Abrahams, Mitra and Tuck, Fiona, ‘Understanding the Impact of Event Cinema: An Evidence Review’, Arts Council England, 2 November 2015.Google Scholar

Aebischer, Pascale, ‘Broadcasting a Multi-Faceted Duchess from the Sam Wanamaker Playhouse: Sightlines, Sinister Camerawork and Websterian Dramaturgy’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 38 (forthcoming, 2020).Google Scholar

Aebischer, Pascale, ‘Performing Shakespeare through Social Media’, in Callaghan, Dympna and Gossett, Suzanne (eds.), Shakespeare in our Time (London: Bloomsbury, 2016), pp. 99–103.Google Scholar

Aebischer, Pascale, Screening Early Modern Drama: Beyond Shakespeare (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Aebischer, Pascale, Shakespeare’s Violated Bodies: Stage and Screen Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Aebischer, Pascale, ‘South Bank Shakespeare Goes Global: Broadcasting from Shakespeare’s Globe and the National Theatre’, in Aebischer, Pascale, Greenhalgh, Susanne and Osborne, Laurie (eds.), Shakespeare and the ‘Live’ Theatre Broadcast Experience (London: Bloomsbury, 2018), pp. 113–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aebischer, Pascale, ‘Technology and the Ethics of Spectatorship’, in Bulman, James C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare and Performance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 302–20.Google Scholar

Aebischer, Pascale and Greenhalgh, Susanne, ‘Introduction: Shakespeare and the “Live” Theatre Broadcast Experience’, in Aebischer, Pascale, Greenhalgh, Susanne and Osborne, Laurie (eds.), Shakespeare and the ‘Live’ Theatre Broadcast Experience (London: Bloomsbury, 2018), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar

Aebischer, Pascale, Greenhalgh, Susanne and Osborne, Laurie (eds.), Shakespeare and the ‘Live’ Theatre Broadcast Experience (London: Bloomsbury, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Thomas P., Performing Early Modern Trauma from Shakespeare to Milton (London: Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar

Andrejevic, Mark, ‘Watching Television without Pity: The Productivity of Online Fans’, Television & New Media, 9.1 (2008), 24–46.Google Scholar

Arts Council England, ‘Equality, Diversity and the Creative Case: A Data Report, 2016–17’, January 2018.Google Scholar

Arts Council England, ‘Great Art and Culture for Everyone: 10-Year Strategic Framework, 2010–2020’, second edition, uploaded 30 October 2013 (available at www.artscouncil.org.uk/great-art-and-culture-everyone, accessed 16 December 2019).Google Scholar

Auslander, Philip, Liveness: Performance in a Mediatized Culture, 2nd edition (Abingdon: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar

Barker, Martin, Live to Your Local Cinema: The Remarkable Rise of Livecasting, Kindle book (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).Google Scholar

Barker, Roberta, ‘“A Freshly Creepy Reality”: Jacobean Tragedy and Realist Acting on the Contemporary Stage’, in Aebischer, Pascale and Prince, Kathryn (eds.), Performing Early Modern Drama Today (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 121–41.Google Scholar

Barker, Roberta, Solga, Kim, and Mazer, Cary, ‘Tis Pity She’s a Realist: A Conversational Case Study in Realism and Early Modern Theater Today’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 31.4 (2013), 571–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barthes, Roland, Le Plaisir du texte, in Œuvres complètes, vol. 4 (Paris: Seuil, 2002).Google Scholar

Baugh, Christopher, Theatre, Performance and Technology: The Development of Scenography in the 20th Century (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).Google Scholar

Bay-Cheng, Sarah, ‘Theatre Squared: Theatre History in the Age of Media’, Theatre Topics, 17.1 (2007), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Behrent, Michael C., ‘Foucault and Technology’, History and Technology, 29.1 (2013), 54–104.Google Scholar

Belsey, Catherine, The Subject of Tragedy: Identity and Difference in Renaissance Drama (London: Methuen, 1985).Google Scholar

Bennett, Susan, Theatre Audiences: A Theory of Production and Reception, 2nd edition (London: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar

Bentley, Gerald Eades, ‘Shakespeare and the Blackfriars Theatre’, Shakespeare Survey, 1 (1966), 47–50.Google Scholar

Bessell, Jacqueline, ‘The Actors’ Renaissance Season at the Blackfriars Playhouse’, in Aebischer, Pascale and Prince, Kathryn (eds.), Performing Early Modern Drama Today (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 85–103.Google Scholar

Betancourt, Michael, Glitch Art in Theory and Practice: Critical Failures and Post-Digital Aesthetics (New York: Routledge, 2017).Google Scholar

Billington, Michael, ‘National Theatre Live: Phèdre’, The Guardian, 26 June 2009.Google Scholar

Billington, Michael, ‘The Tempest Review: Beale’s Superb Prospero Haunts Hi-Tech Spectacle’, The Guardian, 18 November 2016.Google Scholar

Blake, Bill, Theatre & the Digital (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).Google Scholar

Bloom, Gina, Gaming the Stage: Playable Media and the Rise of English Commercial Theater (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Bloom, Gina, ‘Rough Magic: Performing Shakespeare through Gaming Technology’, Shakespeare Birthday Lecture, Folger Shakespeare Library, 9 April 2019 (available at www.ecosia.org/search?q=Rough+Magic%3A+Performing+Shakespeare+Through+Gaming+Technology&addon=chrome&addonversion=2.1.0).Google Scholar

Boehrer, Bruce, ‘Alsemero’s Closet: Privacy and Interiority in The Changeling’, The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 96.3 (1997), 349–68.Google Scholar

Bogost, Ian, Alien Phenomenology: or What It’s Like to Be a Thing (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogost, Ian, ‘I Became a Fan of Marshall McLuhan on Facebook and Suggested that You Become a Fan, Too’, in Wittkower, D. E. (ed.), Facebook and Philosophy: What’s on Your Mind? (Chicago, IL: Open Court, 2010), pp. 21–32.Google Scholar

Borsuk, Amy, ‘Innovating Shakespeare: The Politics of Technological Partnership in the Royal Shakespeare Company’s The Tempest (2016)’, Humanities, 8.42 (2019), 1–14.Google Scholar

