For Shakespeare's authorshipChambers, E. K. William Shakespeare: A Study of Facts and Problems, 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930).
Elliott, Ward E. Y. and Valenza, Robert J.. ‘And Then There Were None: Winnowing the Shakespeare Claimants’, Computers and the Humanities 30 (1996–7), pp. 191–245.
Elliott, Ward E. Y. and Valenza, Robert J.. ‘Oxford by the Numbers: What are the Odds That the Earl of Oxford could have Written Shakespeare's Poems and Plays’, Tennessee Law Review 72:1 (2004), pp. 323–453.
Kathman, David and Ross, Terry. ‘The Shakespeare Authorship Page: Dedicated to the Proposition That Shakespeare Wrote Shakespeare’.
Matus, Irvin Leigh. Shakespeare, in Fact (New York: Continuum, 1994).
Schoenbaum, S.Shakespeare's Lives (London: Oxford University Press, 1970; new, revised edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).
Authorship as a cultural phenomenonChurchill, Reginald Charles. Shakespeare and His Betters: A History and Criticism of the Attempts Which Have Been Made to Prove Shakespeare's Works Were Written by Others (London: Max Reinhardt, 1958).
Friedman, William F. and , Elizebeth S.The Shakespearean Ciphers Examined: An Analysis of Cryptographic Systems Used as Evidence that Some Author other than William Shakespeare Wrote the Plays Commonly Attributed to him (Cambridge University Press, 1957).
Gibson, Harry Norman. The Shakespeare Claimants: A Critical Survey of the Four Principal Theories Concerning the Authorship of the Shakespearean Plays (London: Methuen; New York: Barnes and Noble, 1962).
Shapiro, James. Contested Will: Who Wrote Shakespeare? (London: Faber and Faber, 2010).
Authorship and collaborationHope, Jonathan. ‘Applied Historical Linguistics: Socio-Historical Linguistic Evidence for the Authorship of Renaissance Plays’, Transactions of the Philological Society 88 (1990), pp. 201–26.
The Authorship of Shakespeare's Plays: A Socio-Linguistic Study (Cambridge University Press, 1994).
Jackson, MacDonald P. ‘Determining Authorship: A New Technique’, Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama 41 (2002), pp. 1–14.
Defining Shakespeare: ‘Pericles’ as Test Case (Oxford University Press, 2003).
‘A Lover's Complaint Revisited’, Shakespeare Studies 32 (2004), pp. 267–94.
Vickers, Brian. Shakespeare, A Lover's Complaint, and John Davies of Hereford (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
Jackson, MacDonald P. ‘“A Lover's Complaint”, Cymbeline, and the Shakespeare Canon: Interpreting Shared Vocabulary’, Modern Language Review 103.3 (2008), pp. 621–38.
‘The Authorship of “A Lover's Complaint”: A New Approach to the Problem’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 102 (2008), pp. 285–313.
An Appendix to ‘The Authorship of “A Lover's Complaint”: A New Approach to the Problem”: A Control Test’. BibSite: .
‘Shakespeare or Davies? A Clue to the Authorship of “A Lover's Complaint”’, Notes and Queries 56.1 (2009), pp. 62–3.
Vickers, Brian. Shakespeare, Co-Author: A Historical Study of Five Collaborative Plays (Oxford University Press, 2002).
‘Coauthors and Closed Minds’, Shakespeare Studies 36 (2008), pp. 101–13.
Anti-Shakespearian studiesBacon, Delia Salter. The Philosophy of the Plays of Shakspere Unfolded (London: Groombridge and Sons, 1857).
Donnelly, Ignatius. The Great Cryptogram: Francis Bacon's Cipher in the So-Called Shakespeare Plays (Chicago, New York and London: R. S. Peale & Company, 1888).
Looney, J. Thomas. ‘Shakespeare’ Identified in Edward de Vere the Seventeenth Earl of Oxford (New York: Frederick A. Stokes Company, 1920).
Zeigler, Wilbur Gleason. It Was Marlowe: A Story of the Secret of Three Centuries (Chicago: Donohue, Henneberry, and Co., 1895).