Book contents
- Spinoza’s Ethics
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- Spinoza’s Ethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 The Indiscernibility of Identicals and the Transitivity of Identity in Spinoza’s Logic of the Attributes
- Chapter 2 Spinoza and Maimonides on Teleology and Anthropocentrism
- Chapter 3 Two Puzzles about Thought and Identity in Spinoza
- Chapter 4 Spinoza and the Mark of the Mental*
- Chapter 5 The “Physical” Interlude
- Chapter 6 The Causes of Our Belief in Free Will: Spinoza on Necessary, “Innate,” yet False Cognition
- Chapter 7 Conatus
- Chapter 8 Scientia Intuitiva in the Ethics
- Chapter 9 “Causa Conscientiae” in Spinoza’s Ethics*
- Chapter 10 Spinoza on the Association of Affects and the Workings of the Human Mind
- Chapter 11 The Terminology of the Affects in Ethics Parts III through V
- Chapter 12 Moral Realism in Spinoza’s Ethics
- Chapter 13 Spinoza and the Metaphysics of Perfection
- Chapter 14 The Free Man and the Free Market: Ethics, Politics, and Economics in Spinoza’s Ethics IV
- Chapter 15 Spinoza and the Power of Reason
- Bibliography
- Ethics Index
- General Index
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 June 2017
Edited by
Book contents
- Spinoza’s Ethics
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- Spinoza’s Ethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 The Indiscernibility of Identicals and the Transitivity of Identity in Spinoza’s Logic of the Attributes
- Chapter 2 Spinoza and Maimonides on Teleology and Anthropocentrism
- Chapter 3 Two Puzzles about Thought and Identity in Spinoza
- Chapter 4 Spinoza and the Mark of the Mental*
- Chapter 5 The “Physical” Interlude
- Chapter 6 The Causes of Our Belief in Free Will: Spinoza on Necessary, “Innate,” yet False Cognition
- Chapter 7 Conatus
- Chapter 8 Scientia Intuitiva in the Ethics
- Chapter 9 “Causa Conscientiae” in Spinoza’s Ethics*
- Chapter 10 Spinoza on the Association of Affects and the Workings of the Human Mind
- Chapter 11 The Terminology of the Affects in Ethics Parts III through V
- Chapter 12 Moral Realism in Spinoza’s Ethics
- Chapter 13 Spinoza and the Metaphysics of Perfection
- Chapter 14 The Free Man and the Free Market: Ethics, Politics, and Economics in Spinoza’s Ethics IV
- Chapter 15 Spinoza and the Power of Reason
- Bibliography
- Ethics Index
- General Index
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Spinoza's EthicsA Critical Guide, pp. 320 - 336Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Primary Sources
Spinoza, Benedict. Spinoza Opera. Edited by Gebhardt, Carl. 4 vols. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Press, 1925/1972.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedict. The Collected Works of Spinoza. Translated and edited by Curley, Edwin. 2 vols. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985–2016.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedict. Complete Works. Translated by Shirley, Samuel. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 2002.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedict. Theological-Political Treatise. Edited by Israel, Jonathan. Translated by Silverthorne, Michael and Israel, Jonathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedict. The Vatican Manuscript of Spinoza’s Ethica. Edited by Spruitt, Leen and Totaro, Pina. Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Maimonides, Moses. Dalālat al-Ḥā’irīn. Edited by Munk, S. and Joël, I.. Jerusalem: Junovitch, 1931.Google Scholar
Maimonides, Moses. The Guide of the Perplexed. Translated by Pines, Shlomo. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Maimonides, Moses. Commentary on the Mishnah (partial). Translated by Rosner, Fred. New York: Feldheim, 1975.Google Scholar
Maimonides, Moses. Moreh ha-Nebukhim. Translated by ibn Tibbon, Samuel. Edited by Even-Shmuel, Y.. Jerusalem: Mosad Ha-Rav Kook, 1982.Google Scholar
Maimonides, Moses. Haqdamot la-Mishnah. Arabic text and Hebrew translation by Shailat, I.. Maʿaleh Adummim: Maʿaliyyot, 1992.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. Les Passions de l’Ame. Par René Des Cartes. Paris: Henry Le Gras, 1649; Latin edition: Passiones Animae, per Renatum Descartes. Gallice ab ipso conscriptae, nunc autem in exterorum gratiam Latina civitate donatae Ab H.D.M.I.V.L. Amsterdam: Ludovicum Elzevirium, 1650.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. Renati Des-Cartes opera philosophica. Amsterdam: Ludovicum Elzevirium, 1650.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. Passiones animae. Amsterdam: Ludovicum Elzevirium, 1692; reprint: Lecce: Conte, 1997.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. Oeuvres de Descartes. Edited by Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul. 12 vols. Paris: J. Vrin, 1964–1976.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Translated by Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, and Murdoch, Dugald (and Kenny, Antony (vol. 3)). 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. The Passions of the Soul. Translated by Voss, S. H.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1989.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. De Cive: The English Version, in The Clarendon Edition of the Works of Thomas Hobbes. Edited by Warrender, Howard. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983, vol. II.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Man and Citizen (De Homine and De Cive). Edited by Gert, Bernard. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1991.Google Scholar
Adler, Jacob. “Spinoza’s Physical Philosophy.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 95 (1996), 253–276.Google Scholar
Akkerman, Fokke. “Studies in the Posthumous Works of Spinoza.” Thesis, University of Groningen. Meppel, NL: Krips Repro, 1980.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry. Benedict de Spinoza: An Introduction. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Alquié, Ferdinand. Le rationalisme de Spinoza. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1981.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2013.Google Scholar
Annas, Julia. “Plato and Common Morality.” The Classical Quarterly 28.2 (1978), 437–451.Google Scholar
