Using sex ratios: why bother?

Stuart A. West; Edward Allen Herre

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511542053.021

Chapter 20 - Using sex ratios: why bother?

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 August 2009

Stuart A. West and

Edward Allen Herre

Edited by

Ian C. W. Hardy

Show author details

Stuart A. West: Affiliation:
Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Edward Allen Herre: Affiliation:
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, USA, and, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Republic of Panama
Ian C. W. Hardy: Affiliation:
University of Nottingham

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Many see research into sex allocation as the jewel in the crown of evolutionary ecology. There is a very rich experimental literature providing qualitative, and in some cases quantitative, support for the predictions of numerous theoretical models. Consequently, it might be argued that future work will primarily be concerned with dotting i's and crossing t's. Given that there are still so many relatively untamed areas in evolutionary biology, we should therefore ask – why bother with more sex-allocation studies? Our aim in this chapter is to address this question (why?), complementing the more methodological (how?) parts of this book. We argue that sex allocation is an excellent model trait for examining general questions in evolutionary biology.

The usefulness of sex allocation

The strength of sex-allocation research arises for both theoretical and empirical reasons. Sex allocation has a direct and potentially large influence on fitness, and the relevant trade-offs are easy to quantify. Consequently, optimality models are able to make clear theoretical predictions in many specified cases. Empirically, sex allocation can be a relatively easy trait to measure. This is especially true in cases where males and females are equally costly to produce, and so we can concern ourselves simply with the sex ratio (defined as proportion males, i.e. males/(males+females)). In this case, all we must do is count the number of male and female offspring that are produced.

Type: Chapter
Information: Sex Ratios
Concepts and Research Methods
, pp. 399 - 413

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542053.021 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson R M & May R M (1991) Infectious Diseases of Humans. Dynamics and Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Barton, N H & Turelli, M (1989) Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know?Annual Review of Genetics, 23, 337–370CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Basolo, A L (1994) The dynamics of Fisherian sex-ratio evolution: theoretical and experimental investigations. American Naturalist, 144, 473–490CrossRef Google Scholar

Boomsma, J J & Grafen, A (1990) Intraspecific variation in ant sex ratios and the Trivers-Hare hypothesis. Evolution, 44, 1026–1034CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Boomsma, J J & Grafen, A (1991) Colony-level sex ratio selection in the eusocial Hymenoptera. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 3, 383–407CrossRef Google Scholar

Bourke A F G & Franks N R (1995) Social Evolution in Ants. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Bull, J J (1981) Sex ratio when fitness varies. Heredity, 46, 9–26CrossRef Google Scholar

Bull JJ & Charnov EL (1988) How fundamental are Fisherian sex ratios? In: P H Harvey & L Partridge (eds) Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, pp 96–135. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Carvalho, A B, Sampaio, M C, Varandas, F R & Klackzo, L B (1998) An experimental demonstration of Fisher's principle: evolution of sexual proportions by natural selection. Genetics, 148, 719–731Google Scholar PubMed

Casas, J, Nisbet, R M, Swarbrick, S & Murdoch, W M (2000) Eggload dynamics and oviposition rate in a wild population of a parasitic wasp. Journal of Animal Ecology, 69, 185–193CrossRef Google Scholar

Chapuisat, M & Keller, L (1999) Testing kin selection with sex allocation data in eusocial Hymenoptera. Heredity, 82, 473–478CrossRef Google Scholar

Charlesworth, D & Charlesworth, B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 18, 237–268CrossRef Google Scholar

Charnov, E L (1979) The genetical evolution of patterns of sexuality: Darwinian fitness. American Naturalist, 113, 465–480CrossRef Google Scholar

Charnov E L (1982) The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Charnov, E L & Bull, J J (1989) Non-Fisherian sex ratios with sex change and environmental sex determination. Nature, 338, 148–150CrossRef Google Scholar

Charnov, E L, Los-den, Hartogh R L, Jones, W T & , Assem J (1981) Sex ratio evolution in a variable environment. Nature, 289, 27–33CrossRef Google Scholar

Clutton-Brock, T H & Iason, G R (1986) Sex ratio variation in mammals. Quarterly Review of Biology, 61, 339–374CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Colwell, R K (1981) Group selection is implicated in the evolution of female-biased sex ratios. Nature, 290, 401–404CrossRef Google Scholar

Conover, D O & , Voorhees D A (1990) Evolution of a balanced sex ratio by frequency dependent selection in a fish. Science, 250, 1556–1558CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Crozier R H & Pamilo P (1996) Evolution of Social Insect Colonies: Sex Allocation and Kin Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Cruden, R W (1977) Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. Evolution, 31, 32–46CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Davies N B (1992) Dunnock Behaviour and Social Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Donaldson, J S & Walter, G H (1991) Host population structure affects the field sex ratios of the heteronomous hyperparasitoid, Coccophagus atratus. Ecological Entomology, 16, 25–33CrossRef Google Scholar