Boyle, Jennifer Ellen, Anamorphosis in Early Modern Literature: Mediation and Affect (London: Routledge, 2010).Google Scholar

Brook, Peter, The Empty Space (London: MacGibbon & Kee, 1968).Google Scholar

Brook, Peter, The Shifting Point: 40 Years of Theatrical Exploration, 1946–87 (London: Methuen, 1989).Google Scholar

Bucknall, Joanna and Sedgman, Kirsty, ‘Documenting Audience Experience: Social Media as Lively Stratification’, in Sant, Toni (ed.), Documenting Performance: The Context and Processes of Digital Curation and Archiving (London: Bloomsbury, 2017), pp. 113–30.Google Scholar

Bulman, James C., ‘Spectatorship, Remediation, and One Hundred Years of Hamlet’, in Callaghan, Dympna and Gossett, Suzanne (eds.), Shakespeare in Our Time (London: Bloomsbury, 2016), pp. 91–8.Google Scholar

Burrell, Ian, ‘New Camera Technology Meant Wolf Hall Adaptation Could Be Shot by Candlelight’, The Independent, 12 December 2014.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar

Calbi, Maurizio, Spectral Shakespeares: Media Adaptations in the Twenty-First Century (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).Google Scholar

Calbi, Maurizio and O’Neill, Stephen, ‘Introduction: #SocialmediaShakespeares’, Borrowers and Lenders, 10.1 (2016), 1–16.Google Scholar

Carlson, Marvin, The Haunted Stage: The Theatre as Memory Machine (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Carlson, Marvin, Places of Performance: The Semiotics of Theatre Architecture (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Carlson, Marvin, ‘Theatre Audiences and the Reading of Performance’, in Postlewait, Thomas and McConachie, Bruce A. (eds.), Interpreting the Theatrical Past: Essays in the Historiography of Performance (Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press, 1989), pp. 82–98.Google Scholar

Cartelli, Thomas, Reenacting Shakespeare in the Shakespeare Aftermath: The Intermedial Turn and Turn to Embodiment (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019).Google Scholar

Causey, Matthew, Theatre and Performance in Digital Culture: From Simulation to Embeddedness (London: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar

Cavendish, Dominic, ‘The RSC’s Tempest: Lord of the Rings-Style Magic and the Welcome Return of Simon Russell Beale’, The Telegraph, 18 November 2016.Google Scholar

Cavendish, Dominic, ‘The Tempest Is a Magical Last Bow for the Globe’s Dominic Dromgoole’, The Telegraph, 25 February 2016.Google Scholar

Chaudhuri, Shohini, Feminist Film Theorists: Laura Mulvey, Kaja Silverman, Teresa de Lauretis, Barbara Creed (London: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar

Cheek by Jowl, , ‘Measure for Measure Education Pack 16+’, 2015 (available at www.cheekbyjowl.com/education-packs/measure-for-measure-pack-preview/).Google Scholar

Clachan, Lizzie, ‘Set Design and Edward II: Interview with Lizzie Clachan’, in James, Jeff (ed.), Background Pack: Edward II by Christopher Marlowe (London: National Theatre Learning, 2013), pp. 14–15.Google Scholar

Cochrane, Bernadette and Bonner, Frances, ‘Screening from the Met, the NT or the House: What Changes with the Live Relay’, Adaptation, 7.2 (2014), 121–33.Google Scholar

Cohen, Ralph Alan, ‘The Most Convenient Place: The Second Blackfriars Theater and Its Appeal’, in Dutton, Richard (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern Theatre (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 209–24.Google Scholar

Collins, David L, ‘Anamorphosis and the Eccentric Observer: Inverted Perspective and Construction of the Gaze’, Leonardo, 25.1 (1992), 73–82.Google Scholar

Collins, Nicholas, ‘“This Prison Where I Live”: Ireland Takes Centre Stage’, Cahiers Élisabéthains, 88 (2015), 125–38.Google Scholar

Conkie, Rob, The Globe Theatre Project: Shakespeare and Authenticity (Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Conkie, Rob, Writing Performative Shakespeares (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Constable, Neil and Rice, Emma, ‘Press Release: Statement Regarding the Artistic Direction of Shakespeare’s Globe’, Shakespeare’s Globe, 25 October 2016.Google Scholar

Cornford, Tom, ‘Reconstructing Theatre: The Globe under Dominic Dromgoole’, New Theatre Quarterly, 26.4 (2010), 319–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crane, Mary Thomas, ‘Optics’, in Turner, Henry S. (ed.), Early Modern Theatricality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 250–69.Google Scholar

Criado-Perez, Caroline, Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men, Kindle book (London: Chatto & Windus, 2019).Google Scholar

Daalder, Joost, ‘The Closet Drama in “The Changeling”, V.III’, Modern Philology, 89.2 (1991), 225–30.Google Scholar

Davidson, Clifford, ‘The Masque within The Tempest’, Notre Dame English Journal, 10.1/2 (1976), 12–17.Google Scholar

Davies, Callan, ‘Strange Devices on the Jacobean Stage: Image, Spectacle, and the Materialisation of Morality’ (PhD Thesis, University of Exeter, 2015).Google Scholar

Davis, Emma, ‘Cheek by Jowl: Measure for Measure Live Stream Screenplay’, Cheek by Jowl web archive, 2015 (available at www.cheekbyjowl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Measure-for-Measure-livestream-screenplay.pdf).Google Scholar

de Lauretis, Teresa, Technologies of Gender: Essays on Theory, Film and Fiction (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Delbridge, Matt, Motion Capture in Performance: An Introduction (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).Google Scholar

Demaray, John G., Shakespeare and the Spectacles of Strangeness: The Tempest and the Transformation of Renaissance Theatrical Forms (Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Dixon, Steve, with contributions by Barry Smith, Digital Performance: A History of New Media in Theater, Dance, Performance Art, and Installation (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Donaldson, Alastair, ‘All the World’s: How Shakespeare Is Viewed around the Globe and the Role His Work Can Play to Support the UK’s Soft Power’, British Council, 2016.Google Scholar

Doran, Gregory, ‘Director’s Commentary’, The Tempest (2016), RSC Live from Stratford-upon-Avon DVD, 2017.Google Scholar

