Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:09:32.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Monitoring forest–savannah dynamics in Kibale National Park with satellite imagery (1989–2003): implications for the management of wildlife habitat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Richard Wrangham
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Elizabeth Ross
Affiliation:
Kasiisi School Project, Uganda
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Remote sensing technologies can provide detailed assessments of the state of Protected Areas, including critical information on threats (such as deforestation and wildfire), while also facilitating habitat evaluation and change detection. A multitude of satellite-based sensors of varying characteristics are now in operation, enabling the mapping of land cover and land use at various spatial and temporal scales. A new generation of high-resolution satellites, coupled with recent advances in desktop computing power and Geographic Information Systems, has greatly enhanced the ability of conservationists and park managers to integrate remote sensing information into their management plans. For example, many species are restricted to specific habitats that can now be identified with remote sensing (Turner et al., 2003; Goetz et al., 2007; Stickler and Southworth, in press). However, despite the advancements mentioned, the perceived complexities of remote sensing data often discourage non-specialists from leveraging this valuable resource. Here we describe how imagery acquired from the well-known Landsat class of satellites can be used to monitor long-term changes in fire regime and wildlife habitat in Kibale National Park, Uganda, thus contributing to the rich body of long-term research at Kibale focusing on conservation applications.

STUDY AREA

The Kibale National Park

Located in southwestern Uganda, the 793 km2 Kibale National Park is one of only a few blocks of tropical forest remaining in the country. Only 3% of Uganda remains covered by rainforest, with nearly all found in the southwestern portion of the Albertine rift.

Type
Chapter
Information
Science and Conservation in African Forests
The Benefits of Longterm Research
, pp. 38 - 50
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baatz, M., Benz, U., Dehghani, S.et al. (2004). eCognition: user guide 4. Definiens Imaging GmbH, pp. 485.Google Scholar
Chapman, C. A. and Lambert, J. E. (2000). Habitat alteration and the conservation of African primates: case study of Kibale National Park, Uganda. American Journal of Primatology, 50, 169–185.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, L. J., Chapman, C. A., and Wrangham, R. W. (1992). Balanites wilsoniana: elephant dependent dispersal?Journal of Tropical Ecology, 8, 275–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, C. A., Balcomb, S. R., Gillespie, T. R., Skorupa, J. P., and Struhsaker, T. T. (2000a). Long-term effects of logging on African primate communities: a 28-year comparison from Kibale National Park, Uganda. Conservation Biology, 14, 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, C. A., Chapman, L. J., and Gillespie, T. R. (2000b). Scale issues in the study of primate foraging: red colobus of Kibale National Park. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 117, 349–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, J. H. (1978). Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science, 199, 1302–1310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fedigan, L. M. and Jack, K. (2001). Neotropical primates in a regenerating Costa Rican dry forest: a comparison of howler and capuchin population patterns. International Journal of Primatology, 22, 689–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,FACE (2007). The Face Foundation. http://www.stichtingface.nl/.
Goetz, S., Steinberg, D., Dubayah, R., and Blair, B. (2007). Laser remote sensing of canopy habitat heterogeneity as a predictor of bird species richness in an eastern temperate forest, USA. Remote Sensing of Environment, 108, 254–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grime, J. P. (1973). Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature, 242, 344–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, P. C. (1991). Nature conservation in Uganda's tropical forest reserves. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, pp. 313.Google Scholar
Kasenene, J. M. (1987). The influence of mechanized selective logging, felling intensity, and gap-size on the regeneration of moist tropical forest in Kibale Forest Reserve, Uganda. Unpublished PhD thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing.Google Scholar
Lwanga, J. S. (2003). Forest succession in Kibale National Park, Uganda: implications for forest restoration and management. African Journal of Ecology, 41, 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lwanga, J. S. (2006). Spatial distribution of primates in a mosaic of colonizing and old growth forest at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda. Primates, 47, 230–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lwanga, J. S., Butynski, T. M., and Struhsaker, T. T. (2000). Tree population dynamics in Kibale National Park, Uganda 1975–1998. African Journal of Ecology, 38, 238–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malingreau, J. P., LaPorte, N., and Gregoire, J. M. (1990). Exceptional fire events in the tropics – southern Guinea, January 1987. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 11, 2121–2123.Google Scholar
Nangendo, G., Steege, H., and Bongers, F. (2006). Composition of woody species in a dynamic forest–woodland–savanna mosaic in Uganda: implications for conservation and management. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15, 1467–1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plumptre, A. J., Behangana, M., Davenport, T.et al. (2003). The biodiversity of the Albertine rift. Albertine Rift Technical Report, No. 3, pp. 105.Google Scholar
Stickler, C. M. and Southworth, J. (in press). Application of multi-scale spatial and spectral analysis for predicting primate occurrence and habitat associations in Kibale National Park, Uganda. Remote Sensing of Environment.
Struhsaker, T. T. (1978). Food habits of five monkey species in the Kibale Forest, Uganda. In Recent Advances in Primatology, vol. 1, Behaviour, ed. Chivers, D. J. and Herbert, J.. London: Academic Press, pp. 225–248.Google Scholar
Struhsaker, T. T. (1997). Ecology of an African Rain Forest: Logging in Kibale and the Conflict between Conservation and Exploitation. Gainsville, Florida: University Press of Florida, pp. 432.Google Scholar
Struhsaker, T. T., Lwanga, J. S., and Kasenene, J. M. (1996). Elephants, selective logging and forest regeneration in the Kibale Forest, Uganda. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 12, 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, C. J. (1979). Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 8, 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, C. J., Grant, D. M., and Dykstra, J. D. (2004). NASA's global orthorectified landsat data set. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 70, 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, W., Spector, S., Gardiner, N., Fladeland, M., Sterling, E., and Steininger, M. (2003). Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 306–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orsdol, K. (1986). Agricultural encroachment in Uganda's Kibale Forest. Oryx, 22, 115–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, R., Noble, I. R., Bolin, B., Ravindranath, N. H., Verardo, D. J., and Dokken, D. J. (2001). Land Use, Land-use Change, and Forestry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (http://www.ipcc.ch/pub/reports.htm), pp. 375.Google Scholar
Whitmore, T. C. (1998). An Introduction to Tropical Rain Forests, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×