Aquila, Richard E. “The Identity of Thought and Object in Spinoza.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 16.3 (1978), 271–288.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica. Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. 5 vols. Allen, TX: Christian Classics, 1948. The original Latin can be found at www.corpusthomisticum.org/index.html.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Truth, vol. 3. Translated by Schmidt, S. J. Robert W. Chicago, IL: Henry Regnery Company, 1954. The original Latin can be found at www.corpusthomisticum.org/index.html.Google Scholar
Ariew, Roger. “The Infinite in Spinoza’s Philosophy,” in Curley, Edwin and Moreau, Pierre-Francois, editors, Spinoza: Issues and Directions. Leiden: Brill, 1990, 16–31.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Metaphysics (tr.Ross, W.D.) In Barnes, Jonathan, editor, The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Augustine, Saint. “On Free Will,” in Augustine: Earlier Writings. Edited and translated by Burleigh, J. H. S.. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press, 1953. The original Latin can be found at www.augustinus.it/latino/libero_arbitrio/index2.htm.Google Scholar
Ayers, Michael, editor. Rationalism, Platonism and God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Balibar, Étienne. “A Note on ‘Consciousness/Conscience’ in the Ethics.” Studia Spinozana 8 (1994), 37–53.Google Scholar
Barker-Plummer, Dave, Barwise, Jon, and Etchemendy, John. Language, Proof and Logic. 2nd edition. CSLI Publications, 2011.Google Scholar
Barry, Galen. “Spinoza and the Feeling of Freedom.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (2016), 631–645.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan. A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 1984.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan. Learning from Six Philosophers, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Blom, Hans W. “Spinoza et les problèmes d’une théorie de la société commerçante.” Studia Spinozana 4 (1988), 281–301.Google Scholar
Borcherding, J. “A View from Nowhere? The Place of Subjectivity in Spinoza’s Rationalism,” in Kaukua, J. and Ekenberg, T., editors, Subjectivity and Selfhood in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, 2016, 235–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandau, John. “Degrees of Essence and Perfection in Spinoza,” in Melamed, Yitzhak Y., editor, The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, 300–318.Google Scholar
Cabrera, Manuel “Mandel” Jr. “Natural Unity and Human Exceptionalism.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 35 (2011), 46–68.Google Scholar
Calepinus & alii, Verba barbara ex Calepini, Passeratii, Stephani, & Fabri Lexicon Latinum, variarum linguarum interpretatione adjecta […] Editio sexta emendatior, & auctior. Patavii: J. Manfre, 1746.Google Scholar
Carr, Spencer. “Spinoza’s Distinction between Rational and Intuitive Knowledge.” The Philosophical Review 87 (1978), 241–252.Google Scholar
Carriero, John. “On the Relationship between Mode and Substance in Spinoza.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (1995), 245–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriero, John. “Spinoza on Final Causality,” in Garber, Daniel and Nadler, Steven M., editors, Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 2, 2005, 105–147.Google Scholar
Carriero, John. Between Two Worlds: A Reading of Descartes’s “Meditations.” Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Carriero, John. “Conatus and Perfection in Spinoza.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 35 (2011), 69–92.Google Scholar
Carriero, John. “Spinoza, the Will, and the Ontology of Power,” in Melamed, Yitzhak Y., editor, The Young Spinoza. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, 160–182.Google Scholar
Carriero, John. “Remarks on Cognition in Spinoza: Understanding, Sensation, and Belief.” De Natura Rerum: Scripta in honorem professoris Olli Koistinen sexagesimum annum complentis. Edited by Laiho, Hemmo and Repo, Arto. Reports from the Department of Philosophy, University of Turku 38, 2016, 134–147.Google Scholar
Casarino, Cesare. “Marx before Spinoza: Notes toward an Investigation,” in Vardoulakis, Dimitris, editor, Spinoza Now. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011, 179–234.Google Scholar
Chauvin, S. Lexicon philosophicum, Leovardiae, Excudit Franciscus Halma, 17132; reprint: Düsseldorf: Stern-Verlag, 1967.Google Scholar
Churchland, Patricia S. Brain-Wise: Studies in Neuro-Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Couliano, J. P. Eros and Magic in the Renaissance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Cumming, Sam. “Names,” in Zalta, Edward N., editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring 2013 edition, 2013. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/names/.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin. Spinoza’s Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin. “Experience in Spinoza’s Theory of Knowledge,” in Grene, Marjorie, editor, Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays. South Bend, IN: Notre Dame University Press, 1973, 25–59.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin. “Spinoza’s Moral Philosophy,” in Grene, Marjorie, editor, Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1973, 354–376.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin. Behind the Geometrical Method: A Reading of Spinoza’s Ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Davies, Catherine. G. Conscience as Consciousness: The Idea of Self-Awareness in French Philosophical Writing from Descartes to Diderot. Voltaire Foundation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