Doran, Gregory, Mallyon, Catherine and Whyman, Erica, ‘Diversity in the Arts’, RSC News, Features and Updates, December 2016.Google Scholar

Dromgoole, Dominic, ‘Let Your Indulgence Set Me Free’, The Guardian, 23 April 2016.Google Scholar

Dromgoole, Dominic, ‘Shakespeare: The Playwright Who Brings the World Closer’, The Guardian, 23 April 2016.Google Scholar

Dromgoole, Dominic, ‘Welcome to the Sam Wanamaker Playhouse’, Programme for The Duchess of Malfi, January 2014.Google Scholar

Dustagheer, Sarah, ‘Acoustic and Visual Practices Indoors’, in Gurr, Andrew and Karim-Cooper, Farah (eds.), Moving Shakespeare Indoors: Performance and Repertoire in the Jacobean Playhouse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 137–51.Google Scholar

Dustagheer, Sarah, ‘“Intimacy” at the Sam Wanamaker Playhouse’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 35.1 (2017), 227-246.Google Scholar

Dustagheer, Sarah, Shakespeare’s Two Playhouses: Repertory and Theatre Space at the Globe and the Blackfriars, 1599–1613 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Dyer, Richard, White: Twentieth Anniversary Edition (London: Routledge, 2017).Google Scholar

Dymkowski, Christine, The Tempest: Shakespeare in Production (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Elleström, Lars, ‘The Modalities of Media: A Model for Understanding Intermedial Relations’, in Elleström, Lars (ed.), Media Borders, Multimodality and Intermediality (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), pp. 11–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Escolme, Bridget, ‘Review: The Duchess of Malfi, The Knight of the Burning Pestle, and The Malcontent: Shakespeare's Globe, January–April 2014’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 65.2 (2014), 209–18.Google Scholar

Escolme, Bridget, Talking to the Audience: Shakespeare, Performance, Self (Abingdon: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar

Evans, Dean, ‘Cinematic Special Effects Come to Live Theatre’, Intel: Entertainment, 31 October 2016.Google Scholar

Fairservice, Don, Film Editing: History, Theory and Practice (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Faulkner, Sally, ‘Introduction: Approaching the Middlebrow: Audience; Text; Institution’, in Faulkner, Sally (ed.), Middlebrow Cinema (London: Routledge, 2016), pp. 1–12.Google Scholar

Fazel, Valerie M and Geddes, Louise, ‘Introduction: The Shakespeare User’, in Fazel, Valerie M. and Geddes, Louise (eds.), The Shakespeare User: Critical and Creative Appropriations in a Networked Culture (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017), pp. 1–22.Google Scholar

Fischlin, Daniel, ed. OuterSpeares: Shakespeare, Intermedia, and the Limits of Adaptation (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, Tim, Playwright, Space and Place in Early Modern Performance: Shakespeare and Company (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011).Google Scholar

Frankl, Ed, ‘Dominic Dromgoole: “Other Countries Perform Shakespeare Better Than Us”’, The Stage, 25 April 2014.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy, ‘The Theory of the Public Sphere: The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (1962)’, in Bunkhorst, Hauke, Kreide, Regina and Lafont, Cristina (eds.), The Habermas Handbook (New York: Columbia University Press, 2018), pp. 245–55.Google Scholar

Freshwater, Helen, Theatre & Audience (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael D., ‘The Shakespeare Cinemacast: Coriolanus’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 67.4 (2016), 457–80.Google Scholar

Frost, Briony, ‘Shakespeare and the “Absent” Audience: Un/heard Applause During the National Theatre Live’s Early Modern Play Broadcasts’, Unpublished paper, Shakespeare, Media, Performance and Technology conference, University of Exeter, 24 June 2017.Google Scholar

Furness, Hannah, ‘Shakespeare’s Globe Risks Wrath after Installing ‘Sixth Form Disco’, The Telegraph, 5 May 2016.Google Scholar

Galton, Bridget, ‘An Insight into the Real World on Life’s Stage’, etcetera, 12 May 2011.Google Scholar

Gamwell, Lynn, Mathematics + Art: A Cultural History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Gardner, Lyn, ‘The Bold, the Old, and the Obsolete’, The Guardian, 27 April 2009.Google Scholar

Gardner, Lyn, ‘Emma Rice is Right to Experiment at the Globe’, The Guardian blog, 28 September 2016.Google Scholar

Gardner, Lyn, ‘A Midsummer Night’s Dream – Review’, The Guardian, 6 May 2016.Google Scholar

Gardner, Lyn, ‘Why Theatres Need to Get Out More’, The Guardian, 25 September 2013.Google Scholar

Giannachi, Gabriella, Virtual Theatres: An Introduction (London: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar

Giannachi, Gabriella, Kaye, Nick and Shanks, Michael, ‘Introduction: Archaeologies of Presence’, in Giannachi, Gabriella, Kaye, Nick and Shanks, Michael (eds.), Archaeologies of Presence: Art, Performance and the Persistence of Being (London: Routledge, 2012), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar

Giesekam, Greg, Staging the Screen: The Use of Film and Video in Theatre (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).Google Scholar

Godwin, Simon, Director’s Commentary, RSC Live from Stratford-upon-Avon DVD, Hamlet (2016).Google Scholar

Gorton, Ceri, ‘Space to Play: Making Arts & Technology Collaborations Work’, RSC, 2017 (available at www.rsc.org.uk/news/archive/what-makes-arts-and-technology-partnerships-work).Google Scholar

Greenblatt, Stephen, Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Greenfield, Jon, with McCurdy, Peter, ‘Practical Evidence for a Reimagined Indoor Jacobean Theatre’, in Gurr, Andrew and Karim-Cooper, Farah (eds.), Moving Shakespeare Indoors: Performance and Repertoire in the Jacobean Playhouse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 32–64.Google Scholar

Greenhalgh, Susanne, ‘Guest Editor’s Introduction’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 32.2 (2014), 255–61.Google Scholar

Grehan, Helena, Performance, Ethics and Spectatorship in a Global Age (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).Google Scholar

Grotowski, Jerzy, Towards a Poor Theatre, ed. Barba, Eugenio (New York: Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar

