Aaltonen, K., Kujala, J. and Oijala, T. 2008. Stakeholder salience in global projects. International Journal of Project Management 26 (5): 509–516.Google Scholar

Abrams, F. 1951. Management responsibilities in a complex world. Harvard Business Review 29 (5): 29–34.Google Scholar

Achterkamp, M. C. and Vos, J. F. J. 2008. Investigating the use of the stakeholder notion in project management literature, a meta-analysis. International Journal of Project Management 26 (7): 749–757.Google Scholar

Ackerman, R. W. 1973. How companies respond to social demands. Harvard Business Review 51 (4): 88–98.Google Scholar

Ackerman, R. W. 1975. The Social Challenge to Business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ackerman, R. W. and Bauer, R. A. 1976. Corporate Social Responsiveness. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Ackoff, R. L. 1970. A Concept of Corporate Planning. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Ackoff, R. L. 1974. Redesigning the Future. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Acquier, A., Gand, S. and Szpirglas, M. 2008. From stakeholder to stakeholder management in crisis episodes: A case study in a public transportation company. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 16 (2): 101–114.Google Scholar

Adams, C. A. 2004. The ethical, social and environmental reporting-performance portrayal gap. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 17 (5): 731–757.Google Scholar

Adler, R. W. 2002. Stakeholders' perceptions of organizational decline. Accounting Forum 26 (1): 31–45.Google Scholar

Adler, R. W. and Chaston, K. 2002. Stakeholders' perceptions of organizational decline. Accounting Forum 26 (1): 31–45.Google Scholar

Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K. and Sonnenfeld, J. A. 1999. Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal 42 (5): 507–525.Google Scholar

Ahlstedt, L. and Jahnukainen, I. 1971. A Business Organization as a Management System. Tapiola: Weilin & Goos.

Albinger, H. S. and Freeman, S. J. 2000. Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations. Journal of Business Ethics 28 (3): 243–253.Google Scholar

Aldrich, H. E. and Whetten, D. A. 1981. Organization sets, action sets, and networks: Making the most of simplicity. In Nystrom, P. C. and Starbuck, W. H. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. 385–408.

Alkhafaji, A. F. 1989. A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Governance: Managing in a Dynamic Environment. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

Allen, D. 2003. All for one and one for all. Financial Management July/August: 12.

Allen, F., Carletti, E. and Marquez, R. 2007. Stakeholder capitalism, corporate governance and firm value. European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) Finance Working Paper no. 190/2007. Knowledge@wharton Working Paper. http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/papers/1344.pdf (accessed Feb. 2, 2009).

Allison, G. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little, Brown.

Allison, G. and Zelikow, P. 1999. The Essence of Decision. 2nd edn. New York: Longman.

Al-Mudimigh, A. S., Zairi, M. and Ahmed, A. M. M. 2004. Extending the concept of supply chain: The effective management of value chains. International Journal of Production Research 87 (3): 309–321.Google Scholar

Alvarez-Gil, J., Berrone, P., Husillos, F. J. and Lado, N. 2007. Reverse logistics, stakeholders' influence, organizational slack, and managers' posture. Journal of Business Research 60: 463–473.Google Scholar

Ambler, T. and Wilson, A. 1995. Problems of stakeholder theory. Business Ethics: A European Review, 4 (1): 30–5.Google Scholar

,American Bar Association, Committee on Corporate Laws. 1990. Other Constituencies Statutes: Potential for Confusion. Business Law 45: 2253.Google Scholar

Andreadis, N. A. 2002. Leadership for civil society: Implications for global corporate leadership development. Human Resource Development International 5 (2): 143–149.Google Scholar

Andrews, K. 1980. The Concept of Corporate Strategy. 3rd edn. Homewood, IL: R. D. Irwin.

Andriof, J., Waddock, S., Husted, B. and Rahman, S. S. (eds.). 2002. Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking. 1: Theory, Responsibility and Engagement. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

Ansoff, H. I. 1965. Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business for Growth and Expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Ansoff, H. I. 1979. The changing shape of the strategic problem. Journal of General Management 4 (4): 42–58.Google Scholar

Ansoff, H. I. 1991. Critique of Henry Mintzberg's “The design school: reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management.” Strategic Management Journal 12: 449–461.Google Scholar

Argandoña, A. 1998. The stakeholder theory and the common good. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (9): 1093–1102.Google Scholar

Argenti, J. 1993. Your Organization: What Is It for? New York: McGraw-Hill.

Argenti, J. 1997. Stakeholders: The case against. Long Range Planning 30 (3): 442–445.Google Scholar

Armstrong, J. S. 1982. The value of formal planning for strategic decisions: Review of empirical research. Strategic Management Journal 3 (3): 197–211.Google Scholar

Arnold, S. J. and Luthra, M. N. 2000. Market entry effects of large format retailers: A stakeholder analysis. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management 28 (4/5): 139–154.Google Scholar

Arora, A. and Alam, P. 2005. CEO compensation and stakeholders' claims. Contemporary Accounting Research 22 (3): 519–547.Google Scholar

Arora, B. and Puranik, R. 2004. A review of corporate social responsibility in India. Development 47 (3): 93–100.Google Scholar

Ashbaugh, H. and Warfield, T. D. 2003. Audits as a corporate governance mechanism: Evidence from the German market. Journal of International Accounting Research 2: 1–21.Google Scholar

Astley, W. G. 1984. Toward an appreciation of collective strategy. Academy of Management Review 9 (3): 526–535.Google Scholar

Astley, W. G. 1985. Administrative science as socially constructed truth. Administrative Science Quarterly 30 (4): 497–513.Google Scholar

Atkinson, A. A., Waterhouse, J. H. and Wells, R. B. 1997. A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement. MIT Sloan Management Review 38 (3): 25–37.Google Scholar

Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B. and Hatfield, J. D. 1985. An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 28 (2): 446–463.Google Scholar

Austin, J., Stevenson, H. and Wei-Skillern, J. 2006. Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Baele, L., Jonge, O. and Vander Vennet, R. 2007. Does the stock market value bank diversification? Journal of Banking and Finance 31 (7): 1999–2023.Google Scholar

Bainbridge, S. M. 1993. Independent directors and the ALI corporate governance project. George Washington Law Review 61: 1034–1083.Google Scholar

Baker, C. R. and Owsen, D. M. 2002. Increasing the role of auditing in corporate governance. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 13 (5/6): 783–796.Google Scholar

Ball, R., Kothari, S. P. and Robin, A. 2000. The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 29 (1): 1–51.Google Scholar

Balmer, J. M. T. 2008. Identity-based views of the corporation: Insights from corporate identity, organisational identity, social identity, visual identity, corporate brand identity and corporate image. European Journal of Marketing 42 (9/10): 879–906.Google Scholar

Bamonte, T. 1995. The meaning of the “corporate constituency” provision of the Illinois Business Corporation Act. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 27: 1–25.Google Scholar

Bansal, P. 2005. Evolving sustainability: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal 26 (3): 197–218.Google Scholar

Barnard, C. I. 1938. Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Barnett, A. 1997. Towards a stakeholder democracy. In Kelly, G., Kelly, D., and Gamble, A. (eds.), Stakeholder Capitalism. London: Macmillan. 82–95.

Barnett, M. L. 2007. Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 32 (3): 794–816.Google Scholar

Barney, J. B. 1986. Types of competition and the theory of strategy: Toward an integrative framework. Academy of Management Review 11 (4): 791–800.Google Scholar

Barney, J. B. Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17 (1): 99–120.Google Scholar

Barney, J. B. and Arikan, A. M. 2001. The resource-based view: Origins and implications. In Hitt, M. A., Freeman, R. E., and Harrison, J. S. (eds.), Handbook of Strategic Management. Oxford: Blackwell. 124–188.