Driessen, G & Hemerik, L (1992) The time and egg budget of Leptopilina clavipes, a parasitoid of larval Drosophila. Ecological Entomology, 17, 17–27CrossRef Google Scholar

Ellegren H, Gustafsson L & Sheldon BC (1996) Sex ratio adjustment in relation to paternal attractiveness in a wild bird population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 93, 11 723–11 728CrossRef

Ellers, J, , Alphen J J M & Sevenster, J G (1998) A field study of size-fitness relationships in the parasitoid Asobara tabida. Journal of Animal Ecology, 67, 318–324CrossRef Google Scholar

Fisher R A (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Flanagan, K E, West, S A & Godfray, H C J (1998) Local mate competition, variable fecundity, and information utilization in a parasitoid. Animal Behaviour, 56, 191–198CrossRef Google Scholar

Frank, S A (1985) Hierarchical selection theory and sex ratios. II. On applying the theory, and a test with fig wasps. Evolution, 39, 949–964CrossRef Google Scholar

Frank, S A (1986) Hierarchical selection theory and sex ratios. I. General solutions for structured populations. Theoretical Population Biology, 29, 312–342CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Frank, S A (1987) Individual and population sex allocation patterns. Theoretical Population Biology, 31, 47–74CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Frank, S A (1990) Sex allocation theory for birds and mammals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 21, 13–55CrossRef Google Scholar

Frank, S A (1995) Sex allocation in solitary bees and wasps. American Naturalist, 146, 316–323CrossRef Google Scholar

Frank S A (1998) Foundations of Social Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Frank, S A & Swingland, I R (1988) Sex ratio under conditional sex expression. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 135, 415–418CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Godfray H C J (1994) Parasitoids. Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Godfray, H C J & Werren, J H (1996) Recent developments in sex ratio studies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 59–63CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Grafen A (1990) Do animals really recognise kin?Animal Behaviour, 39, 42–54CrossRef

Greeff, J M (1996) Alternative mating strategies, partial sibmating and split sex ratios in haplodiploid species. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 9, 855–869CrossRef Google Scholar

Greeff, J M (1997) Offspring sex allocation in externally ovipositing fig wasps with varying clutch size and sex ratio. Behavioral Ecology, 8, 500–505CrossRef Google Scholar

Green, R E, Gordh, G & Hawkins, B (1982) Precise sex ratios in highly inbred parasitic wasps. American Naturalist, 120, 653–665CrossRef Google Scholar

Hamilton, W D (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour, I & II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hamilton, W D (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science, 156, 477–488CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hardy, I C W (1994) Sex ratio and mating structure in the parasitoid Hymenoptera. Oikos, 69, 3–20CrossRef Google Scholar

Herre, E A (1985) Sex ratio adjustment in fig wasps. Science, 228, 896–898CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Herre, E A (1987) Optimality, plasticity and selective regime in fig wasp sex ratios. Nature, 329, 627–629CrossRef Google Scholar

Herre EA, West SA, Cook JM, Compton SG & Kjellberg F (1997) Fig wasp mating systems: pollinators and parasites, sex ratio adjustment and male polymorphism, population structure and its consequences. In: J Choe & B Crespi (eds) Social Competition and Cooperation in Insects and Arachnids. Volume 1: The Evolution of Mating Systems, pp 226–239. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Herre EA, Machado CA & West SA (2001) Selective regime and fig wasp sex ratios: towards sorting rigor from pseudo-rigor in tests of adaptation. In: S Orzack & E Sober (eds), Adaptionism and Optimality, pp 191–218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Houle, D, Moriwaka, B & Lynch, M (1996) Comparing mutational variabilities. Genetics, 143, 1467–1483Google Scholar PubMed

Hunter, M S (1993) Sex allocation in a field population of an autoparasitoid. Oecologia, 93, 421–428CrossRef Google Scholar

Hunter, M S & Godfray, H C J (1995) Ecological determinants of sex allocation in an autoparasitoid wasp. Journal of Animal Ecology, 64, 95–106CrossRef Google Scholar

Hurst, L D (1993) The incidences, mechanisms and evolution of cytoplasmic sex ratio distorters in animals. Biological Reviews, 68, 121–193CrossRef Google Scholar