Groves, Nancy, ‘Arts Head: David Sabel, Head of Digital, National Theatre’, The Guardian, 10 April 2012.Google Scholar

Gurr, Andrew, ‘The New Fashion for Indoor Plays’, in Gurr, Andrew and Karim-Cooper, Farah (eds.), Moving Shakespeare Indoors: Performance and Repertoire in the Jacobean Playhouse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 203–16.Google Scholar

Gurr, Andrew, ‘The Tempest’s Tempest at the Blackfriars’, Shakespeare Survey, 41 (1988), 91–102.Google Scholar

Haber, Judith, ‘“I(t) could not choose but follow”: Erotic Logic in The Changeling’, Representations, 81 (2003), 79–98.Google Scholar

Halliday, Rob, ‘Backstage: How the National Reinvented Theatre’, The Stage, 24 October 2016.Google Scholar

Hancock, David, ‘The End of an Era Arrives as Digital Technology Displaces 35mm Film in Cinema Projection’, Press Release, IHS Technology, 15 November 2011.Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna J., ‘Cyborg Manifesto’, in her Manifestly Haraway (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2016), pp. 3–90.Google Scholar

Hayles, N. Katherine, How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Hayles, N. Katherine, How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin, The Question Concerning Technology, trans. William Lovitt (New York: Harper & Row, 1977).Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin, Die Technik und die Kehre (Pfullingen: Neske, 1963).Google Scholar

Heim, Caroline, Audience as Performer: The Changing Role of Theatre Audiences in the Twenty-First Century (London: Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar

Hemming, Sarah, ‘The Tempest, Sam Wanamaker Theatre, London – Review’, Financial Times, 26 February 2016.Google Scholar

Hewison, Robert, Holden, John and Jones, Samuel, All Together: A Creative Approach to Organisational Change (London: Demos, 2010).Google Scholar

Hill-Gibbins, Joe, ‘Joe Hill-Gibbins and John Heffernan Present an Anarchic Edward II’, chaired by Matt Trueman, TheatreVoice, 17 October 2013 (available at www.theatrevoice.com/audio/joe-hill-gibbins-and-john-heffernan-on-edward-ii/).Google Scholar

Hjarvard, Stig, ‘The Mediatization of Society: A Theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change’, Nordicom Review, 29.2 (2008), 105–34.Google Scholar

Hopkins, Lisa, ‘Acting the Act in The Changeling’, Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 8 (1995), 107–11.Google Scholar

Huertas Martín, Víctor, ‘The Tempest de William Shakespeare, dirigida por Gregory Doran (Royal Shakespeare Company, 2016–2017). Dialéctica entre tecnología virtual y corporalidad’, Diablotexto Digital, 3 (2018), 43–74.Google Scholar

Hurley, Erin, Theatre & Feeling (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).Google Scholar

Hutcheon, Linda, with O’Flynn, Siobhan, A Theory of Adaptation, 2nd edition (London: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar

Hutchings, Mark, ‘De Flores Between the Acts’, Studies in Theatre and Performance 31.1 (2011), 95–111.Google Scholar

Hytner, Nicholas, Balancing Acts: Behind the Scenes at the National Theatre (London: Vintage, 2017).Google Scholar

Ichikawa, Mariko, The Shakespearean Stage Space (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Ingold, Tim, ‘From the Transmission of Representations to the Education of Attention’, in Whitehouse, H. (ed.), The Debated Mind: Evolutionary Psychology versus Ethnography (Oxford: Berg, 2001), pp. 113–53.Google Scholar

James, Jeff, ‘Rehearsal Diary’, in James, Jeff (ed.), Background Pack: Edward II by Christopher Marlowe (London: National Theatre Learning, 2013), pp. 5–10.Google Scholar

Jarrett, Kylie and Naji, Jeneen, ‘What Would Media Studies Do? Social Media Shakespeare as a Technosocial Process’, Borrowers and Lenders, 10.1 (2016), 1–11.Google Scholar

Jenkins, Henry, Convergence Culture: When Old and New Media Collide (New York: New York University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Jenkins, Henry, Ford, Sam and Green, Joshua, Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture (New York: New York University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Jones, Gwylim, Shakespeare’s Storms (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Jowett, John, ‘New Created Creatures: Ralph Crane and the Stage Directions in The Tempest’, Shakespeare Survey, 36 (1983), 107–20.Google Scholar

Karim-Cooper, Farah, ‘The Performance of Early Modern Drama at Shakespeare’s Globe’, in Aebischer, Pascale and Prince, Kathryn (eds.), Performing Early Modern Drama Today (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 53–69.Google Scholar

Kember, Sarah and Zylinska, Joanna, Life after New Media: Mediation as a Vital Process (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2012).Google Scholar

King, Joyce E., ‘Dysconscious Racism: Ideology, Identity, and the Miseducation of Teachers’, in Cashmore, E. and Jennings, J. (eds.), Racism: Essential Readings (London: Sage Publications, 2001), pp. 295–303.Google Scholar

Kirwan, Peter, ‘Cheek by Jowl: Reframing Complicity in Web-Streams of Measure for Measure’, in Aebischer, Pascale, Greenhalgh, Susanne and Osborne, Laurie (eds.), Shakespeare and the ‘Live’ Theatre Broadcast Experience (London: Bloomsbury, 2018), pp. 161–73.Google Scholar

Kirwan, Peter, ‘Edward II (National) @ The Olivier, National Theatre’, Bardathon blog, 9 September 2013 (available at https://blogs.nottingham.ac.uk/bardathon/2013/09/09/edward-ii-national-the-olivier-national-theatre/).Google Scholar

Kirwan, Peter, ‘Measure for Measure (Cheek by Jowl) @ The Silk Street Theatre, Barbican’, The Bardathon blog, 17 April 2015 (available at http://blogs.nottingham.ac.uk/bardathon/2015/04/17/measure-for-measure-cheek-by-jowl-the-silk-street-theatre-barbican/).Google Scholar

Kirwan, Peter, ‘Review of Shakespeare's Roman Tragedies (Coriolanus, Julius Caesar, Antony and Cleopatra) (directed by Ivo Van Hove for Toneelgroep Amsterdam) at the Barbican, London, 20 November 2009’, Shakespeare, 6.4 (2010), 478–82.Google Scholar