Barney, J. B. and Ouchi, W. G. 1986. Organizational Economics. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Baron, D. P. 1995. The nonmarket strategy system. Sloan Management Review 37 (1): 73–85.Google Scholar

Barringer, B. R. and Harrison, J. S. 2000. Walking a tightrope: Creating value through interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management 26 (3): 367–404.Google Scholar

Barton, S. L., Hill, N. C. and Sundaram, S. 1989. An empirical test of stakeholder theory predictions of capital structure. Financial Management 18 (1): 36–44.Google Scholar

Bartov, E., Goldberg, S. R. and Kim, M. 2005. Comparative value relevance among German, US and international accounting standards: A German stock market perspective. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 20 (2): 95–119.Google Scholar

Baskerville-Morley, R. F. 2004. Dangerous, dominant, dependent, or definitive: Stakeholder identification when the profession faces major transgressions. Accounting and the Public Interest 4: 24–42.Google Scholar

Baucus, M. S. 1995. Halo-adusted residuals: Prolonging the life of a terminally ill measure of corporate social performance. Business and Society 34 (2): 227–235.Google Scholar

Bauer, R. A. and Fenn, D. H., Jr., 1972. The Corporate Social Audit. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Baum, J. A. C. and Oliver, C. 1991. Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly 36 (2): 187–218.Google Scholar

Baumhart, R. 1968. An Honest Profit – What Businessmen Say about Ethics in Business. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Baumol, W. J. 1990. Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy 98 (5): 893–921.Google Scholar

Baumol, W. J. 1994. Entrepreneurship, Management, and the Structure of Payoffs. Boston: MIT Press.

Baysinger, B. D. and Butler, H. 1985. Corporate governance and the board of directors: performance effects of changes in board composition. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 1 (1): 101–134.Google Scholar

Beasley, M. S., Chen, A., Nunez, K. and Wright, L. 2006. Working hand in hand: Balanced scorecards and enterprise risk management. Strategic Finance 87 (9): 49–55.Google Scholar

Beasley, M. S. and Frigo, M. L. 2007. Strategic risk management: Creating and protecting value. Strategic Finance, 88 (11): 25–53.Google Scholar

Beer, M., Spector, B., Lawrence, P., Quinn Mills, D. and Walton, R. 1984. Managing Human Assets. New York: Free Press.

Berle, A. A., Jr. 1954. The Twentieth Century Capitalist Revolution. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

Berle, A. A., Jr., and Means, G. C.. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan.

Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S. and Jones, T. M. 1999. Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 42 (5): 488–506.Google Scholar

Beutler, L. 2005. Involving stakeholders in irrigation and drainage district decisions: Who, what, when, where, why, how? California Water Plan Update 4: 1095–1105.Google Scholar

Bhattacharya, C. B. and Korschun, D. 2008. Stakeholder marketing: Beyond the four Ps and the customer. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 27 (1): 113–116.Google Scholar

Bhimani, A. and Soonawalla, K. 2005. From conformance to performance: The corporate responsibilities continuum. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 24 (3): 165–174.Google Scholar

Biancalana, J. 1990. Defining the proper corporate constituency: Asking the wrong question. University of Cincinnati Law Review 59: 425, 429–30.Google Scholar

Biehl, M., Kim, H. and Wade, M. 2006. Relationships among the academic disciplines: A multi-method citation analysis. Omega 34 (4): 359–371.Google Scholar

Binmore, K. 1991. Fun and Games: A Text on Game Theory. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

Binmore, K. 1994. Game Theory and the Social Contract. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Binmore, K. 1997. Rationality and Backward Induction, Journal of Economic Methodology 4: 23–41.Google Scholar

Bishop, John Douglas (ed.). 2000. Ethics and Capitalism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Blair, J. and Buesseler, J. 1998. Competitive forces in the medical group industry: A stakeholder perspective. Health Care Management Review 23 (2): 7–27.Google Scholar

Blair, J. and Fottler, M. 1990. Challenges In Health Care Management: Strategic Perspectives for Managing Key Stakeholders. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Blair, J., Fottler, M. and Whitehead, C. 1996. Diagnosing the stakeholder bottom line for medical group practices: Key stakeholders' potential to threaten and/or cooperate. Medical Group Management Journal 43 (2): 40, 42–8, 50–1.Google Scholar

Blair, J., Rock, T., Rotarius, T., Fottler, M., Bosse, G. and Driskill, J. 1996. The problematic fit of diagnosis and strategy for medical group stakeholders – including IDS/Ns. Health Care Management Review 21 (1): 7–28.Google Scholar

Blair, J., Savage, G. and Whitehead, C. 1989. A strategic approach for negotiating with hospital stakeholders. Health Care Management Review 14 (1): 13–23.Google Scholar

Blair, J. and Whitehead, C. 1988. Too many on the seesaw: Stakeholder diagnosis and management for hospitals. Hospital and Health Services Administration 33 (2): 153–166.Google Scholar

Blair, M. 1995. Whose interests should be served?” In Clarkson, M. (ed.), Ownership and Control: Rethinking Corporate Governance for the Twenty First Century. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution. 202–234.

Blair, M. M. 1998. For whom should corporations be run? An economic rationale for stakeholder management. Long Range Planning 31 (2): 195–200.Google Scholar

Blair, M. M. and Stout, L. 1999. A team production theory of corporate law. Virginia Law Review 85 (2): 248–328.Google Scholar

Blodgett, J. G., Long-Chuan, L., Rose, G. M. and Vitell, S. J. 2001. Ethical sensitivity to stakeholder interests: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 29 (2): 190–202.Google Scholar

Boatright, J. R. 1994. Fiduciary duties and the shareholder-management relation: Or, what's so special about shareholders? Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4): 393–407.Google Scholar

Boatright, J. R. 2000. Ethics and the Conduct of Business. 3rd edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Boatright, J. R. 2002. Contractors as stakeholders: Reconciling stakeholder theory with the nexus-of-contracts firm. Journal of Banking and Finance 26 (9): 1837–1852.Google Scholar

Boesso, G. and Kumar, K. 2007. Drivers of corporate voluntary disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 20 (2): 269–296.Google Scholar

Bosse, D. A., Phillips, R. A. and Harrison, J. S. 2009. Stakeholders, reciprocity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 30 (4): 447–456.Google Scholar

Bourgeois, L. J. III. 1984. Strategic management and determinism. Academy of Management Review 9 (4): 586–596.Google Scholar

Boutilier, R. G. 2007. Social capital in firm-stakeholder networks. Journal of Corporate Citizenship 26: 121–134.Google Scholar

Bowen, H. 1953. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper & Row.

Bowen, R. M., Johnson, M. F., Shevlin, T. and Shores, D. 1992. Determinants of the timing of quarterly earnings announcement. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 7 (4): 395–422.Google Scholar

Bowie, N. E. 1998. A Kantian theory of capitalism. Business Ethics Quarterly. The Ruffin Series, Special Issue 1: 37–60. Charlottesville, VA: Philosophy Documentation Center.

Bowie, N. E. 1999. Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.

Bradley, N. 2003. How to measure and analyze corporate governance. International Financial Law Review, special issue on corporate governance: 40–47. www.iflr.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=2026778 (accessed Feb. 4, 2009).

Braudel, Fernand. 1982. Civilization and Capitalism: 15th–18th Century, Vol. 2, The Wheels of Commerce. New York: Harper & Row.

Brenner, S. N. 1993. The stakeholder theory of the firm and organizational decision making: Some propositions and a model. In Pasquero, J. and Collins, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society. San Diego. 205–210.

Brenner, S. N. 1995. Stakeholder theory of the firm: Its consistency with current management techniques. In Näsi, J. (ed.), Understanding Stakeholder Thinking. Helsinki: LSR-Julkaisut Oy. 75–96.

Broehl, W. G. 1999. Tuck and Tucker: The origin of the Graduate Business School. Hanover: University Press of New England.