de la Court, Pieter. The True Interest and Political Maxims of the Republick of Holland and West-Friesland. London: n.p., 1702.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. Spinoza et le problème de l’expression. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. 1968.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. Spinoza. Philosophie pratique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1970.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. Spinoza: Practical Philosophy. Translated by Hurley, Robert. San Francisco, CA: City Lights, 1988.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. Representation and the Mind-Body Problem in Spinoza. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. “Spinoza’s Metaphysical Psychology,” in Garrett, Don, editor, The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 192–266.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. “A Rationalist Manifesto: Spinoza and the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Philosophical Topics 31 (2003), 75–93.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. “The Power of an Idea: Spinoza’s Critique of Pure Will.” Noûs 37 (2003), 200–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael. “Spinoza and the Metaphysics of Skepticism.” Mind 116 (2007), 851–874.Google Scholar
De Vries, Jan and Van der Woude, Ad. The First Modern Economy: Success, Failure, and Perseverance of the Dutch Economy, 1500–1815. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Dibon, P. En marge de la Préface à la traduction latine des Passions de l’âme, “Studia Cartesiana,” I (1979), pp. 91–109, republished in Regards sur la Hollande au siècle d’or. Napoli: Bibliopolis, 1990, pp. 523–550.Google Scholar
Donagan, Alan. “Spinoza’s Dualism,” in Kennington, Richard, editor, The Philosophy of Baruch Spinoza. Washington, DC: Catholic University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Dreier, James. “Meta-ethics and the Problem of Creeping Minimalism.” Philosophical Perspectives 18 (2004), 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erasmus, D. Adagiorum Chiliades Quatuor, in Opera omnia emendatiora et auctiora […], tomus secundus complectens Adagia, Lugduni Batavorum: Cura & impensis Petri Vander Aa, 1703.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. Introductions to the Wissenschaftslehre and Other Writings. Translated by Breazeale, Daniel. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1994.Google Scholar
Fracastoro, G. De sympathia et antiphatia rerum, 1546 (ed. consulted: Lugduni, Apud Ioan. Tornaesium, & Guil. Gazeium, 1554).Google Scholar
Frankena, W. K. “Spinoza on the Knowledge of Good and Evil.” Philosophia 7 (1977), 15–44.Google Scholar
Friedman, Joel I. “Spinoza’s Problem of ‘Other Minds.’” Synthese 57 (1983), 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabbey, Alan, “Force and Inertia in Seventeenth-Century Dynamics,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 2 (1971), 1–68.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan, “Spinoza’s Natural Philosophy and Methodology,” in Garrett, Don, editor, The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 142–191.Google Scholar
Gabbey, Alan, “Spinoza, Infinite Modes and the Infinite Mood.” Studia Spinozana 16 (2006).Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel. Descartes Embodied. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, Daniel. “God, Laws, and the Order of Nature,” in Watkins, Eric, editor, The Divine Order, the Human Order, and the Order of Nature: Historical Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, 45–67.Google Scholar
Garrett, Aaron. Meaning in Spinoza’s Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Don. “Truth, Method, and Correspondence in Spinoza and Leibniz.” Studia Spinozana 6 (1990), 13–43.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don. “‘A Free Man Always Acts Honestly, Not Deceptively’: Freedom and the Good in Spinoza’s Ethics,” in Curley, Edwin and Moreau, Pierre-François, editors, Spinoza: Issues and Directions. Leiden: Brill, 1990, 221–238.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don. “Spinoza’s Necessitarianism,” in Yovel, Y., editor, God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics. Leiden: Brill, 1991, 97–118.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don. “Spinoza’s Theory of Metaphysical Individuation,” in Barber, Kenneth and Garcia, Jorge, editors, Individuation in Early Modern Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994, 73–101.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don. “Spinoza’s Ethical Theory,” in Garrett, Don, editor, The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 267–314.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don. “Teleology in Spinoza and Early Modern Rationalism,” in Gennaro, Rocco J. and Huenemann, Charles, editors, New Essays on the Rationalists. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999, 310–335.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don. “Spinoza’s Conatus Argument,” in Biro, John I. and Koistinen, Olli, editors, Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Central Themes. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 2002, 127–158.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don. “Representation and Consciousness in Spinoza’s Naturalistic Theory of the Imagination,” in Huenemann, Charlie, editor, Interpreting Spinoza. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, 4–25.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don. “The Essence of the Body and the Part of the Mind That Is Eternal,” in Koistinen, Olli, editor, A Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, 284–302.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don. “Spinoza’s Theory of Scientia Intuitiva,” in Sorell, Tom, Rogers, G. A., and Kraye, Jill, editors, Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy: Seventeenth-Century Thinkers on Demonstrative Knowledge from First Principles. New York: Springer, 2010, 99–115.Google Scholar
Garrett, Don. “Representation and Misrepresentation in Spinoza’s Philosophy of Mind,” in Della Rocca, Michael, editor, The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza. New York: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira. “Spinoza’s Disturbing Thesis: Power, Norms and Fiction in the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus.” History of Political Thought 30 (2009), 455–468.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira and Lloyd, Genevieve. Collective Imaginings: Spinoza, Past and Present. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen. “Spinoza’s Physics,” in Hampe, M. and Schnepf, R., editors, Spinoza: Ethik in geometrischer Ordnung dargestellt. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2006, 123–133.Google Scholar