Kirwan, Peter, Shakespeare in the Theatre: Cheek by Jowl (London: Bloomsbury, 2019).Google Scholar

Kitamura, Sae, ‘The Curious Incident of Shakespeare Fans in NTLive: Public Screenings and Fan Culture in Japan’, in Aebischer, Pascale, Greenhalgh, Susanne and Osborne, Laurie (eds.), Shakespeare and the ‘Live’ Theatre Broadcast Experience (London: Bloomsbury, 2018), pp. 277–84.Google Scholar

Kozel, Susan, Closer: Performance, Technologies, Phenomenology (Boston, MA: MIT, 2007).Google Scholar

LaGrandeur, Kevin, Androids and Intelligent Networks in Early Modern Literature and Culture: Artificial Slaves (New York: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar

Lamm, Claus, Decety, Jean and Singer, Tania, ‘Meta-Analytic Evidence for Common and Distinct Neural Networks Associated with Directly Experienced Pain and Empathy for Pain’, NeuroImage, 54 (2011), 2492–502.Google Scholar

Langley, Eric, Narcissism and Suicide in Shakespeare and His Contemporaries (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Lavender, Andy, ‘Mise en scène, Hypermediacy and the Sensorium’, in Chapple, Freda and Kattenbelt, Chiel (eds.), Intermediality in Theatre and Performance (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2006), pp. 55–66.Google Scholar

Lavender, Andy, Performance in the Twenty-First Century: Theatres of Engagement (London: Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar

Lehmann, Courtney and Way, Geoffrey, ‘Young Turks or Corporate Clones? Cognitive Capitalism and the (Young) User in the Shakespearean Attention Economy’, in Fazel, Valerie M. and Geddes, Louise (eds.), The Shakespeare User: Critical and Creative Appropriations in a Networked Culture (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017), pp. 63–79.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Hans-Thies, Postdramatic Theatre, trans. Karen Jürs-Munby (London: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar

Lehmann, Hans-Thies, Postdramatisches Theater, 3rd updated and enlarged edition (Darmstadt: Verlag der Autoren, 2005).Google Scholar

Levin, Laura, Performing Ground: Space, Camouflage, and the Art of Blending In (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).Google Scholar

Liedke, Heidi, ‘Emancipating the Spectator? Livecasting, Liveness and the Feeling I’, Performance Matters, 5.2 (2019), 6–23.Google Scholar

Lin, Erika T., Shakespeare and the Materiality of Performance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012).Google Scholar

Loftus, Becky and Rushby, Amy, ‘Views of Dreaming: What Did People Think?’, Audience survey commissioned by the RSC, 2013.Google Scholar

Lonergan, Patrick, Theatre & Social Media (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).Google Scholar

McAuley, Gay, Space in Performance: Making Meaning in the Theatre (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Machon, Josephine, Immersive Theatres: Intimacy and Immediacy in Contemporary Performance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).Google Scholar

Mackintosh, Iain, ‘Democratic Design Is Bad for Theatres’, The Guardian, 19 January 2015.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, Iain, Architecture, Actor and Audience (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar

McLuhan, Marshall, Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1964).Google Scholar

McMullan, Gordon, Shakespeare and the Idea of Late Writing: Authorship in the Proximity of Death (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Madelaine, Richard, ‘“The Dark and Vicious Place”: The Location of Sexual Transgression and Its Punishment on the Early Modern English Stage’, Parergon, 22.1 (2005), 159–83.Google Scholar

Maguire, Laurie and Smith, Emma, ‘What Is a Source? Or, How Shakespeare Read His Marlowe’, Shakespeare Survey, 68 (2015), 15–31.Google Scholar

Malague, Rose, ‘Theatrical Realism as Feminist Intervention: Katie Mitchell’s 2011 Staging of A Woman Killed with Kindness’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 31.4 (2013), 623–45.Google Scholar

Mancewicz, Aneta, Intermedial Shakespeares on European Stages (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).Google Scholar

Marowitz, Charles, Programme note, 1964 revival, King Lear, dir. Peter Brook, assistant dir. Charles Marowitz.Google Scholar

Masso, Giverny, ‘National Theatre Criticised for “Dispiriting” All-Male Programme of Work’, The Stage, 29 March 2019.Google Scholar

Menzer, Paul, Shakespeare in the Theatre: The American Shakespeare Center (London: Bloomsbury, 2017).Google Scholar

Mitchell, Robert, Bioart and the Vitality of Media (Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Monaco, James, How to Read a Film: The Art, Technology, Language, History, and Theory of Film and Media (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Mori, Masahiro, ‘The Uncanny Valley’, Karl F. MacDorman and Norri Kageki (trans.), in IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine (June 2012 [1970]), pp. 98-100.Google Scholar

Morrison, John, ‘Imogen’, London Theatre Reviews by John Morrison blog, 21 September 2016.Google Scholar

Mulvey, Laura, Visual and Other Pleasures (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Munro, Lucy, ‘Alarums: Edward II and the Staging of History’, in Melnikoff, Kirk and Knutson, Roslyn L. (eds.), Christopher Marlowe, Theatrical Commerce, and the Book Trade (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 68–80.Google Scholar

Munro, Lucy, The Children of the Queen’s Revels: A Jacobean Theatre Repertory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

National Theatre, ‘5 Reasons to See Edward II at the National Theatre’, The Londonist, 20 August 2013.Google Scholar

Naylor, Richard, Lewis, Bethany, Branzanti, Caterina, Devlin, Graham and Dix, Alan, ‘Analysis of Theatre in England’, Arts Council England, 2016 (available at https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/download-file/ACE_Theatre_Analysis_BOP_FINAL_REPORT_Feb_2017.pdf).Google Scholar

Nead, Lynda, The Female Nude: Art, Obscenity and Sexuality (London: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar

Nelson, Ryan, ‘Developing a Digital Strategy: Developing Audiences at Shakespeare’s Globe’, in Carson, Christie and Kirwan, Peter (eds.), Shakespeare and the Digital World: Redefining Scholarship and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 202–11.Google Scholar

NESTA, ‘NT Live: Digital Broadcast of Theatre: Learning from the Pilot Season’, 2010.Google Scholar