Brown, B. and Perry, S. 1995. Halo-removed residuals of Fortune's “Responsibility to the community and environment”: A decade of data. Business and Society 34 (2): 199–215.Google Scholar

Brugha, R. and Varvasovszky, Z. 2000. Stakeholder analysis: A review. Health Policy and Planning 15 (3): 239–246.Google Scholar

Bryson, J. 2004. What to do when stakeholders matter. Public Management Review 6 (1): 21–53.Google Scholar

Bryson, J., Cunningham, G. and Lokkesmoe, K. 2002. What to do when stakeholders matter: The case of problem formulation for the African American Men Project of Hannepin County Minnesota. Public Administration Review 62 (5): 568–584.Google Scholar

Bryson, J., Freeman, R. E. and Roering, W. 1986. Strategic planning in the public sector: Approaches and future directions. In Checkoway, B. (ed.), Strategic Perspectives on Planning Practice. Boston: Lexington Books. 65–85.

Bryson, N. and Mobolurin, A. 1996. An action learning evaluation procedure for multiple criteria decision making problems. European Journal of Operational Research 96 (2): 379–386.Google Scholar

Buchanan, J. M. and Tullock, G. 1965. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Buchheit, S., Collins, D. and Reitenga, A. 2002. A cross-discipline comparison of top-tier academic journal publication rates: 1997–1999. Journal of Accounting Education 20 (2): 123–130.Google Scholar

Buchholz, R. A. 1989. Fundamental Concepts and Problems in Business Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Buchholz, R. A. and Rosenthal, S. B. 2000. Rethinking Business Ethics: A Pragmatic Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

Burgstahler, D. and Dichev, I. 1997. Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 (1): 99–126.Google Scholar

Burke, M. J., Borucki, C. C. and Hurley, A. E. 1992. Reconceptualizing psychological climate in a retail service environment: A multiple-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology 77 (5): 717–729.Google Scholar

Burton, B. K. and Dunn, C. P. 1996. Collaborative control and the commons: Safeguarding employee rights. Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (3): 277–288.Google Scholar

Burton, R. M. and Naylor, T. H. 1980. Economic theory in corporate planning. Strategic Management Journal 1 (3): 249–262.Google Scholar

Buysse, K. and Verbeke, A. 2003. Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder perspective. Strategic Management Journal 24 (5): 453–470.Google Scholar

Byrne, M. R. and Polonsky, M. J. 2001. Impediments to consumer adoption of sustainable transportation alternative fuel vehicles. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 21 (12): 1521–1538.Google Scholar

Cadbury, A. 1992. Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. London: The Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance and Gee and Co. Ltd./Burgess Science Press.

Calton, J. M. 1991. The dark side of commitment: Is the literature on organizational commitment an ideological black hole? In Paul, K. (ed.), Contemporary Issues in Business Ethics and Politics. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press. 69–99.

Calton, J. M. and Kurland, N. B. 1995. A theory of stakeholder enabling: Giving voice to an emerging postmodern praxis of organisational discourse. In Boje, D. M., Gephart, R. P., and Thatchenkery, T. J. (eds.), Postmodern Management and Organization Theory. London: Sage. 154–177.

Calton, J. M. and Lad, L. J. 1995. Social contracting as a trust-building process: Of network governance. Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (2): 271–295.Google Scholar

Cameron, K. 1980. Critical questions in assessing organizational effectiveness. Organizational Dynamics 9 (2): 66–80.Google Scholar

Cameron, K. 1984. Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science 32 (5): 539–553.Google Scholar

Campbell, A. 1997. Stakeholders: The case in favour. Long Range Planning 30 (3): 446–449.Google Scholar

Campbell, A. and Yeung, S. 1991. Brief case: Mission, vision and strategic intent. Long Range Planning 24 (4): 145–147.Google Scholar

Campbell, D., Moore, G. and Shrives, P. 2006. Cross-sectional effects in community disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 19 (1): 96–114.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. L. 2007. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review 32 (3): 946–967.Google Scholar

Carey, J. M., Beilin, R., Boxshall, A., Burgman, M. A. and Flander, L. 2007. Risk-based approaches to deal with uncertainty in a data-poor system: Stakeholder involvement in hazard identification for marine national parks and marine sanctuaries in Victoria, Australia. Risk Analysis: An International Journal 27 (1): 271–281.Google Scholar

Carrigan, M. 1995. Positive and negative aspects of the social marketing concept: Stakeholder conflicts for the tobacco industry. Journal of Marketing Management 11 (5): 469–485.Google Scholar

Carroll, A. B. (ed.). 1977. Managing Corporate Social Responsibility. Boston: Little, Brown.

Carroll, A. B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 16 (4): 497–505.Google Scholar

Carroll, A. B. 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons 34 (4): 39–48.Google Scholar

Carroll, A. B. 1993. Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management. 2nd edn. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing.

Carroll, A. B. 1999. Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society 38 (3): 268–295.Google Scholar

Carroll, A. B. 2003. The four faces of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review 100 (101): 1–7.Google Scholar

Carroll, A. B. 2006. Corporate social responsibility: A historical perspective. In Epstein, M. and Hanson, K. (eds.), The Accountable Corporation, Vol. 3. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers. 3–30.

Carroll, A. B. and Hoy, F. 1984. Integrating corporate social policy into strategic management. Journal of Business Strategy 4 (3): 48–57.Google Scholar

Carroll, A. B. and Näsi, J. 1997. Understanding stakeholder thinking: Themes from a Finnish conference. Business Ethics 6 (1): 46–51.Google Scholar

Carroll, D. S. A. 1983. Managing relations with government and society: The business perspective. Long Range Planning 16 (2): 10–14.Google Scholar

Carson, T. L. 1993. Does the stakeholder theory constitute a new kind of theory of social responsibility? Business Ethics Quarterly 3 (2): 171–176.Google Scholar

Carter, S. M. 2006. The interaction of top management group, stakeholder, and situational factors on certain corporate reputation management activities. Journal of Management Studies 43 (5): 1145–1176.Google Scholar

Caux, Round Table. 2009. Principles for Responsible Business. www.cauxroundtable.org/index.cfm?&menuid=8.

Chakravarthy, B. S. 1986. Measuring strategic performance. Strategic Management Journal 7 (5): 437–458.Google Scholar

Chandler, A. D. 1962. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chang, Y.-H., Yeh, C.-H. and Wang, S.-Y. 2007. A survey of optimization-based evaluation of development strategies for the air cargo industry. International Journal of Production Economics 106 (2): 550–562.Google Scholar

Chapple, W. and Moon, J. 2005. Corporate social responsibility in Asia. Business and Society 44 (4): 415–441.Google Scholar

Charan, R. and Freeman, R. E. 1980. Planning for the business environment of the 1980s. Journal of Business Strategy 1 (2): 9–19.Google Scholar

Chatterjee, C. and Bergh, D. D. 2003. Failed takeover attempts, corporate governance and refocusing. Strategic Management Journal 24 (1): 87–100.Google Scholar

Chatterjee, C. and Harrison, J. S. 2001. Corporate governance. In Hitt, M. A., Freeman, R. E., and Harrison, J. S. (eds.), Handbook of Strategic Management. Oxford: Blackwell. 543–563.

Chemla, G. 2005. Hold-up, stakeholders and takeover threats. Journal of Financial Intermediation 14 (3): 376–397.Google Scholar

Chen, L., Carson, E. and Simnett, R. 2007. Impact of stakeholder characteristics on voluntary dissemination of interim information and communication of its level of assurance. Accounting and Finance 47 (4): 667–691.Google Scholar

Chen, Y. C. K. and Sackett, P. J. 2007. Return merchandize authorization stakeholders and customer requirements management – high-technology products. International Journal of Production Research 45 (7): 1595–1608.Google Scholar

Child, J. W. and Marcoux, A. M. 1999. Freeman and Evan: Stakeholder theory and the original position. Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (2): 207–224.Google Scholar

Chinyio, E. A. and Akintoye, A. 2008. Practical approaches for engaging stakeholders: Findings from the UK. Construction Management and Economics 26 (6): 591–599.Google Scholar

Chou, T.-Y., Chou, S.-C. T. and Tzeng, G.-H. 2006. Evaluating IT/IS investments: A fuzzy multi-criteria decision model approach. European Journal of Operational Research 173 (3): 1026–1046.Google Scholar

Christensen, R., Andrews, K. and Bower, J. 1980. Business Policy: Text and Cases. Homewood, IL: R. D. Irwin.

