Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T11:11:00.667Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Gene Flow Between Chromosomal Races and Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2019

By
Glenn Yannic ,
Patrick Basset ,
Agnès Horn  and
Jacques Hausser
Edited by
Jeremy B. Searle ,
P. David Polly  and
Jan Zima
Jeremy B. Searle
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
P. David Polly
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Jan Zima
Affiliation:
Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Shrews, Chromosomes and Speciation , pp. 313 - 335
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersson, A.-C., Alström-Rapaport, C., and Fredga, K. (2005). Lack of mitochondrial DNA divergence between chromosome races of the common shrew, Sorex araneus, in Sweden. Implications for interpreting chromosomal evolution and colonization history. Molecular Ecology, 14, 2703–16.Google Scholar
Andersson, A.-C., Narain, Y., Tegelström, H., and Fredga, K. (2004). No apparent reduction of gene flow in a hybrid zone between the West and North European karyotypic groups of the common shrew, Sorex araneus. Molecular Ecology, 13, 1205–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baguette, M., Blanchet, S., Legrand, D., Stevens, V. M., and Turlure, C. (2013). Individual dispersal, landscape connectivity and ecological networks. Biological Reviews, 88, 310–26.Google Scholar
Balloux, F., Brünner, H., Lugon-Moulin, N., Hausser, J., and Goudet, J. (2000a). Microsatellites can be misleading: an empirical and simulation study. Evolution, 54, 1414–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Balloux, F., Ecoffey, E., Fumagalli, L., et al. (1998). Microsatellite conservation, polymorphism, and GC content in shrews of the genus Sorex (Insectivora, Mammalia). Molecular Biology and Evolution, 15, 473–5.Google Scholar
Balloux, F. and Lugon-Moulin, N. (2002). The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers. Molecular Ecology, 11, 155–65.Google Scholar
Balloux, F., Lugon-Moulin, N., and Hausser, J. (2000b). Estimating gene flow across hybrid zones: how reliable are microsatellites? Acta Theriologica, 45, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banaszek, A., Fedyk, S., Fiedorczuk, U., Szałaj, K. A., and Chętnicki, W. (2002). Meiotic studies of male common shrews (Sorex araneus L.) from a hybrid zone between chromosome races. Cytogenetic and Genome Research, 96, 40–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bannikova, A. A., Bulatova, N. S., and Kramerov, D. A. (2006). Molecular variability in the common shrew Sorex araneus L. from European Russia and Siberia inferred from the length polymorphism of DNA regions flanked by short interspersed elements (Inter-SINE PCR) and the relationships between the Moscow and Seliger chromosome races. Russian Journal of Genetics, 42, 595–604.Google Scholar
Barton, N. (2001). Speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, 325.Google Scholar
Basset, P., Yannic, G., Brünner, H., and Hausser, J. (2006a). Restricted gene flow at specific parts of the shrew genome in chromosomal hybrid zones. Evolution, 60, 1718–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Basset, P., Yannic, G., and Hausser, J. (2006b). Genetic and karyotypic structure in the shrews of the Sorex araneus group: are they independent? Molecular Ecology, 15, 1577–87.Google Scholar
Basset, P., Yannic, G., Yang, F. T., et al. (2006c). Chromosome localization of microsatellite markers in the shrews of the Sorex araneus group. Chromosome Research, 14, 253–62.Google Scholar
Broquet, T. and Petit, E. J. (2009). Molecular estimation of dispersal for ecology and population genetics. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 40, 193–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brünner, H. and Hausser, J. (1996). Genetic and karyotypic structure of a hybrid zone between the chromosomal races Cordon and Valais in the common shrew, Sorex araneus. Hereditas, 125, 147–58.Google Scholar
