomized trials. Arch. Neurol. 2011;68(2):172184.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×