Christopher, M., Payne, A. and Ballantyne, D. 1991. Relationship Marketing: Bringing Quality, Customer Service and Marketing Together. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Christopher, M., Payne, A. and Ballantyne, D. 2002. Relationship Marketing: Creating Stakeholder Value. 2nd edn. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Chung, W., Chen, H. and Reid, E. 2009. Business stakeholder analyzer: An experiment of classifying stakeholders on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (1): 59–74.Google Scholar

Churchman, C. W. 1968. The Systems Approach. New York: Delacorte Press.

Churchman, C. W. 1971. The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organizations. New York: Basic Books.

Churchman, C. W., Ackoff, R. L. and Wax, M. (eds.). 1947. Measurement of Consumer Interest. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Clark, R. 1986. Corporate Law. Boston: Little, Brown.

Clarke, L. L. and Lyons, E. C. 2007. The corporate common good: The right and obligation of managers to do good to others. University of Daytona Law Review 32: 273–299.Google Scholar

Clarke, T. 1998. The stakeholder corporation: A business philosophy for the information age. Long Range Planning 31(2): 182–194.Google Scholar

Clarkson, M. B. E. 1988. Corporate social performance in Canada, 1976–86. In Preston, L. E. (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Vol. 12. Greenwich, CT: TM Press. 331–358.

Clarkson, M. B. E. 1991. Defining, evaluating and managing corporate social performance: A stakeholder management model. In Post, J. E. (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Vol. 12. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 331–358.

Clarkson, M. B. E. 1994. A Risk-Based Model of Stakeholder Theory. Toronto: Centre for Corporate Social Performance and Ethics.

Clarkson, M. B. E. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 92–117.Google Scholar

Clarkson, M. B. E. 1998. The Corporation and lts Stakeholders: Classic and Contemporary Readings. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

,Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics. 1999. Principles of Stakeholder Management. Toronto: University of Toronto. (Reproduced in 2002, Business Ethics Quarterly, 12 (1): 256–264.)

Clegg, S. R., Pitsis, T. S., Rura-Polley, T. and Marosszeky, M. 2002. Governmentality matters: Designing an alliance culture of inter-organizational collaboration for managing projects. Organization Studies 23 (3): 317–337.Google Scholar

Cleland, D. I. and Ireland, L. R. 2002. Project Management: Strategic Design and Implementation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Clement, R. W. 2005. The lessons from stakeholder theory for US business leaders. Business Horizons 48 (3): 255–264.Google Scholar

Cloninger, D. O. 1995. Managerial goals and ethical behavior. Financial Practice and Education 5 (1): 50–59.Google Scholar

Cloninger, D. O. 1997. Share price maximization, asymmetric information and ethical behavior: A comment. Financial Practice and Education 7 (2): 82–84.Google Scholar

Clulow, V. 2005. Futures dilemmas for marketers: Can stakeholder analysis add value? European Journal of Marketing 39 (9/10): 978–997.Google Scholar

Coase, R. H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica 4 (16): 386–405.Google Scholar

Cochran, P. L. and Wood, R. A. 1984. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 27 (1): 42–56.Google Scholar

Coff, R. W. 1999. When competitive advantage doesn't lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organization Science 10 (2): 119–133.Google Scholar

Coffee, J. 1988. The uncertain case for takeover reform: An essay on stockholders, stakeholders, and bust-ups. Wisconsin Law Review 435–465.

Colakoglu, S., Lepak, D. P. and Hong, Y. 2006. Measuring HRM effectiveness: Considering multiple stakeholders in a global context. Human Resource Management Review 15: 209–218.Google Scholar

Collier, P. M. 2008. Stakeholder accountability. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 21: 933–954.Google Scholar

Collins, J. and Porras, J. I. 1997. Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies. New York: HarperCollins.

Coman, A. and Ronen, B. 1995. Information technology in operations management: A theory-of-constraints approach. International Journal of Production Research 33 (5): 1403–1415.Google Scholar

Connolly, T., Conlon, E. J. and Deutsch, S. J. 1980. Organizational effectiveness: A multiple-constituency approach. Academy of Management Review 5 (2): 211–217.Google Scholar

Conway, T. and Whitelock, J. 2007. Relationship marketing in the subsidised arts: The key to a strategic marketing focus? European Journal of Marketing 41 (1/2): 199–213.Google Scholar

Coombs, J. E. and Gilley, K. M. 2005. Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation: Main effects and interactions with financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 26 (9): 827–840.Google Scholar

Copulsky, W. 1991. Balancing the needs of customers and shareholders. Journal of Business Strategy 12 (6): 44–47.Google Scholar

Córdoba, J.-R. and Midgley, G. 2006. Broadening the boundaries: An application of critical systems thinking to IS planning in Colombia. Journal of the Operational Research Society 57 (9): 1064–1080.Google Scholar

Cornell, B. and Shapiro, A. C. 1987. Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial Management 16 (1): 5–14.Google Scholar

Covey, S. M. R. and Merrill, R. R. 2006. The Speed of Trust: The One Thing that Changes Everything. New York: Free Press.

Cragg, W. 2002. Business ethics and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (2): 113–142.Google Scholar

Crane, A. 1998. Exploring green alliances. Journal of Marketing Management 14 (6): 559–579.Google Scholar

Cummings, J. F. 2001. Engaging stakeholders in corporate accountability programmes: A cross-sectoral analysis of UK and transnational experience. Business Ethics: A European Review 10 (1): 45–52.Google Scholar

Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Daft, R. L. 1992. Organization Theory and Design. 4th edn. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.

Daft, R. L. and Marcic, D. 2001. Understanding Management. Fort Worth: Southwestern Publishing.

Daily, C. M. 1995. CEO and director turnover in failing firms: an illusion of change? Strategic Management Journal 16 (5): 393–400.Google Scholar

Davis, K. 1996. Governance patterns in bankruptcy reorganizations. Strategic Management Journal 17 (5): 355–375.Google Scholar

Daily, C. M. and Dalton, D. R. 1994. Corporate governance and the bankrupt firm: An empirical assessment. Strategic Management Journal 15 (8): 643–654.Google Scholar

Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E. and Johnson, J. L. 1998. Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 19 (3): 269.Google Scholar

Davis, J. J. 1992. Ethics and environmental marketing. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2): 81–87.Google Scholar

Davis, K. 1960. Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review 2 (3): 70–76.Google Scholar

Davis, K. 1967. Understanding the social responsibility puzzle: What does the businessman owe to society? Business Horizons 10 (4): 45–50.Google Scholar

Davis, K. 1973. The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal 16 (2): 312–322.Google Scholar

Davis, P. and Freeman, R. E. 1978. Technology assessment and idealized design: An application to telecommunications. In Elton, M. C. J., Lucas, W. A. and Conrath, D. W. (eds.), Evaluating New Telecommunications Services. New York: Plenum Press. 325–344.

Deakin, S. and Slinger, G. 1997. Hostile takeovers, corporate law, and the theory of the firm. Journal of Law and Society 24 (1): 124–51.Google Scholar

Lopez, T. 2001. Stakeholder management for conservation projects: A case study of Ream National Park, Cambodia. Environmental Management 28 (1): 47–60.Google Scholar

Demise, N., 2005. Business ethics and corporate governance in Japan. Business and Society 44 (2): 211–217.Google Scholar

Demise, N. 2006. CSR in Japan: A historical perspective. www.ctwcongress.de/ifsam/download/track_19/pap00478.pdf (accessed Jan. 30, 2009).

Hengst, M., Vreed, G-J. and Maghnouji, R. 2007. Using soft OR principles for collaborative simulation: A case study in the Dutch airline industry. Journal of the Operational Research Society 58 (5): 669–682.Google Scholar

Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K. and Sarin, A. 1997. Agency problems, equity ownership, and corporate diversification. Journal of Finance 52 (1): 135–160.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. 1995. Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Derkinderen, F. G. J. and Crum, R. L. 1979. Projects Set Strategies. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.