Brünner, H., Lugon-Moulin, N., and Hausser, J. (2002). Alps, genes, and chromosomes: their role in the formation of species in the Sorex araneus group (Mammalia, Insectivora), as inferred from two hybrid zones. Cytogenetic and Genome Research, 96, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catzeflis, F., Graf, J.-D., Hausser, J., and Vogel, P. (1982). Comparaison biochimique des musaraignes du genre Sorex en Europe occidentale (Soricidae, Mammalia). Zeitschrift für zoologische Systematik und Evolutions-forschung, 20, 223–33.Google Scholar
Coyne, J. A. and Orr, H. A. (1998). The evolutionary genetics of speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 353, 287–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyne, J. A. and Orr, H. A. (2004). Speciation. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Fredga, K. (1996). The chromosome races of Sorex araneus in Scandinavia. Hereditas, 125, 123–35.Google Scholar
Frykman, I. and Bengtsson, B. O. (1984). Genetic differentiation in Sorex. III. Electrophoretic analysis of a hybrid zone between two karyotypic races in Sorex araneus. Hereditas, 100, 259–70.Google Scholar
Gompert, Z. and Buerkle, C. A. (2016). What, if anything, are hybrids: enduring truths and challenges associated with population structure and gene flow. Evolutionary Applications, 9, 909–23.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. (1922). Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in animal hybrids. Journal of Genetics, 12, 101–9.Google Scholar
Hausser, J. (1978). Distribution in Switzerland and France of Sorex araneus L., 1758 and of S. coronatus Millet, 1828 (Mammalia, Insectivora). Mammalia, 42, 329–41.Google Scholar
Hausser, J., Bosshard, F., Taberlet, P., and Wójcik, J. M. (1991). Relationship between chromosome races and species of the Sorex araneus group in the western Alps. Mémoires de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles, 19, 79–95.Google Scholar
Hewitt, G. M. (2001). Speciation, hybrid zones and phylogeography – or seeing genes in space and time. Molecular Ecology, 10, 537–51.Google Scholar
Holsinger, K. E. and Weir, B. S. (2009). Genetics in geographically structured populations: defining, estimating and interpreting FST. Nature Reviews Genetics, 10, 639–50.Google Scholar
Horn, A., Basset, P., Yannic, G., et al. (2012). Chromosomal rearrangements do not seem to affect the gene flow in hybrid zones between karyotypic races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus). Evolution, 66, 882–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jadwiszczak, K., Ratkiewicz, M., and Banaszek, A. (2006). Analysis of molecular differentiation in a hybrid zone between chromosomally distinct races of the common shrew Sorex araneus (Insectivora: Soricidae) suggests their common ancestry. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 89, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiggins, C. D. and Mallet, J. (2000). Bimodal hybrid zones and speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15, 250–5.Google Scholar
King, M. (1993). Species Evolution: the Role of Chromosomal Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
López-Fuster, M. J., Ventura, J., Garcia-Perea, R., and Gisbert, J. (1999). The Sorex araneus group in the northern Iberian system (Spain): a contact zone between S. coronatus and S. granarius? Acta Theriologica, 44, 113–22.Google Scholar
Lugon-Moulin, N., Brünner, H., Balloux, F., Hausser, J., and Goudet, J. (1999a). Do riverine barriers, history or introgression shape the genetic structuring of a common shrew (Sorex araneus) population? Heredity, 83, 155–61.Google Scholar
Lugon-Moulin, N., Brünner, H., Wyttenbach, A., Hausser, J., and Goudet, J. (1999b). Hierarchical analyses of genetic differentiation in a hybrid zone of Sorex araneus (Insectivora: Soricidae). Molecular Ecology, 8, 419–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugon-Moulin, N. and Hausser, J. (2002). Phylogeographical structure, postglacial recolonization and barriers to gene flow in the distinctive Valais chromosome race of the common shrew (Sorex araneus). Molecular Ecology, 11, 785–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackiewicz, P., Moska, M., Wierzbicki, H., Gagat, P., and Mackiewicz, D. (2017). Evolutionary history and phylogeographic relationships of shrews from Sorex araneus group. PLoS ONE, 12, e0179760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muller, H. J. (1942). Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biology Symposium, 6, 71–125.Google Scholar