Geulincx, A. Opera philosophica, recognovit J. P. N. Land, III. Hagae: M. Nijhoff, 1893; reprint: Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann Verlag, 1968.Google Scholar
Goclenius, R. Lexicon philosophicum, quo tanquam clave philosophiae fores aperiuntur. Francofurti, Typis viduae Matthiae Beckeri, impensis Petri Musculi & Ruperti Pistorij, 1613; reprint: Hildesheim: Olms, 1980.Google Scholar
Goldenbaum, Ursula. “The Affects as a Condition of Human Freedom in Spinoza’s Ethics,” in Yovel, Yirmiyahu and Segal, Gideon, editors, Ethica IV: Spinoza on Reason and the “Free Man.” New York: Little Room Press, 2004, 149–166.Google Scholar
Goodman, Lenn E. “What Does Spinoza’s Ethics Contribute to Jewish Philosophy?” in Ravven, H. M. and Goodman, L., editors, Jewish Themes in Spinoza’s Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002, 17–92.Google Scholar
Grey, John. “‘Use Them at Our Pleasure’: Spinoza on Animal Ethics.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 30.4 (2013), 367–388.Google Scholar
Hampshire, Stuart. “A Kind of Materialism.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 43 (1969), 5–23.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. “Moral Relativism Is Moral Realism.” Philosophical Studies 172 (2015), 855–863.Google Scholar
Hart, Alan. Spinoza’s Ethics, Part I and II: A Platonic Commentary. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1983.Google Scholar
Harvey, Steven. “The Impact of Philoponus’ Commentary on the Physics on Averroes’ Three Commentaries on the Physics,” in Adamson, Peter, Baltussen, Hans, and Stone, M. V. W., editors, Philosophy, Science, and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic, and Latin Commentaries. London: University of London, 2004, 89–104.Google Scholar
Harvey, Warren Zev. “A Portrait of Spinoza as a Maimonidean.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 19 (1981), 151–172.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Lectures on the History of Philosophy, vol. 3. Translated by Haldane, E. S. and Simson, F. H.. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Heil, John. Philosophy of Mind: A Contemporary Introduction, 3rd edition. New York: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
Hoefer, Carl, “Causal Determinism.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition), Zalta, Edward N., editor, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/determinism-causal/.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Paul. “Final Causation in Spinoza,” in Perler, Dominik and Schmid, Stephan, editors, Final Causes and Teleological Explanations. Paderborn: Mentis, 2011. A special issue of Logical Analysis and the History of Philosophy 14 (2011), 40–50.Google Scholar
Hubbeling, Hubertus Gezinus. Spinoza’s Methodology. Assen, Netherlands: Van Gorcum, 1964.Google Scholar
Hübner, Karolina. “Spinoza on Essences, Universals, and Beings of Reason.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2016), 58–88.Google Scholar
Huenemann, Charles. “The Necessity of Finite Modes and the Geometrical Containment in Spinoza’s Metaphysics,” in Gennaro, Rocco J. and Huenemann, Charles, editors, New Essays on the Rationalists. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999, 224–240.Google Scholar
Hume, David. Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by Norton, David and Norton, Mary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan. “Philosophy, Commerce and the Synagogue: Spinoza’s Expulsion from the Amsterdam Portuguese Jewish Community in 1656,” in Israel, Jonathan and Salverda, Reinier, editors, Dutch Jewry: Its History and Secular Culture (1500–2000). Leiden: Brill, 2002, 125–140.Google Scholar
James, Susan. “Power and Difference: Spinoza’s Conception of Freedom.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 4 (1996), 207–228.Google Scholar
James, Susan. Passion and Action: The Emotions in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
James, Susan. “Freedom, Slavery and the Passions,” in Koistinen, Olli, editor, The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, 223–241.Google Scholar
James, Susan. Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion, and Politics: The Theological-Political Treatise. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Jaquet, Chantal. Sub specie aeternitatis: Étude des concepts de temps, durée et éternité chez Spinoza. Paris: Éditions Kimé, 1997.Google Scholar
Jaquet, Chantal. L’unité du corps et de l’esprit. Affects, actions passions chez Spinoza. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2004.Google Scholar
Jarrett, Charles E. “On the Rejection of Dualism in Spinoza’s Ethics.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 20.2 (1982), 153–175.Google Scholar
Jarrett, Charles E. “Spinozistic Constructivism,” in Kisner, Matthew and Youpa, Andrew, editors, Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, 57–85.Google Scholar
Joachim, Harold. Spinoza’s Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione: A Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1940.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, Larry M. “Seventeenth-Century Theories of Consciousness,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014 Edition), Zalta, Edward N., editor, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consciousness-17th/.Google Scholar
Kain, Patrick. “Realism and Anti-realism in Kant’s Second Critique.” Philosophy Compass 1 (2006), 449–465.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God, in Theoretical Philosophy: 1755–1770. Translated and edited by Walford, David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Kisner, Matthew J. “Spinoza’s Virtuous Passions.” Review of Metaphysics, 61 (2008), 759–783.Google Scholar
Kisner, Matthew J. “Spinoza’s Benevolence: The Rational Basis for Acting to the Benefit of Others.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 47.4 (2009), 549–568.Google Scholar
Kisner, Matthew J. “Perfection and Desire: Spinoza on the Good.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91.1 (2010), 97–117.Google Scholar