Dermer, J. 1990. The strategic agenda: Accounting for issues and support. Accounting, Organizations and Society 15 (1/2): 67–76.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. 1927. The Public and Its Problems. New York: Ohio University Press Books.

Dey, P. K., Hariharan, S. and Clegg, B. T. 2006. Measuring the operational performance of intensive care units using the analytic hierarchy process approach. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 26 (8): 849–865.Google Scholar

Dienhart, J. 2008. The separation thesis: Perhaps nine lives are enough. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (4): 555–559.Google Scholar

Dierickx, I. and Cool, K. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science 35 (12): 1504–1511.Google Scholar

Dill, W. R. 1958. Environment as an influence on managerial autonomy. Administrative Science Quarterly 2 (4): 409–443.Google Scholar

Dill, W. R. 1975. Public participation in corporate-planning: Strategic management in a kibitzer's world. Long Range Planning 8 (1): 57–63.Google Scholar

DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.Google Scholar

Dimovski, B. and Brooks, R. 2004. Stakeholder representation on the boards of Australian initial public offerings. Applied Financial Economics 14 (17): 1233–1238.Google Scholar

Dipboye, R. L. 2007. Eight outrageous statements about HR science. Human Resource Management Review 17 (2): 96–106.Google Scholar

Dodd, E. M., Jr. 1932. For whom are corporate managers trustees? Harvard Law Review 45 (7): 1145–1163.Google Scholar

Donaldson, T. 1999. Response: Making stakeholder theory whole, Academy of Management Review 24 (2): 237–241.Google Scholar

Donaldson, T. and Dunfee, T. W. 1994. Towards a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts. Academy of Management Review 19 (2): 252–284.Google Scholar

Donaldson, T. 1999. Ties that Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Donaldson, T. and Preston, L. E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 65–91.Google Scholar

Donaldson, T. J. and Freeman, R. E. (eds.). 1994. Business as a Humanity. New York: Oxford University Press.

Dray, W. H. 1964. Philosophy of History. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Drisco, C. and Stank, M. 2004. The primordial stakeholder: Advancing the conceptual consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics 49 (1): 55–74.Google Scholar

Drucker, P. 1980. Managing in Turbulent Times. New York: Harper & Row.

Duncan, T. and Moriarty, S. E. 1998. A communication-based marketing model for managing relationships. Journal of Marketing 62 (2): 1–13.Google Scholar

Dunham, L., Freeman, R. E. and Liedtka, J. 2006. Enhancing stakeholder practice: A particularized exploration of community. Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (1): 23–42.Google Scholar

Dyer, J. H. and Hatch, N. W. 2004. Using supplier networks to learn faster. MIT Sloan Management Review 45 (3): 57–63.Google Scholar

Dyer, J. H. and Nobeoka, K. 2000. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal 21 (3): 345–367.Google Scholar

Dyer, J. H. and Singh, H. 1998. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 23 (4): 660–679.Google Scholar

Dymond, S., Nix, T., Rotarius, T. and Savage, G. 1995. Why do key integrated delivery stakeholders really matter? Assessing control, coalitions, resources and power. Medical Group Management Journal 42 (6): 27–38.Google Scholar

Edmunds, D. and Wollenberg, E. 2001. A strategic approach to multistakeholder negotiations. Development and Change 32 (2): 231–253.Google Scholar

Elias, A. A., Cavana, R. Y. and Jackson, L. S. 2002. Stakeholder analysis for R&D project management. R&D Management 32 (4): 301–320.Google Scholar

Elkington, J. 1994. Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review 36 (2): 90–100.Google Scholar

Elkington, J. 1997. Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.

Elms, H., Berman, S. and Wicks, A. 2002. Ethics and incentives: An inductive development of stakeholder theory in the health care industry. Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (4): 413–432.Google Scholar

Ely, K. M. and Pownall, G. 2002. Shareholder- versus stakeholder-focused Japanese companies: Firm characteristics and accounting valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 19 (4): 615–636.Google Scholar

Emanuel, E. 1999. Choice and representation in health care. Medical Care Research and Review 56 (1): 113–140.Google Scholar

Emery, F. E. and Trist, E. L. 1965. The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations 18 (1): 21–32.Google Scholar

Emshoff, J. and Freeman, R. E. 1981. Stakeholder management: A case study of the US brewers and the container issue. In Schultz, R. (ed.), Applications of Management Science, Vol. 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 57–90.

Emshoff, J. R. 1980. Managerial Breakthroughs. New York: AMACOM.

Emshoff, J. R. and Finnel, A. 1979. Defining corporate strategy: A case study using strategic assumptions analysis. Sloan Management Review 20 (3): 41–52.Google Scholar

Enderle, G. 2006. Corporate responsibility in the CSR debate. In Wieland, J. and Brenkert, G. (eds.), Unternehmensethik im Spannungsfeld der Kulturen und Religionen. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. 108–124.

,Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1998. Stakeholder involvement: Action plan. www.epa.gov/publicinvolvement/siap1298.htm.

2005. Handbook for Developing Watershed Plans to Restore and Protect Our Waters. EPA 841-B-05–005. www.epa.gov/owow/nps/pubs.html.

Epstein, E. M. 1969. The Corporation in American Politics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Epstein, E. M. 1980. Business political activity: Research approaches and analytical issues. In Preston, L. E. (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance, II. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 1–55.

Epstein, E. M. 1987. The corporate social policy process: Beyond business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and corporate social responsiveness. California Management Review 29 (3): 99–114.Google Scholar

Etzioni, A. 1964. Modern Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Etzioni, A. 1996. The New Golden Rule. Community and Morality in a Democratic Society. New York: Basic Books.

Etzioni, A. 1998. A communitarian note on stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (4): 679–691.Google Scholar

Evan, W. M. 1966. The organization-set: Toward a theory of inter-organizational relations. In Thompson, J. D. (ed.), Approaches to Organizational Design. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. 174–190.

Evan, W. M. and Freeman, R. E. 1993. A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In Beauchamp, T. L. and Bowie, N. E. (eds.), Ethical Theory and Business. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 97–106.

Eyles, J., Brimacombe, M., Chaulk, P., Stoddart, G., Pranger, T. and Moase, O. 2001. What determines health? To where should we shift resources? Attitudes towards the determinants of health among multiple stakeholder groups in Prince Edward Island, Canada. Social Science and Medicine 53 (12): 1611–1619.Google Scholar

Fairfax, L. 2006. The rhetoric of corporate law: The impact of stakeholder rhetoric on corporate norms. Journal of Corporate Law 31 (3): 675–719.Google Scholar

Fama, E. F. 1970. Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance 25 (5): 383–417.Google Scholar

Fama, E. F. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88 (2): 288–307.Google Scholar

Fama, E. F. and Jensen, M. C. 1983. Separation of ownership and corporate control. Journal of Law and Economics 26 (2): 301–325.Google Scholar

Fassin, Y. 2008. Imperfections and shortcomings of the stakeholder model graphical representation. Journal of Business Ethics 80 (4): 879–888.Google Scholar

Ferguson, J., Collison, D., Power, D. and Stevenson, L. 2005. What are recommended accounting textbooks teaching students about corporate stakeholders? British Accounting Review 37 (1): 23–46.Google Scholar

Ferguson, J., Collison, D., Power, D. and Stevenson, L. 2007. Exploring lecturers' perceptions of the emphasis given to different stakeholders in introductory accounting textbooks. Accounting Forum 31 (2): 113–127.Google Scholar

Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J. and Sutton, R. I. 2005. Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review 30 (1): 8–24.Google Scholar

Ferrell, O. C. and Ferrell, L. 2008. A macromarketing ethics framework: Stakeholder orientation and distributive justice. Journal of Macromarketing 28 (1): 24–32.Google Scholar

Feyerabend, P. K. 1975. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: Humanities Press.