Narain, Y. and Fredga, K. (1997). Meiosis and fertility in common shrews, Sorex araneus, from a chromosomal hybrid zone in central Sweden. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics, 78, 253–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Narain, Y. and Fredga, K. (1998). Spermatogenesis in common shrews, Sorex araneus, from a hybrid zone with extensive Robertsonian polymorphism. Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics, 80, 158–64.Google Scholar
Neet, C. R. and Hausser, J. (1989). Chromosomal rearrangements, speciation and reproductive isolation: the example of two karyotypic species of the genus Sorex. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2, 373–8.Google Scholar
Orr, H. A. (1997). Haldane’s rule. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 28, 195–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payseur, B. A. and Rieseberg, L. H. (2016). A genomic perspective on hybridization and speciation. Molecular Ecology, 25, 2337–60.Google Scholar
Polyakov, A. V. and Panov, V. V. (2017). Study of male-mediated gene flow across a hybrid zone in the common shrew (Sorex araneus) using Y chromosome. Comparative Cytogenetics, 11, 421–30.Google Scholar
Potter, S., Moritz, C., and Eldridge, M. D. B. (2015). Gene flow despite complex Robertsonian fusions among rock-wallaby (Petrogale) species. Biology Letters, 11, 20150731.Google Scholar
Ratkiewicz, M., Fedyk, S., Banaszek, A., et al. (2002). The evolutionary history of the two karyotypic groups of the common shrew, Sorex araneus, in Poland. Heredity, 88, 235–42.Google Scholar
Ratkiewicz, M., Supruniuk, J., Fedyk, S., et al. (2000). Genetic differentiation and gene flow between the Drnholec and Łęgucki Młyn chromosome races of the common shrew Sorex araneus in northern Poland. Acta Theriologica, 45, 79–91.Google Scholar
Ratkiewicz, M. A., Banaszek, A., and Lobodzińska, J. (1994). Isoenzyme variation in the common shrew (Sorex araneus) from the hybrid zone between the chromosomal races Drużno and Łęgucki Młyn: preliminary results. Folia Zoologica, 43 (Suppl. 1), 21–8.Google Scholar
Rieseberg, L. H. (2001). Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, 351–8.Google Scholar
Ruedi, M. (1998). Protein evolution in shrews. In Evolution of Shrews, ed. Wójcik, J. M. and Wolsan, M.. Białowieża: Mammal Research Institute, pp. 269–94.Google Scholar
Searle, J. B. (1984). Three new karyotypic races of the common shrew Sorex araneus (Mammalia: Insectivora) and a phylogeny. Systematic Zoology, 33, 184–94.Google Scholar
Searle, J. B. (1985). Isoenzyme variation in the common shrew (Sorex araneus) in Britain, in relation to karyotype. Heredity, 55, 175–80.Google Scholar
Searle, J. B., Fedyk, S., Fredga, K., Hausser, J., and Volobouev, V. (1991). Nomenclature for the chromosomes of the common shrew (Sorex araneus). Mémoires de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles, 19, 13–22.Google Scholar
Searle, J. B. and Wójcik, J. M. (1998). Chromosomal evolution: the case of Sorex araneus. In Evolution of Shrews, ed. Wójcik, J. M. and Wolsan, M.. Białowieża: Mammal Research Institute, pp. 219–68.Google Scholar
Shurtliff, Q. R. (2013). Mammalian hybrid zones: a review. Mammal Review, 43, 1–21.Google Scholar
Slatkin, M. (1981). Estimating levels of gene flow in natural population. Genetics, 99, 323–35.Google Scholar
Slatkin, M. (1995). A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics, 139, 457–62.Google Scholar
Taberlet, P., Fumagalli, L., and Hausser, J. (1994). Chromosomal versus mitochondrial DNA evolution – tracking the evolutionary history of the southwestern European populations of the Sorex araneus group (Mammalia, Insectivora). Evolution, 48, 623–36.Google Scholar
Toews, D. P. and Brelsford, A. (2012). The biogeography of mitochondrial and nuclear discordance in animals. Molecular Ecology, 21, 3907–30.Google Scholar