Hurst, L D & Peck, J R (1996) Recent advances in understanding of the evolution and maintenance of sex. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 46–53CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kathuria, P, Greeff, J M, Compton, S G & Ganeshaiah, K N (1999) What fig wasp sex ratios do and do not tell us about sex allocation strategies. Oikos, 87, 520–530CrossRef Google Scholar

Kawecki, T J (1994) Accumulation of deleterious mutations and the evolutionary cost of being a generalist. American Naturalist, 144, 833–838CrossRef Google Scholar

Komdeur, J, Daan, S, Tinbergen, J & Mateman, C (1997) Extreme modification of sex ratio of the Seychelles warbler's eggs. Nature, 385, 522–525CrossRef Google Scholar

Krebs JR & Kacelnik A (1991) Decision-making. In: J R Krebs & N B Davies (eds) Behavioural Ecology, an Evolutionary Approach, pp 105–136. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific

Kruuk, L E B, Clutton-Brock, T H, Albon, S D, Pemberton, J M & Guinness, F E (1999) Population density affects sex ratio variation in red deer. Nature, 399, 459–461CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lande, R (1975) The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci. Genetical Research, 26, 221–236CrossRef Google Scholar

Leigh, E G, Herre, E A & Fischer, E A (1985) Sex allocation in animals. Experientia, 41, 1265–1276CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Merila, J & Sheldon, B C (1999) Genetic architecture of fitness and nonfitness traits: empirical patterns and development of ideas. Heredity, 83, 103–109CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Molbo, D & Parker, E D (1996) Mating structure and sex ratio variation in a natural population of Nasonia vitripennis. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, series B, 263, 1703–1709CrossRef Google Scholar

Nunney, L & Luck, R F (1988) Factors influencing the optimum sex ratio in structured populations. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 33, 1–30CrossRef Google Scholar

Ode, P J, Antolin, M F & Strand, M R (1995) Brood-mate avoidance in the parasitic wasp Bracon hebetor Say. Animal Behaviour, 49, 1239–1248CrossRef Google Scholar

Orzack, S H & Gladstone, J (1994) Quantitative genetics of sex ratio traits in the parasitic wasp, Nasonia vitripennis. Genetics, 137, 211–220Google Scholar PubMed

Orzack, S H & Parker, E D (1990) Genetic variation for sex ratio traits within a natural population of a parsitic wasp. Genetics, 124, 373–384Google Scholar

Orzack, S H, Parker, E D & Gladstone, J (1991) The comparative biology of genetic variation for conditional sex ratio behaviour in a parasitic wasp, Nasonia vitripennis. Genetics, 127, 583–599Google Scholar

Parker, E D & Orzack, S H (1985) Genetic variation for the sex ratio in Nasonia vitripennis. Genetics, 110, 93–105Google Scholar PubMed

Parker, G A & Maynard, Smith J (1990) Optimality theory in evolutionary biology. Nature, 348, 27–33CrossRef Google Scholar

Paul, R E L, Packer, M J, Walmsley, M, Lagog, M, Ranford-Cartwright, L C, Paru, R & Day, K P (1995) Mating patterns in malaria parasite populations of Papua New Guinea. Science, 269, 1709–1711CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pickering, J, Read, A F, Guerrero, S & West, S A (2000) Sex ratio and virulence in two species of lizard malaria parasites. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 2, 171–184Google Scholar

Read, A F, Narara, A, Nee, S, Keymer, A E & Day, K P (1992) Gametocyte sex ratios as indirect measures of outcrossing rates in malaria. Parasitology, 104, 387–395CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Read, A F, Anwar, M, Shutler, D & Nee, S (1995) Sex allocation and population structure in malaria and related parasitic protozoa. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, series B, 260, 359–363CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Reboud, X & Bell, G (1997) Experimental evolution in Chlamydomonas. III. Evolution of specialist and generalist types in environments that vary in time and space. Heredity, 78, 507–514CrossRef Google Scholar

Rosenheim, J A (1996) An evolutionary argument for egg limitation. Evolution, 50, 2089–2094CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rosenheim, J A (1999) The relative contribution of time and eggs to the cost of reproduction. Evolution, 53, 376–385CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Seger J & Stubblefield JW (1996) Optimization and adaptation. In: M R Rose & G V Lauder (eds) Adaptation, pp 93–123. San Diego CA: Academic Press

Sevenster, J G, Ellers, J & Driessen, G (1998) An evolutionary argument for time limitation. Evolution, 52, 1241–1244CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sheldon, B C, Andersson, S, Griffith, S C, Ornborg, J & Sendecka, J (1999) Ultraviolet colour variation influences blue tit sex ratios. Nature, 402, 874–877CrossRef Google Scholar

Shutler, D & Read, A F (1998) Extraordinary and ordinary blood parasite sex ratios. Oikos, 82, 417–424CrossRef Google Scholar