Fiedler, L. and Kirchgeorg, M. 2007. The role concept in corporate branding and stakeholder management reconsidered: Are stakeholder groups really different? Corporate Reputation Review 10 (3): 177–188.Google Scholar

Fineman, S. and Clark, K. 1996. Green stakeholders: Industry interpretations and response, Journal of Management Studies 33 (6): 715–30.Google Scholar

Firouzabadi, A. K., Henson, B. and Barnes, C. 2008. A multiple stakeholders' approach to strategic selection decisions. Computers and Industrial Engineering 54 (4): 851–865.Google Scholar

Fischer, E. and Reuber, R. 2007. The good, the bad and the unfamiliar: The challenges of reputation facing new firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 31 (1): 53–75.Google Scholar

Flak, L., Moe, C. and Sæbø, Ø. 2003. On the evolution of e-government: The user imperative. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on e-Government. Prague: 139–142.

Florida, R. and Goodnight, J. 2005. Managing for creativity. Harvard Business Review 83 (7/8): 124–131.Google Scholar

Fogarty, T. J. and Markarian, G. 2007. An empirical assessment of the rise and fall of accounting as an academic discipline. Issues in Accounting Education 22 (2): 137–161.Google Scholar

Fombrun, C. 2001. Corporate reputations as economic assets. In Hitt, M. A., Freeman, R. E., and Harrison, J. S. (eds.), Handbook of Strategic Management. Oxford: Blackwell. 289–312.

Fombrun, C. and Astley, W. G. 1983. Beyond corporate strategy. Journal of Business Strategy 3 (4): 47–54.Google Scholar

Fombrun, C. and Shanley, M. 1990. What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal 33 (2): 233–258.Google Scholar

Fort, T. 1997. The corporation as mediating institution: An efficacious synthesis of stakeholder theory and corporate constituency statutes. Notre Dame Law Review 73 (1): 173–203.Google Scholar

Fort, T. and Schipani, C. 2000. Corporate governance in a global environment: The search for the best of all worlds. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 33 (4): 829–876.Google Scholar

Foster, D. and Jonker, J. 2003. Third generation quality management: The role of stakeholders in integrating business into society. Managerial Auditing Journal 18 (4): 323–333.Google Scholar

Fottler, M. and Blair, J. 2002. Introduction: New concepts in health care stakeholder management theory and practice. Health Care Management Review 27 (2): 50–51.Google Scholar

Fottler, M. D., Blair, J. D., Whitehead, C. J., Laus, M. D. and Savage, G. T. 1989. Assessing key stakeholders: Who matters to hospitals and why? Hospital and Health Services Administration 34 (4): 525–547.Google Scholar

Frank, R. H. 1988. Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of Emotions. New York: W. W. Norton.

Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T. and Regan, D. T. 1993. Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives 7: 159–171.Google Scholar

Frederick, W. C. 1978. From CSR1 to CSR2: The maturing of business and society thought. Working Paper no. 279, Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh.

Frederick, W. C. 1986. Toward CSR3: Why ethical analysis is indispensable and unavoidable in corporate affairs. California Management Review 28 (2), 126–155.Google Scholar

Frederick, W. C. 1987. Theories of corporate social performance. In Sethi, S. P. and Falbe, C. M. (eds.), Business and society: Dimensions of Conflict and Cooperation. Lexington, MA: Lexington/D.C. Heath. 142–161

Frederick, W. C. 1994. From CSR1 to CSR2. Business and Society 33 (2): 150–165.Google Scholar

Frederick, W. C. 1998a. Creatures, corporations, communities, chaos, complexity: A naturological view of the corporate social role. Business and Society 37 (4): 358–389.Google Scholar

Frederick, W. C. 1998b. Moving to CSR4: What to pack for the trip. Business and Society 37 (1): 40–59.Google Scholar

Frederick, W. C. 2006. Corporation Be Good! The Story of Corporate Social Responsibility. Dog Ear Publishing Inc.

Frederick, W. C., Post, J. E. and Davis, K. 1988. Business and Society: Corporate Strategy, Public Policy, Ethics. 6th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Frederiksen, H. D. and Mathiassen, L. 2005. Information-centric assessment of software metrics practices. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 52 (3): 350–362.Google Scholar

Freedman, M. and Stagliano, A. J. 1992. European unification, accounting harmonization and social disclosures. International Journal of Accounting 27 (2): 112–122.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.

Freeman, R. E. 1994. The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4): 409–421.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. 1998. Poverty and the politics of capitalism. In Werhane, Patricia H. (ed.), New Approaches to Business Ethics, The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 1. 31–35.

Freeman, R. E. 1999. Response: Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review 24 (2): 233–236.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. 2000. Business ethics at the millennium. Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (1): 169–180.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. 2004. The stakeholder approach revisited. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Unternehmensethik 5 (3): 228–241.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. 2005. The development of stakeholder theory: An idiosyncratic approach. In Smith, K. and Hitt, M. A. (eds.), Great Minds in Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 417–435.

Freeman, R. E., Bryson, J. and Roering, W. 1986. Strategic planning in the public sector: Approaches and future directions. In Checkoway, B. (ed.), Strategic Perspectives on Planning Practice. Boston: Lexington Books. 65–85.

Freeman, R. E. and Emshoff, J. 1979. Who's butting into your business? Wharton Magazine 4 (Fall): 44–48, 58–59.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. and Evan, W. 1990. Corporate governance: a stakeholder interpretation. Journal of Behavioral Economics 19 (4): 337–59.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. and Gilbert, D. R. 1987. Managing stakeholder relationships. In Sethi, S. P. and Falbe, G. M. (eds.), Business and Society: Dimensions of Conflict and Cooperation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. 397–423.

Freeman, R. E. and Gilbert, D. R. 1988. Corporate Strategy and the Search for Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Freeman, R. E. 1992. Business ethics and society: a critical agenda. Business and Society 31 (1): 9–17.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S. and Wicks, A. C. 2007. Managing for Stakeholders: Business in the 21st Century. Managing for Stakeholders: Survival, Reputation, and Success. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Freeman, R. E. and Liedtka, J. 1991. Corporate social responsibility: A critical approach. Business Horizons 34 (4): 92–98.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. and Liedtka, J. 1997. Stakeholder capitalism and the value chain. European Management Journal 15 (3): 286–296.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. and Lorange, P. 1985. Theory building in strategic management. In Lamb, R. and Shrivastava, P. (eds.), Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 3, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 9–38.

Freeman, R. E. and McVea, J. 2001. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. In Hitt, M. A., Freeman, R. E., and Harrison, J. S. (eds.), Handbook of Strategic Management. Oxford: Blackwell. 189–207.

Freeman, R. E., Martin, K. and Parmar, B. 2006. Ethics and capitalism. In Epstein, M. and Hanson, K. (eds.), The Accountable Corporation, Vol. 2, Business Ethics. Westport: Praeger. 193–208.

Freeman, R. E. and Newkirk, D. 2008a. Business school research: Some preliminary suggestions. 1st IESE Conference, Humanizing the Firm and Management Profession, Barcelona, IESE Business School.

Freeman, R. E. and Newkirk, D. 2008b. Business as a human enterprise: Implications for education? In Gregg, Samuel and Stoner, James R., Jr. (eds.), Rethinking Business Management. Princeton, NJ: Witherspoon Institute. 131–148.

Freeman, R. E. and Phillips, R. 2002. Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense. Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (3): 331–350.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E. and Reed, D. L. 1983. Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review 15 (3): 88–106.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. and Parmar, B. 2004. Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited.” Organization Science 15 (3): 364–369.Google Scholar

Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. and McVea, J. 2004. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art and future perspectives. Politeia Anno XX, No.74. 9–22.

Fried, C. 1981. Contract as Promise: A Theory of Contractual Obligation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Friedman, A. L. 2002. Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies 39 (1): 1–21.Google Scholar

Friedman, A. L. and Miles, S. 2001. Socially responsible investment and corporate social and environmental reporting in the UK: An exploratory study. British Accounting Review 33 (4): 523–548.Google Scholar

Friedman, A. L. and Miles, S. 2006. Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Friedman, A. L. and Phillips, M. 2005. Model for governance of professional associations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 15 (2): 187–204.Google Scholar

Friedman, D. 1973. The Machinery of Freedom: Guide to a Radical Capitalism. New York: Arlington House.

Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press and Phoenix Books.

Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times September 13: 33.

Friedman, M. T. and Mason, D. 2004. A stakeholder approach to analyzing economic development decision making: Public subsidies for professional sport facilities. Economic Development Quarterly 18 (3): 236–254.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. T. and Mason, D. 2005. Stakeholder management and the public subsidization of Nashville's coliseum. Journal of Urban Affairs 27 (1): 93–118.Google Scholar

Friedman, S. D. and Olk, P. 1995. Four ways to choose a CEO: Crown heir, horse race, coup d'état, and comprehensive search. Human Resource Management 34 (1): 141–164.Google Scholar

Frooman, J. 1999. Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review 24 (2): 191–205.Google Scholar

Frost, F. A. and Mensik, S. 1991. Balancing minerals development and environmental protection. Long Range Planning 24 (4): 58–73.Google Scholar

Froud, J., Haslam, C., Suckdev, J., Shaoul, J. and Williams, K. 1996. Stakeholder economy? From utility privatisation to new labour. Capital and Class 60 (Autumn): 119–134.Google Scholar

Fry, M. L. and Polonsky, M. J. 2004. Examining the unintended consequences of marketing. Journal of Business Research 57 (11): 1303–1314.Google Scholar

Fryxell, G. E. and Wang, J. 1994. The Fortune corporate reputation index: Reputation for what? Journal of Management 20 (1): 1–14.Google Scholar

Fubini, D. G., Price, C. and Zollo, M. 2006. The elusive art of postmerger leadership. McKinsey Quarterly 4: 28–37.Google Scholar

Gallo, G. 2004. Operations research and ethics: Responsibility, sharing and cooperation. European Journal of Operational Research 153 (2): 468–476.Google Scholar

Gamble, G. and Kelly, G. 1996. Stakeholder capitalism and one nation socialism. Renewal 4 (1): 23–32.Google Scholar

Garavan, T. N. 1995. Stakeholders and strategic human resource development. Journal of European Industrial Training 19 (10): 11–15.Google Scholar

Gauthier, D. 1986. Morals by Agreement. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gelis, A. 2003. The reaction of stakeholders to the role of the Brazilian Federal Agency for Health Plans. Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs 20: (1): 59–66.Google Scholar

George, B. 2003. Authentic Leadership: Rediscovering the Secrets to Creating Lasting Value. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.

Ghonkrokta, S. S. and Lather, A. S. 2007. Identification of role of social audit by stakeholders as accountability tool in good governance. Journal of Management Research 7(1): 18–26.Google Scholar

Ghoshal, S. 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education 4 (1): 75–91.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., Donnelly, J. H. and Konopaske, R. 2003. Organizations: Behavior Structure Processes. 11th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Gibson, K. 2000. The moral basis of stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics 26 (3): 245–257.Google Scholar

Gilligan, C. 1982. In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Gilmartin, M. and Freeman, R. E. 2002. Business ethics and health care: A stakeholder perspective. Health Care Management Review 27 (2): 52–65.Google Scholar

Gioia, D. A. 1999a. Practicability, paradigms and problems in stakeholder theorizing. Academy of Management Review 24 (2): 228–232.Google Scholar

Gioia, D. A. 1999b. Gioia's reply to Jones and Wicks, Academy of Management Review 26 (4): 624–625.Google Scholar

Glaskiewicz, J. 1994. Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Gonin, M. 2007. Business research, self-fulfilling prophecy, and the inherent responsibility of scholars. Journal of Academic Ethics 5(1): 33–58.Google Scholar

González-Benito, J. and González-Benito, O. 2006. The role of stakeholder pressure and managerial values in the implementation of environmental logistics practices. International Journal of Production Research 44 (7): 1353–1373.Google Scholar

Goodpaster, K. 1991. Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly 1 (1): 53–73.Google Scholar

Goodpaster, K. and Holloran, T. 1994. In defense of a paradox. Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4): 423–430.Google Scholar

Gordon, R. A. and Howell, J. E. 1959. Higher Education for Business. New York: Columbia University Press.

Gowthorpe, C. and Amat, O. 1999. External reporting of accounting and financial information via the Internet in Spain. European Accounting Review 8 (2): 365–371.Google Scholar

Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481–510.Google Scholar

Graves, S. B. and Waddock, S. A. 1990. Institutional ownership and control: Implications for long-term corporate performance. Academy of Management Executive 37 (4): 1034–1046.Google Scholar

Graves, S. B. and Waddock, S. A. 1994. Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal 37 (4): 75–83.Google Scholar

Gray, R. 2001. Thirty years of social accounting, reporting, and auditing: What (if anything) have we learnt? Business Ethics: A European Review 10 (1): 9–15.Google Scholar

Gray, R., Dey, C., Owen, D., Evans, R. and Zadek, S. 1997. Struggling with the praxis of social accounting: Stakeholders, accountability, audits and procedures. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 10 (3): 325–364.Google Scholar

Gray, R., Kouhy, R. and Lavers, S. 1995. Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 8 (2): 47–75.Google Scholar

Gray, R., Owen, D. and Adams, C. 1996. Accounting and Accountability: Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting. London: Prentice-Hall.

Greenhalgh, L. 2001. Managing Strategic Relationships. New York: Free Press.

Greening, D. W. and Turban, D. B. 2000. Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business and Society 39 (3): 254–280.Google Scholar

Greenley, G. E. and Foxall, G. R. 1996. Consumer and nonconsumer stakeholder orientation in U.K. companies. Journal of Business Research 35 (2): 105–116.Google Scholar

Greenley, G. E. and Foxall, G. R. 1997. Multiple stakeholder orientation in UK companies and the implications for company performance. Journal of Management Studies 34 (2): 259–284.Google Scholar

Greenley, G. E. and Foxall, G. R. 1998. External moderation of associations among stakeholder orientations and company performance. International Journal of Research in Marketing 15 (1): 51–69.Google Scholar

Greenley, G. E., Hooley, G. J., Broderick, A. and Rudd, J. M. 2004. Strategic planning differences among different multiple stakeholder orientation profiles. Journal of Strategic Marketing 12 (3): 163–182.Google Scholar

Greenwood, M. R. and Simmons, J. 2004. A stakeholder approach to ethical human resource management. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 23 (3): 3–23.Google Scholar

Gregory, A. 2007. Involving stakeholders in developing corporate brands: The communication dimension. Journal of Marketing Management 23 (1–2): 59–73.Google Scholar

Gregory, R. and Keeney, R. L. 1994. Creating policy alternatives using stakeholder values. Management Science 40 (8): 1035–1048.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. J. 1998. Using technology to understand stakeholders. Business and Society 37 (1): 107–110.Google Scholar

Grimble, R., Aglionby, J. and Quan, J. 1994. Tree Resources and Environmental Policy: A Stakeholder Approach. NRI Socioeconomics Series 7. Chatham: Natural Resources Institute.

Grimble, R. and Chan, M. 1995. Stakeholder analysis for natural resource management in developing countries. Natural Resources Forum 19 (2): 113–124.Google Scholar

Grimble, R. and Wellard, K. 1997. Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: A review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agricultural Systems 55 (2): 173–193.Google Scholar

Grinyer, J. R., Sinclair, C. D. and Ibrahim, D. N. 1999. Management objectives in capital budgeting. Financial Practice and Education 9 (2): 12–22.Google Scholar

Grossman, S. J. and Hart, O. 1986. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy 94: 691–719.Google Scholar

Guild, W. L. 2002. Relative importance of stakeholders: Analysing speech acts in a layoff. Journal of Organizational Behavior 23 (7): 837–852.Google Scholar

Gulati, R. and Singh, J. H. 1998. The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly 43 (4): 781–814.Google Scholar

Gunther, M. 2004. Money and morals at GE. Fortune. November 15: 178.