Turelli, M. and Orr, H. A. (1995). The dominance theory of Haldane’s rule. Genetics, 140, 389–402.Google Scholar
Volobouev, V. T. (1989). Phylogenetic relationships of the Sorex araneus-arcticus species complex (Insectivora, Soricidae) based on high-resolution chromosome analysis. Journal of Heredity, 80, 284–90.Google Scholar
Volobouev, V. T. and Dutrillaux, B. (1991). Chromosomal evolution and phylogenetic relationships of the Sorex araneus-arcticus species group. Mémoires de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles, 19, 131–9.Google Scholar
Weber, J. L. and May, P. E. (1989). Abundant class of human DNA polymorphisms which can be typed using the polymerase chain reaction. American Journal of Human Genetics, 44, 388–96.Google Scholar
Whitlock, M. C. and McCauley, D. E. (1999). Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: FST ≠ 1/(4Nm + 1). Heredity, 82, 117–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wójcik, J. M. and Searle, J. B. (1988). The chromosome complement of Sorex granarius – the ancestral karyotype of the common shrew (Sorex araneus). Heredity, 61, 225–9.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1951). The genetical structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics, 15, 323–54.Google Scholar
Wyttenbach, A., Favre, L., and Hausser, J. (1997). Isolation and characterization of simple sequence repeats in the genome of the common shrew. Molecular Ecology, 6, 797–800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyttenbach, A., Goudet, J., Cornuet, J. M., and Hausser, J. (1999a). Microsatellite variation reveals low genetic subdivision in a chromosome race of Sorex araneus (Mammalia, Insectivora). Journal of Heredity, 90, 323–27.Google Scholar
Wyttenbach, A. and Hausser, J. (1996). Microsatellites in Sorex araneus (Insectivora): highly polymorphic markers for population genetic studies within and between chromosomal races. Hereditas, 125, 177–81.Google Scholar
Wyttenbach, A., Narain, Y., and Fredga, K. (1999b). Genetic structuring and gene flow in a hybrid zone between two chromosome races of the common shrew (Sorex araneus, Insectivora) revealed by microsatellites. Heredity, 82, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yannic, G., Basset, P., and Hausser, J. (2008a). A new perspective on the evolutionary history of western European Sorex araneus group revealed by paternal and maternal molecular markers. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 47, 237–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yannic, G., Basset, P., and Hausser, J. (2008b). A hybrid zone with coincident clines for autosomal and sex-specific markers in the Sorex araneus group. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 658–67.Google Scholar
Yannic, G., Basset, P., and Hausser, J. (2008c). Phylogeography and recolonization of the Swiss Alps by the Valais shrew (Sorex antinorii), inferred with autosomal and sex-specific markers. Molecular Ecology, 17, 4103–18.Google Scholar
Yannic, G., Basset, P., and Hausser, J. (2009). Chromosomal rearrangements and gene flow over time in an inter-specific hybrid zone of the Sorex araneus group. Heredity, 102, 616–25.Google Scholar
Yannic, G., Dubey, S., Hausser, J., and Basset, P. (2010). Additional data for nuclear DNA give new insights into the phylogenetic position of Sorex granarius within the Sorex araneus group. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 57, 1062–71.Google Scholar
Yannic, G., Basset, P., Buechi, L., Hausser, J., and Broquet, T. (2012a). Scale-specific sex-biased dispersal in the Valais shrew unveiled by genetic variation on the Y chromosome, autosomes, and mitochondrial DNA. Evolution, 66, 1737–50.Google Scholar
Yannic, G., Pellissier, L., Dubey, S., et al. (2012b). Multiple refugia and barriers explain the phylogeography of the Valais shrew, Sorex antinorii (Mammalia: Soricomorpha). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 105, 864–80.Google Scholar
Zima, J., Lukáčová, L., and Macholán, M. (1998). Chromosomal evolution in shrews. In Evolution of Shrews, ed. Wójcik, J. M. and Wolsan, M.. Białowieża: Mammal Research Institute, pp. 175–218.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×