Nice, David, ‘Edward II, National Theatre’, The Arts Desk, 5 September 2013.Google Scholar

Nicholas, Rachael, ‘Understanding “New” Encounters with Shakespeare: Hybrid Media and Emerging Audience Behaviours’, in Aebischer, Pascale, Greenhalgh, Susanne and Osborne, Laurie (eds.), Shakespeare and the ‘Live’ Theatre Broadcast Experience (London: Bloomsbury, 2018), pp. 77–92.Google Scholar

O’Flynn, Siobhan, ‘Epilogue’, in Hutcheon, Linda, with O’Flynn, Siobhan, A Theory of Adaptation, 2nd edition (London: Routledge, 2013), pp. 179–206.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Stephen, ‘Ophelian Negotiations: Remediating the Girl on YouTube’, Borrowers and Lenders, 9.1 (2014), 1–22.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Stephen, ‘Shakespeare and Social Media’, Literature Compass, 12.6 (2015), 274–85.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Stephen, Shakespeare and YouTube: New Media Forms of the Bard (London: Bloomsbury, 2014).Google Scholar

Orgel, Stephen, ‘To Make Boards to Speak: Inigo Jones’s Stage and the Jonsonian Masque’, Renaissance Drama n.s., 1 (1968), 121–52.Google Scholar

Orpen, Valerie, Film Editing: The Art of the Expressive (London: Wallflower Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Osborne, Laurie E., ‘iShakespeare: Digital Art/Games, Intermediality and the Future of Shakespearean Film’, Shakespeare Studies, 38 (2010), 48–57.Google Scholar

Papagiannouli, Christina, Political Cyberperformance: The eTheatre Project (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).Google Scholar

Parker-Starbuck, Jennifer, Cyborg Theatre: Corporeal/Technological Intersections in Multimedia Performance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).Google Scholar

Parkinson, Andy and Buttrick, Jamie, ‘Equality and Diversity within the Arts and Cultural Sector in England, 2013–16: Evidence Review’, Consilium Research & Consultancy for Arts Council England, 13 November 2018.Google Scholar

Patterson, Annabel, ‘The Changeling’, in Taylor, Gary and Lavagnino, John (eds.), Thomas Middleton: The Collected Works (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 1632–6.Google Scholar

Paulson, Michael, ‘At This “Tempest,” Digital Wizardry Makes “Rough Magic”’, The New York Times, 4 January 2017.Google Scholar

Pearson, Roberta, ‘Fandom in the Digital Era’, Popular Communication, 8.1 (2010), 84–95.Google Scholar

Phelan, Peggy, ‘Marina Abramović: Witnessing Shadows’, Theatre Journal, 56.4 (2004), 569–77.Google Scholar

Phelan, Peggy, Unmarked: The Politics of Performance (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar

Popat, Sita and Preece, Kelly, ‘Pluralistic Presence: Practising Embodiment with My Avatar’, in Broadhurst, Susan and Machon, Josephine (eds.), Identity, Performance and Technology: Practices of Empowerment, Embodiment and Technicity (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), pp. 160–74.Google Scholar

Price, Eoin, ‘Desperate Measures’, asidenotes blog, 27 April 2015 (available at https://asidenotes.wordpress.com/2015/04/27/measuring-measure/).Google Scholar

Purcell, Stephen, ‘The Impact of New Forms of Public Performance’, in Desmet, Christy and Kirwan, Peter (eds.), Shakespeare and the Digital World: Redefining Scholarship and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 212–25.Google Scholar

Purcell, Stephen, ‘“It’s All a Bit of a Risk”: Reformulating “Liveness” in Twenty-First Century Performances of Shakespeare’, in Bulman, James C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare and Performance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 284–301.Google Scholar

Purcell, Stephen, ‘King Lear, Donmar Warehouse’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 32.2 (2014), 264–6.Google Scholar

Purcell, Stephen, ‘Shakespeare Performances in England, 2016’, Shakespeare Survey 70 (2017), 287–325.Google Scholar

Purcell, Stephen, ‘Shakespeare Performances in England, 2017’, Shakespeare Survey, 71 (2018), 305–43.Google Scholar

Purcell, Stephen, Shakespeare and Audience in Practice (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).Google Scholar

Quarmby, Kevin, ‘OP PC or PaR RIP?’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 36.4 (2018), 567–98.Google Scholar

Raby, Julie, ‘A View from the Stalls: The Audience’s Experience in the Theatre during the RSC Live from Stratford-upon-Avon Broadcasts’, in Aebischer, Pascale, Greenhalgh, Susanne and Osborne, Laurie (eds.), Shakespeare and the ‘Live’ Theatre Broadcast Experience (London: Bloomsbury, 2018), pp. 103–9.Google Scholar

Rajewsky, Irina O., ‘Intermediality, Intertextuality, and Remediation: A Literary Perspective on Intermediality’, Intermédialités, 6 (2005), 43–64.Google Scholar

Rancière, Jacques, The Emancipated Spectator, trans. Gregory Elliott (London: Verso, 2006).Google Scholar

Rayner, Alice, Ghosts: Death’s Double and the Phenomena of Theatre (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Read, Claire, ‘Performance ⇔ Documentation: Disrupting Ontologies’ (PhD Thesis, University of Roehampton, 2017).Google Scholar

Rebellato, Dan, ‘Playing Puck’, Dan Rebellato blog, 27 June 2013 (available at www.danrebellato.co.uk/spilledink/2013/6/25/playing-puck).Google Scholar

Reid, Francis, Designing for the Theatre, 2nd edition (New York: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar

Reidy, Brent Karpf, Schutt, Becky, Abramson, Deborah and Durski, Antoni, ‘From Live-to-Digital: Understanding the Impact of Digital Developments in Theatre on Audiences, Production and Distribution’, Arts Council UK, October 2016.Google Scholar

Reynolds, Brian and Thompson, Ayanna, ‘Inspriteful Ariel: Transversal Tempests’, in Reynolds, Brian (ed.), Performing Transversally: Reimagining Shakespeare and the Critical Future (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003), pp. 189–214.Google Scholar