Kisner, Matthew J. Spinoza on Human Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Kisner, Matthew and Youpa, Andrew, editors. Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, George. “On the Infinity of Spinoza’s Attributes,” in Hessing, S., editor, Speculum Spinozanum 1677–1977. London: Routledge, 1977, 342–346.Google Scholar
Knuuttila, S. Emotions in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Koistinen, Olli and Biro, John, editors. Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Kraye, Jill, editor. Cambridge Translations of Renaissance Philosophical Texts. Vol. 1: Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kristeller, Paul. “Stoic and NeoPlatonic Sources of Spinoza’s Ethics.” History of European Ideas 5.1 (1984), 1–15.Google Scholar
Lachterman, David. “The Physics of Spinoza’s Ethics,” in Shanahan, Robert and Biro, J. I., editors, Spinoza: New Perspectives. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1978, 71–111.Google Scholar
Laerke, Mogens. “Spinoza’s Language.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 52.3 (2014), 519–548.Google Scholar
Laerke, Morgens. “Aspects of Spinoza’s Theory of Essence,” in Sinclair, M., editor, The Actual and the Possible. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
LeBuffe, Michael. “Theories about Consciousness in Spinoza’s Ethics.” Philosophical Review 119 (2010), 531–563.Google Scholar
LeBuffe, Michael. From Bondage to Freedom: Spinoza on Human Excellence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
LeBuffe, Michael. “Necessity and the Commands of Reason,” in Kisner, Matthew and Youpa, Andrew, editors, Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, 197–220.Google Scholar
LeBuffe, Michael. “The Doctrine of the Two Kingdoms: Miracles, Monotheism, and Reason in Spinoza.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (2015), 318–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecrivain, Andre. “Spinoza et la physique cartesienne.” Cahiers Spinoza I (1977), 235–265 and II (1978), 93–206.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe. Edited by Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften. Darmstadt and Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1923.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Philosophical Papers and Letters. Translated and edited by Loemker, Leroy E, second edition. Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel, 1969.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Philosophical Essays. Edited and translated by Ariew, Roger and Garber, Daniel. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 1989.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. De Summa Rerum. Translated by Parkinson, G. H. R.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Levie Bernfeld, Tirtsah. “Financing Poor-Relief in the Spanish-Portuguese Community in Amsterdam,” in Israel, Jonathan and Salverda, Reinier, editors, Dutch Jewry: Its History and Secular Culture (1500–2000). Leiden: Brill, 2002, 63–102.Google Scholar
Levy, D. A. “Neural Holism and Free Will.” Philosophical Psychology 16 (2003), 205–228.Google Scholar
Levy, Lia. “La cause de la conscience ou pourquoi la philosophie ne peut partir du sujet.” Etudes de Philosophie 5 (1999), 65–80.Google Scholar
Levy, Lia. L’automate spirituel. La subjectivité moderne d’après l’Éthique de Spinoza. Assen: Van Gorcum, 2000.Google Scholar
Lin, Martin. “Memory and Personal Identity in Spinoza.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (2005), 243–268.Google Scholar
Lin, Martin. “Teleology and Human Action in Spinoza.” Philosophical Review 115 (2006), 317–354.Google Scholar
Lin, Martin. “Spinoza’s Account of Akrasia.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 44.3 (2006), 401–404.Google Scholar
Lin, Martin. “Yitzhak Melamed’s Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance and Thought.” The Leibniz Review 23 (2013), 195–205.Google Scholar
Lin, Martin. “Spinoza on the Metaphysics of Thought and Extension,” in the Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. Part of Nature: Self-Knowledge in Spinoza’s Ethics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Loeb, Louis. From Descartes to Hume: Continental Metaphysics and the Development of Modern Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Lord, Beth. “‘Disempowered by Nature’: Spinoza on the Political Capabilities of Women.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19.6 (2011), 1085–1106.Google Scholar
Lord, Beth. “The Concept of Equality in Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise.” Epoche: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2016), 367–386.Google Scholar
Lordon, Frédéric. Willing Slaves of Capital: Spinoza and Marx on Desire. Translated by Ash, Gabriel. London: Verso, 2014.Google Scholar
Lucash, Frank S. “The Mind’s Body: The Body’s Self-Awareness.” Dialogue 23 (1984), 619–633.Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas. Treatise on Nature and Grace. Translated by Riley, Patrick. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 199.Google Scholar
Malinowski-Charles, Syliane. “Conscience et connaissance expérientielle: le rôle des affects dans la progression éthique chez Spinoza.” Doctoral Thesis. University of Ottawa, 2002.Google Scholar
Malinowski-Charles, Syliane. “Reason and Intuition in Spinoza.” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 1 (2003), 139–163.Google Scholar
Manekin, Charles H. “Spinoza and the Deterministic Tradition in Medieval Jewish Philosophy,” in Nadler, Steven, editor, Spinoza and Medieval Jewish Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, 36–58.Google Scholar
Manning, Richard. “Spinoza’s Physical Theory.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2016 edition, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/spinoza-physics.Google Scholar
Marshall, Colin. “The Mind and the Body as ‘One and the Same Thing’ in Spinoza.” British Journal for History of Philosophy 17.5 (2009), 897–919.Google Scholar
