Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:02:13.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Polarization and Democratization

from Reforming the Electoral System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Arend Lijphart
Affiliation:
University of California
Nathaniel Persily
Affiliation:
Stanford Law School
Get access

Summary

Are there solutions to the serious problem of political polarization in the United States? The two main approaches would be efforts to change attitudes and efforts to change institutions and rules. Both are difficult, especially in the short run, but institutional changes are probably somewhat less daunting. I focus on the latter approach.

My point of departure is the fact that polarization between Democrats and Republicans is almost entirely caused by the increasing extremism of the Republican party and especially its right Tea-Party wing – as extensively documented by Thomas E. Mann and Norman J. Ornstein (2012). Democrats may have moved slightly to the left in recent decades, but Republicans have moved much further to the right. In comparison with progressive parties in other advanced industrial democracies – in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand – the Democratic Party looks like a center or slightly left-of-center party instead of a party of the far left. In a similar comparison with conservative parties elsewhere, however, the Republican Party is not just clearly on the right of the political spectrum, but considerably further to the right. A striking example of this difference is the acceptance of universal health insurance by almost all conservative parties, but not by the Republican Party in the United States, which not only opposes it but rejects it with great passion and vehemence. Paul Krugman (2013) has recently called the Republican Party the “crazy party.” This is a judgment with which European conservatives are likely to agree.

We probably cannot change the minds of Republicans like Ted Cruz and Eric Cantor, but we can try to reduce their extraordinary influence – which cannot be justified in terms of basic democratic principles. The key to my recommendations for institutional reform is to try to limit the power and influence of (1) the Republican Party as a whole, which has drifted far to the extreme right, and (2) in particular the extreme right wing of the party.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blow, Charles M. 2013. “Court Fight.” New York Times, November 2, A19.
Center for Voting and Democracy. 2012. “FairVote's Fix for Top Two in California.” Retrieved from http://www.fairvote.org/fairvote-s-fix-for-top-two-in-california.
Dahl, Robert A. 2001. How Democratic Is the American Constitution?New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 2013. “The Crazy Party.” New York Times, September 20, A27.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945–1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1997. “Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma.” American Political Science Review 91(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 2012. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas E., and Ornstein, Norman J.. 2012. It's Even Worse than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Shugart, Matthew S. 2012. “Spurious Majorities in the US House in Comparative Perspective.” Retrieved from http://fruitsandvotes.com/?p=6513.
Taylor, Steven L., Shugart, Matthew S., Lijphart, Arend, and Grofman, Bernard. 2014. A Different Democracy: American Government in a 31-Country Perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×