Ridout, Nicholas, Stage Fright, Animals, and Other Theatrical Problems (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Ridout, Nicholas, Theatre & Ethics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).Google Scholar

Rodosthenous, George, ‘Staring at the Forbidden: Legitimizing Voyeurism’, in Rodosthenous, George (ed.), Theatre as Voyeurism: The Pleasures of Watching (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar

Rogers, Jami, ‘The Shakespearean Glass Ceiling: The State of Colorblind Casting in Contemporary British Theatre’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 31.3 (2013), 405–30.Google Scholar

Rogers, Jami, ‘Talawa and Black Theatre Live: “Creating the Ira Aldridges That Are Remembered” – Live Theatre Broadcast and the Historical Record’, in Aebischer, Pascale, Greenhalgh, Susanne and Osborne, Laurie (eds.), Shakespeare and the ‘Live’ Theatre Broadcast Experience (London: Bloomsbury, 2018), pp. 147–73.Google Scholar

Rokison, Abigail, Shakespeare in the Theatre: Nicholas Hytner (London: Bloomsbury, 2017).Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Daniel, The National Theatre Story (London: Oberon Books, 2013).Google Scholar

Roth, Lorna, ‘Looking at Shirley, the Ultimate Norm: Colour Balance, Image Technologies, and Cognitive Equity’, Canadian Journal of Communication, 34 (2009), 111–36.Google Scholar

Rumbold, Kate, ‘From “Access” to “Creativity”: Shakespeare Institutions, New Media, and the Language of Cultural Value’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 61.3 (2010), 313–36.Google Scholar

Ryan, Marie-Laure, ‘Cyberspace, Virtuality, and the Text’, in Ryan, Marie-Laure (ed.), Cyberspace Textuality: Computer Technology and Literary Theory (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1999), pp. 78–107.Google Scholar

Saltz, David Z., ‘Live Media: Interactive Technology and Theatre’, Theatre Topics, 11.2 (2001), 107–30.Google Scholar

Schafer, Liz, ‘Review: The Duchess of Malfi’, Times Higher Education, 16 January 2014.Google Scholar

Schechner, Richard, ‘6 Axioms for Environmental Theatre’, The Drama Review: TDR, 12.3 (1968), 41–64.Google Scholar

Schechner, Richard, Between Theater and Anthropology (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Schneider, Rebecca, Performance Remains: Art and War in Times of Theatrical Reenactment (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar

Sedgman, Kirsty, The Reasonable Audience: Theatre Etiquette, Behaviour Policing, and the Live Performance Experience (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018).Google Scholar

Globe, Shakespeare’s, ‘This Magical Space: Emma Rice’s Top 10 Globe Moments’, Medium.com, 20 April 2018.Google Scholar

Shaughnessy, Robert, ‘Connecting the Globe: Actors, Audience and Entrainment’, Shakespeare Survey, 68 (2015), 294–305.Google Scholar

Shenton, Mark, ‘The Tempest Review at the Royal Shakespeare Theatre, Stratford-upon-Avon – “Gimmicky, but Simon Russell Beale Soars”’, The Stage, 17 November 2016.Google Scholar

Slater, Ann Pasternak, ‘Hypallage, Barley-Break, and The Changeling’, The Review of English Studies n.s., 34.136 (1983), 429–40.Google Scholar

Smith, Bruce R., ‘Eyeing and Wording in Cymbeline’, in Gallagher, Lowell and Raman, Shankar (eds.), Knowing Shakespeare: Senses, Embodiment and Cognition (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), pp. 50–64.Google Scholar

Sofer, Andrew, Dark Matter: Invisibility in Drama, Theater and Performance (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Solga, Kim, ‘Playing The Changeling Architecturally’, in Bennett, Susan and Polito, Mary (eds.), Performing in Environments: Site-Specificity in Medieval and Early Modern English Drama (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), pp. 56–76.Google Scholar

Solga, Kim, Theory for Theatre Studies: Space (London: Methuen, 2019).Google Scholar

Solga, Kim, Violence against Women in Early Modern Performance: In/Visible Acts (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).Google Scholar

Stern, Tiffany, ‘Taking Part: Actors and Audience on the Stage at Blackfriars’, in Menzer, Paul (ed.), Inside Shakespeare: Essays on the Blackfriars Stage (Selinsgrove, PN: Susquehanna University Press, 2006), pp. 25–53.Google Scholar

Stern, Tiffany, ‘“This Wide and Universal Theatre”: The Theatre as Prop in Shakespeare's Metadrama’, in Karim-Cooper, Farah and Stern, Tiffany (eds.), Shakespeare’s Theatres and the Effects of Performance (London: Bloomsbury, 2013), pp. 11–32.Google Scholar

Stern, Tiffany, Rehearsal from Shakespeare to Sheridan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Stone, Alison, ‘Not Making a Movie: The Livecasting of Shakespeare Stage Productions by the Royal National Theatre and the Royal Shakespeare Company’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 34.4 (2016), 627–43.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Erin, ‘The Audience Is Present: Aliveness, Social Media, and the Theatre Broadcast Experience’, in Aebischer, Pascale, Greenhalgh, Susanne and Osborne, Laurie (eds.), Shakespeare and the ‘Live’ Theatre Broadcast Experience (London: Bloomsbury, 2018), pp. 59–75.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Erin, ‘“The Forms of Things Unknown”: Shakespeare and the Rise of the Live Broadcast’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 35.4 (2017), 627–62.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Erin, ‘Richard II, Royal Shakespeare Company (RST)’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 32.2 (2014), 272–5.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Erin, ‘Shakespeare, Social Media, and the Digital Public Sphere: Such Tweet Sorrow and A Midsummer Night's Dreaming’, Shakespeare, 14.1 (2018), 64–79.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Erin, ‘Stage, Space, and Celebrity: Coriolanus at the Donmar’, Digital Shakespeare blog, 4 April 2014 (available at https://digitalshakespeares.wordpress.com/2014/04/04/stage-screen-and-celebrity-coriolanus-at-the-donmar/comment-page-1/).Google Scholar

Sullivan, Erin, Shakespeare and Digital Performance in Practice (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, forthcoming).Google Scholar