Marshall, Colin. “Schopenhauer and Non-cognitivist Moral Realism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Marshall, Colin. “Kant’s Derivation of the Moral ‘Ought’ from a Metaphysical ‘Is,’” in Stang, Nick and Schafer, Karl, editors, The Sensible and Intelligible Worlds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Martin, Christopher. “Consciousness in Spinoza’s Philosophy of Mind.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (2007), 269–287.Google Scholar
Matheron, Alexandre. “Spinoza and Euclidean Arithmetic: The Example of the Fourth Proportional,” in Grene, M. and Nails, D., editors, Spinoza and the Sciences. Dordrecht: Reidel 1986, 125–150.Google Scholar
Matheron, Alexandre. “Ideas of Ideas and Certainty in the Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione and in the Ethics,” in Yovel, Yirmiyahu, editor, Spinoza on Knowledge and the Human Mind. Leiden: Brill, 1994, 83–91.Google Scholar
Matheron, Alexandre. “Spinoza et la propriété,” in Matheron, A. Études sur Spinoza et les philosophies de l’age classique. Lyon: ENS Editions, 2011, 253–266.Google Scholar
McDonough, Jeffrey K. “Teleology and Early Modern Philosophy.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 35 (2011), 179–204.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. “Spinoza’s Metaphysics of Substance: The Substance–Mode Relation as a Relation of Inherence and Predication.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (2009), 17–82.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. “Acosmism or Weak Individuals? Hegel, Spinoza, and the Reality of the Finite.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (2010), 77–92.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. “Spinoza’s Anti-humanism: An Outline,” in Fraenkel, Carlos, Perinetti, Dario, and Smith, Justin, editors, The Rationalists. Kluwer: New Synthese Historical Library, 2010, 147–166.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. “Spinoza’s Deification of Existence.” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 6 (2012), 75–104.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. “Reply to Colin Marshall and Martin Lin.” The Leibniz Review 23 (2013), 207–222.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. “Mapping the Labyrinth of Spinoza’s Scientia Intuitiva,” in Haag, J., editor, Übergänge – diskursiv oder intuitiv? Essays zu Eckart Förster die 25 Jahre der Philosophie. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 2013, 99–116.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. “Spinoza’s Metaphysics of Thought: Parallelisms and the Multifaceted Structure of Ideas.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (2013), 636–683.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. “Hasdai Crescas and Spinoza on Actual Infinity and the Infinity of God’s Attributes,” in Nadler, Steven, editor, Spinoza and Jewish Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, 204–215.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. “The Building Blocks of Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance, Attributes, and Modes,” in Della Rocca, Michael, editor, The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Mercer, Christia. Leibniz’s Metaphysics: Its Origins and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. and Schechter, Oded. “Spinoza on Death, ‘Our Present Life’ & the Imagination.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Meshelski, Kristina. “Two Kinds of Definition in Spinoza’s Ethics.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19.2 (2011), 201–218.Google Scholar
Meynen, Gerben. “Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Free Will, and Control.” Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 19 (2012), 323–348.Google Scholar
Mignini, Filippo. “In Order to Interpret Spinoza’s Theory of the Third Kind of Knowledge: Should Intuitive Science be Considered per Causam Proximam Knowledge?” in Curley, E. and Moreau, P.-F., editors, Spinoza: Issues and Directions. Leiden: Brill, 1990, 136–146.Google Scholar
Miller, Jon. “Spinoza’s Axiology.” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 2 (2005), 149–172.Google Scholar
Miller, Jon. “The Status of Consciousness in Spinoza’s Concept of Mind,” in Heinämaa, Sara, Lähteenmäki, Vili, and Remes, Paulina, editors, Consciousness: From Perception to Reflection in the History of Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007, 203–222.Google Scholar
Micraelius, J. Lexicon philosophicum terminorum philosophis usitatorum. Stetini, impensis Jeremiae Mamphrasii, 1662; reprint: Düsseldorf: Stern-Verlag Janssen & Co., 1966.Google Scholar
Montag, Warren. Bodies, Masses, Power: Spinoza and His Contemporaries. New York: Verso, 1999.Google Scholar
More, Henry. Enchiridion Ethicum, praecipua moralis philosophiae rudimenta complectens, in Opera omnia, II, Londini, impensis Gualtieri Kettilby. 1679; reprint: Hildesheim: Olms, 1966.Google Scholar
Morrison, John. “Descartes and Spinoza on Numerical Identity and Time.” Unpublished draft.Google Scholar
Morrison, John. “Spinoza on Mind, Body, and Numerical Identity.” Unpublished draft.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven. “Descartes’s Soul, Spinoza’s Mind,” in Schmaltz, T., editors, Receptions of Descartes. New York: Routledge, 2005, 99–112.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven. Spinoza’s Ethics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven. “The Lives of Others: Spinoza on Benevolence as a Rational Virtue,” in Kisner, Matthew and Youpa, Andrew, editors, Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, 41–56.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven. “On Spinoza’s Free Man.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1 (2015), 103–120.Google Scholar
Nadler, Steven. “Baruch Spinoza.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 Edition), Zalta, Edward N., editor, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/spinoza/.Google Scholar
Nahmias, Eddy A. “Close Calls and the Confident Agent: Free Will, Deliberation, and Alternative Possibilities.” Philosophical Studies 131, 627–667.Google Scholar