Stearns S C (1992) Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Stearns, S C & Kawecki, T J (1994) Fitness sensitivity and the canalization of life-history traits. Evolution, 48, 1438–1450CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Strand, M R (1988) Variable sex ratio strategy of Telenomus heliothidis (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae): adaptation to host and conspecific density. Oecologia, 77, 219–224CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Stubblefield, J W & Seger, J (1990) Local mate competition with variable fecundity: dependence of offspring sex ratios on information utilization and mode of male production. Behavioural Ecology, 1, 68–80CrossRef Google Scholar

Sundstrom, L (1994) Sex ratio bias, relatedness asymmetry and queen mating frequency in ants. Nature, 367, 266–268CrossRef Google Scholar

Sundstrom, L, Chapuisat, M & Keller, L (1996) Conditional manipulation of sex ratios by ant workers: a test of kin selection theory. Science, 274, 993–995CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Taylor LH (1997) Epidemiological and evolutionary consequences of mixed-genotype infections of malaria parasites. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh

Taylor, P D (1981) Intra-sex and inter-sex sibling interactions as sex determinants. Nature, 291, 64–66CrossRef Google Scholar

Taylor, P D & Bulmer, M G (1980) Local mate competition and the sex ratio. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 86, 409–419CrossRef Google Scholar

Taylor, P D & Crespi, B J (1994) Evolutionary stable strategy sex ratios when correlates of relatedness can be assessed. American Naturalist, 143, 297–316CrossRef Google Scholar

Trivers, R L & Hare, H (1976) Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects. Science, 191, 249–263CrossRef Google Scholar

Trivers, R L & Willard, D E (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science, 179, 90–92CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Turelli, M (1984) Heritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle. Theoretical Population Biology, 25, 138–193CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Varandas, F R, Sampaio, M C & Carvalho, A B (1997) Heritability of sexual proportion in experimental sex ratio populations of Drosophila mediopunctata. Heredity, 79, 104–112CrossRef Google Scholar

Werren, J H (1980) Sex ratio adaptations to local mate competition in a parasitic wasp. Science, 208, 1157–1159CrossRef Google Scholar

Werren, J H (1983) Sex ratio evolution under local mate competition in a parasitic wasp. Evolution, 37, 116–124CrossRef Google Scholar

Werren, J H (1987) Labile sex ratios in wasps and bees. Bioscience, 37, 498–506CrossRef Google Scholar

Werren, J H & Taylor, P D (1984) The effects of population recruitment on sex ratio selection. American Naturalist, 124, 143–148CrossRef Google Scholar

West, S A & Godfray, H C J (1997) Sex ratio strategies after perturbation of the stable age distribution. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 186, 213–221CrossRef Google Scholar

West, S A & Herre, E A (1998a) Partial local mate competition and the sex ratio: a study on non-pollinating fig wasps. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 11, 531–548CrossRef Google Scholar

West, S A & Herre, E A (1998b) Stabilizing selection and variance in fig wasp sex ratios. Evolution, 52, 475–485CrossRef Google Scholar

West, S A & Rivero, A (2000) Using sex ratios to estimate what limits reproduction in parasitoids. Ecology Letters, 3, 294–299CrossRef Google Scholar

West, S A, Herre, E A, Windsor, D W & Green, P R S (1996) The ecology and evolution of the New World non-pollinating fig wasp communities. Journal of Biogeography, 23, 447–458CrossRef Google Scholar

West, S A, Flanagan, K E & Godfray, H C J (1999a) Sex allocation and clutch size in parasitoid wasps that produce single sex broods. Animal Behaviour, 57, 265–275CrossRef Google Scholar

West, S A, Lively, C M & Read, A F (1999b) A pluralist approach to the evolution of sex and recombination. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 12, 1003–1012CrossRef Google Scholar

West, S A, Herre, E A & Sheldon, B C (2000a) The benefits of allocating sex. Science, 290, 288–290CrossRef Google Scholar

West, S A, Smith, T G & Read, A F (2000b) Sex allocation and population structure in Apicomplexan (Protozoa) parasites. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, series B, 267, 257–263CrossRef Google Scholar

West, S A, Reece, S E & Read, A F (2001) Evolution of gametocyte sex ratios in malaria and related apicomplexan (protozoan) parasites. Trends in Parasitology, 17, 525–531CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Whitlock, M C (1996) The red queen beats the jack-of-all-trades: the limitations on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity and niche breadth. American Naturalist, 148, S65–S77CrossRef Google Scholar

Book contents

Chapter 20 - Using sex ratios: why bother?

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive