Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-27gpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T12:00:13.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter II - Admissibility

from Part three - Situation Selection Criteria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2018

Get access

Summary

The second statutory requirement that should be met before initiating an investigation into a situation is the admissibility. Article 17 of the Rome Statute is the legal and statutory framework for applying the admissibility test. According to Paragraph 1 of this article, “the Court shall determine whether a case is inadmissible where: a) the case is being investigated or prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution; b) the case has been investigated by a State which has jurisdiction over it and the State has decided not to prosecute the person concerned, unless the decision resulted from the unwillingness or inability of the State genuinely to prosecute; c) the person concerned has already been tried for conduct which is the subject of the complaint, and a trial by the Court is not permitted under Article 20, paragraph 3; d) the case is not of sufficient gravity to justify further action by the Court.”

CONCEPTUALIZATION OF ADMISSIBILITY

This section seeks the meaning of the admissibility requirement in the Rome Statute. For this purpose, firstly the distinction between admissibility and jurisdiction is clarified. Next, the functions of the admissibility requirement and its components are addressed, in order to clarify the important role of the admissibility requirement in selecting a situation or a case.

DISTINCTION BETWEEN ADMISSIBILITY AND JURISDICTION

To initiate an investigation or prosecution at the ICC, jurisdiction is a necessary requirement, but it is not sufficient. The Rome Statute distinguishes between jurisdiction and admissibility. The assessment of jurisdiction precedes the admissibility assessment. Admissibility is about the exercise of the Court's jurisdiction rather than its existence. In the PTC's words, “the question of admissibility mainly concerns the scenarios or conditions on the basis of which the Court shall refrain from exercising its recognized jurisdiction over a given situation or case.” Hence, the admissibility is a post-jurisdiction issue.

The difference between admissibility and jurisdiction is better understood by considering the difference between ‘jurisdiction to prescribe’ and ‘jurisdiction to enforce’. At the domestic level, a State has power to legislate for all matters within its territorial domain. Such authority is called ‘jurisdiction to prescribe’ or ‘prescriptive jurisdiction’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Intersentia
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Admissibility
  • Mohammad Hadi Zakerhossein
  • Book: Situation Selection Regime at the International Criminal Court
  • Online publication: 13 October 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780686585.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Admissibility
  • Mohammad Hadi Zakerhossein
  • Book: Situation Selection Regime at the International Criminal Court
  • Online publication: 13 October 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780686585.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Admissibility
  • Mohammad Hadi Zakerhossein
  • Book: Situation Selection Regime at the International Criminal Court
  • Online publication: 13 October 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780686585.012
Available formats
×