Negri, Antonio. The Savage Anomaly. Translated by Hardt, Michael. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Nelson, Alan. “The Rationalist Impulse,” in Nelson, Alan, editor, A Companion to Rationalism. London: Blackwell, 2005, 3–11.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric. The Hebrew Republic: Jewish Sources and the Transformation of European Political Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Neu, Jerome. Emotion, Thought and Therapy: A Study of Hume and Spinoza and the Relationship of Philosophical Theories of Emotion to Psychological Theories of Therapy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Newlands, Samuel. “The Harmony of Spinoza and Leibniz.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81.1 (2010), 64–104.Google Scholar
Newlands, Samuel. “Hegel’s Idealist Reading of Spinoza.” Philosophy Compass 6 (2011), 100–108.Google Scholar
Newlands, Samuel. “More Recent Idealist Readings of Spinoza.” Philosophy Compass 6 (2011), 109–119.Google Scholar
Newlands, Samuel. “From Theism to Idealism to Monism: A Leibnizian Road Not Taken.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Newlands, Samuel. “Reconceiving Spinoza.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Newlands, Samuel. “Spinoza’s Anti-abstractionism,” in Melamed, Yitzhak Y., editor, The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, 255–271.Google Scholar
Newlands, Samuel. “Evils, Privations, and the Early Moderns,” in Evil: A Philosophical History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Newlands, Samuel. “Spinoza on Universals,” in Di Bella, Stefano and Schmaltz, Tad, editors, The Problem of Universals in Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Parens, Joshua. Maimonides and Spinoza. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Parkinson, G. H. R. “Spinoza’s Philosophy of Mind,” in Floistad, G., editor, Contemporary Philosophy: A New Survey. Gravenhage: M. Nijhoff, 1983, vol. IV, 105–131.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. Metaphysical Themes: 1274–1671. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Paster, G. K., Rowe, K., and Floyd-Wilson, M., editors. Reading the Early Modern Passions: Essays in the Cultural History of Emotion. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Peterman, Alison. “Spinoza on ‘the Principles of Natural Things.’” Leibniz Review 22 (2012), 24–57.Google Scholar
Plato, . Theaetetus. Edited by Williams, Bernard and Burnyeat, Myles. Translated by Levett, M. J.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1992.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S. De jure naturae et gentium, libri otto, Francofurti et Lipsiae, ex Officina Knochio-Eslingeriana, 1759; reprint: 2 vols., Frankfurt a. M.: Minerva, 1967.Google Scholar
Rauscher, Frederick. “Kant’s Moral Anti-realism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (2002), 477–499.Google Scholar
Renz, Ursula. “The Definition of the Human Mind and the Numerical Difference between Subjects (2p11–2p13s),” in Hampe, M., Renz, U., and Schnepf, R., editors, Spinoza’s Ethics: A Collective Commentary. Leiden: Brill, 2011, 99–119.Google Scholar
Rice, Lee. “Reflexive Ideas in Spinoza.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 28 (1990), 201–211.Google Scholar
Riese, W. La théorie des passions à la lumière de la pensée medicale du XVIIe siècle. New York: Karger, 1965.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Michael. “Why Spinoza Chose the Hebrews: The Exemplary Function of Prophecy in the Theological-Political Treatise.” History of Political Thought 18 (1997), 207–241.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Michael. “Persuasive Passions: Rhetoric and the Interpretation of Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 85 (2003), 249–268.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Michael. “Politics and Ethics in Spinoza: The Problem of Normativity,” in Kisner, Matthew and Youpa, Andrew, editors, Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, 85–101.Google Scholar
Rozemond, Marleen. Descartes’s Dualism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Don. “Salvation as a State of Mind: The Place of Acquiescentia in Spinoza’s Ethics.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 7 (1999), 447–473.Google Scholar
Sandler, Ronald. “Intuitus and Ratio in Spinoza’s Ethical Thought.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (2005), 73–90.Google Scholar
Sangiacomo, A. “Adequate Knowledge and Bodily Complexity in Spinoza’s Account of Consciousness.” Methodos 6 (2011), 7–104.Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey, editor. Essays on Moral Realism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. “On What Grounds What,” in Manley, David, Chalmers, David J., and Wasserman, Ryan, editors, Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, 347–383.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. “Why the World Has Parts: Reply to Horgan and Potrc,” in Goff, Philip, editor, Spinoza on Monism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, 77–91.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. “What Not to Multiply Without Necessity.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy (2014), 1–21.Google Scholar
Schama, Simon. The Embarrassment of Riches: An Interpretation of Dutch Culture in the Golden Age. London: Harper Perennial, 2004.Google Scholar
Schliesser, Eric. “Spinoza and the Philosophy of Science: Mathematics, Motion and Being,” in Della Rocca, Michael, editor, The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Schmid, Stephan “Wahrheit und Adäquatheit bei Spinoza.” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 62.2 (2008), 209–232.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. On the Basis of Morals, in Two Fundamental Problems of Ethics. Translated and edited by Cartwright, D. and Erdman, E.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Lisa. “Spinoza on Imagination and the Affects,” in Ebbersmeyer, Sabrina, editor, Emotional Minds. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012, 89–104.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Lisa. “How We Experience the World: Passionate Perception in Descartes and Spinoza,” in Pickavé, Martin and Shapiro, Lisa, editors, Emotion and Cognitive Life in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, 193–216.Google Scholar
Sharp, Hasana. “Nemo non videt: Intuitive Knowledge and the Question of Spinoza’s Elitism,” in Fraenkel, , Perinetti, , and Smith, , editors, The Rationalists: Between Tradition and Innovation. New York: Springer, 2011, 101–122.Google Scholar