Svendsen, Zoë, ‘Dramaturg Zoë Svendsen Discusses the Young Vic Production of The Changeling’, Theatrevoice, 13 December 2012 (available at www.theatrevoice.com/audio/dramaturg-zoe-svendsen-discusses-the-young-vic-production-of-the-changeling/, last accessed 25 March 2019).Google Scholar

Svendsen, Zoë, ‘Zoë Svendsen on the Dramaturge’s Role at the Heart of the Action’, Times Higher Education, 29 August 2013.Google Scholar

Taylor, Paul, ‘The Tempest, Royal Shakespeare Theatre’, The Independent, 18 November 2016.Google Scholar

Taylor, Diana, The Archive and the Repertoire: Performing Cultural Memory in the Americas (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Taylor, Millie, ‘Listening to Theatre Music at the RSC – The Tempest (2016)’, unpublished paper, TaPRA, University of Exeter, 6 September 2019.Google Scholar

Taymor, Julie and Schechner, Richard, ‘Julie Taymor: From Jacques Lecoq to The Lion King’, TDR: The Drama Review, 43.3 (1999), 36–55.Google Scholar

Teague, Frances, ‘The Phoenix and the Cockpit-in-Court’, in Dutton, Richard (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern Theatre (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 240–59.Google Scholar

Tosh, Will, Playing Indoors: Staging Early Modern Drama in the Sam Wanamaker Playhouse (London: Bloomsbury, 2017).Google Scholar

Tribble, Evelyn B., Cognition in the Globe: Attention and Memory in Shakespeare’s Theatre (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).Google Scholar

Trueman, Matt, ‘Pippa Nixon: “Actresses can now have a Shakespeare canon of their own”’, The Stage, 26 February 2016.Google Scholar

Turner, Cathy and Behrndt, Synne K., Dramaturgy and Performance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).Google Scholar

Tynan, Kenneth, ‘The Triumph of Stratford’s Lear’, The Observer, 11 November 1962.Google Scholar

Universities UK International, ‘International Facts and Figures’, Higher Education, May 2017.Google Scholar

Vallelly, Neil, ‘Being-in-Light at the Early Modern and Reconstructed Theatres’ (PhD thesis, University of Otago, 2015).Google Scholar

Van Es, Bart, ‘Reviving the Legacy of Indoor Performance’, in Gurr, Andrew and Karim-Cooper, Farah (eds.), Moving Shakespeare Indoors: Performance and Repertoire in the Jacobean Playhouse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 237–51.Google Scholar

Van Hove, Ivo, ‘Roman Tragedies: “The Times They Are A-changin’ (Bob Dylan)”’, in Bennett, Susan and Massai, Sonia (eds.), Ivo van Hove: From Shakespeare to David Bowie (London: Methuen, 2018), pp. 56–9.Google Scholar

Vaughan, Virginia Mason, The Tempest: A Critical Reader (London: Bloomsbury, 2015).Google Scholar

Walker, Jonathan, Site Unscene: The Offstage in English Renaissance Drama (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Walker, Saint John, ‘A Quick Walk through “Uncanny Valley”’, in Oddey, Alison and White, Christine (eds.), Modes of Spectating (Bristol: Intellect, 2009), pp. 29–40.Google Scholar

Ward, Peter, Studio and Outside Broadcast Camera Work: A Guide to Multi-Camera Work Production, 2nd edition (Oxford: Focal Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Wardle, Janice, ‘“Outside Broadcast”: Looking Backwards and Forwards, Live Theatre in the Cinema – NT Live and RSC Live’, Adaptation, 7.2 (2014), 134–53.Google Scholar

Warren, Roger, Staging Shakespeare’s Late Plays (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Way, Geoffrey, ‘Peeking behind the Digital Curtains: Shakespearean Performance Institutions, Social Media, and Access’, Borrowers and Lenders, 10.1 (2016), 1–23.Google Scholar

Way, Geoffrey, ‘Together, Apart: Liveness, Eventness, and Streaming Shakespearean Performance’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 35.3 (2017), 389–406.Google Scholar

Weimann, Robert, Author’s Pen and Actor’s Voice: Playing and Writing in Shakespeare’s Theatre (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Weimann, Robert, Shakespeare and the Popular Tradition in the Theater, trans. Robert Schwartz (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

White, Martin, The Chamber of Demonstrations: Reconstructing the Jacobean Indoor Playhouse (Bristol: Ignition Films, 2009), an interactive DVD presented as a book.Google Scholar

Wiles, David, A Short History of Western Performance Space (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Williams, Nora Jean, ‘Between Performances, Text, and Editions: The Changeling’ (PhD Thesis, University of Exeter, 2016).Google Scholar

Williams, Nora, ‘“Cannot I Keep That Secret?”: Editing and Performing Asides in The Changeling’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 34.1 (2016), 29–45.Google Scholar

Williams, Nora J., ‘The Changeling Presented by Shakespeare’s Globe at the Sam Wanamaker Playhouse, London, January 2015’, Early Modern Literary Studies, 19.2 (2017), 1–14.Google Scholar

Woods, Penelope, ‘The Audience of the Indoor Theatre’, in Gurr, Andrew and Karim-Cooper, Farah (eds.), Moving Shakespeare Indoors: Performance and Repertoire in the Jacobean Playhouse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 152–67.Google Scholar

Worthen, W. B., ‘Interactive, Immersive and Original Shakespeare’, Shakespeare Bulletin, 35.3 (2017), 407–24.Google Scholar

Worthen, W. B., Shakespeare and the Authority of Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Worthen, W. B., Shakespeare and the Force of Modern Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Worthen, W. B., Shakespeare Performance Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Wyver, John, ‘“All the Trimmings?”: The Transfer of Theatre to Television in Adaptations of Shakespeare Stagings’, Adaptation, 7.2 (2014), 104–20.Google Scholar

Wyver, John, ‘Creating RSC Live from Stratford-upon-Avon’, draft chapter, November 2018, for Judith Buchanan and John Wyver, Being There: Shakespeare and Live Broadcast Theatre (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Wyver, John, ‘Screening the RSC Stage: The 2014 Live from Stratford-upon-Avon Cinema Broadcasts’, Shakespeare, 11.3 (2015), 286–302.Google Scholar

Žižek, Slavoj, The Parallax View (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009).Google Scholar