The Interests of Prince Charles Stuart

Samuel Johnson never went to war. That has not prevented a few eccentrics from considering the possibility that he somehow engaged in combat himself. Boswell records that his hero “was once drawn to serve in the militia, the Trained Bands of the City of London … . He upon that occasion provided himself with a musket, and with a sword and belt, which I have seen hanging in his closet.” Boswell found “the idea” of Johnson in uniform, “with all its circumstances, is certainly laughable,” and any reasonable reader has to number this among Johnson's more ridiculous moments. But the evidence of a musket and sword prompted J. L. Ward to wonder conspiratorially in 1932,

We know the answer to this question: “slaving at dull literary hackwork.” It would be virtually impossible to for something like military service to escape biographical notice, and we would have to pity any commanding officer obliged to give orders to the authority-averse and half-blind Johnson. Whatever the exact nature of his “kind of liking for Jacobitism,” it did not extend to defending the Pretender's interests on the battlefield. Even Ward calls it “admittedly difficult to picture the scholarly and myopic Samuel Johnson, armed with dirk and targe, tramping in the ranks of the Young Pretender's army.” And yet he cannot forbear concluding that “some definite Jacobite activity may reasonably be suspected.” This stretches the definition of “reasonably” past the breaking point. Johnson never went to war.