Shein, Noa. “The False Dichotomy between Objective and Subjective Interpretations of Spinoza’s Attributes.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (2009), 505–532.Google Scholar
Shepherd, Joshua. “Scientific Challenges to Free Will and Moral Responsibility.” Philosophy Compass 10.3 (2015), 197–207.Google Scholar
Silverman, Alex. “The Union of Thought and Being in Spinoza.” Thesis. Yale University, 2014.Google Scholar
Sirat, Colette and Di Donato, Silvia. Maïmonide et les brouillons autographes du Dalālat al-Ḥā’irīn. Paris: Vrin, 2011.Google Scholar
Sleight, Robert Jr., Chapelle, Vere, and Della Rocca, Michael. “Determinism and Human Freedom,” in Garber, Daniel and Ayers, Michael, editors, The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, vol. II, 1195–1278.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. “Sensations and Brain Processes.” The Philosophical Review 68 (1959), 141–156.Google Scholar
Soyarslan, S. “The Distinction between Reason and Intuitive Knowledge in Spinoza’s Ethics.” European Journal of Philosophy 24 (2016) 27–54.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Diana. “Spinoza’s Ethical Doctrine and the Unity of Human Nature.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 22 (1984), 303–324.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Justin. “Imitation, Representation, and Humanity in Spinoza’s Ethics.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 (2013), 383–407.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Justin. “Following a Recta Ratio Vivendi: The Practical Utility of Spinoza’s Dictates of Reason,” in Kisner, Matthew and Youpa, Andrew, editors, Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, 178–196.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Justin. “Affect, Desire and Motivation in Spinoza’s Account of Motivation.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (2015), 67–87.Google Scholar
Strawson, Galen. “The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility,” in Watson, Gary, editor, Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, 212–228.Google Scholar
Street, Sharon. “Reply to Copp: Naturalism, Normativity, and Varieties of Realism Worth Worrying About.” Philosophical Issues 18 (2008), 207–228.Google Scholar
Thiel, Udo. The Early Modern Subject: Self-Consciousness from Descartes to Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Totaro, Pina. “Acquiescentia dans la première partie de l’Ethique.” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 119 (1994): 65–79.Google Scholar
Totaro, Pina. “Instrumenta mentis” Contributi al lessico filosofico di Spinoza. Firenze: L. Olschki, 2009.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter. “Free Will Remains a Mystery,” in Kane, Robert, editor, The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, 158–177.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Marco H. D. “Giving in Early Modern History: Philanthropy in Amsterdam in the Golden Age.” Continuity and Change 27 (2012), 301–343.Google Scholar
Viljanen, Valtteri. “Spinoza’s Dynamics of Being: The Concept of Power and Its Role in Spinoza’s Metaphysics.” Doctoral Thesis. University of Turku, 2007.Google Scholar
Viljanen, Valtteri. “Spinoza’s Essentialist Model of Causation.” Inquiry 51 (2008), 412–437.Google Scholar
Viljanen, Valtteri. Spinoza’s Geometry of Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Wagener, Hans-Jürgen. “Cupiditate et Potentia: The Political Economy of Spinoza.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 1 (1994), 475–493.Google Scholar
Wilson, Margaret. “Spinoza’s Theory of Knowledge,” in Garrett, Don, editor, The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 89–141.Google Scholar
Wilson, Margaret. “Objects, Ideas, and ‘Minds’: Comments on Spinoza’s Theory of Mind,” in Wilson, Margaret, editor, Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999, 126–140.Google Scholar
Wolf, A. “Spinoza’s Conception of the Attributes of Substance.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 27 (1926): 177–192.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. Psychologia empirica, methodo scientifica pertractata […], Francofurti & Lipsiae: Prostat in officina Libraria Rengeriana. 1738; reprint in Id., Gesammelte Werke, II Abt., Band 5, hrsg. und bearbeitet von J. Ecole. Hildesheim: Olms, 1968.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Harry Austryn. The Philosophy of Spinoza. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1934.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen. “Fichte on Freedom: The Spinozistic Background,” in Förster, Eckart and Melamed, Yitzhak Y., editors, Spinoza and German Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, 121–135.Google Scholar
Wright, Crispin. Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Youpa, Andrew. “Spinozistic Self-Preservation.” Southern Journal of Philosophy, 31 (2003), 477–490.Google Scholar
Youpa, Andrew. “Spinoza’s Theory of the Good,” in Koistinen, Olli, editor, The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, 242–257.Google Scholar
Youpa, Andrew. “Spinoza’s Model of Human Nature.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (2010), 61–76.Google Scholar
Youpa, Andrew. “Spinoza’s Theories of Value.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (2010), 209–229.Google Scholar
Yovel, Yirmiyahu. “The Third Kind of Knowledge as Alternative Salvation,” in Spinoza and Other Heretics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989, vol. I, 153–171.Google Scholar
Yovel, Yirmiyahu. “The Second Kind of Knowledge and the Removal of Error,” in Yovel, Yirmiyahu, editor, Spinoza on Knowledge and the Human Mind. Leiden: Brill, 1994, 93–110.Google Scholar
Zac, Sylvain. L’idée de vie dans la philosophie de Spinoza. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1963.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda. “Omnisubjectivity.” Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 1 (2008), 1–23.Google Scholar
Zuk, Peter. “A Third Version of Constructivism: Rethinking Spinoza’s Metaethics.” Philosophical Studies 172 (2015), 2565–2574.Google Scholar