Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: June 2012

4 - Possible Worlds Semantics

Summary

Possible worlds semantics have been widely applied both in philosophy and in other fields such as linguistic semantics and pragmatics, theoretical computer science, and game theory. This chapter discusses the general contrast between modal realism and actualism and questions about the kind of explanation that possible worlds provide for modal discourse and modal facts. It looks at Saul Kripke's views about how possible worlds are specified, in particular at the role of individuals in specifying possible worlds. A large part of the attraction of modal realism is that it purports to provide a genuine eliminative reduction of modality. Kripke thinks that the "distant planets" picture of possible worlds contributes to the illusion that there is a problem about the identification of individuals across possible worlds, and that is one of his main reasons for thinking that the modal realist doctrine is a pernicious one.
References
Adams, R 1981 Actuality and ThisnessSynthese 49 3
Fine, K 1977 Worlds, Times and SelvesLondonDuckworth
Kaplan, D 1979 Loux, M.The Possible and the Actual: Readings in the Metaphysics of ModalityIthaca, NYCornell University Press
Kripke, S 1980 Naming and NecessityCambridgeHarvard University Press
Lewis, D 1968 Counterpart theory and quantified modal logicJournal of Philosophy 65 113
Lewis, D 1986 On the Plurality of WorldsOxfordBasil Blackwell
Plantinga, A 2003 Essays in the Metaphysics of ModalityOxfordOxford University Press
Williamson, T 2002 O’Hear, A.Logic, Thought and LanguageCambridgeCambridge University Press