Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:23:41.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Profile: The huddler's dilemma: a cold shoulder or a warm inner glow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

David Haig
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Tamás Székely
Affiliation:
University of Bath
Allen J. Moore
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Jan Komdeur
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

My interest in huddling was aroused by the discovery that GNAS, the locus that encodes the G protein α stimulatory subunit (Gαs), was preferentially expressed from its maternally derived allele in brown adipose tissue of mice (Haig 2004). Since then, additional imprinted genes have been identified with effects on the recruitment and function of brown adipocytes (Haig 2008). The observation that multiple imprinted genes are expressed in brown fat – the principal site of facultative thermogenesis in young mammals – suggests that genetic conflicts over heat transfers among relatives have been a significant selective force in mammalian evolution.

Huddling together for warmth is a simple and widespread cooperative behaviour of inactive birds and mammals (Hill 1992, Forbes 2007). Huddling reduces heat loss from animals that are warmer than their environment by reducing each individual's exposed surface. Moreover, a group can raise the temperature of an enclosed space more effectively than can an individual acting alone. Savings may be substantial. For example, a 10-day-old rat pup in a group of eight consumes 37% less oxygen at 28 °C than an equivalent solitary pup (Alberts 1978).

The fuel consumed by thermogenesis is a direct personal cost to the individual generating heat, but others share in the benefit. Contributors are therefore vulnerable to exploitation by individuals who skimp on their share of the heating bill.

Type
Chapter
Information
Social Behaviour
Genes, Ecology and Evolution
, pp. 107 - 109
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberts, J. R. (1978) Huddling by rat pups: group behavioral mechanisms of temperature regulation and energy conservation. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 92, 231–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, F., Gustafson, U. & Andersson, L. (2006) The uncoupling protein 1 gene (UCP1) is disrupted in the pig lineage: a genetic explanation for poor thermoregulation in piglets. PLoS Genetics, 2 (8), e129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daly, T. J. M. & Buffenstein, R. (1998) Skin morphology and its role in thermoregulation in mole-rats, Heterocephalus glaber and Cryptomys hottentotus. Journal of Anatomy, 193, 495–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forbes, S. (2007) Sibling symbiosis in nestling birds. Auk, 124, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D. & Thompson, B. K. (1991) Armed sibling rivalry among suckling pigs. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 29, 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haig, D. (2004) Genomic imprinting and kinship: how good is the evidence?Annual Review of Genetics, 38, 553–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haig, D. (2008) Huddling: brown fat, genomic imprinting, and the warm inner glow. Current Biology, 18, R172–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, R. W. (1992) The altricial/precocial contrast in the thermal relations and energetics of small mammals. In: Mammalian Energetics, ed. Tomasi, T. M. & Horton, T. H.Ithaca, NY: Comstock, pp. 122–159.Google Scholar
Hislop, M. S. & Buffenstein, R. (1994) Noradrenaline induces nonshivering thermogenesis in both the naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber) and the Damara mole-rat (Cryptomys damarensis) despite their very different modes of thermoregulation. Journal of Thermal Biology, 19, 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mount, L. E. (1960) The influence of huddling and body size on the metabolic rate of the young pig. Journal of Agricultural Science, 55, 101–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, D. R., Fullenwider, J. L., McClure, P. A., Profeta, L. & Long, J. (1990) Geometry of maternal–offspring contact in two rodents. Physiological Zoology, 63, 821–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×