Gupta, A. 1995. A stakeholder analysis approach for interorganizational systems. Industrial Management and Data Systems 95: (6): 3–7.Google Scholar

Gutting, G. 1999. Pragmatic Liberalism and the Critique of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Habermas, J. 1978. Knowledge and Human Interests, trans. Shapiro, J. J.. 2nd edn. Boston: Beacon Press.

Habermas, J. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon Hill.

Habermas, J. 1987. Philosophy as stand-in and interpreter. In Baynes, K., Bohman, J., and McCarthy, T. (eds.), After Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Habermas, J. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, trans. Burger, T.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Habermas, J. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity.

Habermas, J. 1993. Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Habermas, J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hall, A. T., Blass, F. R., Ferris, G. R. and Massengale, R. 2004. Leader reputation and accountability in organizations: Implications for dysfunctional leader behavior. Leadership Quarterly 15 (4): 515–536.Google Scholar

Hall, J. and Vredenburg, H. 2005. Managing stakeholder ambiguity. MIT Sloan Management Review 47 (1): 11–13.Google Scholar

Hambrick, D. C. 2007. The field of management's devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing? Academy of Management Journal 50 (6): 1346–1352.Google Scholar

Hampton-Turner, C. and Trompenaars, A. 1993. The Seven Cultures of Capitalism. New York: Doubleday Dell Publishing Group.

Hanks, J. 1991. Playing with fire: Nonshareholder constituency statutes in the 1990s. Stetson Law Review 21: 97, 111.Google Scholar

Hansmann, H. 1996. The Ownership of the Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hardy, C., Phillips, E. and Lawrence, T. B. 2003. Resources, knowledge and influence: The organizational effects of interorganizational collaboration. Journal of Management Studies 40 (2): 321–347.Google Scholar

Hargreaves, B. J. A. and Dauman, J. 1975. Business Survival and Social Change: A Practical Guide to Responsibility and Partnership. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Harris, J. and Bromiley, P. 2007. Incentives to cheat: The influence of executive compensation and firm performance on financial misrepresentation. Organization Science 18 (3): 350–367.Google Scholar

Harris, J. and Freeman, R. E. 2008. The impossibility of the separation thesis. Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (4): 541–548.Google Scholar

Harris, P. and Rees, P. 2005. Stakeholder Marketing. London: Sage.

Harrison, J. S. 1996. Managing and partnering with external stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive 10 (2): 46–60.Google Scholar

Harrison, J. S. and Fiet, J. O. 1999. New CEOs pursue their own self-interests by sacrificing stakeholder values. Journal of Business Ethics 19 (3): 301–308.Google Scholar

Harrison, J. S. and St. John, C. H. 1994. Strategic Management of Organizations and Stakeholders: Concepts and Cases. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.

Harrison, J. S. 1998. Strategic Management of Organizations and Stakeholders: Concepts and Cases. 2nd edn. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing.

Harsanyi, J. C., 1977. Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hart, O. 1995. Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hart, O. and Holmstrom, B. 1986. The theory of contracts. Working Paper no. 418, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics.

Hart, O. and Moore, J. 1990. Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 98 (6): 1119–1158.Google Scholar

Hart, S. L. and Sharma, S. 2004. Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination. Academy of Management Executive 18 (1): 7–18.Google Scholar

Hartman, E. 1996. Organizational Ethics and the Good Life. New York: Oxford University Press.

Haselhoff, F. 1976. A new paradigm for the study of organizational goals. In Ansoff, I., Declerk, R. and Hayes, R. (eds.), From Strategic Planning to Strategic Management. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 15–27.

Hasnas, J. 1998. The normative theories of business ethics. A guide for the perplexed. Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (1): 19–42.Google Scholar

Hausman, D. M. 2002. Trustworthiness and self-interest. Journal of Banking and Finance 26 (9): 1767–1783.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. von 1974. The pretence of knowledge. In Nobel Lectures: Economic Sciences 1969–1980. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. 179–189.

Hayek, F. 1979. Law, Legislation, Liberty, Vol. 3, The Political Order of a Free People. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

Hayes, R. H. and Abernathy, W. J., 1980. Managing our way to economic decline. Harvard Business Review 58 (4): 67–77.Google Scholar

Heenan, D. and Perlmutter, H. 1979. Multinational Organizational Development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Heller, F. 1997. Leadership and power in a stakeholder setting. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 6 (4): 467–479.Google Scholar

Hellriegel, D., Slocum, J. W., Jr. and Woodman, R. W. 2001. Organizational Behavior. 9th edn. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.

Hemmati, M. 2002. Multi-Stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability – Beyond Deadlock and Conflict. London: Earthscan.

Hendry, J. 2001a. Economic contacts versus social relationships as a foundation for normative stakeholder theory. Business Ethics: A European Review 10 (3): 223–232.Google Scholar

Hendry, J. 2001b. Missing the target: Normative stakeholder theory and the corporate governance debate. Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (1): 159–176.Google Scholar

Henn, A. and Patz, R. 2007. A multicriteria approach for corporate decisions in sustainable planning policy. International Transactions in Operational Research 14 (1): 14–23.Google Scholar

Henriksen, E., Johansen, M., Deraas, T. and Arild, E. 2005. Difficulties in moving routine medical checks from the specialist level to the general practitioner level. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 11 (S2): 47–50.Google Scholar

Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., Bosch, F. A. J. and Riel, C. B. M. 2002. Stakeholder integration: Building mutually enforcing relationships. Business and Society 41 (1): 36–60.Google Scholar

Hilary, G. 2003. Accounting behavior of German firms after an ADR issuance. International Journal of Accounting 38 (3): 355–377.Google Scholar

Hill, C. W. L. and Jones, T. M. 1992. Stakeholder–agency theory. Journal of Management Studies 29 (2): 131–154.Google Scholar

Hillman, A. J. and Dalziel, T. 2003. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review 28 (3): 383–396.Google Scholar

Hillman, A. J. and Keim, G. D. 2001. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What's the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal 22 (2): 125–139.Google Scholar

Hirschman, A. O. 1970. Exit Voice and Loyalty: Response to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hitt, M. A. 2005. Spotlight on strategic management. Business Horizons 48 (5): 371–377.Google Scholar

Hitt, M. A., Freeman, R. E. and Harrison, J. S. (eds.). 2001. Handbook of Strategic Management, Oxford: Blackwell.

Hitt, M. A., Harrison, J. S. and Ireland, R. D. 2001. Mergers and Acquisitions: A Guide to Creating Value for Stakeholder. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hitt, M. A., Keats, B. W. and DeMarie, S. M. 1998. Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century. Academy of Management, 12 (4): 22–42.Google Scholar

Hjortsø, C. N. 2004. Enhancing public participation in natural resource management using soft OR – an application of strategic option development and analysis in tactical forest planning. European Journal of Operational Research 152: 667–683.Google Scholar

Hoek, J. and Maubach, N. 2005. A model for addressing stakeholders' concerns about direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medicines. European Journal of Marketing 39 (9–10): 1151–1169.Google Scholar

Hofer, C. W., Murray, E. A., Charan, R. and Pitts, R. A. 1980. Strategic Management: A Casebook in Business Policy and Planning. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.

Hofer, C. W. and Schendel, D. E. 1978. Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.

Holder, M. E., Langrehr, F. W. and Hexter, J. L. 1998. Dividend policy determinants: An investigation of the influences of stakeholder theory. Financial Management 27 (3): 73–82.Google Scholar

Honore, A. M. 1961. Ownership. In Guest, A. G. (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hoover, K. R. 2003. Economics as Ideology. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Hosmer, L. T. 1994. Strategic planning as if ethics mattered. Strategic Management Journal 15 (Special Issue): 17–34.Google Scholar

Hosseini, J. and Brenner, S. N. 1992. The stakeholder theory of the firm: A methodology to generate value matrix weight. Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (2): 99–119.Google Scholar

Hrebiniak, L. G. and Joyce, W. F. 1985. Organizational adaptation: Strategic choice and environmental determinism. Administrative Science Quarterly 30 (3): 336–349.Google Scholar